Novel Methods for Ascertainment of Gout Flares -A Pilot Study
Primary Purpose
Gout
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
IVR (Phone call)
RheumPro (Smartphone application)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Gout
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- >/= to 18 yrs of age with Current physician diagnosed gout
- current hyperuricemia (serum urate level >6.8 mg/dl)
- self-report of at least two gout flares in the previous 6 months
- current smartphone user utilizing a FitBit compatible smart Phone (with the ability to download RheumPRO from Apple/Google Play store).
Sites / Locations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Interactive Voice Response
RheumPro Smartphone Application
Arm Description
The interactive voice response system (IVR) is an automated telephone system that is used to contact study participants. At enrollment the study coordinator will explain how the IVR works, planned survey schedule, and that participant -initiated calls to IVR are allowed.
RheumPro is a UAB developed smartphone application to capture patient reported outcomes. At enrollment the study coordinator will explain how RheumPro works, planned survey schedule, and that participant -initiated surveys in RheumPro are allowed.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Preference IVR vs RheumPRO
Percentage of total study population preferring IVR vs. RheumPRO
Feasibility of Using IVR vs. RheumPRO to Report Gout Flares
Feasibility ----Assessed by the percentage of participants completing answer IRV/RheumPRO queries.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02855437
First Posted
July 28, 2016
Last Updated
October 24, 2019
Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Collaborators
University of Nebraska
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02855437
Brief Title
Novel Methods for Ascertainment of Gout Flares -A Pilot Study
Official Title
Novel Methods for Ascertainment of Gout Flares -A Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Collaborators
University of Nebraska
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of using different remote data collection technologies to ascertain flare occurrence among gout patients. Two technologies will be the focus of this study: a telephone based interactive voice response (IVR) and a smartphone mobile application (called RheumPRO). The results of this study will not only guide research approaches in clinical trials, but may also have direct implications for monitoring patient outcomes in the context of day-to-day clinical practice.
The investigators hypothesize that acceptability will be greater for RheumPRO application than IVR. Additionally, the investigators hypothesize that RheumPRO will be associated with a greater frequency of patient-initiated interactions.
Detailed Description
Acute gout flares are a major cause of morbidity. Flares lead to substantial reductions in health-related quality of life, increased work absenteeism, productivity loss, and substantial healthcare costs. Acute gout flares are likely related to more than 174,000 emergency department visits in the U.S. annually with corresponding charges approaching $166 million.
In recent surveys, gout patients and healthcare providers alike identified the reduction of gout flares as the highest priority outcome that should be examined in future comparative effectiveness studies of urate lowering therapy (ULT) (unpublished results). Despite consensus about the importance of capturing flares, clinical trials investigating ULTs or anti-inflammatory prophylaxis have used inconsistent flare definitions and methods of flare ascertainment. The inconsistency has likely been driven by the absence of a standardized definition or ascertainment method. These deficits limit comparisons that can be made across investigations.
Recently, a group supported by the American College of Rheumatology & European League Against Rheumatism (ACR & EULAR) has attempted to define a gout flare (8-10). For simplicity, the group focused on defining only those flares occurring after a definitive gout diagnosis. Nine elements of a flare definition emerged from the first two studies. These nine elements included physician reported information, laboratory data and patient self-report. In a third study, Gaffo et al. compared the discriminatory ability of the self-reported items against the gold standard of a rheumatologist's judgment of flare presence. Self-report of 4 criteria had the greatest discriminatory ability with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.931. These promising results indicate the important role for a standardized self-report definition of a gout flare.
In addition to variability in gout flare definitions, the optimal method for obtaining self-reported flares remains undefined. An early study of febuxostat, for example, assessed flares weekly at physician visits Another study counted a flare only when it was treated by a healthcare provider. Still other studies assessed flares during physician visits occurring at variable time points. These inconsistent methods also pose practical limitations given by their time and resource intensive nature. Opportunities to increase efficiency have only recently become available with the validation of the self-reported definition for gout flares described above. Self-report can now be combined with technological advances in remote data collection to develop novel and highly efficient methods to identify gout flares. The investigators propose a study to address this pressing need by leveraging technological advances that facilitate the remote and real-time collection of patient reported flares and outcomes (PROs) in gout.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gout
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
44 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Interactive Voice Response
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The interactive voice response system (IVR) is an automated telephone system that is used to contact study participants. At enrollment the study coordinator will explain how the IVR works, planned survey schedule, and that participant -initiated calls to IVR are allowed.
Arm Title
RheumPro Smartphone Application
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
RheumPro is a UAB developed smartphone application to capture patient reported outcomes. At enrollment the study coordinator will explain how RheumPro works, planned survey schedule, and that participant -initiated surveys in RheumPro are allowed.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
IVR (Phone call)
Intervention Description
IVR will auto dial participants at a schedule time. Participants complete questions using their phone keypad. Participants can also call the IVR to complete surveys if they experience a flare. The IVR will be programmed to call the patient weekly for 26 weeks to complete a weekly Gout Flare Survey and Patient Reported Outcomes Survey. Consistent with the published gout flare self-report definition, gout flare ascertainment questions will include whether the recent flare is similar to past flares, the number of swollen joints and the number of warm joints. Pain at rest during the attack will be assessed on a 0-9 scale. Further questions will include peak pain, timing of attack and duration of attack if completed. We will capture patient reported outcome measures (e.g. pain, fatigue, sleep) using instruments from NIH PROMIS. Following completion of 26 week IVR period participants will crossover to RheumPro arm.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
RheumPro (Smartphone application)
Intervention Description
RheumPRO will be programmed to notify participants weekly for 26 weeks via a scheduled "pop-up" to complete Gout Flare and Patient Reported Outcomes Surveys. Participants self-navigate through the survey questions using their smartphone. If participants do not complete the Gout Flare or Patient Reported Outcomes surveys RheumPro will generate 2 more "pop-ups" at the same time over the proceeding 2 days (eg. Tuesday 4 PM, Wednesday 4 PM). Participants can also open the RheumPro application on their smartphone and complete surveys or if they experience a flare on a day they are not scheduled to complete a survey. Following completion of 26 week RheumPro period participants will crossover to IVR arm.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Preference IVR vs RheumPRO
Description
Percentage of total study population preferring IVR vs. RheumPRO
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Feasibility of Using IVR vs. RheumPRO to Report Gout Flares
Description
Feasibility ----Assessed by the percentage of participants completing answer IRV/RheumPRO queries.
Time Frame
6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
>/= to 18 yrs of age with Current physician diagnosed gout
current hyperuricemia (serum urate level >6.8 mg/dl)
self-report of at least two gout flares in the previous 6 months
current smartphone user utilizing a FitBit compatible smart Phone (with the ability to download RheumPRO from Apple/Google Play store).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kenneth Saag, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama at Birmingham
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35294
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22949176
Citation
Garg R, Sayles HR, Yu F, Michaud K, Singh J, Saag KG, Mikuls TR. Gout-related health care utilization in US emergency departments, 2006 through 2008. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Apr;65(4):571-7. doi: 10.1002/acr.21837.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15751090
Citation
Becker MA, Schumacher HR Jr, Wortmann RL, MacDonald PA, Palo WA, Eustace D, Vernillet L, Joseph-Ridge N. Febuxostat, a novel nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase: a twenty-eight-day, multicenter, phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response clinical trial examining safety and efficacy in patients with gout. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Mar;52(3):916-23. doi: 10.1002/art.20935.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16339094
Citation
Becker MA, Schumacher HR Jr, Wortmann RL, MacDonald PA, Eustace D, Palo WA, Streit J, Joseph-Ridge N. Febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricemia and gout. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 8;353(23):2450-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050373.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18975369
Citation
Schumacher HR Jr, Becker MA, Wortmann RL, Macdonald PA, Hunt B, Streit J, Lademacher C, Joseph-Ridge N. Effects of febuxostat versus allopurinol and placebo in reducing serum urate in subjects with hyperuricemia and gout: a 28-week, phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Nov 15;59(11):1540-8. doi: 10.1002/art.24209.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20370912
Citation
Becker MA, Schumacher HR, Espinoza LR, Wells AF, MacDonald P, Lloyd E, Lademacher C. The urate-lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat in the treatment of the hyperuricemia of gout: the CONFIRMS trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(2):R63. doi: 10.1186/ar2978. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21846852
Citation
Sundy JS, Baraf HS, Yood RA, Edwards NL, Gutierrez-Urena SR, Treadwell EL, Vazquez-Mellado J, White WB, Lipsky PE, Horowitz Z, Huang W, Maroli AN, Waltrip RW 2nd, Hamburger SA, Becker MA. Efficacy and tolerability of pegloticase for the treatment of chronic gout in patients refractory to conventional treatment: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2011 Aug 17;306(7):711-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1169.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15570646
Citation
Borstad GC, Bryant LR, Abel MP, Scroggie DA, Harris MD, Alloway JA. Colchicine for prophylaxis of acute flares when initiating allopurinol for chronic gouty arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004 Dec;31(12):2429-32.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18055475
Citation
Taylor WJ, Schumacher HR Jr, Baraf HS, Chapman P, Stamp L, Doherty M, McQueen F, Dalbeth N, Schlesinger N, Furst DE, Vazquez-Mellado J, Becker MA, Kavanaugh A, Louthrenoo W, Bardin T, Khanna D, Simon LS, Yamanaka H, Choi HK, Zeng X, Strand V, Grainger R, Clegg D, Singh JA, Diaz-Torne C, Boers M, Gow P, Barskova VG. A modified Delphi exercise to determine the extent of consensus with OMERACT outcome domains for studies of acute and chronic gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Jun;67(6):888-91. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.079970. Epub 2007 Nov 29. Erratum In: Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Nov;67(11):1652.. Mellado, J Vazquez [corrected to Vazquez-Mellado, J].
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19333981
Citation
Taylor WJ, Shewchuk R, Saag KG, Schumacher HR Jr, Singh JA, Grainger R, Edwards NL, Bardin T, Waltrip RW, Simon LS, Burgos-Vargas R. Toward a valid definition of gout flare: results of consensus exercises using Delphi methodology and cognitive mapping. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Apr 15;61(4):535-43. doi: 10.1002/art.24166.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22083456
Citation
Gaffo AL, Schumacher HR, Saag KG, Taylor WJ, Dinnella J, Outman R, Chen L, Dalbeth N, Sivera F, Vazquez-Mellado J, Chou CT, Zeng X, Perez-Ruiz F, Kowalski SC, Goldenstein-Schainberg C, Chen L, Bardin T, Singh JA. Developing a provisional definition of flare in patients with established gout. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 May;64(5):1508-17. doi: 10.1002/art.33483.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32746893
Citation
Elmagboul N, Coburn BW, Foster J, Mudano A, Melnick J, Bergman D, Yang S, Chen L, Filby C, Mikuls TR, Curtis JR, Saag K. Physical activity measured using wearable activity tracking devices associated with gout flares. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Aug 3;22(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02272-2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31255174
Citation
Elmagboul N, Coburn BW, Foster J, Mudano A, Melnick J, Bergman D, Yang S, Redden D, Chen L, Filby C, Curtis JR, Mikuls TR, Saag KG. Comparison of an interactive voice response system and smartphone application in the identification of gout flares. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Jun 29;21(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1944-5.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Novel Methods for Ascertainment of Gout Flares -A Pilot Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs