search
Back to results

Pre-procedural Mouthwash in Reducing Bacteria in Dental Aerosols

Primary Purpose

Chronic Periodontitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dental prophylaxis
Mouthwash CPC+Zn+F
Mouthwash CHX
No rinsing
Water
Sponsored by
University of Guarulhos
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Chronic Periodontitis focused on measuring cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine, oral aerosol, oral splatter, mouthwash, microbiology

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged between 18-70 years;
  • minimum of 20 natural teeth (excluding third molars and teeth with advanced decay indicated for extraction);
  • at least 80% of the sites with visible supragingival plaque;
  • fewer than 10% of sites with visible supragingival calculus;
  • fewer than 30% of sites with probing depth (PD) ≥ 5 mm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of orthodontic bands;
  • partial removable dentures;
  • lesions of the soft or hard tissues of the oral cavity;
  • carious lesions requiring immediate restorative treatment;
  • history of allergy to CHX, CPC, zinc lactate or sodium fluoride;
  • participation in any other clinical study within the one-month period prior to entering into the study;
  • professional tooth cleaning procedure (oral prophylaxis) during the period of one month prior to entering the study;
  • pregnant or breast-feeding women;
  • antibiotic therapy in the previous 6 months;
  • continuous use of oral mouthwashes;
  • any systemic condition that may require prophylactic medication for dental treatment (e.g., mitral valve prolapse).

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm 4

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Placebo Comparator

    Placebo Comparator

    Arm Label

    Test: Mouthwash CPC+Zn+F

    Positive control: Mouthwash CHX

    Negative control A: No rinsing

    Negative control B: Water

    Arm Description

    To rinse with pre-procedural mouthwash containing 0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride, 0.28% zinc lactate and 0.05% sodium fluoride in an Alcohol-free base (for one minute and 20 ml of solution) + full mouth dental prophylaxis using ultrasonic scaler.

    To rinse with pre-procedural mouthwash containing 0.12% CHX with 10% alcohol (for one minute and 20 ml of solution) + full mouth dental prophylaxis using ultrasonic scaler.

    No rinsing with pre-procedural mouthwash + full mouth dental prophylaxis using ultrasonic scaler.

    To rinse with pre-procedural mouthwash containing water from a three-way syringe (for one minute and 20 ml of solution) + full mouth dental prophylaxis using ultrasonic scaler.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Difference between groups (test, positive control, negative control A and negative control B) for the mean number of total colony-forming units (CFUs) in all plates.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Number of total CFUs in plates positioned on the clinician forehead.
    Number of total CFUs in plates positioned on the volunteer's chest.
    Number of total CFUs in plates positioned on the support board.
    Proportion of the microbial complexes.
    Reduction in CFUs in the CPC+Zn+F and CHX groups in comparison with the two negative control groups.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 18, 2016
    Last Updated
    June 2, 2020
    Sponsor
    University of Guarulhos
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02875769
    Brief Title
    Pre-procedural Mouthwash in Reducing Bacteria in Dental Aerosols
    Official Title
    Effectiveness of a Pre-procedural Mouthwash in Reducing Bacteria in Dental Aerosols and Splatters: a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    June 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    February 2015 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    March 2015 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    April 2015 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Guarulhos

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The aim of this randomized, single blinded clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of a pre-procedural mouthwash containing cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), zinc lactate (Zn) and sodium fluoride (F) in the reduction of viable bacteria in oral aerosol/splatter after a dental prophylaxis with ultrasonic scaler.
    Detailed Description
    The propagation of oral microorganisms in the dental office during different oral procedures has been a concern. The use of certain equipment such as ultrasonic devices, highspeed dental handpieces or three-way syringes may spread aerosols and splatters containing microorganisms in the environment. These microorganisms may cause cross-infections in the dental office, jeopardizing the health of patients and dental professionals. Different procedures, materials and antimicrobial agents have been proposed to minimize microbial cross-contamination in the dental office. Chlorhexidine (CHX) is considered the gold standard substance in controlling oral biofilm growth in the oral cavity or microbial spread by oral aerosols due to its broad antibacterial spectrum and substantivity of 8 to 12 hours. However, other antiseptics have also been used as pre-procedural mouthwashes. CPC has an important antimicrobial activity and is considered a safe product for marketing. In this context, the present trend has been to combine more than one active substance in mouthwash and toothpaste formulations with the aim of increasing the efficacy of the products, or treating more than one clinical problem, such as plaque accumulation and halitosis, caries or gingival inflammation. Therefore, the aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to evaluate the effectiveness of a new mouthwash formulation containing 0.075% CPC, 0.28% zinc lactate and 0.05% sodium fluoride (CPC+Zn+F) in reducing viable bacteria present in oral aerosol/splatter. Sixty systemically healthy volunteers receiving dental prophylaxis were randomly assigned to one of the following experimental groups (15 per group): i) rinsing with 0.075% CPC, 0.28% Zn and 0.05% F (CPC+Zn+F), ii) 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX), iii) no rinsing and iv) rinsing with water. Viable bacteria were collected from different locations in the dental office on enriched TSA plates and anaerobically incubated for 72 hours. The colonies were counted and species were then identified by Checkerboard DNA-DNA Hybridization. The total number of colony-forming units (CFUs) detected in the aerosols/splatters from volunteers who rinsed with CPC+Zn+F or CHX was statistically significantly (p<0.05) lower than of those subjects who did not rinse or who rinsed with water. When all locations were considered together, the aerosols/splatters from the CPC+Zn+F and CHX groups showed, respectively, 70% and 77% fewer CFUs than those from the no rinsing group and 61% and 70% than those from the water group. The mean proportions of bacterial species from the orange complex were statistically significantly (p<0.05) lower in aerosols/splatter from the CPC+Zn+F and CHX groups compared with the two negative controls. In conclusion, the results of the present investigation showed that a mouthwash containing 0.075% CPC, 0.28% Zn and 0.05% F, is effective in reducing viable bacteria in oral aerosol/splatter after a dental prophylaxis with ultrasonic scaler. This finding is highly relevant to the clinical practice, as it may greatly reduce the risk of cross-contamination in dental offices.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Chronic Periodontitis
    Keywords
    cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine, oral aerosol, oral splatter, mouthwash, microbiology

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Phase 3
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Care Provider
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    60 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Test: Mouthwash CPC+Zn+F
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    To rinse with pre-procedural mouthwash containing 0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride, 0.28% zinc lactate and 0.05% sodium fluoride in an Alcohol-free base (for one minute and 20 ml of solution) + full mouth dental prophylaxis using ultrasonic scaler.
    Arm Title
    Positive control: Mouthwash CHX
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    To rinse with pre-procedural mouthwash containing 0.12% CHX with 10% alcohol (for one minute and 20 ml of solution) + full mouth dental prophylaxis using ultrasonic scaler.
    Arm Title
    Negative control A: No rinsing
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    No rinsing with pre-procedural mouthwash + full mouth dental prophylaxis using ultrasonic scaler.
    Arm Title
    Negative control B: Water
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    To rinse with pre-procedural mouthwash containing water from a three-way syringe (for one minute and 20 ml of solution) + full mouth dental prophylaxis using ultrasonic scaler.
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Dental prophylaxis
    Intervention Description
    Full mouth dental prophylaxis (FMDP) was conducted in one appointment lasting 10 minute, using an ultrasonic scaler at a frequency of 25 kHz (Cavitron Select SPC, Dentsply professional, York, PA, USA) at less than 50% power. The FMDP performed without anesthesia and in order to eliminate supragingival plaque, calculus and stainings.
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Mouthwash CPC+Zn+F
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Pre-procedural mouthwash CPC+Zn+F
    Intervention Description
    The volunteer rinsed with pre-procedural mouthwash containing 0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride, 0.28% zinc lactate and 0.05% sodium fluoride in an Alcohol-free base for one minute, 20 ml of solution and then expectorated all remaining liquid.
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Mouthwash CHX
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Pre-procedural mouthwash
    Intervention Description
    The volunteer rinsed with pre-procedural mouthwash containing 0.12% CHX with 10% alcohol for one minute, 20 ml of solution and then expectorated all remaining liquid.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    No rinsing
    Intervention Description
    The volunteer did not rinse with any pre-procedural mothwash.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Water
    Intervention Description
    The volunteer rinsed with pre-procedural mouthwash containing water from a three-way syringe for one minute, 20 ml of water and then expectorated all remaining liquid.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Difference between groups (test, positive control, negative control A and negative control B) for the mean number of total colony-forming units (CFUs) in all plates.
    Time Frame
    During oral prophylaxis procedure.
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of total CFUs in plates positioned on the clinician forehead.
    Time Frame
    During oral prophylaxis procedure.
    Title
    Number of total CFUs in plates positioned on the volunteer's chest.
    Time Frame
    During oral prophylaxis procedure.
    Title
    Number of total CFUs in plates positioned on the support board.
    Time Frame
    During oral prophylaxis procedure.
    Title
    Proportion of the microbial complexes.
    Time Frame
    During oral prophylaxis procedure.
    Title
    Reduction in CFUs in the CPC+Zn+F and CHX groups in comparison with the two negative control groups.
    Time Frame
    During oral prophylaxis procedure.

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    70 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: aged between 18-70 years; minimum of 20 natural teeth (excluding third molars and teeth with advanced decay indicated for extraction); at least 80% of the sites with visible supragingival plaque; fewer than 10% of sites with visible supragingival calculus; fewer than 30% of sites with probing depth (PD) ≥ 5 mm. Exclusion Criteria: presence of orthodontic bands; partial removable dentures; lesions of the soft or hard tissues of the oral cavity; carious lesions requiring immediate restorative treatment; history of allergy to CHX, CPC, zinc lactate or sodium fluoride; participation in any other clinical study within the one-month period prior to entering into the study; professional tooth cleaning procedure (oral prophylaxis) during the period of one month prior to entering the study; pregnant or breast-feeding women; antibiotic therapy in the previous 6 months; continuous use of oral mouthwashes; any systemic condition that may require prophylactic medication for dental treatment (e.g., mitral valve prolapse).
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Magda Feres, Professor
    Organizational Affiliation
    Guarulhos University
    Official's Role
    Study Chair

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Yes
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    September 2016
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    8195499
    Citation
    Bentley CD, Burkhart NW, Crawford JJ. Evaluating spatter and aerosol contamination during dental procedures. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994 May;125(5):579-84. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0093.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    2760346
    Citation
    Cochran MA, Miller CH, Sheldrake MA. The efficacy of the rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms during dental treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989 Jul;119(1):141-4. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1989.0131.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26031397
    Citation
    Erovic Ademovski S, Lingstrom P, Renvert S. The effect of different mouth rinse products on intra-oral halitosis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2016 May;14(2):117-23. doi: 10.1111/idh.12148. Epub 2015 May 31.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    7487047
    Citation
    Grenier D. Quantitative analysis of bacterial aerosols in two different dental clinic environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Aug;61(8):3165-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.8.3165-3168.1995.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23855840
    Citation
    Gupta G, Mitra D, Ashok KP, Gupta A, Soni S, Ahmed S, Arya A. Efficacy of preprocedural mouth rinsing in reducing aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scaler: a pilot study. J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):562-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120616. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15127864
    Citation
    Harrel SK, Molinari J. Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: a brief review of the literature and infection control implications. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Apr;135(4):429-37. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0207.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    9643233
    Citation
    Jones CG. Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? Periodontol 2000. 1997 Oct;15:55-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00105.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19433532
    Citation
    Kanjirath PP, Coplen AE, Chapman JC, Peters MC, Inglehart MR. Effectiveness of gloves and infection control in dentistry: student and provider perspectives. J Dent Educ. 2009 May;73(5):571-80.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23422617
    Citation
    Keni NN, Aras MA, Chitre V. Chlorhexidine allergy due to topical application. Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;23(5):674-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.107393.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    9021321
    Citation
    Kjaerheim V, Skaare A, Barkvoll P, Rolla G. Antiplaque, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties of triclosan mouthrinses in combination with zinc citrate or polyvinylmethylether maleic acid (PVM-MA) copolymer. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996 Oct-Dec;104(5-6):529-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00137.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    17085522
    Citation
    Lang C, Murgia C, Leong M, Tan LW, Perozzi G, Knight D, Ruffin R, Zalewski P. Anti-inflammatory effects of zinc and alterations in zinc transporter mRNA in mouse models of allergic inflammation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007 Feb;292(2):L577-84. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00280.2006. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    11326448
    Citation
    Leggat PA, Kedjarune U. Bacterial aerosols in the dental clinic: a review. Int Dent J. 2001 Feb;51(1):39-44. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-595x.2001.tb00816.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    7938434
    Citation
    Legnani P, Checchi L, Pelliccioni GA, D'Achille C. Atmospheric contamination during dental procedures. Quintessence Int. 1994 Jun;25(6):435-9.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25727335
    Citation
    Mendes L, Coimbra J, Pereira AL, Resende M, Pinto MG. Comparative effect of a new mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine, triclosan and zinc on volatile sulphur compounds: a randomized, crossover, double-blind study. Int J Dent Hyg. 2016 Aug;14(3):202-8. doi: 10.1111/idh.12132. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23930175
    Citation
    Nejatidanesh F, Khosravi Z, Goroohi H, Badrian H, Savabi O. Risk of Contamination of Different Areas of Dentist's Face During Dental Practices. Int J Prev Med. 2013 May;4(5):611-5.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25600577
    Citation
    Pandit S, Cai JN, Jung JE, Lee YS, Jeon JG. Effect of brief cetylpyridinium chloride treatments during early and mature cariogenic biofilm formation. Oral Dis. 2015 Jul;21(5):565-71. doi: 10.1111/odi.12312. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    10368050
    Citation
    Rivera-Hidalgo F, Barnes JB, Harrel SK. Aerosol and splatter production by focused spray and standard ultrasonic inserts. J Periodontol. 1999 May;70(5):473-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.5.473.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22909110
    Citation
    Slots J. Low-cost periodontal therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2012 Oct;60(1):110-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00429.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    9495612
    Citation
    Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent RL Jr. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Feb;25(2):134-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02419.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12656466
    Citation
    Souza-Gugelmin MC, Lima CD, Lima SN, Mian H, Ito IY. Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines. Braz Dent J. 2003;14(1):55-7. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402003000100010. Epub 2003 Jul 31.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21911948
    Citation
    Thomas E. Efficacy of two commonly available mouth rinses used as preprocedural rinses in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Apr-Jun;29(2):113-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.84682.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15142216
    Citation
    Timmerman MF, Menso L, Steinfort J, van Winkelhoff AJ, van der Weijden GA. Atmospheric contamination during ultrasonic scaling. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Jun;31(6):458-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00511.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    11510639
    Citation
    Toroglu MS, Haytac MC, Koksal F. Evaluation of aerosol contamination during debonding procedures. Angle Orthod. 2001 Aug;71(4):299-306. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)0712.0.CO;2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22976567
    Citation
    Varoni E, Tarce M, Lodi G, Carrassi A. Chlorhexidine (CHX) in dentistry: state of the art. Minerva Stomatol. 2012 Sep;61(9):399-419. English, Italian.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25564419
    Citation
    Veena HR, Mahantesha S, Joseph PA, Patil SR, Patil SH. Dissemination of aerosol and splatter during ultrasonic scaling: a pilot study. J Infect Public Health. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2014.11.004. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15457911
    Citation
    Yengopal V. The use of essential oil mouthwashes as preprocedural rinses for infection control. SADJ. 2004 Jul;59(6):247-8, 250. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24024983
    Citation
    Costa X, Laguna E, Herrera D, Serrano J, Alonso B, Sanz M. Efficacy of a new mouth rinse formulation based on 0.07% cetylpyridinium chloride in the control of plaque and gingivitis: a 6-month randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Nov;40(11):1007-15. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12158. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    20354090
    Citation
    Feres M, Figueiredo LC, Faveri M, Stewart B, de Vizio W. The effectiveness of a preprocedural mouthrinse containing cetylpyridinium chloride in reducing bacteria in the dental office. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Apr;141(4):415-22. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0193.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    15316186
    Citation
    Giertsen E. Effects of mouthrinses with triclosan, zinc ions, copolymer, and sodium lauryl sulphate combined with fluoride on acid formation by dental plaque in vivo. Caries Res. 2004 Sep-Oct;38(5):430-5. doi: 10.1159/000079623.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    26478974
    Citation
    Kang JH, Jang YJ, Kim DJ, Park JW. Antimicrobial effectiveness of cetylpyridinium chloride and zinc chloride-containing mouthrinses on bacteria of halitosis and peri-implant disease. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1341-7. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3824. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    24992844
    Citation
    Kaur R, Singh I, Vandana KL, Desai R. Effect of chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, and ozone on microorganisms in dental aerosols: randomized double-blind clinical trial. Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Mar-Apr;25(2):160-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.135910.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    7499664
    Citation
    Logothetis DD, Martinez-Welles JM. Reducing bacterial aerosol contamination with a chlorhexidine gluconate pre-rinse. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995 Dec;126(12):1634-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0111.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    23055587
    Citation
    Reddy S, Prasad MG, Kaul S, Satish K, Kakarala S, Bhowmik N. Efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: A clinical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Apr;16(2):213-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.99264.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    24685786
    Citation
    Shetty SK, Sharath K, Shenoy S, Sreekumar C, Shetty RN, Biju T. Compare the effcacy of two commercially available mouthrinses in reducing viable bacterial count in dental aerosol produced during ultrasonic scaling when used as a preprocedural rinse. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Sep 1;14(5):848-51. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1414.
    Results Reference
    result

    Learn more about this trial

    Pre-procedural Mouthwash in Reducing Bacteria in Dental Aerosols

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs