search
Back to results

PK, PD, Safety, and Efficacy of SAIT101 Versus MabThera® Versus Rituxan® in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
SAIT101
MabThera
Rituxan
Sponsored by
Archigen Biotech Limited
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis focused on measuring an inadequate response to anti -TNF therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Severe RA defined as:

  • Diagnosis of RA according to the revised (1987) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classification of RA for at least 3 months prior to screening visit (see Appendix 3).
  • And ≥6 swollen joints and ≥6 tender/painful joints (from the 66/68 joint count system).
  • And C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥1.0 mg/dL or an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥28 mm/hour at Screening.
  • And positive rheumatoid factor (RF) (≥20 units/mL) or anti cyclic citrullinase peptide (CCP) antibodies (≥10 units/mL) at Screening.

    2. Patients with severe RA who have had an inadequate response to at least 3 months' treatment (according to the approved treatment and dosage) or intolerance (at Investigator's discretion and/or experience of intolerable AE or toxicity such as infusion related reaction, hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis or severe toxicity) to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy (experience of severe adverse event (AE) or toxicity).

    3. Current treatment for RA on an outpatient basis:

  • Receiving methotrexate (MTX) 7.5 - 25mg/week (oral or parenteral) for at least 12 weeks, including the last 4 weeks prior to Day 1 at a stable dose, via the same route of administration, dose, and formulation. Patients receiving a lower dose of MTX (<10 mg/week), stable for 4 weeks prior to Day 1, should be doing so as a result of a documented evidence of intolerance to higher doses of MTX.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Females who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning a pregnancy during the Treatment Period of and 12 months after the last infusion of study drug.
  2. Class IV as per the Classification of Global Functional Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis (as per ACR 1991 Revised Criteria) (see Appendix 4) or wheelchair/bed bound.
  3. History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA (including but not limited to gout, reactive arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthropathy or Lyme disease).
  4. History of or current systemic autoimmune disorder (including but not limited to systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease, pulmonary fibrosis, Felty syndrome, scleroderma, inflammatory myopathy, fibromyalgia, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, mixed connective tissue disease, vasculitis or other overlap syndrome), with the exception of the secondary Sjögren's syndrome.
  5. Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of, or currently active), including known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive test at screening.
  6. History of opportunistic infection.
  7. History of deep space/tissue infection (e.g., fasciitis, abscess, osteomyelitis) and infected prosthetic joint.
  8. Active infection of any kind (excluding fungal infection of nail beds) or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with i.v. anti infective agents within 4 weeks prior to Screening or oral anti-infective agents within 2 weeks prior to Screening or use of antibiotic therapy three or more times in the last six months prior to Screening
  9. Positive serological test for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) or hepatitis C serology.

    • Patients with a negative HBsAg and positive HBcAb must have a hepatitis B virus (HBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) level <20 IU/mL (or 112 copies/mL) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). These HBV patients must be willing to undergo monthly PCR HBV DNA testing during treatment and may participate following consultation with a hepatitis expert regarding monitoring and use of HBV antiviral therapy, and provided they agree to receive treatment as indicated. An HBV re-test will be performed monthly including Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, 52, and unscheduled visit if required.
    • Patients with a positive test because of HBV vaccine may be included (i.e., anti-HBs+ and anti HBc-).
    • Patients positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody are eligible only if PCR is negative for HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA).
  10. Confirmed current active tuberculosis (TB). • Patients with latent TB as determined by positive QuantiFERON-TB test may be enrolled if such patients have written confirmation from health care provider (e.g., Pulmonologist or Infection Specialist) of adequate prophylaxis before or within the screening period and no evidence of tuberculosis on a chest X-ray performed within 3 months from Day 1.

    • Screening period can be extended to 60 days for prophylaxis of latent TB.

    • QuantiFERON-TB test can be re-tested, if inconclusive.

  11. Any significant cardiac disease (e.g., coronary artery disease with unstable angina, coronary heart failure New York Heart Association Class III and IV, familial long QT syndrome, uncontrolled cardiac disease).
  12. History of moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or history of severe COPD exacerbation(s) within the last 12 months of Screening.
  13. Vaccination with live or attenuated vaccines within 6 weeks prior to first dose of study drug or planned administration during study participation or within 4 weeks following last dose of study drug. Treatment with IV Gamma Globulin or the Prosorba® Column within 6 months prior to Day 1.
  14. History of a severe allergic reaction or anaphylactic reaction to a biological agent or history of hypersensitivity to any component of the study drug including known hypersensitivity or allergy to a murine product.
  15. Hypogammaglobulinemia at screening (Immunoglobulin G (IgG) <600 mg/dL).
  16. Patients with hemoglobin <8.5 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1,500 cells/µL or platelet count <75,000 cells/µL at Screening. If a patient has findings marginally below this limit, re testing is allowed, at the Investigator's discretion, within the 30 day period between Visit 1 and Visit 2.

• Creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula)

• Liver function: Total bilirubin >2.0 mg/dL (>34 µmol/L) except for patients with Gilbert's Syndrome or hemolysis. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3 × upper limit of normal (ULN). Patients with total bilirubin >2.0 mg/dL possibly due to Gilbert's Syndrome should have a direct bilirubin checked. If the direct bilirubin is normal and medical history is suggestive/positive for Gilbert's Syndrome, the patient successfully meets the criteria.

The AST and ALT may be repeated once within the Screening period if the initial result exceeds this limit, and the lesser value accepted if it meets this criterion.

18. History of cancer within the last 5 years prior to Screening, treated with anti-cancer chemotherapy, including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies and carcinoma in situ (except basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri that have been excised and cured).

19. Major surgical procedure within 4 weeks prior to or planned within 24 weeks of Day 1, with the exception of surgical procedures for dental prosthesis.

20. Previous treatment with a B cell modulating or B cell depletion therapy, such as, but not limited to rituximab, belimumab, atacicept, tabalumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, epratuzumab and other experimental treatments.

21. Injectable corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to Day 1.

22. Participation in a previous clinical study within 4 weeks of Screening or having received treatment with a drug that has not received regulatory approval for any indication within a minimum of 5 half-lives prior to Day 1.

23. Patients who, based on the Investigator's judgment, have a clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition that may preclude safe and complete study participation. Conditions may also include cardiovascular, vascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, endocrine or neurological conditions as determined by medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests or electrocardiogram (ECG).

24. Patients who, in the judgment of the Investigator, are likely to be non-compliant or uncooperative during the study.

25. History of substance abuse (alcohol or drug).

26. History of demyelinating disorders (such as multiple sclerosis or Guillain-Barré syndrome).

27. Patients at risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML):

  • Patients with immune deficiency such as transplant patients on immunosuppressive medications
  • Patients receiving certain kinds of chemotherapy
  • Patients receiving natalizumab (Tysabri®) for multiple sclerosis
  • Patients with psoriasis on longer term efalizumab (Raptiva®) or patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)

Sites / Locations

  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site-1
  • Research Site-2
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research Site-1
  • Research Site-2
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

SAIT101

Rituxan

MabThera

Arm Description

In Part A, each patient will receive one course of two 1000 mg SAIT101 infusions: one on Day 1 and the second on Day 15. In Part B, patients with an inadequate response (<50% improvement from Baseline in swollen and tender joint count at Week 24) will be eligible for a further course of two 1000 mg infusions of SAIT101 on Week 24 and Week 26.

In Part A, each patient will receive one course of two 1000 mg Rituxan infusions: one on Day 1 and the second on Day 15. In Part B, patients with an inadequate response (<50% improvement from Baseline in swollen and tender joint count at Week 24) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive Rituxan or SAIT101 10000 mg infusions on Week 24 and Week 26.

In Part A, each patient will receive one course of two 1000 mg MabThera infusions: one on Day 1 and the second on Day 15. In Part B, patients with an inadequate response (<50% improvement from Baseline in swollen and tender joint count at Week 24) will be eligible for a further course of two 1000 mg infusions of MabThera on Week 24 and Week 26.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Area Under the Concentration Time Cure From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 (immediately predose on Day 1) to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t). Geometric means by treatment (Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set).
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-∞)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area Under the Plasma Concentration from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ (infinity). Calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation and extrapolated to infinity by addition of the last quantifiable concentration divided by the elimination rate constant: AUC(0-last) + C(last)/λz.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-D15)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area Under the Concentration verses time from time 0 to Day 15 prior to infusion (AUC0-D15) calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation. Actual time/concentration on Day 15 was used for the calculation of this parameter unless the parameter was derived by interpolation.
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After Day 15 Infusion
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) after Day 15 infusion (Dose 2)
Trough Concentration (Ctrough) Before the Second Infusion on Day 15
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Trough concentration (Ctrough) before the second infusion on Day 15 (Dose 2). Trough (pre-dose) concentration prior to second infusion on Day 15 obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 24
Disease Activity Score 28 C-reactive protein score (DAS28-CRP) at Week 24 (Full Analysis Set). CRP samples were collected at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16 and 24. DAS28-CRP was calculated using the following equation: [0.56*Square Root (SQRT) (tender 28 joint count)+0.28*SQRT(swollen 28 joint count)+0.36*ln(CRP+1)]*1.10+1.15. Total DAS28-CRP scores were calculates and range from 2.0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). Lower scores represent a better patient outcome. Disease remission is considered achieved if the score is between 0 and <2.6. Low disease activity corresponds to 2.6 to <3.2. Moderate activity is between 3.2 & ≤5.1, while high activity is above 5.1.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Week 2 to Week 24 (AUC(w2-24)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area under the concentration time curve week 2 to week 24 (AUC(w2-24) calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation.
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Day 0 to Week 12 (AUC(0-w12))
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area under the concentration time curve Day 0 to Week 12 calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation.
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) (Dose 1)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Maximum plasma concentration over the first dosing interval obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) (Dose 2)
Time of maximum concentration postinfusion over the second dosing interval, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.
Apparent Terminal Rate Constant (λz)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Apparent terminal rate constant (λz) determined by linear regression of the terminal points of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Best fit method followed by visual assessment was used to identify the terminal linear phase of the concentration-time profile. A minimum of 3 data points was used for determination.
Systemic Clearance (CL)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Systemic clearance (CL) over the first dosing period calculated as dose (first + second dose) divided by AUC(0-∞).
Volume of Distribution (VD)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Volume of distribution (VD) over the first dosing period calculated as dose (first + second dose) divided by [λz AUC(0-∞)]
Terminal Half-life (T1/2)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Terminal half-life determined as ln2/λz.
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Weeks 8, 16, 36 and 52
Disease Activity Score 28-C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) samples taken at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52. DAS28-CRP was calculated using the following equation: [0.56*Square Root (SQRT) (tender 28 joint count)+0.28*SQRT(swollen 28 joint count)+0.36*ln(CRP+1)]*1.10+1.15. Total DAS28-CRP scores are presented and range from 2.0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). Lower scores represent a better patient outcome. Disease remission is considered achieved if the score is between 0 and <2.6. Low disease activity corresponds to 2.6 to <3.2. Moderate activity is between 3.2 & ≤5.1, while high activity is above 5.1.
American Collage of Rheumatology 20% Response Criteria (ACR20) Response Rates at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
American Collage of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response criteria (ACR20) response rates were assessed at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52. An ACR20 response is defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], visual analogue pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP).
American Collage of Rheumatology 50% Response Criteria (ACR50) Response Rates and American Collage of Rheumatology 70% Response Criteria (ACR70) at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Efficacy endpoint: American Collage of Rheumatology 50% response criteria (ACR50) response rates and American Collage of Rheumatology 70% response criteria (ACR70) at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52. An ACR50 response is defined as both improvement of 50% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 50% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], visual analogue pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP). An ACR70 response is defined as both improvement of 70% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 70% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], visual analogue pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP).
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) and Tender Joint Count (TJC) (the 66/68 Joint Count System)
Efficacy endpoint: Individual components of the ACR improvement criteria on Day 1 and at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) (the 66/68 joint count system). SJC and TJC assess the level of skeletal disease involvement. The 66/68 Joint Count evaluates 66 joints for swelling and 68 joints for tenderness.
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity (Assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS])
Efficacy endpoint: Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Physicians global assessment of disease activity (assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]). Where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = maximum disease activity.
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants Assessment of Pain (Assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS])
Participants assessment of pain (assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]). Participants assessment of pain (assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) where 0 = no pain and 100 = severe pain.
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants Global Assessment of Disease Activity (Assessed on 1 to 100 mm VAS)
Efficacy endpoint: Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants global assessment of disease activity (assessed on 1 to 100 mm visual analogue scale [VAS]). Patients rate how their Rheumatoid Arthritis has affected them, where 0 = very well and 100 = very poor.
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants Assessment of Disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI])
the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) contains 20 questions split into 8 categories (dressing & grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip & activities). Scores were: 0 = Without ANY Difficulty; 1 = With SOME Difficulty; 2 = With MUCH Difficulty; 3 = UNABLE to Do. Total scores were calculated as the summed category scores divided by the number of categories. Total HAQ-DI scores are presented which range from 0 to 3. Higher scores represent a worse outcome. Scores of 0 to 1 represent mild to moderate difficulty, 1 to 2 moderate disability, and 2 to 3 severe to very severe disability.
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level
C-reactive protein (CRP) level (Mg/L). CRP is a marker for inflammation. a normal reading is <3 Mg/L. Higher values indicate disease related inflammation and increased cardiovascular risk. CRP levels between 3 Mg/L and 10 Mg/L are mildly elevated. Levels between 10 Mg/L and 100 Mg/L are moderately elevated and CRP levels above 100 Mg/L are severely elevated.
Change From Baseline DAS28-erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Disease Activity Score 28- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) consisted of tender joint counts (TJC), swollen joint counts (SJC) & erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The formula is: [0.56*SQRT(tender 28 joint count)+0.28*SQRT(swollen 28 joint count)+0.7*ln(ESR)]+0.014*patient global health assessment. Total DAS28-ESR scores are presented. Total scores range from 2 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). A lower score represents a better patient outcome. A DAS28-ESR of greater than 5.1 implies active disease, less than 3.2 low disease activity, and less than 2.6 remission.
Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response (Continuous ACR70) for at Least 24 Weeks
Efficacy endpoint: number of participants with a major clinical response defined as a continuous ACR70 from Baseline (Day 1) for at least 24 weeks. ACR70 is a measure based on American College of Rheumatology criteria of at least a 70% improvement in the number of tender and swollen joints, and a 70% improvement in at least 3 of the following: the patient's global assessment of disease status; the patient's assessment of pain; the patient's assessment of function measured using the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire the physician's global assessment of disease status; serum C-reactive protein levels.
Number of Participants With a Clinical Remission Response (CRR) at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Number if Participants with a Clinical Remission Response (CRR) defined by the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <3.3 at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS).
Proportion of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 8, 16, 24 36 and 52
Efficacy endpoint: Proportion of participants with European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response (defined as good response, moderate response or no response) at weeks 8, 16, 24 36 and 52 (EOS). EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) response was classified using the individual amount of change in the DAS28-CRP score. The DAS28-CRP was classified into 3 categories: low disease activity (<= 3.2), moderate disease activity (> 3.2 and <= 5.1) and high disease activity (> 5.1). Good response was defined as >1.2 improvement in the DAS28-CRP from baseline with low disease activity.
Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM and IgA Levels)
Change from baseline (Day 1) in immunoglobulin G (IgG), Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels (mg/dL) at Week 8, 16, 24 36 and 52 (End of study)

Full Information

First Posted
June 20, 2016
Last Updated
February 4, 2020
Sponsor
Archigen Biotech Limited
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02819726
Brief Title
PK, PD, Safety, and Efficacy of SAIT101 Versus MabThera® Versus Rituxan® in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Efficacy of SAIT101 Versus MabThera® Versus Rituxan® in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 11, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 30, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 7, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Archigen Biotech Limited

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A randomised, double blind, parallel group, multicentre study yo compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of SAIT101 versus MabThera® versus Rituxan® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter study to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, efficacy, tolerability, and immunogenicity of SAIT101 (biosimilar rituximab) versus MabThera® versus Rituxan® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study will take place globally across approximately 75 study centers in order to randomize approximately 282 patients. The study consists of Part A from baseline for PK and efficacy analysis, followed by Part B from Week 24 to 52 for safety follow-up in which collects transition data.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Keywords
an inadequate response to anti -TNF therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
In Part A, patients are randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive one course (baseline and Week 2) of SAIT101 (n=94) versus Rituxan® (n=94) versus MabThera® (n=94). At Week 24, patients are evaluated for the second course (Week 24 and 26) of the infusion. In Part B, eligible patients in the SAIT101 arm receive the second course of SAIT101 treatment. Eligible patients in the MabThera® arm receive the second course of MabThera® treatment. Eligible patients in the Rituxan® arm are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive SAIT101 or Rituxan® treatment. Patients are followed up for safety until Week 52.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
294 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
SAIT101
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In Part A, each patient will receive one course of two 1000 mg SAIT101 infusions: one on Day 1 and the second on Day 15. In Part B, patients with an inadequate response (<50% improvement from Baseline in swollen and tender joint count at Week 24) will be eligible for a further course of two 1000 mg infusions of SAIT101 on Week 24 and Week 26.
Arm Title
Rituxan
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
In Part A, each patient will receive one course of two 1000 mg Rituxan infusions: one on Day 1 and the second on Day 15. In Part B, patients with an inadequate response (<50% improvement from Baseline in swollen and tender joint count at Week 24) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive Rituxan or SAIT101 10000 mg infusions on Week 24 and Week 26.
Arm Title
MabThera
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
In Part A, each patient will receive one course of two 1000 mg MabThera infusions: one on Day 1 and the second on Day 15. In Part B, patients with an inadequate response (<50% improvement from Baseline in swollen and tender joint count at Week 24) will be eligible for a further course of two 1000 mg infusions of MabThera on Week 24 and Week 26.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
SAIT101
Intervention Description
1,000 mg i.v. of SAIT101 on Day 1 and 15. 1,000 mg i.v. of SAIT101 on week 24 and 26 for eligible patients.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
MabThera
Other Intervention Name(s)
Rituximab
Intervention Description
1,000 mg i.v. of MabThera® on Day 1 and 15. 1,000 mg i.v. of MabThera® on week 24 and 26 for eligible patients.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Rituxan
Other Intervention Name(s)
Rituximab
Intervention Description
1,000 mg i.v. of Rituxan® on Day 1 and 15. 1,000 mg i.v. of Rituxan® on week 24 and 26 for eligible patients.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Area Under the Concentration Time Cure From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t)
Description
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 (immediately predose on Day 1) to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t). Geometric means by treatment (Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set).
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-∞)
Description
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area Under the Plasma Concentration from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ (infinity). Calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation and extrapolated to infinity by addition of the last quantifiable concentration divided by the elimination rate constant: AUC(0-last) + C(last)/λz.
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-D15)
Description
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area Under the Concentration verses time from time 0 to Day 15 prior to infusion (AUC0-D15) calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation. Actual time/concentration on Day 15 was used for the calculation of this parameter unless the parameter was derived by interpolation.
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After Day 15 Infusion
Description
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) after Day 15 infusion (Dose 2)
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1 and 2 (Pre-dose 2). Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Trough Concentration (Ctrough) Before the Second Infusion on Day 15
Description
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Trough concentration (Ctrough) before the second infusion on Day 15 (Dose 2). Trough (pre-dose) concentration prior to second infusion on Day 15 obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1 and 2 (Pre-dose 2). Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 24
Description
Disease Activity Score 28 C-reactive protein score (DAS28-CRP) at Week 24 (Full Analysis Set). CRP samples were collected at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16 and 24. DAS28-CRP was calculated using the following equation: [0.56*Square Root (SQRT) (tender 28 joint count)+0.28*SQRT(swollen 28 joint count)+0.36*ln(CRP+1)]*1.10+1.15. Total DAS28-CRP scores were calculates and range from 2.0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). Lower scores represent a better patient outcome. Disease remission is considered achieved if the score is between 0 and <2.6. Low disease activity corresponds to 2.6 to <3.2. Moderate activity is between 3.2 & ≤5.1, while high activity is above 5.1.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Week 2 to Week 24 (AUC(w2-24)
Description
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area under the concentration time curve week 2 to week 24 (AUC(w2-24) calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation.
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Day 0 to Week 12 (AUC(0-w12))
Description
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area under the concentration time curve Day 0 to Week 12 calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation.
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) (Dose 1)
Description
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Maximum plasma concentration over the first dosing interval obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) (Dose 2)
Description
Time of maximum concentration postinfusion over the second dosing interval, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Apparent Terminal Rate Constant (λz)
Description
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Apparent terminal rate constant (λz) determined by linear regression of the terminal points of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Best fit method followed by visual assessment was used to identify the terminal linear phase of the concentration-time profile. A minimum of 3 data points was used for determination.
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Systemic Clearance (CL)
Description
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Systemic clearance (CL) over the first dosing period calculated as dose (first + second dose) divided by AUC(0-∞).
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Volume of Distribution (VD)
Description
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Volume of distribution (VD) over the first dosing period calculated as dose (first + second dose) divided by [λz AUC(0-∞)]
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Terminal Half-life (T1/2)
Description
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Terminal half-life determined as ln2/λz.
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Weeks 8, 16, 36 and 52
Description
Disease Activity Score 28-C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) samples taken at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52. DAS28-CRP was calculated using the following equation: [0.56*Square Root (SQRT) (tender 28 joint count)+0.28*SQRT(swollen 28 joint count)+0.36*ln(CRP+1)]*1.10+1.15. Total DAS28-CRP scores are presented and range from 2.0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). Lower scores represent a better patient outcome. Disease remission is considered achieved if the score is between 0 and <2.6. Low disease activity corresponds to 2.6 to <3.2. Moderate activity is between 3.2 & ≤5.1, while high activity is above 5.1.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
American Collage of Rheumatology 20% Response Criteria (ACR20) Response Rates at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Description
American Collage of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response criteria (ACR20) response rates were assessed at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52. An ACR20 response is defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], visual analogue pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP).
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
American Collage of Rheumatology 50% Response Criteria (ACR50) Response Rates and American Collage of Rheumatology 70% Response Criteria (ACR70) at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Description
Efficacy endpoint: American Collage of Rheumatology 50% response criteria (ACR50) response rates and American Collage of Rheumatology 70% response criteria (ACR70) at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52. An ACR50 response is defined as both improvement of 50% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 50% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], visual analogue pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP). An ACR70 response is defined as both improvement of 70% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 70% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], visual analogue pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP).
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) and Tender Joint Count (TJC) (the 66/68 Joint Count System)
Description
Efficacy endpoint: Individual components of the ACR improvement criteria on Day 1 and at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) (the 66/68 joint count system). SJC and TJC assess the level of skeletal disease involvement. The 66/68 Joint Count evaluates 66 joints for swelling and 68 joints for tenderness.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity (Assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS])
Description
Efficacy endpoint: Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Physicians global assessment of disease activity (assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]). Where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = maximum disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants Assessment of Pain (Assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS])
Description
Participants assessment of pain (assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]). Participants assessment of pain (assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) where 0 = no pain and 100 = severe pain.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants Global Assessment of Disease Activity (Assessed on 1 to 100 mm VAS)
Description
Efficacy endpoint: Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants global assessment of disease activity (assessed on 1 to 100 mm visual analogue scale [VAS]). Patients rate how their Rheumatoid Arthritis has affected them, where 0 = very well and 100 = very poor.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants Assessment of Disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI])
Description
the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) contains 20 questions split into 8 categories (dressing & grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip & activities). Scores were: 0 = Without ANY Difficulty; 1 = With SOME Difficulty; 2 = With MUCH Difficulty; 3 = UNABLE to Do. Total scores were calculated as the summed category scores divided by the number of categories. Total HAQ-DI scores are presented which range from 0 to 3. Higher scores represent a worse outcome. Scores of 0 to 1 represent mild to moderate difficulty, 1 to 2 moderate disability, and 2 to 3 severe to very severe disability.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level
Description
C-reactive protein (CRP) level (Mg/L). CRP is a marker for inflammation. a normal reading is <3 Mg/L. Higher values indicate disease related inflammation and increased cardiovascular risk. CRP levels between 3 Mg/L and 10 Mg/L are mildly elevated. Levels between 10 Mg/L and 100 Mg/L are moderately elevated and CRP levels above 100 Mg/L are severely elevated.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
Change From Baseline DAS28-erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Description
Disease Activity Score 28- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) consisted of tender joint counts (TJC), swollen joint counts (SJC) & erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The formula is: [0.56*SQRT(tender 28 joint count)+0.28*SQRT(swollen 28 joint count)+0.7*ln(ESR)]+0.014*patient global health assessment. Total DAS28-ESR scores are presented. Total scores range from 2 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). A lower score represents a better patient outcome. A DAS28-ESR of greater than 5.1 implies active disease, less than 3.2 low disease activity, and less than 2.6 remission.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response (Continuous ACR70) for at Least 24 Weeks
Description
Efficacy endpoint: number of participants with a major clinical response defined as a continuous ACR70 from Baseline (Day 1) for at least 24 weeks. ACR70 is a measure based on American College of Rheumatology criteria of at least a 70% improvement in the number of tender and swollen joints, and a 70% improvement in at least 3 of the following: the patient's global assessment of disease status; the patient's assessment of pain; the patient's assessment of function measured using the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire the physician's global assessment of disease status; serum C-reactive protein levels.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
Number of Participants With a Clinical Remission Response (CRR) at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Description
Number if Participants with a Clinical Remission Response (CRR) defined by the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <3.3 at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS).
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
Proportion of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 8, 16, 24 36 and 52
Description
Efficacy endpoint: Proportion of participants with European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response (defined as good response, moderate response or no response) at weeks 8, 16, 24 36 and 52 (EOS). EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) response was classified using the individual amount of change in the DAS28-CRP score. The DAS28-CRP was classified into 3 categories: low disease activity (<= 3.2), moderate disease activity (> 3.2 and <= 5.1) and high disease activity (> 5.1). Good response was defined as >1.2 improvement in the DAS28-CRP from baseline with low disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Title
Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM and IgA Levels)
Description
Change from baseline (Day 1) in immunoglobulin G (IgG), Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels (mg/dL) at Week 8, 16, 24 36 and 52 (End of study)
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Depletion of B-lymphocyte Antigen CD19 (CD19+) B-cell Count up to Week 24
Description
Pharmacodynamic endpoint: proportion of participants (n) with depletion of CD19+ B-cell count up to week 24 (Pharmacodynamic analysis set).
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacodynamic evaluation (CD19+ B-cell) were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Time Needed to CD19+ B-cell Depletion
Description
Time needed to CD19+ B-cell depletion in Part A (calculated as the first time CD19+ B-cell count below 20/µL minus time of first dosing in days).
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacodynamic evaluation (CD19+ B-cell) were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36 and 52. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Duration of CD19+ B-cell Depletion
Description
Duration of CD19+ B-cell depletion (only participants that returned to non-depletion at or before week 24 were included)
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacodynamic evaluation (CD19+ B-cell) were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36 and 52. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Number of Participants With CD19+ B-cell Count Recover Versus Baseline
Description
Number of participants with CD19+ B-cell count recover versus baseline. Incidence of B-Cell recovery was defined as either CD19+ B-cell counts retuned to baseline or the lower limit or normal of 110 cells/µL at week 24).
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacodynamic evaluation (CD19+ B-cell) were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36 and 52. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Pharmaco Endpoint: Area Under the Concentration Time Curve of CD19 B-cell Count Change at Day 15 and Week 24
Description
Area under the concentration time curve of CD19 B-cell count change at Day 15 (AUEC0-d15) and week 24 (AUEC0-w24) based on change from baseline and percent of baseline values
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacodynamic evaluation (CD19+ B-cell) were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36 and 52. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Change From Baseline in CD19+ B-cell Count During the Study Period
Description
Pharmacodynamic endpoint: Descriptive statistics (mean [SD]) of the change from baseline in CD19+ B-cell count during the study period (Day 15 [AUEC(0-d15] and Week 24 [AUEC(0-w24])
Time Frame
Samples for pharmacodynamic evaluation (CD19+ B-cell) were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Title
Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Description
Pharmacodynamic endpoint: Change from baseline (Day 1) in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (mg/dL) at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 26 & 52 (EOS)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Severe RA defined as: Diagnosis of RA according to the revised (1987) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classification of RA for at least 3 months prior to screening visit (see Appendix 3). And ≥6 swollen joints and ≥6 tender/painful joints (from the 66/68 joint count system). And C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥1.0 mg/dL or an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥28 mm/hour at Screening. And positive rheumatoid factor (RF) (≥20 units/mL) or anti cyclic citrullinase peptide (CCP) antibodies (≥10 units/mL) at Screening. 2. Patients with severe RA who have had an inadequate response to at least 3 months' treatment (according to the approved treatment and dosage) or intolerance (at Investigator's discretion and/or experience of intolerable AE or toxicity such as infusion related reaction, hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis or severe toxicity) to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy (experience of severe adverse event (AE) or toxicity). 3. Current treatment for RA on an outpatient basis: Receiving methotrexate (MTX) 7.5 - 25mg/week (oral or parenteral) for at least 12 weeks, including the last 4 weeks prior to Day 1 at a stable dose, via the same route of administration, dose, and formulation. Patients receiving a lower dose of MTX (<10 mg/week), stable for 4 weeks prior to Day 1, should be doing so as a result of a documented evidence of intolerance to higher doses of MTX. Exclusion Criteria: Females who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning a pregnancy during the Treatment Period of and 12 months after the last infusion of study drug. Class IV as per the Classification of Global Functional Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis (as per ACR 1991 Revised Criteria) (see Appendix 4) or wheelchair/bed bound. History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA (including but not limited to gout, reactive arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthropathy or Lyme disease). History of or current systemic autoimmune disorder (including but not limited to systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease, pulmonary fibrosis, Felty syndrome, scleroderma, inflammatory myopathy, fibromyalgia, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, mixed connective tissue disease, vasculitis or other overlap syndrome), with the exception of the secondary Sjögren's syndrome. Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of, or currently active), including known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive test at screening. History of opportunistic infection. History of deep space/tissue infection (e.g., fasciitis, abscess, osteomyelitis) and infected prosthetic joint. Active infection of any kind (excluding fungal infection of nail beds) or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with i.v. anti infective agents within 4 weeks prior to Screening or oral anti-infective agents within 2 weeks prior to Screening or use of antibiotic therapy three or more times in the last six months prior to Screening Positive serological test for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) or hepatitis C serology. Patients with a negative HBsAg and positive HBcAb must have a hepatitis B virus (HBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) level <20 IU/mL (or 112 copies/mL) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). These HBV patients must be willing to undergo monthly PCR HBV DNA testing during treatment and may participate following consultation with a hepatitis expert regarding monitoring and use of HBV antiviral therapy, and provided they agree to receive treatment as indicated. An HBV re-test will be performed monthly including Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, 52, and unscheduled visit if required. Patients with a positive test because of HBV vaccine may be included (i.e., anti-HBs+ and anti HBc-). Patients positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody are eligible only if PCR is negative for HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA). Confirmed current active tuberculosis (TB). • Patients with latent TB as determined by positive QuantiFERON-TB test may be enrolled if such patients have written confirmation from health care provider (e.g., Pulmonologist or Infection Specialist) of adequate prophylaxis before or within the screening period and no evidence of tuberculosis on a chest X-ray performed within 3 months from Day 1. • Screening period can be extended to 60 days for prophylaxis of latent TB. • QuantiFERON-TB test can be re-tested, if inconclusive. Any significant cardiac disease (e.g., coronary artery disease with unstable angina, coronary heart failure New York Heart Association Class III and IV, familial long QT syndrome, uncontrolled cardiac disease). History of moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or history of severe COPD exacerbation(s) within the last 12 months of Screening. Vaccination with live or attenuated vaccines within 6 weeks prior to first dose of study drug or planned administration during study participation or within 4 weeks following last dose of study drug. Treatment with IV Gamma Globulin or the Prosorba® Column within 6 months prior to Day 1. History of a severe allergic reaction or anaphylactic reaction to a biological agent or history of hypersensitivity to any component of the study drug including known hypersensitivity or allergy to a murine product. Hypogammaglobulinemia at screening (Immunoglobulin G (IgG) <600 mg/dL). Patients with hemoglobin <8.5 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1,500 cells/µL or platelet count <75,000 cells/µL at Screening. If a patient has findings marginally below this limit, re testing is allowed, at the Investigator's discretion, within the 30 day period between Visit 1 and Visit 2. • Creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula) • Liver function: Total bilirubin >2.0 mg/dL (>34 µmol/L) except for patients with Gilbert's Syndrome or hemolysis. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3 × upper limit of normal (ULN). Patients with total bilirubin >2.0 mg/dL possibly due to Gilbert's Syndrome should have a direct bilirubin checked. If the direct bilirubin is normal and medical history is suggestive/positive for Gilbert's Syndrome, the patient successfully meets the criteria. The AST and ALT may be repeated once within the Screening period if the initial result exceeds this limit, and the lesser value accepted if it meets this criterion. 18. History of cancer within the last 5 years prior to Screening, treated with anti-cancer chemotherapy, including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies and carcinoma in situ (except basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri that have been excised and cured). 19. Major surgical procedure within 4 weeks prior to or planned within 24 weeks of Day 1, with the exception of surgical procedures for dental prosthesis. 20. Previous treatment with a B cell modulating or B cell depletion therapy, such as, but not limited to rituximab, belimumab, atacicept, tabalumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, epratuzumab and other experimental treatments. 21. Injectable corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to Day 1. 22. Participation in a previous clinical study within 4 weeks of Screening or having received treatment with a drug that has not received regulatory approval for any indication within a minimum of 5 half-lives prior to Day 1. 23. Patients who, based on the Investigator's judgment, have a clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition that may preclude safe and complete study participation. Conditions may also include cardiovascular, vascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, endocrine or neurological conditions as determined by medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests or electrocardiogram (ECG). 24. Patients who, in the judgment of the Investigator, are likely to be non-compliant or uncooperative during the study. 25. History of substance abuse (alcohol or drug). 26. History of demyelinating disorders (such as multiple sclerosis or Guillain-Barré syndrome). 27. Patients at risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML): Patients with immune deficiency such as transplant patients on immunosuppressive medications Patients receiving certain kinds of chemotherapy Patients receiving natalizumab (Tysabri®) for multiple sclerosis Patients with psoriasis on longer term efalizumab (Raptiva®) or patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Anniston
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36207
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
El Cajon
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92020
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
La Mesa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91942
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lakewood
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90712
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site-1
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site-2
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
San Leandro
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94578
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32804
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33613
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Boise
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83642
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lansing
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48917
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Waco
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mostar
ZIP/Postal Code
88000
Country
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Facility Name
Research site
City
Sarajevo
ZIP/Postal Code
71000
Country
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Facility Name
Research Site-1
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4002
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Research Site-2
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4002
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1336
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1612
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Research site
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
656 91
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Research site
City
Ostrava
ZIP/Postal Code
702 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Research site
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 50
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Research site
City
Uherské Hradiště
ZIP/Postal Code
686 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Research site
City
Bad Doberan
State/Province
Mecklegurg-Vorpommern
ZIP/Postal Code
18209
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research site
City
Ratingen
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
40882
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research site
City
Vogelsang
State/Province
Sachsen-Anhalt
ZIP/Postal Code
39245
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research site
City
Dresden
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
01067
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
22143
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research site
City
Rendsburg
ZIP/Postal Code
24768
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1027
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1083
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Research site
City
Bangalore
State/Province
Karnataka
ZIP/Postal Code
560054
Country
India
Facility Name
Research site
City
Hubli
State/Province
Karnataka
ZIP/Postal Code
580021
Country
India
Facility Name
Research site
City
Pune
State/Province
Maharashtra
ZIP/Postal Code
411001
Country
India
Facility Name
Research site
City
Pune
State/Province
Maharashtra
ZIP/Postal Code
411005
Country
India
Facility Name
Research site
City
Pune
State/Province
Maharashtra
ZIP/Postal Code
411007
Country
India
Facility Name
Research site
City
Bīkaner
State/Province
Rajasthan
ZIP/Postal Code
334003
Country
India
Facility Name
Research site
City
Jaipur
State/Province
Rajasthan
ZIP/Postal Code
302001
Country
India
Facility Name
Research site
City
Kolkata
State/Province
West Bengal
ZIP/Postal Code
700107
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Anyang
ZIP/Postal Code
14068
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Busan
ZIP/Postal Code
49201
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Busan
ZIP/Postal Code
49241
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Daegu
ZIP/Postal Code
41944
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Daegu
ZIP/Postal Code
42472
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Daejeon
ZIP/Postal Code
35015
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Gwangju
ZIP/Postal Code
61469
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Jeju
ZIP/Postal Code
63241
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
03080
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
04763
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
07061
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Suwon
ZIP/Postal Code
16247
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Durango
ZIP/Postal Code
34000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mexico City
ZIP/Postal Code
06700
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mexico City
ZIP/Postal Code
07020
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Research site
City
Gdańsk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-952
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research site
City
Kraków
ZIP/Postal Code
30-033
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research site
City
Kraków
ZIP/Postal Code
30-363
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research site
City
Kłodzko
ZIP/Postal Code
57-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research site
City
Nowa Sól
ZIP/Postal Code
67-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research site
City
Oświęcim
ZIP/Postal Code
32-600
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research site
City
Poznań
ZIP/Postal Code
60-773
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research site
City
Poznań
ZIP/Postal Code
61-113
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research site
City
Tychy
ZIP/Postal Code
43-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
00-660
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
03-291
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research site
City
Wrocław
ZIP/Postal Code
51-128
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research site
City
Zamość
ZIP/Postal Code
22-400
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Fuenlabrada
ZIP/Postal Code
28942
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
La Coruña
ZIP/Postal Code
15006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
La Coruña
ZIP/Postal Code
15702
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
La Coruña
ZIP/Postal Code
15706
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41010
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41014
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

PK, PD, Safety, and Efficacy of SAIT101 Versus MabThera® Versus Rituxan® in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs