Suction on Post-Operative Chest Tubes (SPOCT)
Primary Purpose
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Suction is set to -2 cmH2O
Suction is set to -10 cmH2O
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Speaks and understands Danish.
- Referred for planned VATS lobectomy for confirmed or suspected primary lung cancer.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cannot cooperate or unable to give consent.
- Chronic drain carrier.
- Planned open procedure.
- Planned resection of additional wedge, additional lobe or thoracic wall.
Sites / Locations
- Rigshospitalet
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Group 1
Group 2
Arm Description
Post-operative suction is set to -2 cmH2O.
Post-operative suction is set to -10 cmH2O (standard treatment).
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Chest tube duration through study completion, an average of 3 days.
Time from intraoperative chest tube placement to it's removal.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Time to removal criteria have been fulfilled up to 24 hours
Chest tubes can be removed when the patient has been mobilized and the air leakage has not superceeded 20 mL/min in 12 hours and fluid production has not superceded 500 mL in 24 hours.
Number of participants with prolonged air leak
Number of participants requiring treatment for prolonged air leak.
Number of participants requiring treatment for subcutaneous emphysema.
Number of participants with pneumonia or empyema.
Length of stay.
Number of participants with other respiratory problems.
Number of participants requiring readmission for thoracic surgical complications.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02911259
First Posted
February 23, 2016
Last Updated
April 26, 2018
Sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Collaborators
Medela AG
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02911259
Brief Title
Suction on Post-Operative Chest Tubes
Acronym
SPOCT
Official Title
Suction on Post-Operative Chest Tubes After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy for Presumed or Confirmed Primary Lung Cancer - At Which Level?
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 14, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 14, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Collaborators
Medela AG
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The level of suction on post-operative chest tubes after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for lung cancer has previously shown to affect duration of drainage. These results, however, are based on traditional drainage systems with water seal and need to be confirmed using digital drainage systems.
Hypothesis: Suction of -2 cmH2O is equal to or superior compared with standard suction of -10 cmH2O when looking at chest tube duration and complications.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Care Provider
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
230 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Group 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Post-operative suction is set to -2 cmH2O.
Arm Title
Group 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Post-operative suction is set to -10 cmH2O (standard treatment).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Suction is set to -2 cmH2O
Intervention Description
Post-operative suction is set to -2 cmH2O (intervention).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Suction is set to -10 cmH2O
Intervention Description
Post-operative suction is set to -10 cmH2O (standard treatment).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Chest tube duration through study completion, an average of 3 days.
Description
Time from intraoperative chest tube placement to it's removal.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 days.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to removal criteria have been fulfilled up to 24 hours
Description
Chest tubes can be removed when the patient has been mobilized and the air leakage has not superceeded 20 mL/min in 12 hours and fluid production has not superceded 500 mL in 24 hours.
Time Frame
Duration from the post-operative chest tube has been placed, until it's potential removal.
Title
Number of participants with prolonged air leak
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 7 days
Title
Number of participants requiring treatment for prolonged air leak.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 14 days
Title
Number of participants requiring treatment for subcutaneous emphysema.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 14 days
Title
Number of participants with pneumonia or empyema.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 21 days
Title
Length of stay.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 days
Title
Number of participants with other respiratory problems.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 30 days
Title
Number of participants requiring readmission for thoracic surgical complications.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 30 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Speaks and understands Danish.
Referred for planned VATS lobectomy for confirmed or suspected primary lung cancer.
Exclusion Criteria:
Cannot cooperate or unable to give consent.
Chronic drain carrier.
Planned open procedure.
Planned resection of additional wedge, additional lobe or thoracic wall.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bo L. Holbek, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Merete Christensen, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jesper Ravn, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rigshospitalet
City
Copenhagen
ZIP/Postal Code
2100
Country
Denmark
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
11888968
Citation
Marshall MB, Deeb ME, Bleier JI, Kucharczuk JC, Friedberg JS, Kaiser LR, Shrager JB. Suction vs water seal after pulmonary resection: a randomized prospective study. Chest. 2002 Mar;121(3):831-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.3.831.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20619231
Citation
Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. The management of chest tubes after pulmonary resection. Thorac Surg Clin. 2010 Aug;20(3):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2010.04.001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21757129
Citation
Brunelli A, Beretta E, Cassivi SD, Cerfolio RJ, Detterbeck F, Kiefer T, Miserocchi G, Shrager J, Singhal S, Van Raemdonck D, Varela G. Consensus definitions to promote an evidence-based approach to management of the pleural space. A collaborative proposal by ESTS, AATS, STS, and GTSC. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(2):291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.05.020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20833554
Citation
Gottgens KW, Siebenga J, Belgers EH, van Huijstee PJ, Bollen EC. Early removal of the chest tube after complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Apr;39(4):575-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20619233
Citation
Cerfolio RJ, Varela G, Brunelli A. Digital and smart chest drainage systems to monitor air leaks: the birth of a new era? Thorac Surg Clin. 2010 Aug;20(3):413-20. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2010.03.007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24906602
Citation
Pompili C, Detterbeck F, Papagiannopoulos K, Sihoe A, Vachlas K, Maxfield MW, Lim HC, Brunelli A. Multicenter international randomized comparison of objective and subjective outcomes between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;98(2):490-6; discussion 496-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.043. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30445572
Citation
Holbek BL, Christensen M, Hansen HJ, Kehlet H, Petersen RH. The effects of low suction on digital drainage devices after lobectomy using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trialdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Apr 1;55(4):673-681. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy361.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Suction on Post-Operative Chest Tubes
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs