search
Back to results

REpositionable Percutaneous Replacement of NatIve StEnotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of LOTUS EDGE Valve System (REPRISE EDGE)

Primary Purpose

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
LOTUS Edge Valve System
Sponsored by
Boston Scientific Corporation
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Aortic Valve Stenosis

Eligibility Criteria

70 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is ≥70 years of age.
  2. Subject has documented calcific native aortic valve stenosis with an initial aortic valve area (AVA) of <1.0 cm2 (or AVA index of <0.6 cm2/m2) and either a mean pressure gradient >40 mm Hg or a jet velocity >4 m/s, as measured by echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamics.

    Note: In cases of low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis dobutamine can be used to assess the grade of aortic stenosis (maximum dobutamine dose of 20 mcg/kg/min recommended)c; the subject may be enrolled if echocardiographic criteria are met with this augmentation.

  3. Subject has a documented aortic annulus size between ≥20 mm and ≤27 mm based on pre-procedure diagnostic imaging.
  4. Subject has symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with NYHA Functional Class ≥ II.
  5. Subject is considered high risk for surgical valve replacement based on at least one of the following:

    • STS score ≥8%, and/or
    • Agreement by the heart team (which must include an in-person evaluation by an experienced cardiac surgeon) that subject is at high operative risk of serious morbidity or mortality with surgical valve replacement.
  6. Heart team (which must include an experienced cardiac surgeon) assessment that the subject is likely to benefit from valve replacement
  7. Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent.
  8. Subject, family member and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has a congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve.
  2. Subject with an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK-MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation).
  3. Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months, or has any permanent neurologic defect prior to study enrollment.
  4. Subject is on dialysis or has serum creatinine level >3.0 mg/dL or 265 µml/L.
  5. Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic aortic or mitral valve.
  6. Subject has >3+ mitral regurgitation, >3+ aortic regurgitation or >3+ tricuspid regurgitation.
  7. Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  8. Subject has a history of endocarditis within 12 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis.
  9. Subject has echocardiographic evidence of new intra-cardiac vegetation or intraventricular or paravalvular thrombus requiring intervention.
  10. Subject has Hgb <9 g/dL, platelet count <50,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3, or white blood cell count <1,000 cells/mm3.
  11. Subject requires chronic anticoagulation therapy after the implant procedure and cannot be treated with warfarin (other anticoagulants are not permitted in the first month) for at least 1 month concomitant with either aspirin or clopidogrel.

    Note: An alternative P2Y12 inhibitor may be prescribed if subject is allergic to or intolerant of clopidogrel

  12. Subject has had a gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 3 months, or has other clinically significant bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that would preclude treatment with required antiplatelet regimen, or will refuse transfusions.
  13. Subject has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to aspirin, all thienopyridines, heparin, nickel, titanium, or polyurethanes.
  14. Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, co-morbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment.
  15. Subject has hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
  16. Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty and pacemaker implantation which are allowed).
  17. Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician, is clinically significant and requires revascularization.
  18. Subject has documented left ventricular ejection fraction <30%.
  19. Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices.
  20. Subject has severe vascular disease that would preclude safe access (e.g., aneurysm with thrombus that cannot be crossed safely, marked tortuosity, significant narrowing of the abdominal aorta, severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta, or symptomatic carotid or vertebral disease).
  21. Subject has arterial access that is not acceptable for the LOTUS Edge delivery system and its compatible Lotus or iSleeve Introducers as defined in the Directions For Use, or severe iliofemoral tortuosity or calcification that would prevent safe placement of either introducer sheath.
  22. Current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.).
  23. Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint.
  24. Subject does not have a permanent pacemaker but has a class I or II indication for pacemaker implantation (based on the latest available ESC guidelines).

Sites / Locations

  • Rigshospitalet
  • Clinique Pasteur
  • Skåne University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

LOTUS Edge Valve System

Arm Description

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the LOTUS Edge™ Valve System when used with the Lotus™ or iSleeve™ Introducer Set

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean aortic valve pressure gradient
Mean aortic valve pressure gradient as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Technical success
Defined as successful vascular access, delivery, and deployment of a Lotus Valve; successful retrieval with the delivery system; and correct positioning of a single Lotus Valve in the proper anatomical location (reported as percent of subjects implanted with a Lotus Valve). Reported as percent of subjects.
Effective orifice area
Effective orifice area as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Successful repositioning of the study valve if repositioning is attempted
Successful retrieval of the study valve if retrieval is attempted
Grade of paravalvular aortic regurgitation
Grade of paravalvular aortic regurgitation as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory

Full Information

First Posted
July 28, 2016
Last Updated
May 30, 2018
Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02854319
Brief Title
REpositionable Percutaneous Replacement of NatIve StEnotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of LOTUS EDGE Valve System
Acronym
REPRISE EDGE
Official Title
REPRISE EDGE: REpositionable Percutaneous Replacement of NatIve StEnotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of LOTUS EDGE Valve System - Evaluation of Performance and Safety
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Investigational Medical Device is not available and the 15 patients enrolled completed their 1-yr follow-up per protocol
Study Start Date
September 7, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 25, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 13, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of the REPRISE EDGE study is to confirm the acute performance and safety of the LOTUS Edge™ Valve System when used with the Lotus™ or iSleeve™ Introducer Set for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in symptomatic patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis who are considered high risk for surgical valve replacement.
Detailed Description
This clinical study is a prospective, single-arm study designed to demonstrate that the acute performance and safety of the LOTUS Edge Valve System when used with the iSleeve or Lotus Introducer Set are consistent with the results of the commercially approved Lotus Valve System used in the REPRISE II study, when delivered and deployed in symptomatic subjects who have severe calcific aortic valve stenosis and who are at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aortic Valve Stenosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
15 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
LOTUS Edge Valve System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the LOTUS Edge™ Valve System when used with the Lotus™ or iSleeve™ Introducer Set
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
LOTUS Edge Valve System
Intervention Description
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) with the LOTUS Edge™ Valve System when used with the Lotus™ or iSleeve™ Introducer Set
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean aortic valve pressure gradient
Description
Mean aortic valve pressure gradient as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory.
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or at 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Technical success
Description
Defined as successful vascular access, delivery, and deployment of a Lotus Valve; successful retrieval with the delivery system; and correct positioning of a single Lotus Valve in the proper anatomical location (reported as percent of subjects implanted with a Lotus Valve). Reported as percent of subjects.
Time Frame
Immediately post-procedure (patient discharged from operative room)
Title
Effective orifice area
Description
Effective orifice area as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or at 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first)
Title
Successful repositioning of the study valve if repositioning is attempted
Time Frame
Immediately post-procedure (patient discharged from operative room)
Title
Successful retrieval of the study valve if retrieval is attempted
Time Frame
Immediately post-procedure (patient discharged from operative room)
Title
Grade of paravalvular aortic regurgitation
Description
Grade of paravalvular aortic regurgitation as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or at 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Mortality: all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Stroke: disabling and non-disabling
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Myocardial infarction (MI): periprocedural (≤72 hours post index procedure) and spontaneous (>72 hours post index procedure)
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Bleeding: life-threatening (or disabling) and major
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Acute kidney injury based on the AKIN System Stage 3 (including renal replacement therapy) or Stage 2
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Major vascular complication
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction (surgical or interventional therapy)
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure (New York Hear Association [NYHA] class III or IV)
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
New permanent pacemaker implantation resulting from new or worsened conduction disturbances (including new left bundle branch block [LBBB] and third degree atrioventricular block)
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
New onset of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Coronary obstruction
Time Frame
≤72 hours post index procedure
Title
Ventricular septal perforation
Time Frame
≤72 hours post index procedure
Title
Mitral apparatus damage
Time Frame
≤72 hours post index procedure
Title
Cardiac tamponade
Time Frame
≤72 hours post index procedure
Title
Prosthetic aortic valve malpositioning, including valve migration, valve embolization, or ectopic valve deployment
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Transcatheter aortic valve (TAV)-in-TAV deployment
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Prosthetic aortic valve thrombosis
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Prosthetic aortic valve performance: effective orifice area
Description
Measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Time Frame
30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Prosthetic aortic valve performance: mean pressure gradient
Description
Measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Time Frame
30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Prosthetic aortic valve performance: aortic valve regurgitation
Description
Measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Prosthetic aortic valve performance: peak gradient
Description
Measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Prosthetic aortic valve performance: peak velocity
Description
Measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Functional status as evaluated by New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure
Title
Neurological status: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Time Frame
At discharge and 1 year
Title
Neurological status: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Time Frame
At discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject is ≥70 years of age. Subject has documented calcific native aortic valve stenosis with an initial aortic valve area (AVA) of <1.0 cm2 (or AVA index of <0.6 cm2/m2) and either a mean pressure gradient >40 mm Hg or a jet velocity >4 m/s, as measured by echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamics. Note: In cases of low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis dobutamine can be used to assess the grade of aortic stenosis (maximum dobutamine dose of 20 mcg/kg/min recommended)c; the subject may be enrolled if echocardiographic criteria are met with this augmentation. Subject has a documented aortic annulus size between ≥20 mm and ≤27 mm based on pre-procedure diagnostic imaging. Subject has symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with NYHA Functional Class ≥ II. Subject is considered high risk for surgical valve replacement based on at least one of the following: STS score ≥8%, and/or Agreement by the heart team (which must include an in-person evaluation by an experienced cardiac surgeon) that subject is at high operative risk of serious morbidity or mortality with surgical valve replacement. Heart team (which must include an experienced cardiac surgeon) assessment that the subject is likely to benefit from valve replacement Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent. Subject, family member and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits. Exclusion Criteria: Subject has a congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve. Subject with an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK-MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation). Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months, or has any permanent neurologic defect prior to study enrollment. Subject is on dialysis or has serum creatinine level >3.0 mg/dL or 265 µml/L. Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic aortic or mitral valve. Subject has >3+ mitral regurgitation, >3+ aortic regurgitation or >3+ tricuspid regurgitation. Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason. Subject has a history of endocarditis within 12 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis. Subject has echocardiographic evidence of new intra-cardiac vegetation or intraventricular or paravalvular thrombus requiring intervention. Subject has Hgb <9 g/dL, platelet count <50,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3, or white blood cell count <1,000 cells/mm3. Subject requires chronic anticoagulation therapy after the implant procedure and cannot be treated with warfarin (other anticoagulants are not permitted in the first month) for at least 1 month concomitant with either aspirin or clopidogrel. Note: An alternative P2Y12 inhibitor may be prescribed if subject is allergic to or intolerant of clopidogrel Subject has had a gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 3 months, or has other clinically significant bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that would preclude treatment with required antiplatelet regimen, or will refuse transfusions. Subject has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to aspirin, all thienopyridines, heparin, nickel, titanium, or polyurethanes. Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, co-morbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment. Subject has hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty and pacemaker implantation which are allowed). Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician, is clinically significant and requires revascularization. Subject has documented left ventricular ejection fraction <30%. Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices. Subject has severe vascular disease that would preclude safe access (e.g., aneurysm with thrombus that cannot be crossed safely, marked tortuosity, significant narrowing of the abdominal aorta, severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta, or symptomatic carotid or vertebral disease). Subject has arterial access that is not acceptable for the LOTUS Edge delivery system and its compatible Lotus or iSleeve Introducers as defined in the Directions For Use, or severe iliofemoral tortuosity or calcification that would prevent safe placement of either introducer sheath. Current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.). Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint. Subject does not have a permanent pacemaker but has a class I or II indication for pacemaker implantation (based on the latest available ESC guidelines).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthias Götberg, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Skane University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sabine Bleiziffer, MD
Organizational Affiliation
German Heart Centre München
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rigshospitalet
City
Copenhagen
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Clinique Pasteur
City
Toulouse
Country
France
Facility Name
Skåne University Hospital
City
Lund
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

REpositionable Percutaneous Replacement of NatIve StEnotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of LOTUS EDGE Valve System

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs