Health Economic Analysis of Islet Cell Transplantation for the Stabilization of the Severe Forms of Type 1 Diabetes (STABILOT)
Primary Purpose
Type 1 Diabetes
Status
Active
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Islet graft
best medical care
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Type 1 Diabetes focused on measuring Islet cell Transplantation, cost-effectiveness analysis, Cost-utility analysis, Type 1 Diabetes
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria :
- Suffering from diabetes since more than 5 years
- Patient with brittle type 1 diabetes despite an optimized insulin treatment and educational training will be included. A patient will be considered as experiencing a brittle type 1 diabetes if at least two criteria are present among: persistence of severe hypoglycemia, occurrence of ketoacidosis events without obvious etiology, diagnosis of unaware hypoglycemic episodes < 3 mmol/l based on CGM or self-monitoring blood glucose data, a mean blood glucose standard deviation>50%, MAGE index (Mean amplitude of glucose excursions)>60 mg/dl, LBGI index (low blood glucose index)>5, Clarke score≥4 or HYPOSCORE>800.
- Insulin needs < 0,85 U/kg/day
- HbA1c < 12% ;
- No residual insulin secretion (plasmatic basal and stimulated C-peptide < 0.3 ng/ml)
- Social Security membership or benefit from Social Security
- Patients who signed the consent form
Exclusion Criteria :
Exclusion criteria related to islet infusion:
- Hemostatic disorders, pre-existing liver disease (PAL, Gamma-GT, ASAT-ALAT >2N) or vesicular lithiasis.
Exclusion criteria related to diabetic complications:
- Evolutive proliferative retinopathy, evolutive nephropathy (Glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73m2 and/or proteinuria >0.5g/day), evolutive cardiopathy or obliterative arteriopathy with trophic cutaneous lesions.
Exclusion criteria related to immunosuppressant use:
- Hemoglobin < 110mg/dL in women and < 120 mg/dL in men, leuconeutropenia, thrombopenia, systemic infection including chronic hepatitis B, C and VIH, neoplasia disease and hypertension>160/100 mmHg.
- Corticoid treatment (except for patient that benefited from a kidney graft with maintenance steroid therapy)
- Presence of anti-HLA antibody directed against the donor
- Positive B or T cells crossmatch
Sites / Locations
- University Hospital of Besançon
- university hospital of Clermont Ferrand
- Grenoble University Hospital
- University hospital of Lille
- University Hospital of Lyon
- University Hospital of Montpellier
- University hospital of Nancy
- university hospital of Nantes
- APHP
- University hospital of Strasbourg
- University Hospital of Geneva
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Islet graft
Best medical care
Arm Description
Patients who receive islet graft Intervention : Procedure/Surgery
Patients who continue their optimal medical treatment (insulin pump therapy coupled with real time continuous glucose monitoring) Intervention : insulin treatment
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Incremental cost- utility ratio at 1 year
The primary endpoint will be the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at one year for islet transplantation versus Best Medical Treatment of brittle type 1 diabetes.The effectiveness will be expressed as quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in a cost-utility analysis. QALYs are a composite measure of outcomes where utilities for health states (on 0-1 scale, where 0 corresponds to death and 1 to full health) act as qualitative weights to combine quantity and quality of life. The number of QALYs in each group will be assessed with the EuroQol 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ5D). The EQ-5D measures health status in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Cost-effectiveness ratio at 1 year
Assessment of the cost-effectiveness ratio at 1 year between islet cell transplantation versus best medical treatment (SAP therapy) for patients with brittle type 1 diabetes without impairment of vital prognosis. Two criteria of effectiveness will be used : the life years gained and the number of hypoglycemia
Assessment of individual medical benefit of quality of life
Evaluate with DQOL questionnaire
Assessment of individual medical benefit in terms of metabolic efficacy
measured from the following criteria: severe hypoglycemia, HbA1c, stimulated C-peptide, fasting glucose, insulin dose or oral diabetes, glycemic variability
Assessment and comparison of individual medical benefit in terms of complications of islet cell transplantation between the two groups
measured from in insulin independence, hospitalizations
Assessment and comparison of clinical benefit for patients with brittle type 1 diabetes with impairment of vital prognosis before and after islet cell transplantation
measured from DQOL, insulin independence, complications of islet cell transplantation
Assessment and comparison of costs for patients with brittle type 1 diabetes with impairment of vital prognosis before and after islet cell transplantation
measured from hospitalizations
Assessment of total cost of islet cell transplantation
Assessment of total cost of islet cell transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes without impairment of vital prognosis, from pre-transplant period until 1 year after the last injection. Two perspectives will be used: French health care system and hospital.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02854696
First Posted
March 4, 2016
Last Updated
June 17, 2022
Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02854696
Brief Title
Health Economic Analysis of Islet Cell Transplantation for the Stabilization of the Severe Forms of Type 1 Diabetes
Acronym
STABILOT
Official Title
Health Economic Analysis of Islet Cell Transplantation for Patients With Severe Forms of Brittle Type 1 Diabetes
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
July 7, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The main goal is to perform a cost-utility analysis to compare islet cell transplantation versus best medical treatment (defined as Sensor augmented pump therapy) for patients with brittle type1 diabetes.
Detailed Description
The main goal is to perform a cost-utility analysis to compare islet cell transplantation versus best medical treatment (defined as Sensor augmented insulin pump therapy) for patients with brittle type1 diabetes.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Type 1 Diabetes
Keywords
Islet cell Transplantation, cost-effectiveness analysis, Cost-utility analysis, Type 1 Diabetes
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
42 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Islet graft
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients who receive islet graft Intervention : Procedure/Surgery
Arm Title
Best medical care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients who continue their optimal medical treatment (insulin pump therapy coupled with real time continuous glucose monitoring) Intervention : insulin treatment
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Islet graft
Other Intervention Name(s)
islet cell transplantation
Intervention Description
Patients will be transplanted with pancreatic islet cells
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
best medical care
Other Intervention Name(s)
insulin treatment
Intervention Description
Patients will continue their insulin treatment
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incremental cost- utility ratio at 1 year
Description
The primary endpoint will be the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at one year for islet transplantation versus Best Medical Treatment of brittle type 1 diabetes.The effectiveness will be expressed as quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in a cost-utility analysis. QALYs are a composite measure of outcomes where utilities for health states (on 0-1 scale, where 0 corresponds to death and 1 to full health) act as qualitative weights to combine quantity and quality of life. The number of QALYs in each group will be assessed with the EuroQol 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ5D). The EQ-5D measures health status in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cost-effectiveness ratio at 1 year
Description
Assessment of the cost-effectiveness ratio at 1 year between islet cell transplantation versus best medical treatment (SAP therapy) for patients with brittle type 1 diabetes without impairment of vital prognosis. Two criteria of effectiveness will be used : the life years gained and the number of hypoglycemia
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Assessment of individual medical benefit of quality of life
Description
Evaluate with DQOL questionnaire
Time Frame
6 months and 1year
Title
Assessment of individual medical benefit in terms of metabolic efficacy
Description
measured from the following criteria: severe hypoglycemia, HbA1c, stimulated C-peptide, fasting glucose, insulin dose or oral diabetes, glycemic variability
Time Frame
6 months and 1 year
Title
Assessment and comparison of individual medical benefit in terms of complications of islet cell transplantation between the two groups
Description
measured from in insulin independence, hospitalizations
Time Frame
6 months and 1 year
Title
Assessment and comparison of clinical benefit for patients with brittle type 1 diabetes with impairment of vital prognosis before and after islet cell transplantation
Description
measured from DQOL, insulin independence, complications of islet cell transplantation
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Assessment and comparison of costs for patients with brittle type 1 diabetes with impairment of vital prognosis before and after islet cell transplantation
Description
measured from hospitalizations
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Assessment of total cost of islet cell transplantation
Description
Assessment of total cost of islet cell transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes without impairment of vital prognosis, from pre-transplant period until 1 year after the last injection. Two perspectives will be used: French health care system and hospital.
Time Frame
1 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria :
Suffering from diabetes since more than 5 years
Patient with brittle type 1 diabetes despite an optimized insulin treatment and educational training will be included. A patient will be considered as experiencing a brittle type 1 diabetes if at least two criteria are present among: persistence of severe hypoglycemia, occurrence of ketoacidosis events without obvious etiology, diagnosis of unaware hypoglycemic episodes < 3 mmol/l based on CGM or self-monitoring blood glucose data, a mean blood glucose standard deviation>50%, MAGE index (Mean amplitude of glucose excursions)>60 mg/dl, LBGI index (low blood glucose index)>5, Clarke score≥4 or HYPOSCORE>800.
Insulin needs < 0,85 U/kg/day
HbA1c < 12% ;
No residual insulin secretion (plasmatic basal and stimulated C-peptide < 0.3 ng/ml)
Social Security membership or benefit from Social Security
Patients who signed the consent form
Exclusion Criteria :
Exclusion criteria related to islet infusion:
Hemostatic disorders, pre-existing liver disease (PAL, Gamma-GT, ASAT-ALAT >2N) or vesicular lithiasis.
Exclusion criteria related to diabetic complications:
Evolutive proliferative retinopathy, evolutive nephropathy (Glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73m2 and/or proteinuria >0.5g/day), evolutive cardiopathy or obliterative arteriopathy with trophic cutaneous lesions.
Exclusion criteria related to immunosuppressant use:
Hemoglobin < 110mg/dL in women and < 120 mg/dL in men, leuconeutropenia, thrombopenia, systemic infection including chronic hepatitis B, C and VIH, neoplasia disease and hypertension>160/100 mmHg.
Corticoid treatment (except for patient that benefited from a kidney graft with maintenance steroid therapy)
Presence of anti-HLA antibody directed against the donor
Positive B or T cells crossmatch
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pierre-Yves BENHAMOU, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Grenoble
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital of Besançon
City
Besancon
Country
France
Facility Name
university hospital of Clermont Ferrand
City
Clermont Ferrand
Country
France
Facility Name
Grenoble University Hospital
City
Grenoble
ZIP/Postal Code
38000
Country
France
Facility Name
University hospital of Lille
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59000
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital of Lyon
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69000
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital of Montpellier
City
Montpellier
ZIP/Postal Code
34000
Country
France
Facility Name
University hospital of Nancy
City
Nancy
ZIP/Postal Code
54511
Country
France
Facility Name
university hospital of Nantes
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
44093
Country
France
Facility Name
APHP
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75010
Country
France
Facility Name
University hospital of Strasbourg
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67000
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital of Geneva
City
Geneva
ZIP/Postal Code
CH-1211
Country
Switzerland
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22723582
Citation
Barton FB, Rickels MR, Alejandro R, Hering BJ, Wease S, Naziruddin B, Oberholzer J, Odorico JS, Garfinkel MR, Levy M, Pattou F, Berney T, Secchi A, Messinger S, Senior PA, Maffi P, Posselt A, Stock PG, Kaufman DB, Luo X, Kandeel F, Cagliero E, Turgeon NA, Witkowski P, Naji A, O'Connell PJ, Greenbaum C, Kudva YC, Brayman KL, Aull MJ, Larsen C, Kay TW, Fernandez LA, Vantyghem MC, Bellin M, Shapiro AM. Improvement in outcomes of clinical islet transplantation: 1999-2010. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jul;35(7):1436-45. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0063.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21323736
Citation
Beckwith J, Nyman JA, Flanagan B, Schrover R, Schuurman HJ. A health economic analysis of clinical islet transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2012 Jan-Feb;26(1):23-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01411.x. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18808408
Citation
Bellin MD, Kandaswamy R, Parkey J, Zhang HJ, Liu B, Ihm SH, Ansite JD, Witson J, Bansal-Pakala P, Balamurugan AN, Papas KK, Sutherland DE, Moran A, Hering BJ. Prolonged insulin independence after islet allotransplants in recipients with type 1 diabetes. Am J Transplant. 2008 Nov;8(11):2463-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02404.x. Epub 2008 Sep 19. Erratum In: Am J Transplant. 2010 May;10(5):1337. Papas, K [corrected to Papas, K K].
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17627243
Citation
Badet L, Benhamou PY, Wojtusciszyn A, Baertschiger R, Milliat-Guittard L, Kessler L, Penfornis A, Thivolet C, Renard E, Bosco D, Morel P, Morelon E, Bayle F, Colin C, Berney T; GRAGIL Group. Expectations and strategies regarding islet transplantation: metabolic data from the GRAGIL 2 trial. Transplantation. 2007 Jul 15;84(1):89-96. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000268511.64428.d8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28219959
Citation
Lablanche S, David-Tchouda S, Margier J, Schir E, Wojtusciszyn A, Borot S, Kessler L, Morelon E, Thivolet C, Pattou F, Vantyghem MC, Berney T, Benhamou PY. Randomised, prospective, medico-economic nationwide French study of islet transplantation in patients with severely unstable type 1 diabetes: the STABILOT study protocol. BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 20;7(2):e013434. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013434.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Health Economic Analysis of Islet Cell Transplantation for the Stabilization of the Severe Forms of Type 1 Diabetes
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs