search
Back to results

Investigate Safety, Tolerability, PK, PD and Efficacy of Risdiplam (RO7034067) in Infants With Type1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy (FIREFISH)

Primary Purpose

Muscular Atrophy, Spinal

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Risdiplam
Sponsored by
Hoffmann-La Roche
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Muscular Atrophy, Spinal

Eligibility Criteria

1 Month - 7 Months (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical history, signs or symptoms attributable to Type 1 SMA with onset after 28 days but prior to the age of 3 months
  • Gestational age of 37 to 42 weeks
  • Confirmed diagnosis of 5q-autosomal recessive SMA
  • Participants has two survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2) gene copies, as confirmed by central testing
  • Body weight greater than or equal to (>=) third percentile for age, using appropriate country-specific guidelines
  • Receiving adequate nutrition and hydration (with or without gastrostomy) at the time of screening, in the opinion of the Investigator
  • Adequately recovered from any acute illness at the time of screening and considered well-enough to participate in the opinion of the Investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant or previous participation in any investigational drug or device study within 90 days prior to screening or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer
  • Concomitant or previous administration of SMN2-targeting antisense oligonucleotide, SMN2 splicing modifier or gene therapy study
  • Any history of cell therapy
  • Hospitalization for pulmonary event within the last 2 months, or planned at the time of screening
  • Presence of clinically relevant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities before study drug administration
  • Unstable gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, endocrine or cardiovascular system diseases
  • Participants requiring invasive ventilation or tracheostomy
  • Participants requiring awake non-invasive ventilation or with awake hypoxemia (arterial oxygen saturation less than [<] 95 percent [%]) with or without ventilator support
  • Participants with a history of respiratory failure or severe pneumonia, and have not fully recovered their pulmonary function at the time of screening
  • Multiple or fixed contractures and/or hip subluxation or dislocation at birth
  • Presence of non-SMA related concurrent syndromes or diseases
  • Any major illness within one month before the screening examination or any febrile illness within one week prior to screening and up to first dose administration
  • Any inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and/or any Organic Cation Transporter 2 (OCT-2) and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) substrates taken within 2 weeks and/or any inducer of CYP3A4 taken within 4 weeks (or within 5-times the elimination half-life, whichever is longer) prior to dosing or participants (and the mother, if breastfeeding the infant) taking any nutrients known to modulate CYP3A activity and any known flavin containing monooxygenase (FMO) 1 or FMO3 inhibitors or substrates
  • Prior use (at any time in the participants lives) and/or anticipated need for quinolones (chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine), thioridazine, vigabatrin, retigabine, or any other drug known to cause retinal toxicity during the study. Infants exposed to chloroquine, hydroxycholoroquine, thioridazine, vigabatrin, retigabine or drugs with known retinal toxicity given to mothers during pregnancy (and lactation) should not be enrolled.
  • Recent history (less than 6 months) of ophthalmic disease that would interfere with the conduct of the study as assessed by an ophthalmologist
  • Therapeutic use, defined as use for 8 weeks or longer, of the following medications within 90 days prior to enrollment: riluzole, valproic acid, hydroxyurea, sodium phenylbutyrate, butyrate derivatives, creatine, carnitine, growth hormone, anabolic steroids, probenecid, agents anticipated to increase or decrease muscle strength, agents with known or presumed histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitory effect, medications known to or suspected of causing retinal toxicity (deferoxamine, topiramate, latanoprost, niacin, rosiglitazone, tamoxifen, canthaxanthine, sildenafil, and interferon) and medications with known phototoxicity liabilities (e.g., oral retinoids including over-the-counter [OTC] formulations, amiodarone, phenothiazines and use of minocycline)

Sites / Locations

  • Stanford University Medical Center
  • Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children Hospital of Chicago
  • Boston Childrens Hospital
  • Columbia University Medical Center; The Neurological Institute of New York
  • UZ Gent
  • UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg
  • Chr de La Citadelle
  • Instituto de Puericultura E Pediatria Martagão Gesteira
  • Hospital das Clinicas - FMUSP_X; Neurologia
  • Peking University First Hospital
  • Children's Hospital of Fudan University
  • Clinical Medical Center Zagreb; University Hospital Rebro Department of Paediatrics
  • Hopital Femme Mere Enfant; Medecine Physique et Readaptation Pediatrique ? L?ESCALE
  • Hopital Armand Trousseau
  • IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù; U.O. Malattie Neuromuscolari e Neurodegenerative
  • Policlinico Agostino Gemelli; Dipartimento di Neuropsichiatria Infantile
  • IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini; U.O.S.D. Centro di Miologia e Patologie Neurodegenerative
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Unità Operativa Complessa di Neurologia
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico ?Carlo Besta?; UO di Neurologia dello Sviluppo
  • Hyogo Medical University Hospital
  • Szpital Gdanskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego; Clinic of developmental neurology
  • The Children?s Memorial Health Institute Department of Neurology and Epileptology
  • Russian Children Neuromuscular Center of Veltischev
  • King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre Building
  • Institute for Mother and Child Dr. Vukan Cupic
  • Hospital Sant Joan De Deu
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron; Area Genética Clínica y Molecular
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
  • Universitäts-Kinderspital (UKBB) Neuropädiatrie
  • Hacettepe University, School of Medicine; Pediatrics Department; Pediatrics Child Neurology Unit
  • Hospital Yeditepe University Kozyatagi; Pediatry
  • Ams of Ukraine; Inst. of Neurology, Psychiatry & Narcology

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Part 1 (Dose Finding): Risdiplam (RO7034067)

Part 2 (Confirmatory): Risdiplam (RO7034067)

Arm Description

Participants will receive multiple ascending doses of risdiplam (RO7034067), administered orally once daily for a minimum of 4 weeks to select the dose for Part 2. During the first year of treatment, most participants will switch to the Part 2 dose. During the second year of treatment, all Part 1 participants will be receiving the Part 2 dose. They will thereafter enter a 3-year open-label extension phase and continue to receive risdiplam at the same dose.

Participants will receive risdiplam (RO7034067), administered orally once daily at the dose defined in Part 1 of the study, for a duration of 24 months. They will thereafter enter a 3-year open-label extension phase and continue to receive risdiplam at the same dose.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Part 1: Selected Part 2 Dose of Risdiplam
All safety, tolerability, PK and PD data available up to the clinical cut-off date of 5 January 2018, plus data that became available prior to the database snapshot on 6 February 2018 were included in the Internal Monitoring Committee (IMC) review. The IMC was responsible for selecting the dose for Part 2 of the study (pivotal dose). An external Independent Data Monitoring Committee (iDMC) reviewed data from Part 1 and confirmed the dose-selection decision of the IMC. The dose for Part 2 selected by the IMC was a dose that: 1.Was judged to be safe and well-tolerated, based on all available safety data from Part 1 and as confirmed by the iDMC; 2. Resulted in an exposure at steady-state below the exposure cap (mean value) of AUC0-24h,ss 2000 ng*h/mL (adjusted for free-fraction, if required); 3. Resulted in an SMN protein increase that was expected to be clinically relevant.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Sitting Without Support for at Least 5 Seconds as Assessed by Item 22 of the Gross Motor Scale of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (BSID-III) at Month 12
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). Item 22 is not considered achieved if the infant sits alone for less than 5 seconds before losing balance and falling over, or if the infant uses his or her arms to prop him- or herself up. The assessment was video recorded at study sites and reviewed/scored by two independent raters. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Achieve a Score of 40 or Higher in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) at Month 12
The CHOP-INTEND instrument was developed to evaluate motor function in infants with SMA from the ages of 1.4 to 37.9 months. It consists of 16 items, where each item assesses a specific motor task graded on a scale of 0 to 4, where zero is no response and 4 is a complete response. The total score ranges from 0 to 64, with higher scores consistent with better motor function. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Achieving an Increase of >/= 4 Points in Their CHOP-INTEND Score From Baseline at Months 8 and 12
The CHOP-INTEND instrument was developed to evaluate motor function in infants with SMA from the ages of 1.4 to 37.9 months. It consists of 16 items, where each item assesses a specific motor task graded on a scale of 0 to 4, where zero is no response and 4 is a complete response. The total score ranges from 0 to 64, with higher scores consistent with better motor function. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Achieving Head Control (Defined as a Score of >/= 3 for CHOP-INTEND Item 12) at Months 8, 12 and 24
The CHOP-INTEND instrument was developed to evaluate motor function in infants with SMA from the ages of 1.4 to 37.9 months. It consists of 16 items, where each item assesses a specific motor task graded on a scale of 0 to 4, where zero is no response and 4 is a complete response. The total score ranges from 0 to 64, with higher scores consistent with better motor function. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Total Raw Score of the BSID-III Gross Motor Scale at Months 12 and 24
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). In this study the gross motor scale was assessed in a modified way compared with the standard administration. A total raw score was calculated by summing the item scores to give a maximum possible score of 72.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Achieve the Attainment Levels of a Subset of Motor Milestones Assessed in the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination Module 2 (HINE-2) at Month 8
The HINE was designed to evaluate infants between 2 months and 24 months of age. It is a simple and standardized instrument that includes 26 items assessing different aspects of neurological examinations, such as cranial nerves, posture, movements, tone, and reflexes. In this study, Module 2 of the HINE (HINE-2) was assessed. The HINE-2 evaluates 8 developmental milestones (head control, sitting, voluntary grasp, ability to kick, rolling, crawling, standing, and walking) scored on a 3, 4, or 5-point scale, with 0 indicating inability to perform a task and a score of 2, 3, or 4 (depending on the task) indicating full milestone development. The total score is calculated by summing the item scores to give a maximum possible score of 26. This measure represents subset numbers at Month 8 for head control, ability to kick and rolling milestones only.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Achieve the Attainment Levels of the Motor Milestones Assessed in the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination Module 2 (HINE-2) at Month 12
The HINE was designed to evaluate infants between 2 months and 24 months of age. It is a simple and standardized instrument that includes 26 items assessing different aspects of neurological examinations, such as cranial nerves, posture, movements, tone, and reflexes. In this study, Module 2 of the HINE (HINE-2) was assessed. The HINE-2 evaluates 8 developmental milestones (head control, sitting, voluntary grasp, ability to kick, rolling, crawling, standing, and walking) scored on a 3, 4, or 5-point scale, with 0 indicating inability to perform a task and a score of 2, 3, or 4 (depending on the task) indicating full milestone development. The total score is calculated by summing the item scores to give a maximum possible score of 26.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Achieve the Attainment Levels of the Motor Milestones Assessed in the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination Module 2 (HINE-2) at Month 24
The HINE was designed to evaluate infants between 2 months and 24 months of age. It is a simple and standardized instrument that includes 26 items assessing different aspects of neurological examinations, such as cranial nerves, posture, movements, tone, and reflexes. In this study, Module 2 of the HINE (HINE-2) was assessed. The HINE-2 evaluates 8 developmental milestones (head control, sitting, voluntary grasp, ability to kick, rolling, crawling, standing, and walking) scored on a 3, 4, or 5-point scale, with 0 indicating inability to perform a task and a score of 2, 3, or 4 (depending on the task) indicating full milestone development. The total score is calculated by summing the item scores to give a maximum possible score of 26.
Part 2: Percentage of Motor Milestone Responders as Assessed by HINE-2 at Months 12 and 24
The HINE-2 evaluates 8 developmental milestones scored on a 3, 4, or 5-point scale, with 0 indicating inability to perform a task and a score of 2, 3, or 4 (depending on the task) indicating full milestone development. The total score is calculated by summing the item scores to give a maximum possible score of 26. For the motor milestone responder definition, an improvement in a motor milestone is defined as at least a 2-point increase in ability to kick (or maximal score) or a 1-point increase in head control, rolling, sitting, crawling, standing, or walking. Worsening is similarly defined as a 2-point decrease in ability to kick (or lowest score) or a 1-point decrease in head control, rolling, sitting, crawling, standing, or walking. Voluntary grasp is excluded from the definition. An infant is classified as a responder if more motor milestones show improvement than show worsening. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Part 2: Highest Motor Milestone Achieved of Six Specified Milestones Assessed in the BSID-III Gross Motor Scale by Months 12 and 24
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). This specific measure included 6 milestones: Item 9 'Controls head while upright for 15 seconds', Item 14 'Rolls from side to back', Item 22 'Sits without support for 5 seconds', Item 30 'Crawls on stomach', Item 40 'Stands alone' and Item 42 'Walks alone'. Reported here is the percentage of participants for whom the reported item was the highest item achieved out of these six items by Months 12 and 24.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Sitting Without Support for at Least 5 Seconds as Assessed by Item 22 of the BSID-III Gross Motor Scale at Month 24
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). Item 22 is not considered achieved if the infant sits alone for less than 5 seconds before losing balance and falling over, or if the infant uses his or her arms to prop him- or herself up. The assessment was video recorded at study sites and reviewed/scored by two independent raters. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Sitting Without Support for at Least 30 Seconds as Assessed by Item 26 of the BSID-III Gross Motor Scale at Month 24
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). Item 26 is not considered achieved if the infant sits alone for less than 30 seconds before losing balance and falling over, or if the infant uses his or her arms to prop him- or herself up. The assessment was video recorded at study sites and reviewed/scored by two independent raters. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Standing Alone as Assessed by Item 40 of the BSID-III Gross Motor Scale at Month 24
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). Reported here is the percentage of participants who achieved item 40 'Stands alone' at Month 24. The assessment was video recorded at study sites and reviewed/scored by two independent raters. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Walking Alone as Assessed by Item 42 of the BSID-III Gross Motor Scale at Month 24
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). Reported here is the percentage of participants who achieved item 42 'Walks alone' at Month 24. The assessment was video recorded at study sites and reviewed/scored by two independent raters. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Part 2: Time to Death
The median time to event was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. 90% CI was estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Part 2: Time to Death or Permanent Ventilation
Permanent ventilation is defined as >/=16 hours of non-invasive ventilation per day or intubation for >21 consecutive days in the absence of, or following the resolution of, an acute reversible event; or tracheostomy. Permanent ventilation events were reviewed and confirmed by an independent adjudication committee. The median time to event was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. 90% CI was estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Part 2: Time to Permanent Ventilation
Permanent ventilation is defined as >/=16 hours of non-invasive ventilation per day or intubation for >21 consecutive days in the absence of, or following the resolution of, an acute reversible event; or tracheostomy. Permanent ventilation events were reviewed and confirmed by an independent adjudication committee. The median time to event was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. 90% CI was estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Alive Without Permanent Ventilation at Months 12 and 24
Permanent ventilation is defined as >/=16 hours of non-invasive ventilation per day or intubation for >21 consecutive days in the absence of, or following the resolution of, an acute reversible event; or tracheostomy. Permanent ventilation events were reviewed and confirmed by an independent adjudication committee. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the percentages. 90% CI was computed using the complementary log-log transformation.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Alive at Months 12 and 24
Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the percentages. 90% CI was computed using the complementary log-log transformation.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Without Permanent Ventilation at Months 12 and 24
Permanent ventilation is defined as >/=16 hours of non-invasive ventilation per day or intubation for >21 consecutive days in the absence of, or following the resolution of, an acute reversible event; or tracheostomy. Permanent ventilation events were reviewed and confirmed by an independent adjudication committee. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the percentages. 90% CI was computed using the complementary log-log transformation.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Achieve a Reduction of At Least 30 Degrees in Phase Angle From Baseline, as Measured by Respiratory Plethysmography (RP) at Month 12
RP measures the degree of synchrony between abdominal and thoracic cage-driven breathing. The weakness of intercostal muscles leads to asynchrony of the thorax with the diaphragm, resulting in inefficient and paradoxical breathing patterns. The degree of synchrony between the movement of the chest wall and abdomen during the respiratory cycle can be expressed as the phase angle between the two compartments and measured by placing two RP bands around the thorax and abdomen. In paradoxical breathing, the phase angle is reversed compared with the normal ventilation cycle. A phase angle of 0° indicates perfect in-phase movement, while a value of 180° indicates completely out-of-phase movement between the two compartments. In this measure, 8 or more valid breaths were used to determine the phase angle at each visit; the calculation was not performed if fewer than 8 valid breaths had been measured. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Not Requiring Respiratory Support (Invasive or Non-Invasive) at Months 12 and 24
90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Able to Feed Orally at Months 12 and 24
Able to feed orally includes participants fed orally and participants fed via a combination of oral and tube feeding. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Part 2: Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Part 2: Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs Leading to Treatment Modification/Interruption
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Part 2: Anthropometric Examination of Weight Measured in Kilograms
Anthropometric examination included weight, height, head circumference and chest circumference.
Part 2: Anthropometric Examination of Height, Head Circumference and Chest Circumference Measured in Centimeters
Anthropometric examination included weight, height, head circumference and chest circumference.
Part 2: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Risdiplam
Part 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Risdiplam
Part 2: Concentration at the End of a Dosing Interval (Ctrough) of Risdiplam
Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) Protein Levels in Blood
Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) Levels in Blood

Full Information

First Posted
September 21, 2016
Last Updated
October 5, 2023
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02913482
Brief Title
Investigate Safety, Tolerability, PK, PD and Efficacy of Risdiplam (RO7034067) in Infants With Type1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Acronym
FIREFISH
Official Title
A Two Part Seamless, Open-label, Multicenter Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of Risdiplam (RO7034067) in Infants With Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
December 23, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 14, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 17, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Open-label, multi-center clinical study is to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy of Risdiplam (RO7034067) in infants with Type 1 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The study consists of two parts, an exploratory dose finding part (Part 1) and a confirmatory part (Part 2) which will investigate Risdiplam (RO7034067) for 24-months at the dose selected in Part 1.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Muscular Atrophy, Spinal

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
62 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Part 1 (Dose Finding): Risdiplam (RO7034067)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive multiple ascending doses of risdiplam (RO7034067), administered orally once daily for a minimum of 4 weeks to select the dose for Part 2. During the first year of treatment, most participants will switch to the Part 2 dose. During the second year of treatment, all Part 1 participants will be receiving the Part 2 dose. They will thereafter enter a 3-year open-label extension phase and continue to receive risdiplam at the same dose.
Arm Title
Part 2 (Confirmatory): Risdiplam (RO7034067)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive risdiplam (RO7034067), administered orally once daily at the dose defined in Part 1 of the study, for a duration of 24 months. They will thereafter enter a 3-year open-label extension phase and continue to receive risdiplam at the same dose.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Risdiplam
Other Intervention Name(s)
RO7034067, Evrysdi
Intervention Description
Risdiplam will be administered orally.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Part 1: Selected Part 2 Dose of Risdiplam
Description
All safety, tolerability, PK and PD data available up to the clinical cut-off date of 5 January 2018, plus data that became available prior to the database snapshot on 6 February 2018 were included in the Internal Monitoring Committee (IMC) review. The IMC was responsible for selecting the dose for Part 2 of the study (pivotal dose). An external Independent Data Monitoring Committee (iDMC) reviewed data from Part 1 and confirmed the dose-selection decision of the IMC. The dose for Part 2 selected by the IMC was a dose that: 1.Was judged to be safe and well-tolerated, based on all available safety data from Part 1 and as confirmed by the iDMC; 2. Resulted in an exposure at steady-state below the exposure cap (mean value) of AUC0-24h,ss 2000 ng*h/mL (adjusted for free-fraction, if required); 3. Resulted in an SMN protein increase that was expected to be clinically relevant.
Time Frame
Minimum of 2 weeks at steady state exposure
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Sitting Without Support for at Least 5 Seconds as Assessed by Item 22 of the Gross Motor Scale of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (BSID-III) at Month 12
Description
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). Item 22 is not considered achieved if the infant sits alone for less than 5 seconds before losing balance and falling over, or if the infant uses his or her arms to prop him- or herself up. The assessment was video recorded at study sites and reviewed/scored by two independent raters. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Time Frame
Month 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Achieve a Score of 40 or Higher in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) at Month 12
Description
The CHOP-INTEND instrument was developed to evaluate motor function in infants with SMA from the ages of 1.4 to 37.9 months. It consists of 16 items, where each item assesses a specific motor task graded on a scale of 0 to 4, where zero is no response and 4 is a complete response. The total score ranges from 0 to 64, with higher scores consistent with better motor function. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Achieving an Increase of >/= 4 Points in Their CHOP-INTEND Score From Baseline at Months 8 and 12
Description
The CHOP-INTEND instrument was developed to evaluate motor function in infants with SMA from the ages of 1.4 to 37.9 months. It consists of 16 items, where each item assesses a specific motor task graded on a scale of 0 to 4, where zero is no response and 4 is a complete response. The total score ranges from 0 to 64, with higher scores consistent with better motor function. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Time Frame
Month 8, Month 12
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Achieving Head Control (Defined as a Score of >/= 3 for CHOP-INTEND Item 12) at Months 8, 12 and 24
Description
The CHOP-INTEND instrument was developed to evaluate motor function in infants with SMA from the ages of 1.4 to 37.9 months. It consists of 16 items, where each item assesses a specific motor task graded on a scale of 0 to 4, where zero is no response and 4 is a complete response. The total score ranges from 0 to 64, with higher scores consistent with better motor function. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Time Frame
Month 8, Month 12, Month 24
Title
Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Total Raw Score of the BSID-III Gross Motor Scale at Months 12 and 24
Description
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). In this study the gross motor scale was assessed in a modified way compared with the standard administration. A total raw score was calculated by summing the item scores to give a maximum possible score of 72.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Achieve the Attainment Levels of a Subset of Motor Milestones Assessed in the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination Module 2 (HINE-2) at Month 8
Description
The HINE was designed to evaluate infants between 2 months and 24 months of age. It is a simple and standardized instrument that includes 26 items assessing different aspects of neurological examinations, such as cranial nerves, posture, movements, tone, and reflexes. In this study, Module 2 of the HINE (HINE-2) was assessed. The HINE-2 evaluates 8 developmental milestones (head control, sitting, voluntary grasp, ability to kick, rolling, crawling, standing, and walking) scored on a 3, 4, or 5-point scale, with 0 indicating inability to perform a task and a score of 2, 3, or 4 (depending on the task) indicating full milestone development. The total score is calculated by summing the item scores to give a maximum possible score of 26. This measure represents subset numbers at Month 8 for head control, ability to kick and rolling milestones only.
Time Frame
Month 8
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Achieve the Attainment Levels of the Motor Milestones Assessed in the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination Module 2 (HINE-2) at Month 12
Description
The HINE was designed to evaluate infants between 2 months and 24 months of age. It is a simple and standardized instrument that includes 26 items assessing different aspects of neurological examinations, such as cranial nerves, posture, movements, tone, and reflexes. In this study, Module 2 of the HINE (HINE-2) was assessed. The HINE-2 evaluates 8 developmental milestones (head control, sitting, voluntary grasp, ability to kick, rolling, crawling, standing, and walking) scored on a 3, 4, or 5-point scale, with 0 indicating inability to perform a task and a score of 2, 3, or 4 (depending on the task) indicating full milestone development. The total score is calculated by summing the item scores to give a maximum possible score of 26.
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Achieve the Attainment Levels of the Motor Milestones Assessed in the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination Module 2 (HINE-2) at Month 24
Description
The HINE was designed to evaluate infants between 2 months and 24 months of age. It is a simple and standardized instrument that includes 26 items assessing different aspects of neurological examinations, such as cranial nerves, posture, movements, tone, and reflexes. In this study, Module 2 of the HINE (HINE-2) was assessed. The HINE-2 evaluates 8 developmental milestones (head control, sitting, voluntary grasp, ability to kick, rolling, crawling, standing, and walking) scored on a 3, 4, or 5-point scale, with 0 indicating inability to perform a task and a score of 2, 3, or 4 (depending on the task) indicating full milestone development. The total score is calculated by summing the item scores to give a maximum possible score of 26.
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Motor Milestone Responders as Assessed by HINE-2 at Months 12 and 24
Description
The HINE-2 evaluates 8 developmental milestones scored on a 3, 4, or 5-point scale, with 0 indicating inability to perform a task and a score of 2, 3, or 4 (depending on the task) indicating full milestone development. The total score is calculated by summing the item scores to give a maximum possible score of 26. For the motor milestone responder definition, an improvement in a motor milestone is defined as at least a 2-point increase in ability to kick (or maximal score) or a 1-point increase in head control, rolling, sitting, crawling, standing, or walking. Worsening is similarly defined as a 2-point decrease in ability to kick (or lowest score) or a 1-point decrease in head control, rolling, sitting, crawling, standing, or walking. Voluntary grasp is excluded from the definition. An infant is classified as a responder if more motor milestones show improvement than show worsening. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24
Title
Part 2: Highest Motor Milestone Achieved of Six Specified Milestones Assessed in the BSID-III Gross Motor Scale by Months 12 and 24
Description
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). This specific measure included 6 milestones: Item 9 'Controls head while upright for 15 seconds', Item 14 'Rolls from side to back', Item 22 'Sits without support for 5 seconds', Item 30 'Crawls on stomach', Item 40 'Stands alone' and Item 42 'Walks alone'. Reported here is the percentage of participants for whom the reported item was the highest item achieved out of these six items by Months 12 and 24.
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Sitting Without Support for at Least 5 Seconds as Assessed by Item 22 of the BSID-III Gross Motor Scale at Month 24
Description
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). Item 22 is not considered achieved if the infant sits alone for less than 5 seconds before losing balance and falling over, or if the infant uses his or her arms to prop him- or herself up. The assessment was video recorded at study sites and reviewed/scored by two independent raters. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Sitting Without Support for at Least 30 Seconds as Assessed by Item 26 of the BSID-III Gross Motor Scale at Month 24
Description
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). Item 26 is not considered achieved if the infant sits alone for less than 30 seconds before losing balance and falling over, or if the infant uses his or her arms to prop him- or herself up. The assessment was video recorded at study sites and reviewed/scored by two independent raters. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Standing Alone as Assessed by Item 40 of the BSID-III Gross Motor Scale at Month 24
Description
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). Reported here is the percentage of participants who achieved item 40 'Stands alone' at Month 24. The assessment was video recorded at study sites and reviewed/scored by two independent raters. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Walking Alone as Assessed by Item 42 of the BSID-III Gross Motor Scale at Month 24
Description
The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate development across five domains in infants and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The gross motor subscale of the BSID-III is evaluated based on the linear and hierarchical obtainment of motor skills, as seen in typically developing children. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform the activity) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). Reported here is the percentage of participants who achieved item 42 'Walks alone' at Month 24. The assessment was video recorded at study sites and reviewed/scored by two independent raters. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
Part 2: Time to Death
Description
The median time to event was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. 90% CI was estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Time Frame
Up to 24 months (up to the Clinical Cut-off Date [CCOD] of 12 November 2020)
Title
Part 2: Time to Death or Permanent Ventilation
Description
Permanent ventilation is defined as >/=16 hours of non-invasive ventilation per day or intubation for >21 consecutive days in the absence of, or following the resolution of, an acute reversible event; or tracheostomy. Permanent ventilation events were reviewed and confirmed by an independent adjudication committee. The median time to event was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. 90% CI was estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Time Frame
Up to 24 months (up to the CCOD of 12 November 2020)
Title
Part 2: Time to Permanent Ventilation
Description
Permanent ventilation is defined as >/=16 hours of non-invasive ventilation per day or intubation for >21 consecutive days in the absence of, or following the resolution of, an acute reversible event; or tracheostomy. Permanent ventilation events were reviewed and confirmed by an independent adjudication committee. The median time to event was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. 90% CI was estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Time Frame
Up to 24 months (up to the CCOD of 12 November 2020)
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Alive Without Permanent Ventilation at Months 12 and 24
Description
Permanent ventilation is defined as >/=16 hours of non-invasive ventilation per day or intubation for >21 consecutive days in the absence of, or following the resolution of, an acute reversible event; or tracheostomy. Permanent ventilation events were reviewed and confirmed by an independent adjudication committee. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the percentages. 90% CI was computed using the complementary log-log transformation.
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Alive at Months 12 and 24
Description
Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the percentages. 90% CI was computed using the complementary log-log transformation.
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Are Without Permanent Ventilation at Months 12 and 24
Description
Permanent ventilation is defined as >/=16 hours of non-invasive ventilation per day or intubation for >21 consecutive days in the absence of, or following the resolution of, an acute reversible event; or tracheostomy. Permanent ventilation events were reviewed and confirmed by an independent adjudication committee. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the percentages. 90% CI was computed using the complementary log-log transformation.
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Who Achieve a Reduction of At Least 30 Degrees in Phase Angle From Baseline, as Measured by Respiratory Plethysmography (RP) at Month 12
Description
RP measures the degree of synchrony between abdominal and thoracic cage-driven breathing. The weakness of intercostal muscles leads to asynchrony of the thorax with the diaphragm, resulting in inefficient and paradoxical breathing patterns. The degree of synchrony between the movement of the chest wall and abdomen during the respiratory cycle can be expressed as the phase angle between the two compartments and measured by placing two RP bands around the thorax and abdomen. In paradoxical breathing, the phase angle is reversed compared with the normal ventilation cycle. A phase angle of 0° indicates perfect in-phase movement, while a value of 180° indicates completely out-of-phase movement between the two compartments. In this measure, 8 or more valid breaths were used to determine the phase angle at each visit; the calculation was not performed if fewer than 8 valid breaths had been measured. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Not Requiring Respiratory Support (Invasive or Non-Invasive) at Months 12 and 24
Description
90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24
Title
Part 2: Percentage of Infants Able to Feed Orally at Months 12 and 24
Description
Able to feed orally includes participants fed orally and participants fed via a combination of oral and tube feeding. 90% CI for one sample binomial was computed using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24
Title
Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Time Frame
From first dose of risdiplam up to a minimum of 24 months (CCOD of 12 November 2020)
Title
Part 2: Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Description
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Time Frame
From first dose of risdiplam up to a minimum of 24 months (CCOD of 12 November 2020)
Title
Part 2: Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs Leading to Treatment Modification/Interruption
Description
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Time Frame
From first dose of risdiplam up to a minimum of 24 months (CCOD of 12 November 2020)
Title
Part 2: Anthropometric Examination of Weight Measured in Kilograms
Description
Anthropometric examination included weight, height, head circumference and chest circumference.
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24
Title
Part 2: Anthropometric Examination of Height, Head Circumference and Chest Circumference Measured in Centimeters
Description
Anthropometric examination included weight, height, head circumference and chest circumference.
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24
Title
Part 2: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Risdiplam
Time Frame
Day 1: predose, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours; Days 14, 119, 245, 364, 427, 490, 609, 728: predose, 4 hours; Days 28, 56, 182, 301, 546, 672: predose, 2, 4, 6 hours
Title
Part 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Risdiplam
Time Frame
Day 1: predose, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours; Days 14, 119, 245, 364, 427, 490, 609, 728: predose, 4 hours; Days 28, 56, 182, 301, 546, 672: predose, 2, 4, 6 hours
Title
Part 2: Concentration at the End of a Dosing Interval (Ctrough) of Risdiplam
Time Frame
Predose on Days 2, 14, 28, 56, 119, 182, 301, 546, 672
Title
Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) Protein Levels in Blood
Time Frame
Days 1, 14 (Part 1 only), 28, 119, 245, 364, 609, 728
Title
Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) Levels in Blood
Time Frame
Days 1, 14 (Part 1 only), 28, 245, 364, 609, 728

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Month
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
7 Months
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Clinical history, signs or symptoms attributable to Type 1 SMA with onset after 28 days but prior to the age of 3 months Gestational age of 37 to 42 weeks Confirmed diagnosis of 5q-autosomal recessive SMA Participants has two survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2) gene copies, as confirmed by central testing Body weight greater than or equal to (>=) third percentile for age, using appropriate country-specific guidelines Receiving adequate nutrition and hydration (with or without gastrostomy) at the time of screening, in the opinion of the Investigator Adequately recovered from any acute illness at the time of screening and considered well-enough to participate in the opinion of the Investigator Exclusion Criteria: Concomitant or previous participation in any investigational drug or device study within 90 days prior to screening or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer Concomitant or previous administration of SMN2-targeting antisense oligonucleotide, SMN2 splicing modifier or gene therapy study Any history of cell therapy Hospitalization for pulmonary event within the last 2 months, or planned at the time of screening Presence of clinically relevant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities before study drug administration Unstable gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, endocrine or cardiovascular system diseases Participants requiring invasive ventilation or tracheostomy Participants requiring awake non-invasive ventilation or with awake hypoxemia (arterial oxygen saturation less than [<] 95 percent [%]) with or without ventilator support Participants with a history of respiratory failure or severe pneumonia, and have not fully recovered their pulmonary function at the time of screening Multiple or fixed contractures and/or hip subluxation or dislocation at birth Presence of non-SMA related concurrent syndromes or diseases Any major illness within one month before the screening examination or any febrile illness within one week prior to screening and up to first dose administration Any inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and/or any Organic Cation Transporter 2 (OCT-2) and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) substrates taken within 2 weeks and/or any inducer of CYP3A4 taken within 4 weeks (or within 5-times the elimination half-life, whichever is longer) prior to dosing or participants (and the mother, if breastfeeding the infant) taking any nutrients known to modulate CYP3A activity and any known flavin containing monooxygenase (FMO) 1 or FMO3 inhibitors or substrates Prior use (at any time in the participants lives) and/or anticipated need for quinolones (chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine), thioridazine, vigabatrin, retigabine, or any other drug known to cause retinal toxicity during the study. Infants exposed to chloroquine, hydroxycholoroquine, thioridazine, vigabatrin, retigabine or drugs with known retinal toxicity given to mothers during pregnancy (and lactation) should not be enrolled. Recent history (less than 6 months) of ophthalmic disease that would interfere with the conduct of the study as assessed by an ophthalmologist Therapeutic use, defined as use for 8 weeks or longer, of the following medications within 90 days prior to enrollment: riluzole, valproic acid, hydroxyurea, sodium phenylbutyrate, butyrate derivatives, creatine, carnitine, growth hormone, anabolic steroids, probenecid, agents anticipated to increase or decrease muscle strength, agents with known or presumed histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitory effect, medications known to or suspected of causing retinal toxicity (deferoxamine, topiramate, latanoprost, niacin, rosiglitazone, tamoxifen, canthaxanthine, sildenafil, and interferon) and medications with known phototoxicity liabilities (e.g., oral retinoids including over-the-counter [OTC] formulations, amiodarone, phenothiazines and use of minocycline)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Stanford University Medical Center
City
Palo Alto
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94304
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children Hospital of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Boston Childrens Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University Medical Center; The Neurological Institute of New York
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
UZ Gent
City
Gent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Chr de La Citadelle
City
Liège
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Instituto de Puericultura E Pediatria Martagão Gesteira
City
Rio de Janeiro
State/Province
RJ
ZIP/Postal Code
CEP 21941-912
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Hospital das Clinicas - FMUSP_X; Neurologia
City
Sao Paulo
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
05403-000
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Peking University First Hospital
City
Beijing City
ZIP/Postal Code
100034
Country
China
Facility Name
Children's Hospital of Fudan University
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
201102
Country
China
Facility Name
Clinical Medical Center Zagreb; University Hospital Rebro Department of Paediatrics
City
Zagreb
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Hopital Femme Mere Enfant; Medecine Physique et Readaptation Pediatrique ? L?ESCALE
City
Bron
ZIP/Postal Code
69677
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Armand Trousseau
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75571
Country
France
Facility Name
IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù; U.O. Malattie Neuromuscolari e Neurodegenerative
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00165
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Policlinico Agostino Gemelli; Dipartimento di Neuropsichiatria Infantile
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00168
Country
Italy
Facility Name
IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini; U.O.S.D. Centro di Miologia e Patologie Neurodegenerative
City
Genova
State/Province
Liguria
ZIP/Postal Code
16147
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Unità Operativa Complessa di Neurologia
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20122
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico ?Carlo Besta?; UO di Neurologia dello Sviluppo
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Hyogo Medical University Hospital
City
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
663-8501
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Szpital Gdanskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego; Clinic of developmental neurology
City
Gda?sk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-952
Country
Poland
Facility Name
The Children?s Memorial Health Institute Department of Neurology and Epileptology
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
04-730
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Russian Children Neuromuscular Center of Veltischev
City
Moscow
State/Province
Moskovskaja Oblast
ZIP/Postal Code
125412
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre Building
City
Riyadh
ZIP/Postal Code
11211
Country
Saudi Arabia
Facility Name
Institute for Mother and Child Dr. Vukan Cupic
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Hospital Sant Joan De Deu
City
Esplugues De Llobregas
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08950
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron; Area Genética Clínica y Molecular
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41013
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Universitäts-Kinderspital (UKBB) Neuropädiatrie
City
Basel
ZIP/Postal Code
4005
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Hacettepe University, School of Medicine; Pediatrics Department; Pediatrics Child Neurology Unit
City
Ankara
ZIP/Postal Code
06100
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Hospital Yeditepe University Kozyatagi; Pediatry
City
Atasehir- Istanbul
ZIP/Postal Code
34752
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Ams of Ukraine; Inst. of Neurology, Psychiatry & Narcology
City
Kharkov
ZIP/Postal Code
61068
Country
Ukraine

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level data through the clinical study data request platform (www.vivli.org). Further details on Roche's criteria for eligible studies are available here (https://vivli.org/ourmember/roche/). For further details on Roche's Global Policy on the Sharing of Clinical Information and how to request access to related clinical study documents, see here (https://www.roche.com/research_and_development/who_we_are_how_we_work/clinical_trials/our_commitment_to_data_sharing.htm).
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36244364
Citation
Masson R, Mazurkiewicz-Beldzinska M, Rose K, Servais L, Xiong H, Zanoteli E, Baranello G, Bruno C, Day JW, Deconinck N, Klein A, Mercuri E, Vlodavets D, Wang Y, Dodman A, El-Khairi M, Gorni K, Jaber B, Kletzl H, Gaki E, Fontoura P, Darras BT; FIREFISH Study Group. Safety and efficacy of risdiplam in patients with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy (FIREFISH part 2): secondary analyses from an open-label trial. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Dec;21(12):1110-1119. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00339-8. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35906608
Citation
Cances C, Vlodavets D, Comi GP, Masson R, Mazurkiewicz-Beldzinska M, Saito K, Zanoteli E, Dodman A, El-Khairi M, Gorni K, Gravestock I, Hoffart J, Scalco RS, Darras BT; ANCHOVY Working Group. Natural history of Type 1 spinal muscular atrophy: a retrospective, global, multicenter study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jul 29;17(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02455-x.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34320287
Citation
Darras BT, Masson R, Mazurkiewicz-Beldzinska M, Rose K, Xiong H, Zanoteli E, Baranello G, Bruno C, Vlodavets D, Wang Y, El-Khairi M, Gerber M, Gorni K, Khwaja O, Kletzl H, Scalco RS, Fontoura P, Servais L; FIREFISH Working Group. Risdiplam-Treated Infants with Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy versus Historical Controls. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 29;385(5):427-435. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102047.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33626251
Citation
Baranello G, Darras BT, Day JW, Deconinck N, Klein A, Masson R, Mercuri E, Rose K, El-Khairi M, Gerber M, Gorni K, Khwaja O, Kletzl H, Scalco RS, Seabrook T, Fontoura P, Servais L; FIREFISH Working Group. Risdiplam in Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 11;384(10):915-923. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2009965. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://roche-sma-clinicaltrials.com
Description
roche-sma-clinicaltrials.com provides information about the Roche Firefish clinical trial NCT02913482 and molecule being investigated in SMA.

Learn more about this trial

Investigate Safety, Tolerability, PK, PD and Efficacy of Risdiplam (RO7034067) in Infants With Type1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs