search
Back to results

A Randomized Study of Enzalutamide in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Active Surveillance (ENACT)

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Enzalutamide
Active Surveillance
Sponsored by
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring Therapeutic Cancer Progression, Pathological Cancer Progression, Enzalutamide, Prostate Cancer, Active surveillance

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate diagnosed (with ≥10 core biopsy) within 6 months of screening. The biopsy that was used for this diagnosis must be submitted for central pathology review.
  • Prostate cancer categorized (as determined by central pathology review) as low risk is defined as T1c-T2a, PSA<10, N0, M0 (or presumed N0, M0 if CT/bone scan not done due to low risk of metastases), GS ≤ 6, ECOG status ≤2 and estimated life expectancy >5 years OR intermediate risk is defined as T2b-T2c, PSA<20, N0, M0 (or presumed N0, M0 if CT/bone scan not done), GS ≤7 (3+4 pattern only), ECOG status ≤ 2 and estimated life expectancy > 5 years. Prostate cancer categorized (as determined by central pathology review) to the very low risk category (T1c, GS ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL, fewer than 3 prostate biopsy cores positive,

    ≤50% cancer in any core, PSA density <0.15 ng/mL/g) is not included.

  • Ability to swallow study drugs and to comply with study requirements throughout the study
  • Institutional Review Board (IRB)-/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)-approved written Informed Consent and privacy language as per national regulations must be obtained from the subject or legally authorized representative prior to any study-related procedures
  • Throughout study, male subject and a female partner who is of childbearing potential must use two acceptable methods of birth control (one of which must include a condom barrier method of contraception) starting at screening and continuing throughout the study period and for three months after the final study drug administration. Two acceptable methods of birth control thus include the following:

    1. Condom (barrier method of contraception) AND
    2. One of the following is required:

    i. Established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception by the female partner; ii. Placement of an intrauterine device or intrauterine system by the female partner; iii. Additional barrier method: Occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with spermicidal foam / gel / film / cream / suppository by the female partner; iv. Tubal ligation in the female partner.

  • Must not donate sperm starting at screening throughout the study period and for 90 days after the final study drug administration.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior radiotherapy, surgery, chemotherapy, or hormonal therapy for prostate cancer
  • Very low risk category (T1c, GS ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL, fewer than 3 prostate biopsy cores positive, ≤50% cancer in any core, PSA density <0.15 ng/mL/g)
  • Prior transurethral resection of the prostate or prior transurethral microwave thermotherapy of the prostate
  • Use of oral glucocorticoids within 1 month of screening
  • Use of 5 alpha reductase inhibitor within 1 month of screening or total use, within the last two years prior to screening, of >3 months
  • Presence of metastatic disease
  • History of seizure or any condition that may predispose to seizures at any time in the past. History of loss of consciousness or transient ischemic attack within 12 months of screening
  • Absolute neutrophil count < 1,500/μL, platelet count < 100,000/μL, or hemoglobin < 6.2 mmol/L (10 g/dL) at screening
  • Total bilirubin >1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 2.5 X ULN at screening
  • Creatinine > 177 μmol/L (> 2 mg/dL) at screening
  • Albumin < 30 g/L (3.0 g/dL) at screening
  • Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to Randomization Visit
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease including:

    1. Myocardial infarction or uncontrolled angina within 6 months
    2. Congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 or 4
    3. History of clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias
    4. History of Mobitz II second degree or third degree heart block without a permanent pacemaker in place
    5. Hypotension as indicated by systolic blood pressure < 86 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) at screening
    6. Bradycardia as indicated by a heart rate of < 45 beats per minute on the screening electrocardiogram (ECG) and on physical examination
    7. Uncontrolled hypertension as indicated by at least 2 consecutive measurements of a resting systolic blood pressure > 170 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 105 mmHg at the Screening Visit
  • Known hypersensitivity to enzalutamide or any of its components.
  • Subject has received investigational therapy within 28 days or 5 half lives, whichever is longer, prior to screening

Sites / Locations

  • Site US10034
  • Site US10024
  • Site US10007
  • Site US10055
  • Site US10004
  • Site US10026
  • Site US10010
  • Site US10051
  • Site US10029
  • Site US10054
  • Site US10072
  • Site US10057
  • Site US10038
  • Site US10062
  • Site US10074
  • Site US10018
  • Site US10071
  • Site US10046
  • Site US10009
  • Site US10037
  • Site US10006
  • Site US10001
  • Site US10032
  • Site US10008
  • Site US10069
  • Site US10044
  • Site US10067
  • Site US10061
  • Site US10049
  • Site US10043
  • Site US10068
  • Site US10050
  • Site US10030
  • Site US10028
  • Site US10021
  • Site US10022
  • Site US10047
  • Site US10045
  • Site US10015
  • Site US10053
  • Site US10063
  • Site US10052
  • Site US10014
  • Site US10019
  • Site US10011
  • Site US10056
  • Site US10036
  • Site US10035
  • Site US10058
  • Site US10017
  • Site CA15005
  • Site CA15004
  • Site CA15001
  • Site CA15003

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Other

Arm Label

Enzalutamide

Active Surveillance (AS)

Arm Description

Participants received 160-milligrams (mg) enzalutamide administered as four 40-mg capsules, orally once daily for 1 year of treatment period. Following the 1-year treatment period, all participants were followed for 1 additional year. Post the 1-year follow-up period, participants then started the continued follow-up period, in which, participants were followed up every 3 months for these 2 years, after which follow-up was either every 6 months up to 36 months or until the end of study (total duration of follow up in the study was approximately up to 35.9 months).

Participants did not receive any study treatment in this arm but were on continued active surveillance (AS) for 1 year of treatment period. Following the 1-year treatment period, all participants were followed for 1 additional year. Post the 1-year follow up, participants then started the continued follow-up period, in which, participants were followed up every 3 months for these 2 years, after which follow-up was either every 6 months up to 36 months or until the end of study (total duration of follow up in the study was approximately up to 35.9 months).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time to Prostate Cancer Progression
Time to cancer prostate progression (pathological or therapeutic): time (in months) from date of randomization until the date of cancer progression (pathological or therapeutic). Pathological progression: increase in primary or secondary Gleason pattern by greater than or equal (>=) 1 or higher proportion of cancer positive cores (>=15 percent [%] increase). Therapeutic progression: earliest occurrence of primary therapy for prostate cancer (prostatectomy/radiation/focal therapy/systemic therapy). Medians and 95% CIs were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. Participants with no cancer progression at the time of study completion, discontinuation or death were censored at the last assessment date. Participants switching therapy during the study were censored at the time of the initial therapy switch, and participants discontinuing therapy were censored at the time of study discontinuation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug or who underwent study procedures and did not necessarily had a causal relationship with treatment. An abnormality identified during a medical test: an AE only if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, required active intervention, required interruption, or discontinuation of study medication, or was clinically significant in the opinion of investigator. An AE: serious if it resulted in any of the following outcomes: Death, was life-threatening, Persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, Congenital anomaly, or birth defect, Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, Other medically important event. Drug-related AEs: assessed by investigator as AEs whose relationship to study drugs could not be ruled out.
Percentage of Participants Reported Negative Biopsies for Cancer
Percentage of Participants who reported negative biopsies for cancer were reported.
Change From Baseline in Percent of Cancer Positive Cores at Month 12 and 24
Percent positive cores were calculated using the number of systemically sampled prostate regions and any targeted regions with at least 1 positive core divided by the total number of systematically sampled regions and targeted regions. This implied that despite the number of samples within a given systematic or targeted region, any positive core indicated that region as positive.
Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
Time to PSA progression was defined as time in months from the date of randomization or first dose enzalutamide untill date of PSA progression (secondary rise in serum PSA >=25% above baseline or >=25% above nadir or absolute increase >= 2 nanogram per mililiter [ng/mL]). Participants with no PSA progression at the time of trial completion, discontinuation or death were censored at the last assessment date. Additionally, participants switching therapy during the study were censored at the time of the initial therapy switch, and participants discontinuing therapy were censored at the time of study discontinuation. Medians and 95% CIs were calculated with the KM method.
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Rise in Serum PSA
Percentage of participants with secondary rise in serum PSA > 25% baseline or > 25% above nadir or absolute increase >2 ng/mL were reported in this measure.
Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Questionnaire Composite Scores to Months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
The BFI is a screening tool designed to assess the severity and impact of fatigue on daily functioning of participants with cancer during the 24 hours. There are 9 items on the scale. The first three questions ask participants to rate their fatigues on a scale from 0 (no fatigue) - 10 (as bad as you can imagine), with higher scores indicating worse outcome. The remaining six questions ask participants to rate how much fatigue has interfered with their daily activities on a scale from 0 (Does not interfere) to 10 (Completely interferes). A composite fatigue score was obtained by averaging all the items on the BFI, ranged between 0 to 10, with a higher BFI fatigue score indicating worse outcome. The composite BFI score was calculated only if at least 5 of the 9 items were answered.
Change From Baseline in 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Questionnaire Composite Score to Months 6, 12, 18, 24 - Mental Component Summary
SF-12 is a questionnaire that measures overall health related quality of life using 12 questions. The questions are then scored and weighted into 2 subscales, physical health and mental health. Each yields scores from 0 (representing the worst possible debilitation) to 100 (representing no reduction in quality of life). Scores are transformed and ranges between 0 to 100; higher score indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in SF-12 Questionnaire Composite Score to Months 6, 12, 18, 24 - Physical Component Summary
SF-12 is a questionnaire that measures overall health related quality of life using 12 questions. The questions are then scored and weighted into 2 subscales, physical health and mental health. Each yields scores from 0 (representing the worst possible debilitation) to 100 (representing no reduction in quality of life). Scores are transformed and ranges between 0 to 100; higher score indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Assessment Scores at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
The EPIC Hormonal Assessment was a questionnaire used to measure quality of life (QoL) issues in participants with prostate cancer. There were a total of 6 questions related to hormonal function such as hot flashes, breast tenderness, depression, lack of energy, weight fluctuation. The answers ranged from "more than once a day" to "rarely or never" (ranged from 1 to 5, corresponding standardized scores were 100, 75, 50, 25, 0), "no problem" to "big problem" (ranged from 0 to 4, corresponding standardized scores were 100, 75, 50, 25, 0). Score from each answer was converted into standardized score at each visit. Total score was calculated by taking average of standardized scores. Total score was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) scale with higher scores representing better hormonal function.
Change From Baseline in EPIC Sexual Assessment Scores at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
EPIC Sexual Assessment: a questionnaire to measure QoL issues in participants with prostate cancer, included a total of 9 questions on sexual function as level of sexual desire, ability to have an erection, ability to reach orgasm, quality and frequency of erections, frequency of sexual intercourse. Answers ranged from "very poor" to "very good,"(ranged from 1 - 5, corresponding standardized scores:0, 25, 50, 75, 100), "none" to "enough"(ranged from 1 - 4, corresponding standardized scores:0, 33, 67, 100), "no problem" to "big problem"(ranged from 0 - 4, corresponding standardized scores:100, 75, 50, 25, 0), and "never" to "daily"(ranged from 1 - 5, corresponding standardized scores:100, 75, 50, 25, 0). Scores from each answer was converted into standardized score at each visit. Total score = calculated by taking average of standardized scores. Total score was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), higher scores = better sexual function and satisfaction.
Change From Baseline in EPIC Urinary Assessment Scores at Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
EPIC urinary assessment: a questionnaire to measure QoL issues in participants with prostate cancer, included a total of 7 questions on urinary function as leaking urine, blood in urine, pain/burning on urination, urinary control and frequency. Answers ranged from "more than once a day" to "rarely or never"(scores from 1 - 5,corresponding standardized scores[CSS]:0, 25, 50, 75, 100), "no urinary control" to "full urinary control"(scores from 1 - 4,CSS:0, 33, 67, 100), "none" to "3 or more pads per day"(scores from 0 - 3, CSS:100, 67, 33, 0), "no problem" to "big problem"(scores from 0 - 4, CSS:100, 75, 50, 25, 0), and "no problem" to "big problem"(scores from 1 - 5, corresponding standardized score:100, 75, 50, 25, 0). Score from each answer was converted into a corresponding standardized score at each visit. Total score was calculated by taking average of standardized scores. Total score ranged from 0(worst) to 100(best), higher scores = better urinary function.
Change From Baseline in Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) Scores at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
The MAX-PC was a questionnaire used to assess participants' feelings about prostate cancer and PSA tests. There were a total of 18 questions related to understanding how participants cope with aspects of their treatment and medical tests frequently involved in their care; questions such as strong feelings about prostate cancer, scared of PSA tests, trouble sleeping due to thoughts of prostate cancer, unable to plan for the future due to prostate cancer, fear of cancer getting worse. The answers range from "not at all" to "often" and "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree. Total score ranged from 0-54, an increase in the score indicates a worsened anxiety level.

Full Information

First Posted
February 29, 2016
Last Updated
October 14, 2021
Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Collaborators
Medivation LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02799745
Brief Title
A Randomized Study of Enzalutamide in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Active Surveillance
Acronym
ENACT
Official Title
A Randomized Study of Enzalutamide in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Active Surveillance (ENACT)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 9, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 28, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 28, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Collaborators
Medivation LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study was to compare the time to prostate cancer progression (pathological or therapeutic progression) between patients treated with enzalutamide versus patients undergoing active surveillance.
Detailed Description
This was a multicenter, randomized, open label exploratory study, conducted in the US and Canada, evaluating the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide for extension of time to prostate cancer progression (pathological or therapeutic) in patients with clinically localized, histologically proven prostate cancer that is categorized as low risk or intermediate risk and who were under AS.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer
Keywords
Therapeutic Cancer Progression, Pathological Cancer Progression, Enzalutamide, Prostate Cancer, Active surveillance

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
227 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Enzalutamide
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received 160-milligrams (mg) enzalutamide administered as four 40-mg capsules, orally once daily for 1 year of treatment period. Following the 1-year treatment period, all participants were followed for 1 additional year. Post the 1-year follow-up period, participants then started the continued follow-up period, in which, participants were followed up every 3 months for these 2 years, after which follow-up was either every 6 months up to 36 months or until the end of study (total duration of follow up in the study was approximately up to 35.9 months).
Arm Title
Active Surveillance (AS)
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Participants did not receive any study treatment in this arm but were on continued active surveillance (AS) for 1 year of treatment period. Following the 1-year treatment period, all participants were followed for 1 additional year. Post the 1-year follow up, participants then started the continued follow-up period, in which, participants were followed up every 3 months for these 2 years, after which follow-up was either every 6 months up to 36 months or until the end of study (total duration of follow up in the study was approximately up to 35.9 months).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Enzalutamide
Other Intervention Name(s)
MDV3100, Xtandi
Intervention Description
Oral
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Active Surveillance
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Prostate Cancer Progression
Description
Time to cancer prostate progression (pathological or therapeutic): time (in months) from date of randomization until the date of cancer progression (pathological or therapeutic). Pathological progression: increase in primary or secondary Gleason pattern by greater than or equal (>=) 1 or higher proportion of cancer positive cores (>=15 percent [%] increase). Therapeutic progression: earliest occurrence of primary therapy for prostate cancer (prostatectomy/radiation/focal therapy/systemic therapy). Medians and 95% CIs were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. Participants with no cancer progression at the time of study completion, discontinuation or death were censored at the last assessment date. Participants switching therapy during the study were censored at the time of the initial therapy switch, and participants discontinuing therapy were censored at the time of study discontinuation.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization until the date of the cancer progression (pathological or therapeutic) (up to study completion date, 28 Aug 2020; approximately 50 months)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Description
An AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug or who underwent study procedures and did not necessarily had a causal relationship with treatment. An abnormality identified during a medical test: an AE only if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, required active intervention, required interruption, or discontinuation of study medication, or was clinically significant in the opinion of investigator. An AE: serious if it resulted in any of the following outcomes: Death, was life-threatening, Persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, Congenital anomaly, or birth defect, Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, Other medically important event. Drug-related AEs: assessed by investigator as AEs whose relationship to study drugs could not be ruled out.
Time Frame
From date of first dose of enzalutamide or randomization until end of study (up to study completion date, 28 Aug 2020; approximately 50 months)
Title
Percentage of Participants Reported Negative Biopsies for Cancer
Description
Percentage of Participants who reported negative biopsies for cancer were reported.
Time Frame
At the end of months 12 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Percent of Cancer Positive Cores at Month 12 and 24
Description
Percent positive cores were calculated using the number of systemically sampled prostate regions and any targeted regions with at least 1 positive core divided by the total number of systematically sampled regions and targeted regions. This implied that despite the number of samples within a given systematic or targeted region, any positive core indicated that region as positive.
Time Frame
Baseline, months 12 and 24
Title
Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
Description
Time to PSA progression was defined as time in months from the date of randomization or first dose enzalutamide untill date of PSA progression (secondary rise in serum PSA >=25% above baseline or >=25% above nadir or absolute increase >= 2 nanogram per mililiter [ng/mL]). Participants with no PSA progression at the time of trial completion, discontinuation or death were censored at the last assessment date. Additionally, participants switching therapy during the study were censored at the time of the initial therapy switch, and participants discontinuing therapy were censored at the time of study discontinuation. Medians and 95% CIs were calculated with the KM method.
Time Frame
From date of randomization or first dose of enzalutamide until date of PSA progression (pathological or therapeutic) (up to study completion date=28 Aug 2020, median duration: 14.82 months for "Enzalutamide", 8.80 months for "Active Surveillance")
Title
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Rise in Serum PSA
Description
Percentage of participants with secondary rise in serum PSA > 25% baseline or > 25% above nadir or absolute increase >2 ng/mL were reported in this measure.
Time Frame
At the end of months 12, 24 and at the end of study (up to study completion date, 28 Aug 2020, approximately 50 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Questionnaire Composite Scores to Months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
The BFI is a screening tool designed to assess the severity and impact of fatigue on daily functioning of participants with cancer during the 24 hours. There are 9 items on the scale. The first three questions ask participants to rate their fatigues on a scale from 0 (no fatigue) - 10 (as bad as you can imagine), with higher scores indicating worse outcome. The remaining six questions ask participants to rate how much fatigue has interfered with their daily activities on a scale from 0 (Does not interfere) to 10 (Completely interferes). A composite fatigue score was obtained by averaging all the items on the BFI, ranged between 0 to 10, with a higher BFI fatigue score indicating worse outcome. The composite BFI score was calculated only if at least 5 of the 9 items were answered.
Time Frame
Baseline, months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Questionnaire Composite Score to Months 6, 12, 18, 24 - Mental Component Summary
Description
SF-12 is a questionnaire that measures overall health related quality of life using 12 questions. The questions are then scored and weighted into 2 subscales, physical health and mental health. Each yields scores from 0 (representing the worst possible debilitation) to 100 (representing no reduction in quality of life). Scores are transformed and ranges between 0 to 100; higher score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-12 Questionnaire Composite Score to Months 6, 12, 18, 24 - Physical Component Summary
Description
SF-12 is a questionnaire that measures overall health related quality of life using 12 questions. The questions are then scored and weighted into 2 subscales, physical health and mental health. Each yields scores from 0 (representing the worst possible debilitation) to 100 (representing no reduction in quality of life). Scores are transformed and ranges between 0 to 100; higher score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Assessment Scores at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
The EPIC Hormonal Assessment was a questionnaire used to measure quality of life (QoL) issues in participants with prostate cancer. There were a total of 6 questions related to hormonal function such as hot flashes, breast tenderness, depression, lack of energy, weight fluctuation. The answers ranged from "more than once a day" to "rarely or never" (ranged from 1 to 5, corresponding standardized scores were 100, 75, 50, 25, 0), "no problem" to "big problem" (ranged from 0 to 4, corresponding standardized scores were 100, 75, 50, 25, 0). Score from each answer was converted into standardized score at each visit. Total score was calculated by taking average of standardized scores. Total score was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) scale with higher scores representing better hormonal function.
Time Frame
Baseline, months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in EPIC Sexual Assessment Scores at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
EPIC Sexual Assessment: a questionnaire to measure QoL issues in participants with prostate cancer, included a total of 9 questions on sexual function as level of sexual desire, ability to have an erection, ability to reach orgasm, quality and frequency of erections, frequency of sexual intercourse. Answers ranged from "very poor" to "very good,"(ranged from 1 - 5, corresponding standardized scores:0, 25, 50, 75, 100), "none" to "enough"(ranged from 1 - 4, corresponding standardized scores:0, 33, 67, 100), "no problem" to "big problem"(ranged from 0 - 4, corresponding standardized scores:100, 75, 50, 25, 0), and "never" to "daily"(ranged from 1 - 5, corresponding standardized scores:100, 75, 50, 25, 0). Scores from each answer was converted into standardized score at each visit. Total score = calculated by taking average of standardized scores. Total score was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), higher scores = better sexual function and satisfaction.
Time Frame
Baseline, months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in EPIC Urinary Assessment Scores at Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
EPIC urinary assessment: a questionnaire to measure QoL issues in participants with prostate cancer, included a total of 7 questions on urinary function as leaking urine, blood in urine, pain/burning on urination, urinary control and frequency. Answers ranged from "more than once a day" to "rarely or never"(scores from 1 - 5,corresponding standardized scores[CSS]:0, 25, 50, 75, 100), "no urinary control" to "full urinary control"(scores from 1 - 4,CSS:0, 33, 67, 100), "none" to "3 or more pads per day"(scores from 0 - 3, CSS:100, 67, 33, 0), "no problem" to "big problem"(scores from 0 - 4, CSS:100, 75, 50, 25, 0), and "no problem" to "big problem"(scores from 1 - 5, corresponding standardized score:100, 75, 50, 25, 0). Score from each answer was converted into a corresponding standardized score at each visit. Total score was calculated by taking average of standardized scores. Total score ranged from 0(worst) to 100(best), higher scores = better urinary function.
Time Frame
Baseline, months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) Scores at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
The MAX-PC was a questionnaire used to assess participants' feelings about prostate cancer and PSA tests. There were a total of 18 questions related to understanding how participants cope with aspects of their treatment and medical tests frequently involved in their care; questions such as strong feelings about prostate cancer, scared of PSA tests, trouble sleeping due to thoughts of prostate cancer, unable to plan for the future due to prostate cancer, fear of cancer getting worse. The answers range from "not at all" to "often" and "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree. Total score ranged from 0-54, an increase in the score indicates a worsened anxiety level.
Time Frame
Baseline, months 6, 12, 18 and 24

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate diagnosed (with ≥10 core biopsy) within 6 months of screening. The biopsy that was used for this diagnosis must be submitted for central pathology review. Prostate cancer categorized (as determined by central pathology review) as low risk is defined as T1c-T2a, PSA<10, N0, M0 (or presumed N0, M0 if CT/bone scan not done due to low risk of metastases), GS ≤ 6, ECOG status ≤2 and estimated life expectancy >5 years OR intermediate risk is defined as T2b-T2c, PSA<20, N0, M0 (or presumed N0, M0 if CT/bone scan not done), GS ≤7 (3+4 pattern only), ECOG status ≤ 2 and estimated life expectancy > 5 years. Prostate cancer categorized (as determined by central pathology review) to the very low risk category (T1c, GS ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL, fewer than 3 prostate biopsy cores positive, ≤50% cancer in any core, PSA density <0.15 ng/mL/g) is not included. Ability to swallow study drugs and to comply with study requirements throughout the study Institutional Review Board (IRB)-/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)-approved written Informed Consent and privacy language as per national regulations must be obtained from the subject or legally authorized representative prior to any study-related procedures Throughout study, male subject and a female partner who is of childbearing potential must use two acceptable methods of birth control (one of which must include a condom barrier method of contraception) starting at screening and continuing throughout the study period and for three months after the final study drug administration. Two acceptable methods of birth control thus include the following: Condom (barrier method of contraception) AND One of the following is required: i. Established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception by the female partner; ii. Placement of an intrauterine device or intrauterine system by the female partner; iii. Additional barrier method: Occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with spermicidal foam / gel / film / cream / suppository by the female partner; iv. Tubal ligation in the female partner. Must not donate sperm starting at screening throughout the study period and for 90 days after the final study drug administration. Exclusion Criteria: Prior radiotherapy, surgery, chemotherapy, or hormonal therapy for prostate cancer Very low risk category (T1c, GS ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL, fewer than 3 prostate biopsy cores positive, ≤50% cancer in any core, PSA density <0.15 ng/mL/g) Prior transurethral resection of the prostate or prior transurethral microwave thermotherapy of the prostate Use of oral glucocorticoids within 1 month of screening Use of 5 alpha reductase inhibitor within 1 month of screening or total use, within the last two years prior to screening, of >3 months Presence of metastatic disease History of seizure or any condition that may predispose to seizures at any time in the past. History of loss of consciousness or transient ischemic attack within 12 months of screening Absolute neutrophil count < 1,500/μL, platelet count < 100,000/μL, or hemoglobin < 6.2 mmol/L (10 g/dL) at screening Total bilirubin >1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 2.5 X ULN at screening Creatinine > 177 μmol/L (> 2 mg/dL) at screening Albumin < 30 g/L (3.0 g/dL) at screening Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to Randomization Visit Clinically significant cardiovascular disease including: Myocardial infarction or uncontrolled angina within 6 months Congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 or 4 History of clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias History of Mobitz II second degree or third degree heart block without a permanent pacemaker in place Hypotension as indicated by systolic blood pressure < 86 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) at screening Bradycardia as indicated by a heart rate of < 45 beats per minute on the screening electrocardiogram (ECG) and on physical examination Uncontrolled hypertension as indicated by at least 2 consecutive measurements of a resting systolic blood pressure > 170 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 105 mmHg at the Screening Visit Known hypersensitivity to enzalutamide or any of its components. Subject has received investigational therapy within 28 days or 5 half lives, whichever is longer, prior to screening
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Site US10034
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35223
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10024
City
Homewood
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10007
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10055
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85741
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10004
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10026
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95670
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10010
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92123
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10051
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10029
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10054
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80220
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10072
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10057
City
Lakeland
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33805
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10038
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10062
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10074
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10018
City
Glenview
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60026
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10071
City
Lake Barrington
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10046
City
Carmel
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10009
City
Jeffersonville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47130
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10037
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70112
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10006
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10001
City
Towson
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10032
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10008
City
Troy
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48084
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10069
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68516
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10044
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10067
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68130
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10061
City
Lebanon
State/Province
New Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
03756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10049
City
Morristown
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07962
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10043
City
Voorhees
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08043
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10068
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10050
City
Cheektowaga
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14225
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10030
City
Garden City
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11530
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10028
City
Poughkeepsie
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10021
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10022
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10047
City
Gastonia
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28053
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10045
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10015
City
Middleburg Heights
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44130
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10053
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10063
City
Bala-Cynwyd
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19004
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10052
City
Lancaster
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17604
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10014
City
Warwick
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02886
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10019
City
Myrtle Beach
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29572
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10011
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10056
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10036
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77027
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10035
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10058
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10017
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53226
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site CA15005
City
Abbotsford
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V2S 3N6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15004
City
Halifax
State/Province
Nova Scotia
ZIP/Postal Code
B3H 2Y9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15001
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15003
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G2M9
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as compounds terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Conditions and exceptions are described under the Sponsor Specific Details for Astellas on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35708696
Citation
Shore ND, Renzulli J, Fleshner NE, Hollowell CMP, Vourganti S, Silberstein J, Siddiqui R, Hairston J, Elsouda D, Russell D, Cooperberg MR, Tomlins SA. Enzalutamide Monotherapy vs Active Surveillance in Patients With Low-risk or Intermediate-risk Localized Prostate Cancer: The ENACT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022 Aug 1;8(8):1128-1136. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1641. Erratum In: JAMA Oncol. 2022 Aug 1;8(8):1225.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/study/?pid=9785-MA-1010
Description
Link to results and other applicable study documents on the Astellas Clinical Trials website
URL
https://www.trialsummaries.com/Study/StudyDetails?id=14506&tenant=MT_AST_9011
Description
Link to plain language summary of the study on the Trial Results Summaries website

Learn more about this trial

A Randomized Study of Enzalutamide in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Active Surveillance

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs