search
Back to results

Working With HIV Clinics to Adopt Addiction Treatments Using Implementation Facilitation (WHAT-IF?)

Primary Purpose

Substance-related Disorders

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Implementation Facilitation
Sponsored by
Yale University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Substance-related Disorders

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient inclusion criteria:

  • HIV-infected
  • Receiving HIV care in the index clinic
  • Age >18 years old
  • Meets criteria for lifetime or current tobacco, alcohol and/or opioid use disorder regardless of addiction treatment status
  • Able to provide verbal informed consent

Staff inclusion criteria:

  • Employed at participating HIV clinic for at least 6 months
  • Able to provide verbal informed consent.

Payer/health insurance provider inclusion criteria:

  • Employed at an organization or agency that provides funding for medical services for HIV-infected individuals for at least 6 months.
  • Able to provide verbal informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide verbal informed consent

Sites / Locations

  • Hartford Hospital's HIV Clinic
  • Haelen Center at Yale New Haven Hospital
  • SUNY Downstate Medical Center
  • Immunology Center at Miriam Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Usual Care- Control

Implementation Facilitation

Arm Description

We will use a stepped wedge design to evaluate the effect of the Implementation Facilitation on the outcomes. The first phase for all clinics is a control phase where clinic staff and patients engage in usual care. The time to implementation is randomly assigned. Each clinic is then followed prospectively to determine their outcome status.

We will use a stepped wedge design to evaluate the effect of the Implementation Facilitation on the outcomes. The time to implementation in a stepped wedge design is randomly assigned. Clinics are then followed prospectively to determine their outcome status..

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Provision of Addiction Treatments
Study team will use the electronic health record (EHR) to identify prescriptions for each of the target medications in the surveillance period. Study team will use CPT codes to determine whether specific counseling therapies were provided. Patients diagnosed with Opioid Use Disorder and/or Alcohol Use Disorder and/or Tobacco Use Disorder were identified and then assessed in the EHR to determine if medication assisted therapy was provided by a provider during the 6 month Intervention period.
Change in Provision of Addiction Treatments
Study team will use the electronic medical record to identify prescriptions for each of the target medications in the surveillance period. Study team will use CPT codes to determine whether specific counseling therapies were provided. Patients diagnosed with Opioid Use Disorder and/or Alcohol Use Disorder and/or Tobacco Use Disorder were identified and then assessed in the EHR to determine if medication assisted therapy was provided by a provider during the 12 month Evaluation period.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Receipt
ART receipt will be defined as at least 180 days of three concurrent antiretroviral agents in the 6-month interval based on prescriptions in the electronic medical record.
Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Receipt
ART receipt will be defined as at least 180 days of three concurrent antiretroviral agents in the 6-month interval based on prescriptions in the electronic medical record.
Viral Suppression
Viral suppression, will be defined as HIV RNA <200 copies/mL at last test closest to the time of data extraction, consistent with Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines. Although current limits of detection are lower, this cutoff allows for low-level "blips" that have no clinical significance.
Viral Suppression
Viral suppression, will be defined as HIV RNA <200 copies/mL at last test closest to the time of data extraction, consistent with Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines. Although current limits of detection are lower, this cutoff allows for low-level "blips" that have no clinical significance.
VACS Index
The Veterans Aging Cohort Study Index (VACS Index) creates a score by summing pre-assigned points for age, routinely monitored indicators of HIV disease (CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA), and general indicators of organ system injury including hemoglobin, platelets, aspartate and alanine transaminase (AST and ALT), creatinine, and viral hepatitis C infection (HCV). This score is weighted to indicate increasing risk of all-cause mortality with increasing score. The score can be used to estimate risk of all-cause mortality using a conversion factor. The VACS Index will be evaluated based on most recent values at the time of data extraction. VACS Index score will be treated as a continuous variable. VACS Index: minimum value: 0; maximum value: 164- a higher score means a worse outcome.
VACS Index
The Veterans Aging Cohort Study Index (VACS Index) creates a score by summing pre-assigned points for age, routinely monitored indicators of HIV disease (CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA), and general indicators of organ system injury including hemoglobin, platelets, aspartate and alanine transaminase (AST and ALT), creatinine, and viral hepatitis C infection (HCV). This score is weighted to indicate increasing risk of all-cause mortality with increasing score. The score can be used to estimate risk of all-cause mortality using a conversion factor. The VACS Index will be evaluated based on most recent values at the time of data extraction. VACS Index score will be treated as a continuous variable. VACS Index: minimum value: 0; maximum value: 164- a higher score means a worse outcome.
Retention in HIV Care
Retention in HIV care, per DHHS guidelines uses a 24-month measurement period. It is defined as at least one HIV medical care visit in each 6-month period, with a minimum of 60 days between the first medical visit in the prior 6-month period and the last medical visit in the subsequent 6-month period. This measure has good agreement with the Institute of Medicine indicator for retention in care and is an independent predictor of mortality. We will evaluate whether patients have had at least 1 visit in the 6-month period prior to time of data extraction.
Retention in HIV Care
Retention in HIV care, per DHHS guidelines uses a 24-month measurement period. It is defined as at least one HIV medical care visit in each 6-month period, with a minimum of 60 days between the first medical visit in the prior 6-month period and the last medical visit in the subsequent 6-month period. This measure has good agreement with the Institute of Medicine indicator for retention in care and is an independent predictor of mortality. We will evaluate whether patients have had at least 1 visit in the 6-month period prior to time of data extraction.
Organizational Readiness
Investigators will use the ORCA to measure factors impacting the provision of addiction treatments. This 15-minute survey is based on the PARiHS framework and asks the respondent to rate local factors related to evidence, context and facilitation on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Facilitation questions will be omitted from the pre-implementation assessment since this part of the intervention and will not have taken place. The score has a range from 1 to 5 where a higher score indicates higher readiness.
Organizational Readiness
Investigators will use the ORCA to measure factors impacting the provision of addiction treatments. This 15-minute survey is based on the PARiHS framework and asks the respondent to rate local factors related to evidence, context and facilitation on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Facilitation questions will be omitted from the pre-implementation assessment since this part of the intervention and will not have taken place. The score has a range from 1 to 5 where a higher score indicates higher readiness.
Provider Readiness
Investigators will use change rulers, among appropriate providers, for each of the medications and counseling to assess readiness to provide each medication and counseling intervention. The change rulers will independently assess, on a 0-10 scale each provider's: 1) confidence to prescribe/provide the intervention, 2) readiness to prescribe/provide the intervention and 3) commitment to prescribe/provide the intervention. Presented is the score that indicates readiness to prescribe medication. The score has a range from 1 to 10 where a higher score indicates increased readiness.
Provider Readiness:
Investigators will use change rulers, among appropriate providers, for each of the medications and counseling to assess readiness to provide each medication and counseling intervention.185 The change rulers will independently assess, on a 0-10 scale each provider's: 1) confidence to prescribe/provide the intervention, 2) readiness to prescribe/provide the intervention and 3) commitment to prescribe/provide the intervention. Presented is the score that indicates readiness to prescribe medication. The score has a range from 1 to 10 where a higher score indicates increased readiness.

Full Information

First Posted
September 14, 2016
Last Updated
April 14, 2023
Sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02907944
Brief Title
Working With HIV Clinics to Adopt Addiction Treatments Using Implementation Facilitation
Acronym
WHAT-IF?
Official Title
Working With HIV Clinics to Adopt Addiction Treatments Using Implementation Facilitation (WHAT-IF?)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 30, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Tobacco, alcohol and opioid use disorders threaten the health of HIV-infected patients. What if evidence-based counseling and medication treatments for tobacco, alcohol and opioid use disorders (herein refered to as addiction treatments) were routinely provided in HIV clinics? Implementation Facilitation is an established strategy to increase the uptake of evidence-based treatments. Our goal is to evaluate the impact of Implementation Facilitation on the use of addiction treatments in four large HIV clinics. The purpose of the WHAT-IF study is: Aim 1. Among key stakeholders, to use quantitative and qualitative (mixed) methods to identify the site-specific evidence, context and facilitation-related barriers and facilitators to the integration of addiction treatments to help tailor an Implementation Facilitation for each clinic. Aim 2. To evaluate the impact of Implementation Facilitation on: 2a: Organizational readiness to deliver addiction treatments 2b: Provider readiness to deliver addiction treatments 2c: Provision of addiction treatments 2d: Changes in organizational models of care used to deliver addiction treatments Aim 3. To evaluate the impact of Implementation Facilitation on antiretroviral therapy receipt, HIV viral suppression, VACS Index, and retention in HIV care among patients eligible for addiction treatment.
Detailed Description
The Working with HIV clinics to adopt Addiction Treatments using Implementation Facilitation (WHAT IF?) study will evaluate the impact of Implementation Facilitation on the adoption of addiction treatment services in four HIV clinics. We will use a stepped wedge design . The primary comparison is of the change that occurs from the pre-implementation period to two post-implementation periods, the initial six months (evaluation) and the following six months (maintenance). This proposal will consist of three main components in each of four clinics: 1) formative evaluation with key stakeholders at each site to guide and refine the Implementation Facilitation, 2) conduct of the Implementation Facilitation and 3) an evaluation of the impact of the Implementation Facilitation on organization and provider-level readiness, provision of addiction treatments, and HIV outcomes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Substance-related Disorders

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
3838 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Usual Care- Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
We will use a stepped wedge design to evaluate the effect of the Implementation Facilitation on the outcomes. The first phase for all clinics is a control phase where clinic staff and patients engage in usual care. The time to implementation is randomly assigned. Each clinic is then followed prospectively to determine their outcome status.
Arm Title
Implementation Facilitation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
We will use a stepped wedge design to evaluate the effect of the Implementation Facilitation on the outcomes. The time to implementation in a stepped wedge design is randomly assigned. Clinics are then followed prospectively to determine their outcome status..
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Implementation Facilitation
Intervention Description
Implementation Facilitation is an evidence-based strategy tailored to the specific needs of the clinic, designed to increase uptake of evidence based treatments for tobacco, alcohol and opioid use disorders. Will include provider education and academic detailing. External Facilitator: Outside content expert who assists site Local Champion: Site stakeholder who promotes change Provider Education and Academic Detailing: Provision of unbiased peer education Stakeholder Engagement: Aligning goals of implementation and those impacted Tailor Program to Site: Addressing site specific needs based on Aim 1 Performance Monitoring and Feedback: Assess implementation of screening and treatment efforts and inform site of results Formative Evaluation: Quant. and qual. determination of impact Establish a Learning Collaborative: Shared learning opportunities tailored to stakeholders Program Marketing: Increase attention to availability of on-site addiction treatment services
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Provision of Addiction Treatments
Description
Study team will use the electronic health record (EHR) to identify prescriptions for each of the target medications in the surveillance period. Study team will use CPT codes to determine whether specific counseling therapies were provided. Patients diagnosed with Opioid Use Disorder and/or Alcohol Use Disorder and/or Tobacco Use Disorder were identified and then assessed in the EHR to determine if medication assisted therapy was provided by a provider during the 6 month Intervention period.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months
Title
Change in Provision of Addiction Treatments
Description
Study team will use the electronic medical record to identify prescriptions for each of the target medications in the surveillance period. Study team will use CPT codes to determine whether specific counseling therapies were provided. Patients diagnosed with Opioid Use Disorder and/or Alcohol Use Disorder and/or Tobacco Use Disorder were identified and then assessed in the EHR to determine if medication assisted therapy was provided by a provider during the 12 month Evaluation period.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Receipt
Description
ART receipt will be defined as at least 180 days of three concurrent antiretroviral agents in the 6-month interval based on prescriptions in the electronic medical record.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Receipt
Description
ART receipt will be defined as at least 180 days of three concurrent antiretroviral agents in the 6-month interval based on prescriptions in the electronic medical record.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Viral Suppression
Description
Viral suppression, will be defined as HIV RNA <200 copies/mL at last test closest to the time of data extraction, consistent with Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines. Although current limits of detection are lower, this cutoff allows for low-level "blips" that have no clinical significance.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Viral Suppression
Description
Viral suppression, will be defined as HIV RNA <200 copies/mL at last test closest to the time of data extraction, consistent with Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines. Although current limits of detection are lower, this cutoff allows for low-level "blips" that have no clinical significance.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
VACS Index
Description
The Veterans Aging Cohort Study Index (VACS Index) creates a score by summing pre-assigned points for age, routinely monitored indicators of HIV disease (CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA), and general indicators of organ system injury including hemoglobin, platelets, aspartate and alanine transaminase (AST and ALT), creatinine, and viral hepatitis C infection (HCV). This score is weighted to indicate increasing risk of all-cause mortality with increasing score. The score can be used to estimate risk of all-cause mortality using a conversion factor. The VACS Index will be evaluated based on most recent values at the time of data extraction. VACS Index score will be treated as a continuous variable. VACS Index: minimum value: 0; maximum value: 164- a higher score means a worse outcome.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
VACS Index
Description
The Veterans Aging Cohort Study Index (VACS Index) creates a score by summing pre-assigned points for age, routinely monitored indicators of HIV disease (CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA), and general indicators of organ system injury including hemoglobin, platelets, aspartate and alanine transaminase (AST and ALT), creatinine, and viral hepatitis C infection (HCV). This score is weighted to indicate increasing risk of all-cause mortality with increasing score. The score can be used to estimate risk of all-cause mortality using a conversion factor. The VACS Index will be evaluated based on most recent values at the time of data extraction. VACS Index score will be treated as a continuous variable. VACS Index: minimum value: 0; maximum value: 164- a higher score means a worse outcome.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Retention in HIV Care
Description
Retention in HIV care, per DHHS guidelines uses a 24-month measurement period. It is defined as at least one HIV medical care visit in each 6-month period, with a minimum of 60 days between the first medical visit in the prior 6-month period and the last medical visit in the subsequent 6-month period. This measure has good agreement with the Institute of Medicine indicator for retention in care and is an independent predictor of mortality. We will evaluate whether patients have had at least 1 visit in the 6-month period prior to time of data extraction.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Retention in HIV Care
Description
Retention in HIV care, per DHHS guidelines uses a 24-month measurement period. It is defined as at least one HIV medical care visit in each 6-month period, with a minimum of 60 days between the first medical visit in the prior 6-month period and the last medical visit in the subsequent 6-month period. This measure has good agreement with the Institute of Medicine indicator for retention in care and is an independent predictor of mortality. We will evaluate whether patients have had at least 1 visit in the 6-month period prior to time of data extraction.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Organizational Readiness
Description
Investigators will use the ORCA to measure factors impacting the provision of addiction treatments. This 15-minute survey is based on the PARiHS framework and asks the respondent to rate local factors related to evidence, context and facilitation on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Facilitation questions will be omitted from the pre-implementation assessment since this part of the intervention and will not have taken place. The score has a range from 1 to 5 where a higher score indicates higher readiness.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Organizational Readiness
Description
Investigators will use the ORCA to measure factors impacting the provision of addiction treatments. This 15-minute survey is based on the PARiHS framework and asks the respondent to rate local factors related to evidence, context and facilitation on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Facilitation questions will be omitted from the pre-implementation assessment since this part of the intervention and will not have taken place. The score has a range from 1 to 5 where a higher score indicates higher readiness.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Provider Readiness
Description
Investigators will use change rulers, among appropriate providers, for each of the medications and counseling to assess readiness to provide each medication and counseling intervention. The change rulers will independently assess, on a 0-10 scale each provider's: 1) confidence to prescribe/provide the intervention, 2) readiness to prescribe/provide the intervention and 3) commitment to prescribe/provide the intervention. Presented is the score that indicates readiness to prescribe medication. The score has a range from 1 to 10 where a higher score indicates increased readiness.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Provider Readiness:
Description
Investigators will use change rulers, among appropriate providers, for each of the medications and counseling to assess readiness to provide each medication and counseling intervention.185 The change rulers will independently assess, on a 0-10 scale each provider's: 1) confidence to prescribe/provide the intervention, 2) readiness to prescribe/provide the intervention and 3) commitment to prescribe/provide the intervention. Presented is the score that indicates readiness to prescribe medication. The score has a range from 1 to 10 where a higher score indicates increased readiness.
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient inclusion criteria: HIV-infected Receiving HIV care in the index clinic Age >18 years old Meets criteria for lifetime or current tobacco, alcohol and/or opioid use disorder regardless of addiction treatment status Able to provide verbal informed consent Staff inclusion criteria: Employed at participating HIV clinic for at least 6 months Able to provide verbal informed consent. Payer/health insurance provider inclusion criteria: Employed at an organization or agency that provides funding for medical services for HIV-infected individuals for at least 6 months. Able to provide verbal informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Unable to provide verbal informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Fiellin, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Yale University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer Edelmen, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Yale University
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hartford Hospital's HIV Clinic
City
Hartford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Haelen Center at Yale New Haven Hospital
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06511
Country
United States
Facility Name
SUNY Downstate Medical Center
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Immunology Center at Miriam Hospital
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02906
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32976995
Citation
Edelman EJ, Dziura J, Esserman D, Porter E, Becker WC, Chan PA, Cornman DH, Rebick G, Yager J, Morford K, Muvvala SB, Fiellin DA. Working with HIV clinics to adopt addiction treatment using implementation facilitation (WHAT-IF?): Rationale and design for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Nov;98:106156. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106156. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33675619
Citation
Edelman EJ, Gan G, Dziura J, Esserman D, Morford KL, Porter E, Chan PA, Cornman DH, Oldfield BJ, Yager JE, Muvvala SB, Fiellin DA. Readiness to Provide Medications for Addiction Treatment in HIV Clinics: A Multisite Mixed-Methods Formative Evaluation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 Jul 1;87(3):959-970. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002666.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
35341613
Citation
Morford KL, Muvvala SB, Chan PA, Cornman DH, Doernberg M, Porter E, Virata M, Yager JE, Fiellin DA, Edelman EJ. Patients' perspectives of medications for addiction treatment in HIV clinics: A qualitative study. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Aug;139:108767. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108767. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
36251291
Citation
Edelman EJ, Gan G, Dziura J, Esserman D, Porter E, Becker WC, Chan PA, Cornman DH, Helfrich CD, Reynolds J, Yager JE, Morford KL, Muvvala SB, Fiellin DA. Effect of Implementation Facilitation to Promote Adoption of Medications for Addiction Treatment in US HIV Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2236904. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36904.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Working With HIV Clinics to Adopt Addiction Treatments Using Implementation Facilitation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs