Purastat® vs Standard Therapy for Haemostasis During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Primary Purpose
Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PuraStat®
Electrocautery
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage focused on measuring Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection, Bleeding
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
- An ESD is attempted for clinical indications approved by MDT.
- Oesophageal or colonic lesion 2-5cm in size
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known coagulopathy likely to affect risk of bleeding
- Submucosal tumour
- Anticoagulation or anti-platelet therapy (apart from single modality aspirin or clopidogrel) which cannot be stopped for clinical reasons
- Patient preference
Sites / Locations
- Portsmputh Hospitals NHS Trust
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Other
Arm Label
PuraStat®
Standard Electrocautery
Arm Description
Interventional arm: PuraStat® applied through a catheter delivery system via the endoscope is used to stop bleeding during ESD.
Control arm where standard electrocautery delivered via the endoscopic knife tip or coag grasper is used to achieve haemostasis during ESD
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The number of times intraprocedural heat therapy is used to achieve haemostasis in ESD in both the PuraStat® and control arms of the study
Secondary Outcome Measures
The length of the procedure in the PuraStat® and control arm of the study
The number of patients with delayed bleeding (bleeding within 28 days) in both the PuraStat® and control arm of the study
Wound healing in the PuraStat® and control arm at 6 weeks post ESD
Wound healing will be measured at endoscopy using qualitative descriptor categories (active ulceration, healing ulceration, scarring or complete mucosal healing). There is no standard definition to qualify ulcer healing post ESD but these categories have previously been used by Uraoka et al in a similar study published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Vol 83, No 6:2016.1259-1264).
Number of adverse events in the PuraStat® and control arm of the study
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02833558
First Posted
June 29, 2016
Last Updated
June 21, 2018
Sponsor
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02833558
Brief Title
Purastat® vs Standard Therapy for Haemostasis During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Official Title
Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Purastat® to Standard Therapy for Haemostasis Control During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 4, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 12, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 18, 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an endoscopic resection technique used to treat superficial neoplasia in the gastrointestinal tract. Bleeding is a commonly encountered problem during submucosal dissection and is usually managed with electrocautery. However, this does carry a risk of deep thermal injury and perforation.
PuraStat® is a novel extracellular scaffold matrix of amino acids that forms a transparent adherent barrier when applied to a bleeding point.
The aim of this trial is to study the use of PuraStat® in reducing the need for thermal haemostasis during ESD.
Detailed Description
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an endoscopic technique that involves the use of an endoscopic knife to gently peel off a superficial neoplasia of any size in an en-bloc fashion. It meets the principles of onco-surgery and is associated with excellent outcomes. A difficulty however with the technique is control of bleeding during the procedure. The GI mucosa is a vascular territory and the current method of managing intraprocedural bleeding is electrocautery using either the endoscopic knife itself or the coag grasper. This introduces a thermal injury to the bowel wall and carries the risk of causing a perforation or causing pain. Furthermore, it requires precise targeting of the bleeding vessel. Practically this can be challenging, particularly if the coag grasper is needed which is a bulky device and can be difficult to apply precisely in some locations.
PuraStat® (3-D Matrix Ltd, Tokyo) is a liquid which is applied to a bleeding area which acts rapidly to form a gel coat which induces haemostasis. This transparent adherent barrier permits further endoscopic therapy to be performed. It can be applied in the general area of bleeding and does not require precise application to the exact point of bleeding. It is applied through a small catheter placed through the biopsy channel of the endoscope which can be used in very small spaces.
PuraStat® is licensed as a CE marked device for use in exudative haemorrhage from vessels in solid organs and within the GI tract. Given this indication, the role of PuraStat in ESD needs to be explored as it could reduce the need for thermal haemostasis. This would be of significant clinical benefit during ESD.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage
Keywords
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection, Bleeding
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
101 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
PuraStat®
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Interventional arm: PuraStat® applied through a catheter delivery system via the endoscope is used to stop bleeding during ESD.
Arm Title
Standard Electrocautery
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Control arm where standard electrocautery delivered via the endoscopic knife tip or coag grasper is used to achieve haemostasis during ESD
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
PuraStat®
Intervention Description
PuraStat® gel is applied through a safe catheter delivery system (via endoscope) over the bleeding point
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Electrocautery
Intervention Description
Electrocautery (coagulation current) to stop bleeding during ESD
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The number of times intraprocedural heat therapy is used to achieve haemostasis in ESD in both the PuraStat® and control arms of the study
Time Frame
Measured during the ESD procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The length of the procedure in the PuraStat® and control arm of the study
Time Frame
Measured during the ESD procedure
Title
The number of patients with delayed bleeding (bleeding within 28 days) in both the PuraStat® and control arm of the study
Time Frame
28 days
Title
Wound healing in the PuraStat® and control arm at 6 weeks post ESD
Description
Wound healing will be measured at endoscopy using qualitative descriptor categories (active ulceration, healing ulceration, scarring or complete mucosal healing). There is no standard definition to qualify ulcer healing post ESD but these categories have previously been used by Uraoka et al in a similar study published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Vol 83, No 6:2016.1259-1264).
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
Number of adverse events in the PuraStat® and control arm of the study
Time Frame
14 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
An ESD is attempted for clinical indications approved by MDT.
Oesophageal or colonic lesion 2-5cm in size
Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
Known coagulopathy likely to affect risk of bleeding
Submucosal tumour
Anticoagulation or anti-platelet therapy (apart from single modality aspirin or clopidogrel) which cannot be stopped for clinical reasons
Patient preference
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pradeep Bhandari, MBBS, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Portsmputh Hospitals NHS Trust
City
Portsmouth
ZIP/Postal Code
PO6 3LY
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
Learn more about this trial
Purastat® vs Standard Therapy for Haemostasis During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs