search
Back to results

Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) Therapy in Subjects With Medically Refractory Heart Failure (IMPULSE-HF)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
OPTIMIZER
Optimal medical therapy
Sponsored by
Impulse Dynamics
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Baseline ejection fraction ≥ 25% and ≤45% (as assessed by the site)
  • NYHA class II or III (chronic, not transient, heart failure) despite receiving optimal medical therapy for heart failure
  • Stable medication for heart failure for at least 30 days based on patient's medical records
  • Baseline Peak VO2 ≥ 10 and ≤ 18.5 ml O2/Kg/min (as assessed by the site)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Potentially correctible cause of HF (valvular, congenital, or untreated ischemic heart disease)
  • Clinically significant angina pectoris
  • Hospitalization for HF requiring the use of inotropic support or IV diuretics within 30 days of enrollment
  • PR interval greater than 375 ms
  • Permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter or cardioversion within 30 days of enrollment.
  • Exercise tolerance limited by condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or unable to perform baseline stress testing
  • Scheduled for a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedure, or CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment.
  • Biventricular pacing system, or indication for Biventricular pacing system
  • Myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment.
  • Mechanical tricuspid or aortic valves.
  • Ventricular assist device
  • Prior heart transplant
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study
  • Age below 18
  • Subject participating in another study, unrelated to CCM, at the same time (or within 30 days prior to enrollment to this study)
  • Subjects on dialysis

Sites / Locations

  • Universitätsklinik Innere Medizin
  • Universtitätsklinikum; Medizinische Klinik I
  • Helios Klinikum; 3. Medizinische Klinik
  • Albertinen Krankenhaus
  • Universitätsklinikum; Kardiologie im Herzzentrum
  • Universität Leipzig; Abteilung für Kardiologie und Angiologie
  • 4th Military Hospital
  • Karolinska University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Device implant

Optimal medical therapy

Arm Description

Patients randomized to the treatment group will receive optimal medical therapy for heart failure. and implantation of the OPTIMIZER System.

Patients randomized to the control group will receive optimal medical therapy for heart failure.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Comparison between the groups of the change in Peak VO2 from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Comparison of change in quality of life as measure (MLWHFQ), from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Comparison of change in NYHA class, from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Comparison of change in Peak VO2 from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up for each of the following subgroups separately: Baseline EF <35% , baseline EF ≥35%

Full Information

First Posted
July 20, 2016
Last Updated
September 1, 2020
Sponsor
Impulse Dynamics
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02857309
Brief Title
Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) Therapy in Subjects With Medically Refractory Heart Failure
Acronym
IMPULSE-HF
Official Title
Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) Therapy in Subjects With Medically Refractory Heart Failure: A Randomized Efficacy Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Slow enrolment.
Study Start Date
February 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 15, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 15, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Impulse Dynamics

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study is designed to substantiate the efficacy of Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) in the heart failure population with ejection fraction ranging between 25 and 45%. The study is designed in an adaptive manner to ensure proper statistical significance and power of the primary efficacy evaluation.
Detailed Description
This study will collect efficacy data in a randomized controlled setting, including New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II and III Heart Failure population with baseline ejection fraction (EF) of 25% to 45%. There is previous evidence related to the beneficial effect of CCM in patients with baseline ejection fraction of <35%. While patients with EF between 35% and 45% were not prospectively studied in the original clinical study initially conducted to support Conformité Européene (CE) Marking of the OPTIMIZER System, recently available data from a randomized study that included such patients show CCM to be safe and effective in this group of patients as well. Furthermore, the literature supports that this population has very similar clinical characteristics, in practice are treated with nearly the same medications, and have similar underlying mechanisms of disease compared to patients with EF <35%. CCM has been successfully used also in patients with EF greater than 35% in routine use and in the FIX-HF-5 study. Since the system is CE marked and since the population includes patients meeting the approved indication as well as population that has shown to benefit from CCM (EF 35%-45%), the risk involved in performing such a clinical investigation seems acceptable. The study is designed to substantiate the efficacy of CCM in heart failure patients with EFs in the range of 25%-to-45% (inclusive). This is a prospective, randomized study comparing CCM plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) (Treatment Group) to OMT alone (Control Group) over a 24 week period. The primary endpoint shall be a comparison of changes in Peak VO2, which is an established objective physiological indicator of exercise capacity which is relevant in heart failure device studies. To further improve the accuracy and objectivity of measurements, double assessment of the Peak VO2 will be performed at each of the primary time points. Tests can be performed using upright and semi-supine bicycle ergometer or using treadmill. In sites where more than one option is available, bicycle ergometer is the preferred option. Treadmill is only allowed in case no bicycle is available at the site. Each subject shall be consistently tested using the same method throughout the study. The study is designed in an adaptive manner to ensure proper statistical significance and power of the primary efficacy evaluation. The study will collect additional (exploratory) efficacy data on the difference between the treatment group and control group in the changes over 24 weeks in predicted survival probability. To evaluate the survival probability, two established models are used: the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM), and the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) model . These models use information collected at a certain time point to predict survival probabilities over the following years. The information used for such prediction includes status of the disease (NYHA, Left Ventricular EF (LVEF)), documented medical history and co-morbidities, documented therapies and medications, and standard blood tests values. Additionally, hospitalization data will be collected from medical records of the site and/or from any other medical records of clinics/hospitals where the patient may have been treated for a timeframe of 12 months before enrollment and until 24 weeks after the Study Start Date (SSD).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Device implant
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Patients randomized to the treatment group will receive optimal medical therapy for heart failure. and implantation of the OPTIMIZER System.
Arm Title
Optimal medical therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients randomized to the control group will receive optimal medical therapy for heart failure.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
OPTIMIZER
Intervention Description
The OPTIMIZER System delivers non-excitatory cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) signals to the heart that are intended to influence myocardial properties in patients with chronic heart failure. The system has no pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) functions.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Optimal medical therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors
Intervention Description
OMT using standard heart failure (HF) drugs
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison between the groups of the change in Peak VO2 from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up.
Time Frame
from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of change in quality of life as measure (MLWHFQ), from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Time Frame
from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Title
Comparison of change in NYHA class, from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Time Frame
from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Title
Comparison of change in Peak VO2 from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up for each of the following subgroups separately: Baseline EF <35% , baseline EF ≥35%
Time Frame
from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Comparison between the groups of the change in SHFM survival prediction model score from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Time Frame
from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Title
Comparison between the groups of the change in MAGGIC survival prediction model score from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Time Frame
from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Title
All-cause mortality
Time Frame
from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Title
Cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame
from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Title
Time to first event - cardiovascular related
Time Frame
from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up
Title
Time to first event - all causes
Time Frame
from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Baseline ejection fraction ≥ 25% and ≤45% (as assessed by the site) NYHA class II or III (chronic, not transient, heart failure) despite receiving optimal medical therapy for heart failure Stable medication for heart failure for at least 30 days based on patient's medical records Baseline Peak VO2 ≥ 10 and ≤ 18.5 ml O2/Kg/min (as assessed by the site) Exclusion Criteria: Potentially correctible cause of HF (valvular, congenital, or untreated ischemic heart disease) Clinically significant angina pectoris Hospitalization for HF requiring the use of inotropic support or IV diuretics within 30 days of enrollment PR interval greater than 375 ms Permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter or cardioversion within 30 days of enrollment. Exercise tolerance limited by condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or unable to perform baseline stress testing Scheduled for a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedure, or CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment. Biventricular pacing system, or indication for Biventricular pacing system Myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment. Mechanical tricuspid or aortic valves. Ventricular assist device Prior heart transplant Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study Age below 18 Subject participating in another study, unrelated to CCM, at the same time (or within 30 days prior to enrollment to this study) Subjects on dialysis
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gerhard Hindricks, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Universitätsklinik Innere Medizin
City
Graz
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Universtitätsklinikum; Medizinische Klinik I
City
Aachen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Helios Klinikum; 3. Medizinische Klinik
City
Erfurt
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Albertinen Krankenhaus
City
Hamburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum; Kardiologie im Herzzentrum
City
Köln
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universität Leipzig; Abteilung für Kardiologie und Angiologie
City
Leipzig
Country
Germany
Facility Name
4th Military Hospital
City
Wroclaw
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Karolinska University Hospital
City
Stockholm
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) Therapy in Subjects With Medically Refractory Heart Failure

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs