search
Back to results

Teaching Skin Self -Examination to Melanoma Patients and Their Skin Check Partners (PSW)

Primary Purpose

Melanoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Skin Self- examination structured training
Sponsored by
Northwestern University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Melanoma focused on measuring melanoma, skin self-examination

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Personal history of Stage 0 (in situ) to IIB melanoma
  • At least 6 weeks post-surgical treatment of Stage 0 (in situ) to IIB melanoma
  • Age 18-70 years old
  • Have sufficient vision to read a newspaper in order to visually detect changes of the skin
  • Able to read English or Spanish at a sixth grade language level
  • Have a skin check partner (i.e. spouse, family member, or friend) who is willing to participate in the research with the patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects overburdened with other co-morbid diseases (e.g. chronic immunosuppression from organ transplantation) or medical treatments (e.g. chemotherapy)
  • Subjects unable to participate in a conversation at a sixth grade language level due to cognitive impairment (e.g. by a stroke)
  • For newly enrolled subjects only: Prior participation in skin self-examination research

Eligibility Criteria for amended portion of the study:

Inclusion Criteria Melanoma survivors

  • Ages 18-70, who are participating in the research supported by the R01
  • Able to read English at a sixth-grade language level
  • Willing to participate in daily online assessments
  • Willingness to wear two sensors for 7 consecutive days
  • Own a smartphone and able to use a mobile application
  • Reliable access to the Internet
  • Reliable mailing address for safe delivery and return of sensors
  • Capable of walking a quarter of a mile (about 3 city blocks) with little to no difficulty

Young adult relatives of melanoma survivors

  • Ages 18-39 years old
  • Able to read English at a sixth-grade language level
  • Willing to participate in daily online assessments
  • Willing to wear two sensors for 7 consecutive days
  • Own a smartphone and able to use a mobile application
  • Reliable access to the Internet
  • Reliable mailing address for safe delivery and return of sensors
  • Capable of walking a quarter of a mile (about 3 city blocks) with little to no difficulty

Exclusion Criteria

  • Excluded subjects are those overburdened with other co-morbid diseases (e.g. chronic immunosuppression from organ transplantation) or medical treatments (e.g. chemotherapy).
  • Subjects unable to participate in a conversation at a sixth-grade language level due to cognitive impairment (e.g. by a stroke) and have an ECOG performance status >1 will also be excluded.

Sites / Locations

  • June K Robinson

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm 7

Arm 8

Arm 9

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

No Intervention

No Intervention

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

skin self-examination

Skin Self- examination:Distance (remote) learning

Active control

Assessment-only control

Observational study 1

Observational study 2

Relationship Factors Study Observational Study

Relationship Factors Study- Skin Self Examination

Comparison of distance (remote) learning vs in-person learning

Arm Description

Participants from the treatment arms of the original RCT. It is anticipated that 228 participant dyads that are 18-70 years old from the original study will be invited to continue in the ongoing study. These subjects received Skin Self- examination structured training. The subject are being followed for an additional period of time after receiving an educational intervention.

Participants receive the Skin Self- examination structured training with partner assistance educational intervention via mailed workbook while under the customary care of their own dermatologists. It is anticipated that 50 new participant dyads will be recruited and randomized to this group.

Participants from the control arm of the original RCT. It is anticipated that 100 participant dyads that are 18-70 years old from the original study will be invited to continue in the ongoing study. These subjects are controls and do not receive the structured training in skin self-examination with partner assistance at the beginning of the study. After completing the 18 month online survey, the subjects may request the Skin Self- examination structured training with partner assistance.

Participants who receive customary care from their own dermatologists. It is anticipated that 150 new participant dyads will be recruited and randomized to this group. These subjects are controls and do not receive the structured training in skin self-examination with partner assistance at the beginning of the study. After completing the 18 month online survey, the subjects may request the structured training in skin self-examination with partner assistance.

Feasibility of wearing 2 sensors No intervention. At the conclusion of the study, participants receive a report of their UV exposure and physical activity over the 7 days of the study. N= 10

Feasibility of completing online daily survey. The research team will strive to integrate event level data in real -time No intervention. At the conclusion of the study, participants receive an event level reports of their daily UV exposure and physical activity over the 7 days of the study. N= 30

Identification of how shared responsibility for SSE (i.e., "being in this together) contributed to SSE frequency and provide dermatologists with practical information they can efficiently communicate to patients with a history of melanoma to increase SSE. No intervention- Control group. n=144 Results pending*

Identification of how shared responsibility for SSE (i.e., "being in this together) contributed to SSE frequency and provide dermatologists with practical information they can efficiently communicate to patients with a history of melanoma to increase SSE. Intervention= Skin self-examination training n=197 Results Pending*

Controls re-enrolled from the original study (n=38) and newly enrolled in the distance (remote) learning (n=106) are compared with participants receiving the workbook in-person in the original study and re-enrolled (n=134) and participants newly enrolled in distance (remote) learning, who had the workbook mailed to them (n=63). Online surveys assessed SSE knowledge, confidence, anxiety and performance. Electronic health record review identified biopsies of concerning moles and the number of melanomas identified.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Knowledge and Performance of Skin self-examination
online survey of validates measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

Accuracy of Identification of melanoma
Biopsy of clinically concerning lesions
Moderation of SSE performance and accuracy by patient-partner relationship qualities and age
online survey
Relationship factors helping to sustain SSE
online survey

Full Information

First Posted
July 11, 2016
Last Updated
March 9, 2021
Sponsor
Northwestern University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02854657
Brief Title
Teaching Skin Self -Examination to Melanoma Patients and Their Skin Check Partners
Acronym
PSW
Official Title
A Comparison of Interventions to Teach Patients Skin Self-examination
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 9, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 9, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Northwestern University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The proposed study is a continuation of a research program (STU00017005: Interventions to teach melanoma patients skin self-examination) designed to increase early detection of melanomas before they metastasize. In 2015, approximately 73,870 individuals in the U.S. will be diagnosed with invasive melanoma and about 9,940 will die from the disease. During 2002-2011, melanoma incidence increased at an average annual rate of 1.6% for men and 1.5% for women. People with a history of melanoma have a 10 times greater risk of developing a second primary melanoma relative to the general population. Early detection with surgical excision at an earlier stage when treatment is usually more effective is the only proven curative strategy. Relationship factors to help sustain skin self-examination will also be evaluated. The study has been amended to include an administrative supplement, which builds upon the pilot research completed during the summer of 2017 that measured the efficacy of two wearable UV sensors (Shade and Wearifi) and a survey assessing sun protection along with the quality of life. See Detailed Description for a description of amendment addition. This research was expanded to distance (remote) learning provided by mailing the same workbook used in the in-office training.
Detailed Description
The completed R01 demonstrated preliminary evidence for a melanoma survivor and partner skin self-examination (SSE) training program resulting in regular and accurate SSEs relative to patients and partners receiving treatment as usual care. However, one caveat is that the patients and partners in the well-controlled study are potentially being cued to conduct the SSEs following training and reinforced for their actions. Whereas in "real-world" conditions the participants would see their dermatologist less frequently with significantly less cueing to conduct SSEs. This research addresses this limitation by examining the long-term influence of SSE training on SSE knowledge, self-efficacy, performance, and accuracy under real-world conditions for melanoma patients in the treatment group from the ongoing R01 study relative to controls (Aim 1). In addition, the continuation study will also examine for whom the intervention works best under real-world conditions (Aim 2). Findings from clinical RCTs of behavioral interventions involving patients are rarely if ever, examined to determine generalizability to real-world settings. The current proposal will contribute critical information to the scientific literature on the impact of early detection of melanomas using SSEs and will be the first to test the sustainability and long-term impact of an efficacious SSE intervention for early detection targeting melanoma survivors in real-world settings. Relationship factors to help sustain skin self-examination will also be evaluated. The amended part of the study is an administrative supplement, which builds upon the pilot research completed during the summer of 2017 that measured the efficacy of two wearable UV sensors (Shade and Wearifi) and a survey assessing sun protection along with the quality of life. The Shade sensor provided a more reliable time-stamped assessment. With the use of the Daily Minutes of Unprotected Sun Exposure Inventory (MUSE) and the Shade sensors, the investigators assessed the sun protection behaviors of melanoma survivors and found that 13% of the melanoma survivors were surprised by their amount of UV exposure. The investigators now wish to determine the feasibility of simultaneously obtaining wearable sensor data for physical activity (ActiGraph) and the Shade sensor and completion of self-reported surveys for the same time period. The feasibility and methodological information derived from this project are highly relevant to capture and quantify UV exposure among physically active individuals. A total of 40 participants will be recruited for this phase (324 from initial study + 40 from amended section = 364 anticipated total).Ten participants (5 melanoma survivors and 5 young adult relatives), testing the feasibility of wearing two sensors and completing daily online surveys. After feasibility testing, the study will enroll melanoma survivors, age 18-70 years, with Stages 0-1A (n=15) and their young adult relatives (n=15) who are 18-39 years old. The sex of enrolled participants will be monitored to assure equivalent numbers of male and female participants. Two arms were added: a) Feasibility of wearing 2 sensors, and b) Feasibility of completing online daily survey. The research team will strive to integrate event level data in real-time. At the conclusion of the study, participants receive a report of their UV exposure and physical activity over the 7 days of the study. Eligibility Criteria has also been updated for the amended portion of the study. Distance (remote) learning will be compared with in-person learning with online surveys assessing SSE knowledge, confidence, anxiety and performance. Electronic health record review will identify biopsies of concerning moles and the number and stage of melanomas identified.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Melanoma
Keywords
melanoma, skin self-examination

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
682 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
skin self-examination
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants from the treatment arms of the original RCT. It is anticipated that 228 participant dyads that are 18-70 years old from the original study will be invited to continue in the ongoing study. These subjects received Skin Self- examination structured training. The subject are being followed for an additional period of time after receiving an educational intervention.
Arm Title
Skin Self- examination:Distance (remote) learning
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants receive the Skin Self- examination structured training with partner assistance educational intervention via mailed workbook while under the customary care of their own dermatologists. It is anticipated that 50 new participant dyads will be recruited and randomized to this group.
Arm Title
Active control
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants from the control arm of the original RCT. It is anticipated that 100 participant dyads that are 18-70 years old from the original study will be invited to continue in the ongoing study. These subjects are controls and do not receive the structured training in skin self-examination with partner assistance at the beginning of the study. After completing the 18 month online survey, the subjects may request the Skin Self- examination structured training with partner assistance.
Arm Title
Assessment-only control
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants who receive customary care from their own dermatologists. It is anticipated that 150 new participant dyads will be recruited and randomized to this group. These subjects are controls and do not receive the structured training in skin self-examination with partner assistance at the beginning of the study. After completing the 18 month online survey, the subjects may request the structured training in skin self-examination with partner assistance.
Arm Title
Observational study 1
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Feasibility of wearing 2 sensors No intervention. At the conclusion of the study, participants receive a report of their UV exposure and physical activity over the 7 days of the study. N= 10
Arm Title
Observational study 2
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Feasibility of completing online daily survey. The research team will strive to integrate event level data in real -time No intervention. At the conclusion of the study, participants receive an event level reports of their daily UV exposure and physical activity over the 7 days of the study. N= 30
Arm Title
Relationship Factors Study Observational Study
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Identification of how shared responsibility for SSE (i.e., "being in this together) contributed to SSE frequency and provide dermatologists with practical information they can efficiently communicate to patients with a history of melanoma to increase SSE. No intervention- Control group. n=144 Results pending*
Arm Title
Relationship Factors Study- Skin Self Examination
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Identification of how shared responsibility for SSE (i.e., "being in this together) contributed to SSE frequency and provide dermatologists with practical information they can efficiently communicate to patients with a history of melanoma to increase SSE. Intervention= Skin self-examination training n=197 Results Pending*
Arm Title
Comparison of distance (remote) learning vs in-person learning
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Controls re-enrolled from the original study (n=38) and newly enrolled in the distance (remote) learning (n=106) are compared with participants receiving the workbook in-person in the original study and re-enrolled (n=134) and participants newly enrolled in distance (remote) learning, who had the workbook mailed to them (n=63). Online surveys assessed SSE knowledge, confidence, anxiety and performance. Electronic health record review identified biopsies of concerning moles and the number of melanomas identified.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Skin Self- examination structured training
Other Intervention Name(s)
MoleScore
Intervention Description
A PowerPoint presentation will be provided as a PDF file. The file will be available in English and Spanish. This is the same skin self-examination structured training intervention used in the original RCT (MoleScore)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Knowledge and Performance of Skin self-examination
Description
online survey of validates measures
Time Frame
18 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Accuracy of Identification of melanoma
Description
Biopsy of clinically concerning lesions
Time Frame
18 months
Title
Moderation of SSE performance and accuracy by patient-partner relationship qualities and age
Description
online survey
Time Frame
18 months
Title
Relationship factors helping to sustain SSE
Description
online survey
Time Frame
18 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Comparison of remote training and In-person training with the workbook
Description
online survey and electronic medical record review
Time Frame
54 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Personal history of Stage 0 (in situ) to IIB melanoma At least 6 weeks post-surgical treatment of Stage 0 (in situ) to IIB melanoma Age 18-70 years old Have sufficient vision to read a newspaper in order to visually detect changes of the skin Able to read English or Spanish at a sixth grade language level Have a skin check partner (i.e. spouse, family member, or friend) who is willing to participate in the research with the patient Exclusion Criteria: Subjects overburdened with other co-morbid diseases (e.g. chronic immunosuppression from organ transplantation) or medical treatments (e.g. chemotherapy) Subjects unable to participate in a conversation at a sixth grade language level due to cognitive impairment (e.g. by a stroke) For newly enrolled subjects only: Prior participation in skin self-examination research Eligibility Criteria for amended portion of the study: Inclusion Criteria Melanoma survivors Ages 18-70, who are participating in the research supported by the R01 Able to read English at a sixth-grade language level Willing to participate in daily online assessments Willingness to wear two sensors for 7 consecutive days Own a smartphone and able to use a mobile application Reliable access to the Internet Reliable mailing address for safe delivery and return of sensors Capable of walking a quarter of a mile (about 3 city blocks) with little to no difficulty Young adult relatives of melanoma survivors Ages 18-39 years old Able to read English at a sixth-grade language level Willing to participate in daily online assessments Willing to wear two sensors for 7 consecutive days Own a smartphone and able to use a mobile application Reliable access to the Internet Reliable mailing address for safe delivery and return of sensors Capable of walking a quarter of a mile (about 3 city blocks) with little to no difficulty Exclusion Criteria Excluded subjects are those overburdened with other co-morbid diseases (e.g. chronic immunosuppression from organ transplantation) or medical treatments (e.g. chemotherapy). Subjects unable to participate in a conversation at a sixth-grade language level due to cognitive impairment (e.g. by a stroke) and have an ECOG performance status >1 will also be excluded.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
June K Robinson, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Northwestern University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
June K Robinson
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
publish results
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Deidentified data available 10/2020 for one year
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Open
IPD Sharing URL
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3733197
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30773613
Citation
Robinson JK, Reavy R, Mallett KA, Turrisi R. Remote partner assisted skin self-examination skills training of melanoma survivors and their partners. Australas J Dermatol. 2019 Feb;60(1):e80-e82. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12877. Epub 2018 Jul 10. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27973675
Citation
Robinson JK, Hultgren B, Mallett K, Turrisi R. Self-confidence and Embarrassment About Partner-Assisted Skin Self-examination for Melanoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Mar 1;153(3):342-344. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4776. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27367303
Citation
Robinson JK, Wayne JD, Martini MC, Hultgren BA, Mallett KA, Turrisi R. Early Detection of New Melanomas by Patients With Melanoma and Their Partners Using a Structured Skin Self-examination Skills Training Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Sep 1;152(9):979-85. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.1985.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26422745
Citation
Hultgren BA, Turrisi R, Mallett KA, Ackerman S, Robinson JK. Influence of Quality of Relationship Between Patient With Melanoma and Partner on Partner-Assisted Skin Examination Education: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Feb;152(2):184-90. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.2819.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26063475
Citation
Stapleton JL, Turrisi R, Mallett KA, Robinson JK. Correspondence between pigmented lesions identified by melanoma patients trained to perform partner-assisted skin self-examination and dermatological examination. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Aug;24(8):1247-53. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0218. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24418949
Citation
Robinson JK, Gaber R, Hultgren B, Eilers S, Blatt H, Stapleton J, Mallett K, Turrisi R, Duffecy J, Begale M, Martini M, Bilimoria K, Wayne J. Skin self-examination education for early detection of melanoma: a randomized controlled trial of Internet, workbook, and in-person interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 13;16(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2883.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32761987
Citation
Robinson JK, Reavy R, Mallett KA, Turrisi R. Remote skin self-examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in-person training. Cancer Med. 2020 Oct;9(19):7301-7309. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3299. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32292057
Citation
Robinson JK. Skin check partner assistance for melanoma skin self-examination by at-risk patients: it takes two to identify melanomas. Future Oncol. 2020 Jun;16(16):1065-1068. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0265. Epub 2020 Apr 15. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32222067
Citation
Robinson JK, Abou-El-Seoud D, Reavy R, Turrisi R, Mallett KA. Persistence of partner-assisted skin self-examination supported by 'being in this together': a randomized trial. Br J Dermatol. 2020 Sep;183(3):571-573. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19048. Epub 2020 Apr 23. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31774148
Citation
Robinson JK. Frequency of 'regular' skin checks by dermatologists for melanoma survivors. Br J Dermatol. 2020 May;182(5):1081. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18626. Epub 2019 Nov 27. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18258332
Citation
Robinson JK, Stapleton J, Turrisi R. Relationship and partner moderator variables increase self-efficacy of performing skin self-examination. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 May;58(5):755-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.12.027. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Teaching Skin Self -Examination to Melanoma Patients and Their Skin Check Partners

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs