search
Back to results

Comparing the Effectiveness of Two Dietary Interventions for Fecal Incontinence

Primary Purpose

Fecal Incontinence

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
low fodmap diet
Psyllium
Sponsored by
University of Michigan
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Fecal Incontinence focused on measuring fodmap diet

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Experience at least 1 episode/week of unintentional loss of stool associated with diarrhea/loose stool (Bristol stool scale of 5 or greater).
  2. Subjects aged 18 and older meeting the Rome III criteria for Functional Fecal incontinence diagnostic criteria:

Recurrent uncontrolled passage of fecal material in an individual and one or more of the following:

  1. Abnormal functioning of normally innervated and structurally intact muscles
  2. Minor abnormalities of sphincter structure and/or innervation
  3. Normal or disordered bowel habits, (i.e., diarrhea) Criteria fulfilled for the last 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Abnormal innervation caused by lesion(s) within the brain (e.g., dementia), spinal cord, or sacral nerve roots, or mixed lesions (e.g., multiple sclerosis), or as part of a generalized peripheral or autonomic neuropathy
  2. Anal sphincter abnormalities associated with a multisystem disease (e.g., scleroderma)
  3. Structural or neurogenic abnormalities believed to be the major or primary cause of fecal incontinence
  4. Have cognitive dysfunction or unable to understand or provide written informed consent
  5. Pregnancy
  6. FI with solid stool only
  7. Comorbid medical problems that may affect gastrointestinal transit or motility: Inflammatory bowel disease, Extraintestinal disease known to affect the gastrointestinal system (i.e., scleroderma, unstable thyroid disease, etc.),Severe renal or hepatic disease
  8. Previous abdominal surgery other than appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and gynecologic/urologic surgery.
  9. . Previous treatment with low FODMAP diet.
  10. Concurrent medications not permitted including probiotics, antibiotics, and narcotics.
  11. Active participation in another form of dietary therapy.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Michigan

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

low fodmap diet

psyllium

Arm Description

Subjects receive formalized teaching in low fodmap diet by a dietician

subjects receive 7.1 g of psyllium daily

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in number of FI episodes from baseline to week 4
Will compare baseline number of FI episodes to number of FI episodes at week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

number of people responding with decreased score in stool consistency
For stool consistency, a responder with improvement will be defined as one who reports a decrease in mean daily BSFS value ( on a scale of 1-7 with 7 being watery stool) of 1 or more compared to baseline for ≥2 of 4 treatment weeks. The proportion of responders between the 2 groups will be compared.
number of people responding with reduction in stool frequency
The number of bowel movements will be recorded each day. Mean daily stool frequency will be averaged for each treatment group at baseline and weekly through week 4. These averages will be compared for the two groups.
Change in stool wet weight
The difference in stool mean wet weight between baseline and during week 4 will be calculated. The change from baseline for each group will be compared.
Change in Fecal incontinence severity index (FISI)
Compare baseline fecal incontinence severity index with 4 week FISI score.
Change in Fecal incontinence quality of life measure (FIqol)
Compare baseline fecal incontinence quality of life with 4 week Fiqol score
Change in Short Form Health survey-36
Compare baseline generalized QOL with 4 week SF-36
Number of participants with reduction in fecal incontinence episodes of ≥50% during weeks 3 & 4 of each diet compared with baseline
Responders are those participants with a reduction in FI episodes of > 50%. The reduction will be measured by the change in mean number of episodes in week 3 and 4 (averaged) from baseline.

Full Information

First Posted
April 25, 2016
Last Updated
August 27, 2019
Sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
The Rome Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02828384
Brief Title
Comparing the Effectiveness of Two Dietary Interventions for Fecal Incontinence
Official Title
Comparing the Effectiveness of Two Dietary Interventions for Fecal Incontinence: a Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
The Rome Foundation

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Background: Fecal incontinence (FI) is a common complaint, and is often associated with diarrhea and urgency. Foods that are high in fermentable oligo-, di-, and mono-saccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) cause symptoms of diarrhea and urgency. Thus, assessing the impact of a low FODMAP diet in FI patients is needed. Aims: Compare the treatment response with a low FODMAP vs. psyllium based on number of episodes in patients with FI. Compare the efficacy of a low FODMAP diet vs. psyllium in patients with FI on pre-specified clinical and quality of life endpoints. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized control trial of adults meeting the Rome III criteria for FI and at least 1 episode of FI due to loose stool per week. After a 2 week screening period and randomization, during which the severity of symptoms will be assessed and eligibility determined, patients will be randomized to psyllium vs. low FODMAP diet for 4 weeks. A total of 20 patients will be recruited for each arm. The primary endpoint will be treatment response based on number of incontinence episodes. A treatment response is defined as a reduction in the number of FI episodes/week.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Fecal Incontinence
Keywords
fodmap diet

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
low fodmap diet
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects receive formalized teaching in low fodmap diet by a dietician
Arm Title
psyllium
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
subjects receive 7.1 g of psyllium daily
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
low fodmap diet
Intervention Description
dietary teaching
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
Psyllium
Intervention Description
7.1g of psyllium daily
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in number of FI episodes from baseline to week 4
Description
Will compare baseline number of FI episodes to number of FI episodes at week 4
Time Frame
4 weeks from baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
number of people responding with decreased score in stool consistency
Description
For stool consistency, a responder with improvement will be defined as one who reports a decrease in mean daily BSFS value ( on a scale of 1-7 with 7 being watery stool) of 1 or more compared to baseline for ≥2 of 4 treatment weeks. The proportion of responders between the 2 groups will be compared.
Time Frame
4 week span from baseline
Title
number of people responding with reduction in stool frequency
Description
The number of bowel movements will be recorded each day. Mean daily stool frequency will be averaged for each treatment group at baseline and weekly through week 4. These averages will be compared for the two groups.
Time Frame
4 weeks from baseline
Title
Change in stool wet weight
Description
The difference in stool mean wet weight between baseline and during week 4 will be calculated. The change from baseline for each group will be compared.
Time Frame
4 weeks from baseline
Title
Change in Fecal incontinence severity index (FISI)
Description
Compare baseline fecal incontinence severity index with 4 week FISI score.
Time Frame
4 weeks from baseline
Title
Change in Fecal incontinence quality of life measure (FIqol)
Description
Compare baseline fecal incontinence quality of life with 4 week Fiqol score
Time Frame
4 weeks from baseline
Title
Change in Short Form Health survey-36
Description
Compare baseline generalized QOL with 4 week SF-36
Time Frame
4 weeks from baseline
Title
Number of participants with reduction in fecal incontinence episodes of ≥50% during weeks 3 & 4 of each diet compared with baseline
Description
Responders are those participants with a reduction in FI episodes of > 50%. The reduction will be measured by the change in mean number of episodes in week 3 and 4 (averaged) from baseline.
Time Frame
4 weeks from baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria Experience at least 1 episode/week of unintentional loss of stool associated with diarrhea/loose stool (Bristol stool scale of 5 or greater). Subjects aged 18 and older meeting the Rome III criteria for Functional Fecal incontinence diagnostic criteria: Recurrent uncontrolled passage of fecal material in an individual and one or more of the following: Abnormal functioning of normally innervated and structurally intact muscles Minor abnormalities of sphincter structure and/or innervation Normal or disordered bowel habits, (i.e., diarrhea) Criteria fulfilled for the last 3 months Exclusion Criteria Abnormal innervation caused by lesion(s) within the brain (e.g., dementia), spinal cord, or sacral nerve roots, or mixed lesions (e.g., multiple sclerosis), or as part of a generalized peripheral or autonomic neuropathy Anal sphincter abnormalities associated with a multisystem disease (e.g., scleroderma) Structural or neurogenic abnormalities believed to be the major or primary cause of fecal incontinence Have cognitive dysfunction or unable to understand or provide written informed consent Pregnancy FI with solid stool only Comorbid medical problems that may affect gastrointestinal transit or motility: Inflammatory bowel disease, Extraintestinal disease known to affect the gastrointestinal system (i.e., scleroderma, unstable thyroid disease, etc.),Severe renal or hepatic disease Previous abdominal surgery other than appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and gynecologic/urologic surgery. . Previous treatment with low FODMAP diet. Concurrent medications not permitted including probiotics, antibiotics, and narcotics. Active participation in another form of dietary therapy.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stacy B Menees, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Michigan
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Michigan
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35060943
Citation
Menees SB, Jackson K, Baker JR, Fenner DE, Eswaran S, Nojkov B, Saad R, Lee AA, Chey WD. A Randomized Pilot Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Low FODMAP Diet vs Psyllium in Patients With Fecal Incontinence and Loose Stools. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 19;13(3):e00454. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000454.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Comparing the Effectiveness of Two Dietary Interventions for Fecal Incontinence

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs