Mini Thoracoscopy vs Semirigid Thoracoscopy in Exudative Pleural Effusions (MIST)
Primary Purpose
Pleural Effusion
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
India
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mini Thoracoscopy
SemiRigid Thoracoscopy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Pleural Effusion
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age >18 years Presence of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion as determined by the criteria detailed by Light et al where a specific diagnosis was not obtained after initial cytological and/or microbiological examinations.
Adequate rib spaces for successful performance of thoracoscopy as judged by clinical examination Adequate pleural fluid space as judged by pre-procedural USG chest
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Coagulopathy (platelet count < 50000/mm3, INR > 1.5)
- Unstable hemodynamic status ( SBP > 180, DBP> 100 or SBP< 90 mm Hg / heart failure
- Myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the last 6 wk
- Hypoxemia not correctable with low flow oxygen (SpO2 <90% despite low flow oxygen @ 1-2 l/min)
- Extensive rib crowding as judged by clinical examination
- Extensive adhesions and lack of pleural space on USG chest
- Refusal of consent
Sites / Locations
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Mini Thoracoscopy
Semirigid Thoracoscopy
Arm Description
Thoracoscopy procedure shall be performed using the Rigid Mini Thoracoscope
Thoracoscopy procedure shall be performed using the SemiRigid Thoracoscope
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Diagnostic Yield
Proportion of diagnostic biopsies in the two arms
Secondary Outcome Measures
Sedation dose
Comparison of sedative and analgesic agent doses between the two groups
Complications
Complications related to the procedure
Procedural pain
Patient rated procedural pain on Visual Analogue Scale
Operator rated pain
Operator rated procedural pain on Visual Analogue Scale
Operator rated overall procedure satisfaction
Operator rated overall procedure satisfaction on Visual Analogue Scale
Biopsy Size
Mean size of biopsy obtained during pleural biopsy procedure
Alternate equipment
Requirement of conversion to alternate equipment for pleural biopsy
Image quality
Operator rated image quality of pleural visualization (VAS)
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02851927
First Posted
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
December 25, 2018
Sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02851927
Brief Title
Mini Thoracoscopy vs Semirigid Thoracoscopy in Exudative Pleural Effusions
Acronym
MIST
Official Title
Rigid 'Mini-thoracoscopy' vs Semirigid Thoracoscopy in Undiagnosed Exudative Pleural Effusions : A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Undiagnosed pleural effusion is a diagnostic dilemma especially in exudative pleural effusions (EPE). 20-40 % are unable to be attributed to a specific diagnosis, even after thoracentesis and closed pleural biopsy. Thoracoscopy has been demonstrated to increase the diagnostic yield in undiagnosed EPE. The diagnostic yield of thoracoscopy in malignant and TB pleural effusion ranges from 91% to 94% and 93% to 100%, respectively.
Rigid thoracoscopy has traditionally been the modality of choice. The recently introduced semirigid thoracoscope provides ease of handling like a flexible bronchoscope. However, there are concerns about the diagnostic yield of semi-rigid thoracoscopy when compared with rigid thoracoscopy. According to the available literature, the yield of semirigid and rigid thoracoscopy is almost similar if adequate pleural biopsy is obtained. However there are concerns that with semi-rigid thoracoscope, there might be greater incidence of inability to obtain adequate pleural biopsy. On the other hand, the use of conventional rigid thoracoscope may be associated with greater procedure related pain.Mini-Thoracoscopy is a newer rigid thoracoscopy instrument which is smaller in diameter (5.5 mm) and may allow pleural biopsy with a smaller incision. There is scant literature on its utility. The investigators hereby propose to undertake a randomized comparison of rigid 'mini thoracoscope' vs semi rigid thoracoscope in undiagnosed pleural effusions.
Detailed Description
Patients meeting the inclusion criteria and giving prior consent for the study shall be randomised. The randomization sequence will be computer generated with variable block size and the assignments will be placed in opaque sealed envelopes. All patients will undergo hemogram, liver and renal function tests, coagulation profile, an electrocardiogram and Computed tomography (CT) of the chest before entering the study. Chest ultrasound will be performed in all patients to evaluate the rib spaces, amount of pleural fluid and for selection of the entry point.
Instruments The semi-rigid thoracoscope to be used is the autoclavable Olympus LTF-160 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) thoracoscope with 2.8 mm inner channel diameter and 7 mm outer diameter. The forceps is flexible forceps with alligator jaw with spike cusps, 2.8 mm of the outer diameter. The rigid mini thoracoscope is the Richard Wolf 5.5 mm operating endoscope with the working channel.
Thoracoscopy technique Thoracoscopy will be performed in the interventional pulmonology lab. Patients shall be fasting for solids for 8 hours and for liquids 6 hours. Patients shall be having continuous monitoring of blood pressure, pulse rate, and oxygen saturation.
Topical anesthesia will be achieved by infiltrating 2% lidocaine locally at the incision site. The procedure shall be performed under conscious sedation and analgesia using a combination of midazolam and intravenous fentanyl. An incision shall be made at the site of maximum fluid thickness as assessed by pre-procedural USG chest, with the patient in lateral decubitus position and involved side upward. After incision, the appropriately sized trocar shall be placed through the skin into the pleural space. The thoracoscope shall be inserted through the trocar. The pleural surfaces shall then be thoroughly inspected. A minimum of 6-8 pleural biopsy samples shall be obtained by semi-rigid thoracoscope and at least 4 with rigid mini-thoracoscope.
Samples shall be sent for histopathological analysis and mycobacterial cultures. At the end of the procedure, a chest tube shall be placed and removed subsequently.
All patients shall be followed up for a period of six months from the time of procedure if non-specific inflammation/ fibrinous pleuritis is the diagnosis or no definitive diagnosis is made during that time.
Statistical analysis:
Data shall be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), or percentage. Differences in continuous variables between the two groups shall be compared using Student's t test (or Mann-Whitney U test); while differences in categorical data shall be compared using the chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test). A p value of less than 0.05 shall be considered statistically significant.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pleural Effusion
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
73 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Mini Thoracoscopy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Thoracoscopy procedure shall be performed using the Rigid Mini Thoracoscope
Arm Title
Semirigid Thoracoscopy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Thoracoscopy procedure shall be performed using the SemiRigid Thoracoscope
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Mini Thoracoscopy
Intervention Description
Pleural biopsy using rigid mini thoracoscope
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
SemiRigid Thoracoscopy
Intervention Description
Pleural biopsy using semirigid thoracoscope
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Diagnostic Yield
Description
Proportion of diagnostic biopsies in the two arms
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sedation dose
Description
Comparison of sedative and analgesic agent doses between the two groups
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Complications
Description
Complications related to the procedure
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Procedural pain
Description
Patient rated procedural pain on Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Operator rated pain
Description
Operator rated procedural pain on Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Operator rated overall procedure satisfaction
Description
Operator rated overall procedure satisfaction on Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Biopsy Size
Description
Mean size of biopsy obtained during pleural biopsy procedure
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Alternate equipment
Description
Requirement of conversion to alternate equipment for pleural biopsy
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Image quality
Description
Operator rated image quality of pleural visualization (VAS)
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Ease of biopsy
Description
Ease of obtaining pleural biopsy on visual analogue scale
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Operator rated pain on scope manipulation
Description
Operator rated pain on scope manipulation on Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Expectation of diagnostic biopsy
Description
Expectation that biopsy will be diagnostic on Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Ease of manoeuvring thoracoscope
Description
Ease of scope maneuvering on Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age >18 years Presence of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion as determined by the criteria detailed by Light et al where a specific diagnosis was not obtained after initial cytological and/or microbiological examinations.
Adequate rib spaces for successful performance of thoracoscopy as judged by clinical examination Adequate pleural fluid space as judged by pre-procedural USG chest
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnancy
Coagulopathy (platelet count < 50000/mm3, INR > 1.5)
Unstable hemodynamic status ( SBP > 180, DBP> 100 or SBP< 90 mm Hg / heart failure
Myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the last 6 wk
Hypoxemia not correctable with low flow oxygen (SpO2 <90% despite low flow oxygen @ 1-2 l/min)
Extensive rib crowding as judged by clinical examination
Extensive adhesions and lack of pleural space on USG chest
Refusal of consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Randeep Guleria, MD, DM
Organizational Affiliation
AIIMS, New Delhi
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
City
New Delhi
ZIP/Postal Code
110029
Country
India
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Learn more about this trial
Mini Thoracoscopy vs Semirigid Thoracoscopy in Exudative Pleural Effusions
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs