search
Back to results

Non-operative Treatment Versus Volar Locking Plate in Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture in Patients Over 65 Years

Primary Purpose

Distal Radius Fracture

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
non-operative treatment
operative treatment
Sponsored by
Tampere University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Distal Radius Fracture

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • low energy intra or extra-articular dorsally displaced distal radius fracture within 3 cm of the radiocarpal joint, diagnosed with lateral and posterior-anterior radiographs in ER
  • >10° dorsal tilt and/or over 2 mm step-off and/or over 3 mm shortening in the radiograph

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refuse to participate the study
  • Open fracture more than Gustilo 1 gradus
  • Age under 65 years
  • Chauffeure's or Barton´s fracture
  • Smith´s fracture (volar angulation of the fracture)
  • Does not understand written and spoken guidance in local languages
  • Pathological fracture or previous fracture in the same wrist or forearm

Sites / Locations

  • Viborg Regional HospitalRecruiting
  • Jyväskylä Central HospitalRecruiting
  • Pori Central HospitalRecruiting
  • Tampere University HospitalRecruiting
  • Karolinska University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Other

Arm Label

Cohort 1

Cohort 2

Arm Description

Early ustable fracture: Phase 1: After closed reduction, if satisfactory reduction is not achieved fulfilling the inclusion criteria, the patient is allocated to Cohort 1. The patient is randomized to either non-operative (=Arm 1) or operative treatment (=Arm 2). Patients allocated to non-operative treatment will undergo a standard treatment protocol. Patients allocated to operative treatment will undergo a surgery with volar locking plate with modified Henry's volar approach.

Early stable fracture: Phase 1: After closed reduction, if satisfactory position is achieved, the patient is allocated to Cohort 2 and conservative treatment is performed as usually. Phase 2: Patients allocated to Cohort 2, will visit orthopedic outpatient clinic in 1 week in the hospital where the treatment was initially started. If reduction is maintained the patient will undergo standard follow-up visits. If reduction is lost to fulfill the inclusion criteria for surgery the patient is asked to participate to phase 2 of this study. After the patient´s enrollment has been confirmed and informed consent is signed, the patient is randomized to either non-operative (=Arm 3N) or operative treatment (=Arm 3O). If allocated to non-operative treatment patient will undergo the same protocol as those in the Arm 1. Patients allocated to operative treatment will undergo surgery with volar locking plate with standard volar approach.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change over time in Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
PRWE is the primary outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in the study. The PRWE comprises 15 questions to measure wrist pain and disability in daily activities. In PRWE patients rate wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10 and it consists three subscales: Pain, Function and Cosmetics.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Disability of the wrist measured with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire
The QuickDASH is self-reported questionnaire and shortened version of DASH outcome measure to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in 11 dimensions in 1-5 scale.
Quality of life measured with the 15-D
The 15D is a validated, generic, self-administered instrument for assessing the health related quality of life among adults. It combines the advantages of a preference-based and single index measure on a 0-1 scale.
Pain measured in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The VAS is derived by health care professional question of pain in scale 0 to 10 in which 0 implies no pain and 10 the worst possible pain.
Grip strength measured with a dynamometer
Grip strength is measured with a dynamometer in kg as the mean of three measurements. It will be numbered in percentage of the uninjured side.
Pain catastrophizing measured with the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS)
The pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) is measured with a self-administered questionnaire. The PCS is designed to measure person's willingness to catastrophize the pain while they are experiencing it. In the questionnaire patients answer questions about how they feel and think when they are in pain and it can be taken while they are not experiencing pain.
Physical activity measured with Axivity accelerometer
Physical activity will be measured in a subgroup of patients in two separate follow-up time points.
Self-assessment
Patient's self-assessment questionnaire will be analyzed to find out which parameters are of most importance for the patient.
EWC
Edinbourgh wrist calculator will be used to estimate the propability of loss of reduction during the follow-up.

Full Information

First Posted
August 17, 2016
Last Updated
April 5, 2021
Sponsor
Tampere University Hospital
Collaborators
Central Finland Hospital District, Satakunta Central Hospital, Regionshospitalet Viborg, Skive
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02879656
Brief Title
Non-operative Treatment Versus Volar Locking Plate in Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture in Patients Over 65 Years
Official Title
Non-operative Treatment Versus Surgery With Volar Locking Plate in Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture in 65-year-old and Older Patients - a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 23, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Tampere University Hospital
Collaborators
Central Finland Hospital District, Satakunta Central Hospital, Regionshospitalet Viborg, Skive

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The present collaboration study on the treatment of distal radius fractures is aimed to: (i) to compare non-operative treatment to volar plating in the treatment of initially malaligned distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 and older in terms of functional outcome measured with PRWE (ii) to compare non-operative treatment to volar plating in the treatment of distal radius fractures with early instability during follow-up, i.e., loss of reduction at 1 week (range 5 to 10 days) in patients aged 65 and older in terms of functional outcome measured with PRWE (iii)to compare pain, disability, quality of life, grip strength, and the number of complications after non-operative treatment and the initial and delayed operative treatment of distal radius fracture (iv) to assess the effect of pain catastrophizing score (PCS) on the functional outcome of non-operatively and operatively treated distal radius fracture (v) to assess the association between physical activity and the number of wrist movements measured with Axivity accelerometer and functional outcome measured with PROMs of non-operatively and operatively treated distal radius fractures (vi) to assess the effect of initial as well as the final radiological parameters on the functional outcome (vii) to assess the correlation of probability of radiological malalignment estimated by clinical prediction rule (EWC) with functional outcome measured with PRWE and PASS

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Distal Radius Fracture

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
228 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cohort 1
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Early ustable fracture: Phase 1: After closed reduction, if satisfactory reduction is not achieved fulfilling the inclusion criteria, the patient is allocated to Cohort 1. The patient is randomized to either non-operative (=Arm 1) or operative treatment (=Arm 2). Patients allocated to non-operative treatment will undergo a standard treatment protocol. Patients allocated to operative treatment will undergo a surgery with volar locking plate with modified Henry's volar approach.
Arm Title
Cohort 2
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Early stable fracture: Phase 1: After closed reduction, if satisfactory position is achieved, the patient is allocated to Cohort 2 and conservative treatment is performed as usually. Phase 2: Patients allocated to Cohort 2, will visit orthopedic outpatient clinic in 1 week in the hospital where the treatment was initially started. If reduction is maintained the patient will undergo standard follow-up visits. If reduction is lost to fulfill the inclusion criteria for surgery the patient is asked to participate to phase 2 of this study. After the patient´s enrollment has been confirmed and informed consent is signed, the patient is randomized to either non-operative (=Arm 3N) or operative treatment (=Arm 3O). If allocated to non-operative treatment patient will undergo the same protocol as those in the Arm 1. Patients allocated to operative treatment will undergo surgery with volar locking plate with standard volar approach.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
non-operative treatment
Intervention Description
conservative treatment with 5 weeks cast immobilization
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
operative treatment
Intervention Description
surgery with volar locking plate with modified Henry's volar approach
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change over time in Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
Description
PRWE is the primary outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in the study. The PRWE comprises 15 questions to measure wrist pain and disability in daily activities. In PRWE patients rate wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10 and it consists three subscales: Pain, Function and Cosmetics.
Time Frame
3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disability of the wrist measured with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire
Description
The QuickDASH is self-reported questionnaire and shortened version of DASH outcome measure to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in 11 dimensions in 1-5 scale.
Time Frame
3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Title
Quality of life measured with the 15-D
Description
The 15D is a validated, generic, self-administered instrument for assessing the health related quality of life among adults. It combines the advantages of a preference-based and single index measure on a 0-1 scale.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Title
Pain measured in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Description
The VAS is derived by health care professional question of pain in scale 0 to 10 in which 0 implies no pain and 10 the worst possible pain.
Time Frame
3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Title
Grip strength measured with a dynamometer
Description
Grip strength is measured with a dynamometer in kg as the mean of three measurements. It will be numbered in percentage of the uninjured side.
Time Frame
3 months, 1 year
Title
Pain catastrophizing measured with the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS)
Description
The pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) is measured with a self-administered questionnaire. The PCS is designed to measure person's willingness to catastrophize the pain while they are experiencing it. In the questionnaire patients answer questions about how they feel and think when they are in pain and it can be taken while they are not experiencing pain.
Time Frame
baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Title
Physical activity measured with Axivity accelerometer
Description
Physical activity will be measured in a subgroup of patients in two separate follow-up time points.
Time Frame
3 months, 1 year
Title
Self-assessment
Description
Patient's self-assessment questionnaire will be analyzed to find out which parameters are of most importance for the patient.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 year, 2 years
Title
EWC
Description
Edinbourgh wrist calculator will be used to estimate the propability of loss of reduction during the follow-up.
Time Frame
Baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: low energy intra or extra-articular dorsally displaced distal radius fracture within 3 cm of the radiocarpal joint, diagnosed with lateral and posterior-anterior radiographs in ER >10° dorsal tilt and/or over 2 mm step-off and/or over 3 mm shortening in the radiograph Exclusion Criteria: Refuse to participate the study Open fracture more than Gustilo 1 gradus Age under 65 years Chauffeure's or Barton´s fracture Smith´s fracture (volar angulation of the fracture) Does not understand written and spoken guidance in local languages Pathological fracture or previous fracture in the same wrist or forearm
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ville Mattila, Prof
Phone
+358-3-311 67674
Email
ville.mattila@uta.fi
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ville Mattila, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
Tampere University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Antti Launonen, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Tampere University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Minna Laitinen, adjunct prof
Organizational Affiliation
Tampere University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Teemu Hevonkorpi, MBBS
Organizational Affiliation
Tampere University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lauri Raittio, MBBS
Organizational Affiliation
Tampere University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Toni Luokkala, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Central Finland Central Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Aleksi Reito, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Central Finland Central Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Juha Kukkonen, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Satakunta Central Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Li Felländer-Tsai
Organizational Affiliation
Karolinska University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Viborg Regional Hospital
City
Viborg
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mette S Skjærbæk
Facility Name
Jyväskylä Central Hospital
City
Jyväskylä
Country
Finland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Toni Luokkala, MD
Facility Name
Pori Central Hospital
City
Pori
Country
Finland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Juha Kukkonen, MD
Facility Name
Tampere University Hospital
City
Tampere
ZIP/Postal Code
33820
Country
Finland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Antti Launonen
Email
antti.launonen@pshp.fi
Facility Name
Karolinska University Hospital
City
Stockholm
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Active, not recruiting

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29621979
Citation
Hevonkorpi TP, Launonen AP, Raittio L, Luokkala T, Kukkonen J, Reito A, Sumrein BO, Laitinen MK, Mattila VM; NITEP-group. Nordic Innovative Trial to Evaluate OsteoPorotic Fractures (NITEP-group): non-operative treatment versus surgery with volar locking plate in the treatment of distal radius fracture in patients aged 65 and over - a study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Apr 5;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2019-5.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Non-operative Treatment Versus Volar Locking Plate in Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture in Patients Over 65 Years

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs