Efficacy and Safety Study of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis
Primary Purpose
Psoriasis
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Guselkumab
Placebo
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Psoriasis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin) at screening and at Week 0
- Before randomization, a woman must be either: a) Not of childbearing potential: premenarchal; postmenopausal (greater than [>] 45 years of age with amenorrhea for at least 12 months or any age with amenorrhea for at least 6 months and a serum follicle-stimulating hormone level (FSH) >40 International Units Per Liter [IU/L]); permanently sterile (example, tubal occlusion, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy); or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy, b) Of childbearing potential and practicing a highly effective method of birth control, consistent with local regulations regarding the use of birth control methods for subjects participating in clinical studies: example, established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception; placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS); barrier methods: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) plus spermicidal foam/gel/ film/cream/suppository (if available in their locale); male partner sterilization (the vasectomized partner should be the sole partner for that participant); true abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant)
- Agree not to receive a Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) vaccination during the study, or within 12 months after the last administration of study drug
- Have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to [>=] 12 at screening and at baseline
- Have an involved body surface area (BSA) >= 10 percent (%) at screening and at baseline
Exclusion Criteria:
- Has unstable cardiovascular disease, defined as a recent clinical deterioration (eg, unstable angina, rapid atrial fibrillation) in the last 3 months or a cardiac hospitalization within the last 3 months
- Has a history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly
- Has a transplanted organ (with exception of a corneal transplant >3 months before the first administration of study drug)
- Has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
- Has received any anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) biologic therapy within 3 months before the first administration of study drug
Sites / Locations
- Renstar Medical Research
- Arlington Dermatology
- Indiana Clinical Trial Center
- Dermatology Specialists
- Hamzavi Dermatology
- University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology
- Clinical Partners
- Virginia Clinical Research
- Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical
- Dermatrials Research
- DermEdge Research
- Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Osteo-Medic s.c. Artur Racewicz i Jerzy Supronik
- Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 1 im. Dr A. Jurasza
- Centrum Medyczne WroMedica
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Group 1 (Guselkumab: Placebo)
Group 2 (Placebo: Guselkumab)
Arm Description
Participants will receive 100 milligram (mg) guselkumab administered as a 100 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL) solution in a single-use prefilled syringe (PFS) assembled in a SelfDose device at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, and 28; liquid placebo for guselkumab 100 mg at Week 16 to maintain the study blind.
Partcipants will receive placebo at Weeks 0, 4, and 12 followed by guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20, and 28.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) or minimal (1) were considered IGA cleared or minimal responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure. Participants who discontinued study drug due to lack of efficacy, an adverse event (AE) of worsening of psoriasis, or who started a protocol-prohibited medication/therapy during study that could improve psoriasis were considered as treatment failures for the study.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent (%) to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) were considered IGA cleared responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a PASI 100 Response at Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants with 100% improvement in PASI from baseline (PASI score=0) were considered PASI 100 responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Mild or Better (Less Than or Equal to [<=] 2) at Week 16
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0), minimal (1), or mild (2) were considered IGA mild or better responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a PASI 50 Response and a PASI 75 Response at Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants with >=50% and >= 75% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50 and PASI 75 responders respectively. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received.
Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score Through Week 40
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) and Mild or Better (<=2) Through Week 40
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) or minimal (1) were considered IGA cleared or minimal responders while those achieved an IGA score of cleared (0), minimal (1), or mild (2) were considered IGA mild or better responders. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Responses, PASI 90 Responses, PASI 75 Responses, and PASI 50 Responses
PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72.Participants with >=50%, >= 75%, >=90% and >= 100% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50, 75, 90 and PASI 100 responders, respectively. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02905331
First Posted
September 14, 2016
Last Updated
September 28, 2018
Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02905331
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety Study of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis
Official Title
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) Delivered Via a SelfDose (TM) Device in the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 28, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 6, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 6, 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, usability, and acceptability of guselkumab delivered using SelfDose device in participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Psoriasis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
78 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Group 1 (Guselkumab: Placebo)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive 100 milligram (mg) guselkumab administered as a 100 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL) solution in a single-use prefilled syringe (PFS) assembled in a SelfDose device at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, and 28; liquid placebo for guselkumab 100 mg at Week 16 to maintain the study blind.
Arm Title
Group 2 (Placebo: Guselkumab)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Partcipants will receive placebo at Weeks 0, 4, and 12 followed by guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20, and 28.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Guselkumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
CNTO 1959
Intervention Description
Participants will receive 100 mg of Guselkumab as 100 mg/mL solution via SelfDose device.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Participants will receive matching placebo supplied in a PFS assembled in a SelfDose device.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
Description
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) or minimal (1) were considered IGA cleared or minimal responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure. Participants who discontinued study drug due to lack of efficacy, an adverse event (AE) of worsening of psoriasis, or who started a protocol-prohibited medication/therapy during study that could improve psoriasis were considered as treatment failures for the study.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16
Description
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent (%) to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Time Frame
Week 16
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16
Description
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) were considered IGA cleared responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a PASI 100 Response at Week 16
Description
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants with 100% improvement in PASI from baseline (PASI score=0) were considered PASI 100 responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Mild or Better (Less Than or Equal to [<=] 2) at Week 16
Description
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0), minimal (1), or mild (2) were considered IGA mild or better responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a PASI 50 Response and a PASI 75 Response at Week 16
Description
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants with >=50% and >= 75% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50 and PASI 75 responders respectively. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 16
Description
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score Through Week 40
Description
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended every 8 weeks [q8w] dosing interval)
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) and Mild or Better (<=2) Through Week 40
Description
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) or minimal (1) were considered IGA cleared or minimal responders while those achieved an IGA score of cleared (0), minimal (1), or mild (2) were considered IGA mild or better responders. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16.
Time Frame
Week 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended q8w dosing interval)
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Responses, PASI 90 Responses, PASI 75 Responses, and PASI 50 Responses
Description
PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72.Participants with >=50%, >= 75%, >=90% and >= 100% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50, 75, 90 and PASI 100 responders, respectively. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16.
Time Frame
Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended q8w dosing interval)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin) at screening and at Week 0
Before randomization, a woman must be either: a) Not of childbearing potential: premenarchal; postmenopausal (greater than [>] 45 years of age with amenorrhea for at least 12 months or any age with amenorrhea for at least 6 months and a serum follicle-stimulating hormone level (FSH) >40 International Units Per Liter [IU/L]); permanently sterile (example, tubal occlusion, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy); or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy, b) Of childbearing potential and practicing a highly effective method of birth control, consistent with local regulations regarding the use of birth control methods for subjects participating in clinical studies: example, established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception; placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS); barrier methods: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) plus spermicidal foam/gel/ film/cream/suppository (if available in their locale); male partner sterilization (the vasectomized partner should be the sole partner for that participant); true abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant)
Agree not to receive a Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) vaccination during the study, or within 12 months after the last administration of study drug
Have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to [>=] 12 at screening and at baseline
Have an involved body surface area (BSA) >= 10 percent (%) at screening and at baseline
Exclusion Criteria:
Has unstable cardiovascular disease, defined as a recent clinical deterioration (eg, unstable angina, rapid atrial fibrillation) in the last 3 months or a cardiac hospitalization within the last 3 months
Has a history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly
Has a transplanted organ (with exception of a corneal transplant >3 months before the first administration of study drug)
Has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
Has received any anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) biologic therapy within 3 months before the first administration of study drug
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Renstar Medical Research
City
Ocala
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34470
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arlington Dermatology
City
Rolling Meadows
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60008
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana Clinical Trial Center
City
Plainfield
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46168
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dermatology Specialists
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40241
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hamzavi Dermatology
City
Fort Gratiot
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48059
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Partners
City
Johnston
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02919
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Clinical Research
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23502
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical
City
Surrey
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V3R 6A7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Dermatrials Research
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8N 1Y2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
DermEdge Research
City
Mississauga
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L5H 1G9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Osteo-Medic s.c. Artur Racewicz i Jerzy Supronik
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-351
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 1 im. Dr A. Jurasza
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-094
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne WroMedica
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
51-685
Country
Poland
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30887876
Citation
Ferris LK, Ott E, Jiang J, Hong HC, Li S, Han C, Baran W. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, administered with a novel patient-controlled injector (One-Press), for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the phase 3 ORION study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 Mar;31(2):152-159. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1587145. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy and Safety Study of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs