Two Cycles Versus Three Cyclle of CCRT for Low Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Primary Purpose
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cisplatin combine with IMRT
Cisplatin combine with IMRT
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, including WHO II or III
- Original clinical staged as T3-4N0-3 M0 or any T、N2-3M0(according to the 7th AJCC edition)
- No evidence of distant metastasis (M0)
- Pretreatment Plasm EB Virus DNA<4000copies/ml
- Male and no pregnant female
- Satisfactory performance status: ECOG (Eastern Cooperative OncologyGroup) scale 0-1
- WBC ≥ 4×109 /L and PLT ≥4×109 /L and HGB ≥90 g/L
- With normal liver function test (ALT、AST ≤ 2.5×ULN, TBIL≤ 2.0×ULN)
- With normal renal function test (Creatinine ≤ 1.5×ULN)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients have evidence of relapse or distant metastasis
- Histologically confirmed keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (WHO I)
- Receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy previously
- The presence of uncontrolled life-threatening illness
- Women of child-bearing potential who are pregnant or breastfeeding because of the potentially dangerous effects of the preparative chemotherapy on the fetus or infant.
- Receiving other ways of anti-cancer therapy.
- Suffered from other malignant tumors (except the cure of basal cell carcinoma or uterine cervical carcinoma in situ) previously.
Sites / Locations
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer CenterRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Two cycle CCRT
Three cycle CCRT
Arm Description
Concurrent cisplatin(100mg/m2,D1,D22)combine with IMRT
Concurrent cisplatin(100mg/m2,D1,D22 and D43)combine with IMRT
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Progress-free survival
Progress-free survival is calculated from the date of randomization to the date of the first progress at any site or death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up
Secondary Outcome Measures
The shor-term toxic effects
The shorterm toxic effects were assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0)
Complete Response (CR)
CR assessed by independent reviewers, according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Disease response evaluated after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment. Complete response defined as the complete disappearance of the target and non-target lesion(s) identified at baseline after radiological evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) only
Overall Survival(OS)
The OS was defined as the duration from the date of random assignment to the date of death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up
Locoregional Relapse-Free Survival(LRRFS)
The LRRFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first locoregional relapse or until the date of the last follow-up visit
Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS)
The DMFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first distant metastases or until the date of the last follow-up visit
Cost-effectiveness analysis
The cost (including direct cost drug fees, inspection fees, expenses and nursing cost) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated between two arms
The monitoring of plasma EBV DNA
The plasma EBV DNA will be detected before treatment ,during treatment (weekly) and during follow up( every 3-6 months)
Long-term toxicities
Patients will be monitored for long-term toxicity by standard NIH criteria. QoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTCQLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ Head and Neck
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02871518
Brief Title
Two Cycles Versus Three Cyclle of CCRT for Low Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Official Title
A Randomized Phase II Non-inferiority Study of Two Cycles Versus Three Cycles of Cisplatin Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Low Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Pretreatment Plasma EBV DNA Level
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
August 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2021 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of two cycles versus three cycles of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in treating patients with Low Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma based on pretreatment plasma EBV DNA.
Detailed Description
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic in Southern China and Southeast Asia. Several prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that concurrent chemoradiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locoregionally advanced NPC. Concurrently, although cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy was considered as the standard regimen for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, several prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that only 52-63% patients can finished three cycles cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy( DDP, 100mg/m2,D1,D22 and D43), due to chemoradiotherapy induced toxicity. Combined analyses of NPC-9901 and NPC-9902 Trials indicated that the 5-year locoregional failure free survival was insignificant between the patients received between two and three cycles cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Our previous studies have also demonstrated that the five years overall survival, distant metastasis free survival and 5-year locoregional failure free survival was not observed significant difference between the patients received between two and three cycles cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy. It indicated that one pressing questions remain to be resolved: can we define the optimal dose so that we can reduce toxicity by avoiding unnecessary overdose or an ineffective phase of treatment? Recently, the quantification of pretreatment plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA, which was considered the most potential biomarker to compliment TNM stage, was demonstrated a useful biomarker for the risk stratification, monitoring and prediction of the prognosis of NPC. The investigators previous study demonstrated that for local and regionally advanced NPC patients with EBV DNA <4,000copies/mL, the 3-year's PFS and DMFS was approximate to 90%. Pretreatment plasma EBV DNA levels might be applied to guide concurrent chemotherapy regimen for local and regionally advanced NPC patients. Therefore, the investigators make a hypothesis that the low risk locoregionally advanced NPC patients received two cycles of chemotherapy may gain similar long-term survival as those received three cycles of chemotherapy, leading to less chemotherapy induced toxicity. Therefore, this phase II non-inferiority, randomised controlled clinical trial was designed to assess efficacy for low-risk patients, identified with pretreatment plasma EBV DNA <4,000 copies/mL, received two cycle cisplatin-based chemotherapy compared with three cycle cisplatin-based chemotherapy
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
236 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Two cycle CCRT
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Concurrent cisplatin(100mg/m2,D1,D22)combine with IMRT
Arm Title
Three cycle CCRT
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Concurrent cisplatin(100mg/m2,D1,D22 and D43)combine with IMRT
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cisplatin combine with IMRT
Other Intervention Name(s)
DDP
Intervention Description
Concurrent cisplatin (100mg/m2,D1,D22) combine with IMRT
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cisplatin combine with IMRT
Other Intervention Name(s)
DDP
Intervention Description
Concurrent cisplatin (100mg/m2,D1,D22 and D43) combine with IMRT
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progress-free survival
Description
Progress-free survival is calculated from the date of randomization to the date of the first progress at any site or death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up
Time Frame
3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The shor-term toxic effects
Description
The shorterm toxic effects were assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0)
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Complete Response (CR)
Description
CR assessed by independent reviewers, according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Disease response evaluated after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment. Complete response defined as the complete disappearance of the target and non-target lesion(s) identified at baseline after radiological evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) only
Time Frame
after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment (up to 9 weeks)
Title
Overall Survival(OS)
Description
The OS was defined as the duration from the date of random assignment to the date of death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Locoregional Relapse-Free Survival(LRRFS)
Description
The LRRFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first locoregional relapse or until the date of the last follow-up visit
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS)
Description
The DMFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first distant metastases or until the date of the last follow-up visit
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Description
The cost (including direct cost drug fees, inspection fees, expenses and nursing cost) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated between two arms
Time Frame
3 years
Title
The monitoring of plasma EBV DNA
Description
The plasma EBV DNA will be detected before treatment ,during treatment (weekly) and during follow up( every 3-6 months)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Long-term toxicities
Description
Patients will be monitored for long-term toxicity by standard NIH criteria. QoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTCQLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ Head and Neck
Time Frame
3 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, including WHO II or III
Original clinical staged as T3-4N0-3 M0 or any T、N2-3M0(according to the 7th AJCC edition)
No evidence of distant metastasis (M0)
Pretreatment Plasm EB Virus DNA<4000copies/ml
Male and no pregnant female
Satisfactory performance status: ECOG (Eastern Cooperative OncologyGroup) scale 0-1
WBC ≥ 4×109 /L and PLT ≥4×109 /L and HGB ≥90 g/L
With normal liver function test (ALT、AST ≤ 2.5×ULN, TBIL≤ 2.0×ULN)
With normal renal function test (Creatinine ≤ 1.5×ULN)
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients have evidence of relapse or distant metastasis
Histologically confirmed keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (WHO I)
Receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy previously
The presence of uncontrolled life-threatening illness
Women of child-bearing potential who are pregnant or breastfeeding because of the potentially dangerous effects of the preparative chemotherapy on the fetus or infant.
Receiving other ways of anti-cancer therapy.
Suffered from other malignant tumors (except the cure of basal cell carcinoma or uterine cervical carcinoma in situ) previously.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lin-Quan Tang, MD,PHD
Phone
8602087343643
Email
tanglq@sysucc.org.cn
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
City
Guangzhou
State/Province
Guangdong
ZIP/Postal Code
510060
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Haiqiang Mai, MD,Ph.D
Phone
86-20-8734-3643
Email
maihq@mail.sysu.edu.cn
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34990291
Citation
Li XY, Luo DH, Guo L, Mo HY, Sun R, Guo SS, Liu LT, Yang ZC, Yang JH, Qiu F, Sun XS, Wang P, Liu Q, Li JB, Tang QN, Lin C, Yang Q, Liu SL, Liang YJ, Jia GD, Wen DX, Guo CY, Yan JJ, Zhao C, Chen QY, Tang LQ, Mai HQ. Deintensified Chemoradiotherapy for Pretreatment Epstein-Barr Virus DNA-Selected Low-Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Phase II Randomized Noninferiority Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr 10;40(11):1163-1173. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01467. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Two Cycles Versus Three Cyclle of CCRT for Low Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs