search
Back to results

Cost- Effectiveness and Quality of Life Assessment in Bipolar Disorder Depressive Episode

Primary Purpose

Bipolar Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lithium Carbonate
Sertraline
Nortriptyline
Risperidone
Sponsored by
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Bipolar Disorder focused on measuring Cost effectiveness, Bipolar disorder, Depressive episodes, Quality of Life

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ages between 18 and 65;
  2. BD current acute mixed episode;
  3. total capacity to understand and respond to self-applied instruments;
  4. the presence of symptoms in the last 30 days;
  5. abstinence for at least 30 days for drug addicts.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. presence of Organic Brain Syndrome (OBS);
  2. pregnancy or lactation;
  3. criteria for psychiatric hospitalization. -

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Lithium Carbonate

    Arm Description

    Group Started: Lithium Carbonate (900mg-1500mg) Subjects evaluated for responsiveness every 2 weeks. Responsive to treatment patients remain in the same step. Max. step duration of 8 weeks. First step: Monotherapy with Lithium (LSL 0.6-0.8). Non responsive patients: 2nd step. Second step: Monotherapy with lithium (LSL 1.0-1.2). Non responsive patients: 3rd step. Third step: Lithium + Sertraline (50mg-200mg). Non responsive patients: 4th step. Fourth step: Lithium + Nortriptyline 100mg. Non responsive patients: 5th step. Fifth step: Lithium + Nortriptyline 100mg + Sertraline (100mg-200mg). Non responsive patients: 6th step Sixth step: Lithium + Nortriptyline 100mg + Sertraline 200mg + Risperidone (1mg-6mg).

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of Participants With Response to Treatment"
    Response to treatment was defined as a 50% reduction from baseline scores in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD)and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scales HRSD was developed to evaluate and quantify depression.Its abbreviated version,. Scoring is based on the 17-item scale and scores of 0-7 are considered as being normal. The cutoff points are: 8-17 for mild depression,18-24 for moderate depression, and 25 or more for severe depression. The maximum score being 52 on the 17-point scale. YMRS is is the most widely used assessment tool for manic symptoms. The scale consists of 11 items .The YMRS follows the style of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) with each item given a severity rating. There are four items that are graded on a 0 to 8 scale (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/agressive behavior), while the remaining seven items are graded on a 0 to 4 scale. Scores of YMRS > 20 generates indicate mania
    Quality of Life Instrument Scores
    Quality of Life - WHOQOL -BREF instrument scores scores 0-20 . higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Number of Participants With Remission to Treatment
    The remission outcome was established as obtaining three consecutive visits with scores of values considered asymptomatic Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression(HRSD <7 points) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS <6 points) during the trial. The subjects that were asymptomatic for at least 6-8 month were considered to be in partial remission and complete if at least 12 months without symptoms, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV).

    Full Information

    First Posted
    September 25, 2016
    Last Updated
    October 25, 2020
    Sponsor
    Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02918097
    Brief Title
    Cost- Effectiveness and Quality of Life Assessment in Bipolar Disorder Depressive Episode
    Official Title
    Cost- Effectiveness and Quality of Life Assessment in Bipolar Disorder Depressive Episode
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2016
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    May 2010 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 2014 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    September 2015 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    To evaluate the effectiveness of an algorithm for Bipolar Disorder depressive episodes (BDD) using medications available in the Brazilian Public Healthcare System (SUS). Quality of life assessment of these patients was also employed. A randomized pragmatic trial was conducted. An algorithm was developed for the treatment of episodes of bipolar disorder depression episodes.
    Detailed Description
    The study design was that of a pragmatic randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for mood disorders in a public healthcare context in the city of Porto Alegre, in southern Brazil. The algorithm was originally developed for the treatment of bipolar disorder depressive episodes by a Delphi panel of experts from psychiatric associations in Brazil. All subjects provided an informed consent form, in writing, in order to participate in the study protocol, which was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Procedures and measurements of the study: The subjects under evaluation were selected and they followed the stages defined by the treatment protocol: Sample selection by being referred from the primary healthcare clinics in the municipality; Informative talk about mood disorders and the research, with the informed consent forms being provided to the subjects; Screening for unipolar depression episodes with the use of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Hypomanic Symptoms Checklist Brazilian Version (HCL -32-BV); Diagnostic evaluation through the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and clinical interview for individuals with positive results in the screening instruments; Baseline and demographic assessments using standardized semi-structured interviews in the first and second visits; In each clinic visit, the severity of the symptoms were evealuated using the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), and Young Manic Rating Scale (YMRS); Biweekly follow-up, changed to monthly after stabilization - with a maximum follow-up period of 52 weeks.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Bipolar Disorder
    Keywords
    Cost effectiveness, Bipolar disorder, Depressive episodes, Quality of Life

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 4
    Interventional Study Model
    Sequential Assignment
    Model Description
    This is a pragmatical clinical trial. The patients follow a pre-established algorithm About the participant flow the results the table to indicate the number of participants who received treatment in the whole algoritm, not in each step.
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    78 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Lithium Carbonate
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Group Started: Lithium Carbonate (900mg-1500mg) Subjects evaluated for responsiveness every 2 weeks. Responsive to treatment patients remain in the same step. Max. step duration of 8 weeks. First step: Monotherapy with Lithium (LSL 0.6-0.8). Non responsive patients: 2nd step. Second step: Monotherapy with lithium (LSL 1.0-1.2). Non responsive patients: 3rd step. Third step: Lithium + Sertraline (50mg-200mg). Non responsive patients: 4th step. Fourth step: Lithium + Nortriptyline 100mg. Non responsive patients: 5th step. Fifth step: Lithium + Nortriptyline 100mg + Sertraline (100mg-200mg). Non responsive patients: 6th step Sixth step: Lithium + Nortriptyline 100mg + Sertraline 200mg + Risperidone (1mg-6mg).
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Lithium Carbonate
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Carbolitium
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Sertraline
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Zoloft
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Nortriptyline
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Pamelor
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Risperidone
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Risperdal
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of Participants With Response to Treatment"
    Description
    Response to treatment was defined as a 50% reduction from baseline scores in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD)and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scales HRSD was developed to evaluate and quantify depression.Its abbreviated version,. Scoring is based on the 17-item scale and scores of 0-7 are considered as being normal. The cutoff points are: 8-17 for mild depression,18-24 for moderate depression, and 25 or more for severe depression. The maximum score being 52 on the 17-point scale. YMRS is is the most widely used assessment tool for manic symptoms. The scale consists of 11 items .The YMRS follows the style of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) with each item given a severity rating. There are four items that are graded on a 0 to 8 scale (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/agressive behavior), while the remaining seven items are graded on a 0 to 4 scale. Scores of YMRS > 20 generates indicate mania
    Time Frame
    8 weeks
    Title
    Quality of Life Instrument Scores
    Description
    Quality of Life - WHOQOL -BREF instrument scores scores 0-20 . higher scores mean a better outcome.
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of Participants With Remission to Treatment
    Description
    The remission outcome was established as obtaining three consecutive visits with scores of values considered asymptomatic Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression(HRSD <7 points) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS <6 points) during the trial. The subjects that were asymptomatic for at least 6-8 month were considered to be in partial remission and complete if at least 12 months without symptoms, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV).
    Time Frame
    8 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: ages between 18 and 65; BD current acute mixed episode; total capacity to understand and respond to self-applied instruments; the presence of symptoms in the last 30 days; abstinence for at least 30 days for drug addicts. Exclusion Criteria: presence of Organic Brain Syndrome (OBS); pregnancy or lactation; criteria for psychiatric hospitalization. -
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Marcelo Fleck, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    28832750
    Citation
    Lima AF, Miguel SR, Cohen M, Zimmermann JJ, Shansis FM, Cruz LN, Ziegelmann PK, Polanczyk CA, Fleck MP. Effectiveness evaluation of mood disorder treatment algorithms in Brazilian public healthcare patients. Braz J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan-Mar;40(1):26-34. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2147. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Cost- Effectiveness and Quality of Life Assessment in Bipolar Disorder Depressive Episode

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs