VivaSight-SL™ Versus Bronchoscopy for Percutaneous Tracheotomy (VivaPDT)
Primary Purpose
Respiratory Insufficiency
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
conventional bronchoscopy
VivaSight-SL tube
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Respiratory Insufficiency focused on measuring tracheotomy, bronchoscopy, critical care
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients receiving percutaneous tracheotomy in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 18 years
- No consent
- Direct laryngoscopy according to Cormack-Lehane ≥ 3
Sites / Locations
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
bronchoscopic guidance
tube mounted camera guidance
Arm Description
optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional bronchoscopy
optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by the VivaSight-SL tube
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score)
Secondary Outcome Measures
minute ventilation according to score generated from 4 point Likert scale at 2 time points
pulse oxymetric oxygen saturation according to score generated from 4 point Likert scale at 2 time points
change in pH-values
change in paCO2 values
change in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (mmHg)
change in etCO2 values
change in endtidal carbon dioxide (mmHg)
change in paO2 values
change in arterial partial pressure of oxygen (mmHg)
changes in peak airway pressure of ventilator
if volume controlled mode is used
duration of the intervention
adverse events
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02861001
First Posted
June 13, 2016
Last Updated
March 22, 2017
Sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02861001
Brief Title
VivaSight-SL™ Versus Bronchoscopy for Percutaneous Tracheotomy
Acronym
VivaPDT
Official Title
Prospective, Randomized Study in Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Receiving Percutaneous Tracheotomy. A Comparison of Periinterventional Visualization of Conventional Bronchoscopy and an Endotracheal Tube Mounted Camera (VivaSight-SL™)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 13, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 13, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Optical guidance for percutaneous tracheotomy in intensive care is usually performed by bronchoscopy. Recently, an endotracheal tube with a camera mounted at its tip (VivaSight-SL) has been introduced that allows for endotracheal visualization.
For feasibility evaluation, ten patients in intensive care receive percutaneous tracheotomy with optical guidance by the VivaSight-SL tube. If this part is completed with satisfactory results, patients are randomized to receive optical guidance by bronchoscopy or by VivaSight-SL tube. The primary end point is the visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score, see detailed description).
Detailed Description
Background
Long-term ventilated critically ill patients often receive a tracheotomy to facilitate weaning from the ventilator and for prevention of secondary complications by the endotracheal tube [1]. Besides surgical tracheotomy in which a muco-cutaneous fistula is prepared between trachea and outer skin, percutaneous tracheotomy (PDT) has been introduced, in which a cannula is being inserted into the trachea. After introduction of a guidewire, the trachea is then dilated [2]. This intervention should be led by optical guidance, i. e. to verify the correct point of tracheal cannulation between the 2nd and 3rd tracheal cartilage and to minimize the risk for accidental injury to the membranous part of the trachea [3]. Usually, optical guidance is performed by bronchoscopy [4]. During bronchoscopy in ventilated patients, a drop in minute ventilation or an increase of carbon dioxide partial pressure with a consecutive respiratory acidosis may occur. Recently, an endotracheal tube with an integrated camera at its tip has been introduced that permits a continuous visualization of the trachea on a monitor connected to the camera (VivaSightTM-SL, ETView Ltd., Misgav, Israel) [5]. This tube has been CE and FDA certified (http://www.etview.com/products/ vivasight-sl).
In this study, it is being evaluated whether the optical guidance during PDT can be performed by the VivaSightTM-SL tube. Without the need for bronchoscopy during intervention, patients' ventilation during the procedure may be optimized with a lesser increase of the arterial and the end-expiratory carbon dioxide partial pressures. Furthermore, the procedure itself would be simpler without the need for a bronchoscopy.
In the investigators' institution, the VivaSightTM-SL tube has already been used in two patients together with bronchoscopic guidance for percutaneous tracheotomy. According to the investigators' experience, it seems to be possible to perform the procedure without a bronchoscopy. Therefore, the feasibility of PDT with guidance by the VivaSightTM-SL tube alone without bronchoscopy is tested. After a positive result in the first part of this study, non-inferiority of the VivaSightTM-SL tube in comparison to bronchoscopy is tested.
Methods
Design of Study / No. of Patients:
part 1: observational study, 10 consecutive patients part 2: randomized, prospective study, 46 patients
With a sample size of 46 (randomized 1:1 in 2 groups of 23 each) a difference of 35% on a visualization score [6] may be seen with an α-error of 0,05 and a β-error of 1-0,8.
Procedures:
screening of for study inclusion according to inclusion and exclusion criteria
changing of the endotracheal tube to the VivaSightTM-SL tube
percutaneous tracheotomy with Ciaglia Blue Rhino technique [2, 7, 8]
arterial blood gas sampling (BGA): baseline value from patients' records, prior to skin incision, immediately after insertion of tracheal tube
study inclusion:
All patients being treated in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine receiving percutaneous tracheotomy due to long term ventilation are screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Details of study-procedures:
Intubation:
The Intubation with the VivaSightTM-SL endotracheal tube does not differ from an intubation with a conventional tube that is done with respect to the standard operating procedure (SOP) of the Dept. for Intensive Care Medicine. During the intubation, vital parameters are monitored with respect to the underlying disease and patients' therapy is continuously adjusted. According to the SOP, two physicians are present of which at least one is a fellow or an attending physician with experience in intensive care medicine.
bronchoscopy:
The bronchoscopy for percutaneous tracheotomy is done according to the SOP of the Dept. for Intensive Care Medicine. Furthermore, during this study the bronchoscopy is done by a physician with an experience of more that 200 bronchoscopies.
percutaneous tracheotomy:
The tracheotomy is performed according to the Ciaglia Blue Rhino method [2, 7, 8] (Ciaglia Blue Rhino® G2, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA). After skin incision and an optional blunt dissection of the subcutaneous tissue, the trachea is cannulated between the 2nd and 3rd tracheal cartilage. Visualization is provided by either the VivaSightTM-SL tube or by conventional bronchoscopy. Should visualization be insufficient (one item of score ≥ 3, see below), a bronchoscope is available as a back-up. The tracheotomy is performed by an experienced fellow or attending physician.
rating of visualization of tracheal structures and ventilation during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (mod. after [6]):
Rating (each item 1 to 4 points)
A) Identification of: thyroid cartilage, cricoid cartilage, 1st-3rd tracheal cartilage
1 Reliable identification; 2 Only cricoid cartilage and tracheal cartilages; 3 Only tracheal cartilages; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
B) Visualization of tracheal circumference 1 Complete; 2 circumference 1/3 to 2/3 of circumference; 3 Only small parts of trachea; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
C) Monitoring puncture: midline + level below 1st or 2nd tracheal cartilage
1 Reliable identification; 2 Midline sure Level uncertain, but below the 1st tracheal cartilage; 3 Level of puncture uncertain; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
D) Monitoring dilatation Anterior wall and Pars membranacea (P.m.) visible; 1 Reliable identification; 2 P.m. only; 3 Only small parts of trachea visible, no control of P.m.; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
E) Quality of Ventilation Before puncture and worst ventilation during PDT, respectively
1 Minute ventilation (MV) as before starting tracheotomy; 2 MV < 2 L/min or oxygen saturation (SO2) 80-90% (>2minutes); 3 MV < 0,5l /min or SO2 70 - 79% (> 2 minutes); 4 MV = 0 or SO2 < 70% (> 2 minutes)
Consent: all patients or their legal surrogate give written informed consent.
Data protection: Data are anonymized.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Respiratory Insufficiency
Keywords
tracheotomy, bronchoscopy, critical care
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
56 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
bronchoscopic guidance
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional bronchoscopy
Arm Title
tube mounted camera guidance
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by the VivaSight-SL tube
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
conventional bronchoscopy
Intervention Description
optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional bronchoscopy
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
VivaSight-SL tube
Intervention Description
optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by the VivaSight-SL tube
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score)
Time Frame
during tracheotomy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
minute ventilation according to score generated from 4 point Likert scale at 2 time points
Time Frame
two time points: 1. during identification of landmark structures before puncture of trachea, 2. during puncture, dilatation and tracheotomy
Title
pulse oxymetric oxygen saturation according to score generated from 4 point Likert scale at 2 time points
Time Frame
two time points: 1. during identification of landmark structures before puncture of trachea, 2. during puncture, dilatation and tracheotomy
Title
change in pH-values
Time Frame
three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
Title
change in paCO2 values
Description
change in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (mmHg)
Time Frame
three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
Title
change in etCO2 values
Description
change in endtidal carbon dioxide (mmHg)
Time Frame
three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
Title
change in paO2 values
Description
change in arterial partial pressure of oxygen (mmHg)
Time Frame
three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
Title
changes in peak airway pressure of ventilator
Description
if volume controlled mode is used
Time Frame
three time points: baseline value (before sterile drapes are applied), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
Title
duration of the intervention
Time Frame
during tracheotomy
Title
adverse events
Time Frame
up to 1 week
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients receiving percutaneous tracheotomy in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine.
Age ≥ 18 years
Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Age < 18 years
No consent
Direct laryngoscopy according to Cormack-Lehane ≥ 3
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stefan Kluge, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Head of Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
City
Hamburg
State/Province
HH
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24668495
Citation
Dreher M, Kluge S. [Airway devices in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2014 Jun;68(6):371-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365318. Epub 2014 Mar 25. German.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3996056
Citation
Ciaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest. 1985 Jun;87(6):715-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.87.6.715.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21630175
Citation
Braune S, Kluge S. [Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Jun;136(23):1265-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280549. Epub 2011 May 31. No abstract available. German.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26271742
Citation
Vargas M, Sutherasan Y, Antonelli M, Brunetti I, Corcione A, Laffey JG, Putensen C, Servillo G, Pelosi P. Tracheostomy procedures in the intensive care unit: an international survey. Crit Care. 2015 Aug 13;19(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1013-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23121322
Citation
Huitink JM, Koopman EM, Bouwman RA, Craenen A, Verwoert M, Krage R, Visser IE, Erwteman M, van Groeningen D, Tijink R, Schauer A. Tracheal intubation with a camera embedded in the tube tip (Vivasight() ). Anaesthesia. 2013 Jan;68(1):74-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.12065. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20357150
Citation
Linstedt U, Zenz M, Krull K, Hager D, Prengel AW. Laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a comparison of visibility of intratracheal structures. Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110(4):1076-82. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d27fb4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20857374
Citation
Baumann HJ, Kemei C, Kluge S. [Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2010 Dec;64(12):769-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255743. Epub 2010 Sep 20. German.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11004042
Citation
Byhahn C, Wilke HJ, Halbig S, Lischke V, Westphal K. Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):882-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00021.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29284503
Citation
Grensemann J, Eichler L, Kahler S, Jarczak D, Simon M, Pinnschmidt HO, Kluge S. Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT). Crit Care. 2017 Dec 29;21(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1901-0.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
VivaSight-SL™ Versus Bronchoscopy for Percutaneous Tracheotomy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs