search
Back to results

Safety and Feasibility of IRE for SRMs

Primary Purpose

Kidney Cancer

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Irreversible Electroporation
Sponsored by
Dr. Prof. M.P. Laguna Pes
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Kidney Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Solid, enhancing mass on cross sectional imaging
  • Signed informed consent
  • Candidate for focal ablative therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Irreversible bleeding disorders
  • Inability/unwillingness to interrupt anticoagulation therapy
  • Previous cryoablation, RFA or partial nephrectomy in affected kidney
  • Anaesthesia Surgical Assignment (ASA), category ≤ IV
  • ICD / pacemaker

Sites / Locations

  • Academic Medical Center (AMC)Recruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Irreversible electroporation (IRE)

Arm Description

IRE is based on high current electric pulses, transferred between two or more placed needle electrodes. Charging the cell membrane causes holes in the cell membrane called "nanopores", resulting in increased permeability of the cell and subsequent cell death.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

safety IRE ablation procedure (evaluating device and procedural adverse events using CTCAE v4.0)
To determine the safety and feasibility of IRE ablation of small renal masses (≤ 4cm), by evaluating device and procedural adverse events using CTCAE v4.0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Clinical efficacy ((non-)presence of tumour enhancement on cross-sectional imaging post IRE)
To determine the clinical efficacy of IRE ablation of small renal masses (≤ 4cm), assessed by calculating recurrence and residual disease at follow-up, measured through the (non-)presence of tumour enhancement on cross-sectional imaging post IRE
Cross sectional imaging post ablation
To evaluate the use of CT, MRI, and CEUS in the imaging of ablation success, extend of the ablation zone, 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post IRE
Renal function
To evaluate the effect of RE ablation of small renal masses (≤ 4cm) on the renal function, measured by serum creatinine levels and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
Average length of hospital stay
To evaluate the effect of IRE ablation of small renal masses (≤ 4cm) on the length of hospital stay, measured in average stay in days
Quality of Life
To evaluate the effect of IRE ablation of small renal masses (≤ 4cm) on the quality of life, assessed through SF-36 questionnaires
Postoperative pain score
To asses the effect of IRE ablation of small renal masses (≤ 4cm), assessed through VAS score and analgesics use

Full Information

First Posted
July 4, 2016
Last Updated
September 26, 2016
Sponsor
Dr. Prof. M.P. Laguna Pes
Collaborators
Angiodynamics, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02828709
Brief Title
Safety and Feasibility of IRE for SRMs
Official Title
The Safety and Feasibility of Irreversible Electroporation for the Ablation of Small Renal Masses
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
July 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2019 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Dr. Prof. M.P. Laguna Pes
Collaborators
Angiodynamics, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) is an emerging technique delivering electrical pulses to ablate tissue, with the theoretical advantage to overcome the main shortcomings of conventional thermal ablation. Recent short-term research showed that IRE for the ablation of renal masses is a safe and feasible treatment option. In an ablate and resect design, histopathological analysis 4 weeks after radical nephrectomy demonstrated that IRE targeted renal tumors were completely covered by ablation zone. In order to develop a validated long-term IRE follow-up study, it is essential to obtain clinical confirmation of the efficacy of this novel technology. Additionally, follow-up after IRE ablation obliges verification of a suitable imaging modality. The objectives of this study are the clinical efficacy and safety of IRE ablation of renal masses and to evaluate the use of cross-sectional imaging modalities in the follow-up after IRE in renal tumours. This is a prospective, human, in-vivo study among 20 patients presenting with solid enhancing SRM on cross sectional imaging suspect for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Preoperatively, imaging is required through Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CT). Furthermore, serum creatinine levels and VAS scores are obtained. A biopsy of the SRM will be performed in preoperative setting. IRE ablation will be performed using CT-guidance and ablation success will be measured directly after the ablation through contrast-enhanced CT. Device related adverse events (AE) will be registered using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 guideline. One week post ablation only CEUS and MRI will be performed to limit exposure to ionizing radiation. At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post ablation CEUS, MRI and CT will be performed. Additionally, at these time points serum creatinine levels and VAS scores will be obtained, and quality of life will be assessed through SF-36 questionnaires. Residual and recurrent disease will be assessed through tissue enhancement on cross sectional imaging.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Kidney Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
20 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Irreversible electroporation (IRE)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
IRE is based on high current electric pulses, transferred between two or more placed needle electrodes. Charging the cell membrane causes holes in the cell membrane called "nanopores", resulting in increased permeability of the cell and subsequent cell death.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Irreversible Electroporation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Nanoknife
Intervention Description
Guided by CT and accompanied by an external spacer for fixation, needle electrodes will be placed. The amount of probes and probe placement will be attuned for specific tumour size and location, granting 15mm between the electrodes with an active tip length of 15mm. IRE pulses with pulse intensity of 1500 V/cm will be delivered in 90 consecutive pulses of 90µs.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
safety IRE ablation procedure (evaluating device and procedural adverse events using CTCAE v4.0)
Description
To determine the safety and feasibility of IRE ablation of small renal masses (≤ 4cm), by evaluating device and procedural adverse events using CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical efficacy ((non-)presence of tumour enhancement on cross-sectional imaging post IRE)
Description
To determine the clinical efficacy of IRE ablation of small renal masses (≤ 4cm), assessed by calculating recurrence and residual disease at follow-up, measured through the (non-)presence of tumour enhancement on cross-sectional imaging post IRE
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Cross sectional imaging post ablation
Description
To evaluate the use of CT, MRI, and CEUS in the imaging of ablation success, extend of the ablation zone, 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post IRE
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Renal function
Description
To evaluate the effect of RE ablation of small renal masses (≤ 4cm) on the renal function, measured by serum creatinine levels and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Average length of hospital stay
Description
To evaluate the effect of IRE ablation of small renal masses (≤ 4cm) on the length of hospital stay, measured in average stay in days
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Quality of Life
Description
To evaluate the effect of IRE ablation of small renal masses (≤ 4cm) on the quality of life, assessed through SF-36 questionnaires
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Postoperative pain score
Description
To asses the effect of IRE ablation of small renal masses (≤ 4cm), assessed through VAS score and analgesics use
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years Solid, enhancing mass on cross sectional imaging Signed informed consent Candidate for focal ablative therapy Exclusion Criteria: Irreversible bleeding disorders Inability/unwillingness to interrupt anticoagulation therapy Previous cryoablation, RFA or partial nephrectomy in affected kidney Anaesthesia Surgical Assignment (ASA), category ≤ IV ICD / pacemaker
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Mara Buijs, MD
Phone
+31(0)205665793
Email
m.buijs@amc.uva.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Maria Pilar Laguna Pes, MD, PhD
Phone
+31(0)205666928
Email
m.p.lagunapes@amc.uva.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maria Pilar Laguna Pes, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Academic Medical Center (AMC) Amsterdam
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Academic Medical Center (AMC)
City
Amsterdam
State/Province
Noord-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
1105AZ
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mara Buijs, MD
Phone
+31(0)20-5665793
Email
m.buijs@amc.uva.nl

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21439847
Citation
Thomson KR, Cheung W, Ellis SJ, Federman D, Kavnoudias H, Loader-Oliver D, Roberts S, Evans P, Ball C, Haydon A. Investigation of the safety of irreversible electroporation in humans. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 May;22(5):611-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.12.014. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26341653
Citation
Wendler JJ, Ricke J, Pech M, Fischbach F, Jurgens J, Siedentopf S, Roessner A, Porsch M, Baumunk D, Schostak M, Kollermann J, Liehr UB. First Delayed Resection Findings After Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) of Human Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) in the IRENE Pilot Phase 2a Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Feb;39(2):239-50. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1200-6. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26250855
Citation
Trimmer CK, Khosla A, Morgan M, Stephenson SL, Ozayar A, Cadeddu JA. Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Treatment of Small Renal Tumors with Irreversible Electroporation: A Single-Center Experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Oct;26(10):1465-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.06.028. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20711837
Citation
Pech M, Janitzky A, Wendler JJ, Strang C, Blaschke S, Dudeck O, Ricke J, Liehr UB. Irreversible electroporation of renal cell carcinoma: a first-in-man phase I clinical study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011 Feb;34(1):132-8. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-9964-1. Epub 2010 Aug 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26449559
Citation
van den Bos W, de Bruin DM, van Randen A, Engelbrecht MR, Postema AW, Muller BG, Varkarakis IM, Skolarikos A, Savci-Heijink CD, Jurhill RR, Zondervan PJ, Laguna Pes MP, Wijkstra H, de Reijke TM, de la Rosette JJ. MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy. Eur Radiol. 2016 Jul;26(7):2252-60. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4042-3. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26703782
Citation
van den Bos W, Scheffer HJ, Vogel JA, Wagstaff PG, de Bruin DM, de Jong MC, van Gemert MJ, de la Rosette JJ, Meijerink MR, Klaessens JH, Verdaasdonk RM. Thermal Energy during Irreversible Electroporation and the Influence of Different Ablation Parameters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):433-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.10.020. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25557146
Citation
Wagstaff PG, de Bruin DM, van den Bos W, Ingels A, van Gemert MJ, Zondervan PJ, Verdaasdonk RM, van Lienden KP, van Leeuwen TG, de la Rosette JJ, Laguna Pes MP. Irreversible electroporation of the porcine kidney: Temperature development and distribution. Urol Oncol. 2015 Apr;33(4):168.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.11.019. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28209559
Citation
Buijs M, van Lienden KP, Wagstaff PG, Scheltema MJ, de Bruin DM, Zondervan PJ, van Delden OM, van Leeuwen TG, de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP. Irreversible Electroporation for the Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective, Human, In Vivo Study Protocol (IDEAL Phase 2b). JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Feb 16;6(2):e21. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6725.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Safety and Feasibility of IRE for SRMs

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs