search
Back to results

Examining the Impact of Physician Influence on Hearing Aid User Satisfaction and Retention

Primary Purpose

Hearing Loss

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Fitting Audiologist completion
Participant's Physician completion
Sponsored by
University of British Columbia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hearing Loss

Eligibility Criteria

55 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 55 years of age or older
  • Sensorineural hearing loss greater than 25 dB averaged over frequencies 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 KHz; or 2, 3 and 4 KHz on pure tone audiometry in either ear.
  • Have used a hearing for up to 21 days after being fitted

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 55 years
  • Unable to follow doctor/audiologist's instructions
  • Previous hearing aid use

Sites / Locations

  • Vancouver General Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Control Group

Test Group

Arm Description

Fitting Audiologist completion of the Client Outcome Scale of Improvement at a post fitting follow up visit.

Participant's physician completion of the Client Outcome Scale of Improvement at a post fitting follow up visit.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life questionnaire score
Participant determined satisfaction level with the hearing aid based on the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire score.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of Hearing aid returned
Participant dissatisfaction with the hearing aid based on the proportion of hearing aids returned

Full Information

First Posted
July 13, 2016
Last Updated
February 15, 2022
Sponsor
University of British Columbia
Collaborators
NexGen Hearing Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02842905
Brief Title
Examining the Impact of Physician Influence on Hearing Aid User Satisfaction and Retention
Official Title
Examining the Impact of Physician Influence on Hearing Aid User Satisfaction and Retention
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of British Columbia
Collaborators
NexGen Hearing Inc.

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Most of us will experience some degree of hearing loss as we get older. It can affect one or both ears and without treatment causes difficulty with following conversations in the home or workplace. Audiologists are trained to diagnose and treat hearing loss and tinnitus problems. They also dispense, and fit hearing aids. Physicians do not provide or fit hearing aids directly, however they diagnose hearing loss and can recommend hearing aids amongst other treatments for hearing loss. It is undecided whether consulting with a physician in addition to an audiologist will improve user's satisfaction with hearing aids, compared to consulting with an audiologist alone. The purpose of this study is to determine whether physician involvement (in addition to an audiologist) in the hearing aid fitting process improves users' satisfaction with hearing aids. The study utilizes questionnaires to assess satisfaction with hearing aids. Furthermore, participants decision to keep the purchased hearing aids will be recorded. The study will take place in the clinics of family doctors, Otolaryngology (Ear) surgeons and audiologists. A hearing aid suitable for the needs of the participant will be fitted by an audiologist. In the first 21days after the fitting, participants will attend follow-up visits with the audiologists for adjustments to the hearing aids to best meet their specific listening needs. After 21 days, eligible participants will be allocated to either the Control or Test groups. Participants in both groups will be asked to describe the change in their hearing performance related to the use of hearing aids to their audiologist(Control) or Physician (Test) at a follow-up visit. At the study's final visit, participants will be asked to complete a satisfaction-based questionnaire. The time taken to fit a hearing aid varies depending on the individual needs of the patient. It is estimated that at most 10 visits will be required over 90 days to complete the hearing aid fitting and study processes. These visits will be of 30 minutes duration on average, except for the initial and final visits which lasts for 45 minutes. A patient will spend a maximum of 330 minutes to complete the hearing aid fitting process, but only 25 minutes of this time will be specifically related to the study. The study is intended to determine the satisfaction with hearing aids and consultations with health professionals.
Detailed Description
Description of study design This study seeks to determine if additional patient benefit is derived from involving the referring physician in the hearing aid fitting process using the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) process. The COSI process is a well-known methodology that consists of two consecutive phases: Phase I is completed by the client with the Audiologist either at the time of initial hearing aid fitting or within 21 days thereafter. The patient is asked to list any specific listening environment/situations in which he/she would like to improve his/her hearing with the assistance of wearing hearing aids; Phase II occurs within days 22 to 76 from the day the hearing aid device is fitted and is also normally completed by the patient and the Audiologist. In this phase, the patient indicates any degree of change in the specific listening environment/situations he/she had previously listed (wearing the hearing aid). Two methods will be used for study purposes to assess patient satisfaction with hearing aid use 77 to 90 days post fitting: (1) the validated SADL questionnaire described previously will be completed by the patient and (2) the number of hearing aids returned up to 90 days post initial fitting will be recorded. The study will consist of two groups: a control group and a test group. Both groups will undergo Phase I of the COSI process with the fitting Audiologist. Patients in the control group will undergo Phase II of the COSI process as part of their follow up with the audiologist, whereas those in the test group will complete Phase II of the COSI process in a scheduled visit with their referring physician before further follow-up with the audiologist. Participants will be recruited from the investigating audiologists' clinics in Vancouver. The study involvement time for each participant will extend over a period of 90 days. Routine Clinical Practice A complete hearing aid fitting takes place over the course of several clinic visits each on average 30-45 minutes in duration. These include the initial hearing test and consultation, actual fitting, and any subsequent post-fitting adjustments. During hearing evaluation and post-fitting follow-up sessions, a COSI questionnaire is used by audiologists as part of routine clinical practice to guide optimal hearing aid adjustment to meet the patient's listening needs. Time schedule The time taken to fit a hearing aid varies depending on the needs of the patient. Very often clients over the age of 55 have problems with dexterity, memory and other health impairments that extend the length of individual consultations. Some patients require more clinic consultations than others. Anecdotally it is estimated that the maximal number of visits required to complete the hearing aid fitting process is 10 visits over 90 days. These visits on average will be of 30 minutes in duration except for the initial and final visits which lasts for 45 minutes. A patient will spend a maximum of 330 minutes to complete the hearing aid fitting process of which 25 minutes will be related to study specific procedures. Subjects Patients referred by General practitioners or Otolaryngologists for hearing aid fittings to the offices of two Audiologists who meet the inclusion criteria will be provided with details of the study including a participant information and consent form at their initial evaluation. Study Procedures Recruitment Patients who satisfy the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in the study and complete a study consent form. Allocation Consenting patients will be assigned a study ID and randomized into the Control or Test group using a table of random numbers. Intervention Process Consenting patients will be randomised using a random number table to have a post-fitting visit between days 21 to 60 after the initial hearing aid fitting with an Audiologist (Control group) or the referring Physician (Test Group). At this visit the audiologist or physician will document the degree of hearing change in specific listening environment/situations as a result of hearing aid use by following the COSI questionnaire. This visit will be for a maximum of 30 minutes. A follow-up visit of this nature is part of routine clinical practice for the participating audiologist. The physician visit is the novel study intervention after which the patient returns for all subsequent follow-ups with the hearing aid fitting audiologist in keeping with routine clinical practice. Patient data to be collected Demographics: • age, sex Clinical data: • degree of hearing loss Data Analysis The primary indicator of patient satisfaction will be the scored 15-item SADL questionnaire. The Statistical Program for the Social Sciences will be used to undertake a t-test or ANOVA comparison of the mean total SADL questionnaire scores in the Control and Test groups. The secondary outcome measure hearing aid returns, will be assessed by Chi-squared tests of the proportion of returned hearing aids returned in both groups.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hearing Loss

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
133 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Fitting Audiologist completion of the Client Outcome Scale of Improvement at a post fitting follow up visit.
Arm Title
Test Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participant's physician completion of the Client Outcome Scale of Improvement at a post fitting follow up visit.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Fitting Audiologist completion
Intervention Description
Phase II of the COSI (Client Oriented Scale of Improvement) questionnaire completed in a scheduled visit with the fitting Audiologist
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Participant's Physician completion
Intervention Description
Phase II of the COSI (Client Oriented Scale of Improvement) questionnaire completed in a scheduled visit with the Participant's Physician
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life questionnaire score
Description
Participant determined satisfaction level with the hearing aid based on the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire score.
Time Frame
SADL questionnaire completed at patient's final visit or when hearing aid is returned (77-90 days from initial hearing aid fitting)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of Hearing aid returned
Description
Participant dissatisfaction with the hearing aid based on the proportion of hearing aids returned
Time Frame
77-90 day post fitting

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 55 years of age or older Sensorineural hearing loss greater than 25 dB averaged over frequencies 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 KHz; or 2, 3 and 4 KHz on pure tone audiometry in either ear. Have used a hearing for up to 21 days after being fitted Exclusion Criteria: Age under 55 years Unable to follow doctor/audiologist's instructions Previous hearing aid use
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Desmond Nunez, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of British Columbia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Vancouver General Hospital
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z1M9
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
We intend to IPD post publication of the study's findings. We estimate that this will be from July 2019
IPD Sharing Time Frame
From July 2019- June 2020
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
By contacting corresponding author in peer reviewed publication.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35588353
Citation
Zhao K, Hambley M, Venema T, Marynewich S, McNeely B, Nunez DA. Effect of Physician Consultation on Satisfaction With Hearing Aid Use: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Jul 1;148(7):630-635. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.0927.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Examining the Impact of Physician Influence on Hearing Aid User Satisfaction and Retention

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs