A Randomized Control Trial of Vitamin D Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
Primary Purpose
Gestational Hypertension, Toxemia, Superimposed Preeclampsia
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vitamin D3
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Gestational Hypertension focused on measuring Vitamin D; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age and older
- With a confirmed intrauterine pregnancy, less than 16 weeks gestation
- Carrying a singleton gestation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Taking Vitamin D supplementation outside of prenatal vitamins
- Has a known disorder that will affect vitamin D levels (i.e, hyperparathyroidism, mal-absorption disorder, history of gastric bypass surgery, immunocompromised state, maternal use of immune-modulators etc.)
- Carrying a fetus with known aneuploidy or anomaly
- With fetal demise
- Women with chronic diuretic or cardiac medication therapy including calcium channel blockers
Sites / Locations
- SUNY Stony Brook HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Vitamin D Prophylaxis
No Vitamin D Prophylaxis
Arm Description
Participants will be provided Vitamin D 3000 IU daily or Vitamin D 4000 IU daily with and without concurrent use of prenatal vitamins, respectively.
Participants will not receive additional Vitamin D in the pregnancy.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Vitamin D prophylaxis in pregnant women and incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Number of participants diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy defined as: elevated blood pressure (systolic/diastolic > 140/90mmHg, 2 determinations, 4 hours apart) more than 20 weeks gestation +/- new onset proteinuria (300mg/24hour; protein/creatinine ratio > 3.0mg/dL; 1+ protein on dipstick) or abnormal labs (thrombocytopenia (platelet < 100,000 microliter), impaired liver function testing (AST/ALT twice higher than normal), renal insufficiency (creatinine >1.1mg/dL or doubling of creatinine in the absence of renal disease)) or pulmonary edema or seizure. The outcome will be dichotomized and coded as present or absent.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Adverse neonatal outcome in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
The number of participants with an adverse neonatal outcome will be determined by the presence of any of the following pregnancy characteristics: preterm birth <37 weeks; Apgar score <5 at 1 minute, <7 at 5 minutes; low birth weight <2500g; neonatal intensive care unit admission; fetal distress; respiratory distress syndrome; ventilation; neonatal infection; fracture; and neonatal death. The outcome will be dichotomized and coded as present or absent.
Placental pathology in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
The number of participants with abnormal placental evaluation will be based on the presence of any of the following: placental abruption, infarction, hypoxia, decidual vasculopathy, or thrombosis of fetal vessels. The outcome will be dichotomized and coded as present or absent.
Placental TNF-alpha in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Number value of placental TNF-alpha level (ng/mL)
Placental inflammatory marker IL-6 in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Number value of placental IL-6 (ng/mL)
Placental inflammatory marker IFN-gamma in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Number value of IFN-gamma (ng/mL)
Placental inflammatory marker GMSCF-2 in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Number value of GMSCF-2 (ng/mL)
Placental inflammatory marker endometrial growth factor in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Number value of endometrial growth factor (ng/mL)
Maternal Vitamin D level in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Number value of maternal serum levels of 25(OH)D (ng/mL)
Cord blood Vitamin D level in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Number value of cord blood levels of 25(OH)D (ng/mL)
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02920593
First Posted
September 9, 2016
Last Updated
October 4, 2017
Sponsor
Stony Brook University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02920593
Brief Title
A Randomized Control Trial of Vitamin D Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
Official Title
A Randomized Control Trial of Vitamin D Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 31, 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2019 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Stony Brook University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators aim to determine if Vitamin D prophylaxis in pregnancy reduces the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Detailed Description
Optimizing Vitamin D status during pregnancy it thought to have maternal, fetal, and neonatal benefit. Studies suggest that Vitamin D acts well beyond its most commonly thought of role in establishing calcium homeostasis and maintaining maternal and neonatal skeletal integrity. Vitamin D has also been found to modulate the maternal renal renin-angiotensin system, maternal immune response, placental implantation and function, and angiogenesis. In light of this, it is no surprise that the 2010 systematic review of vitamin D in pregnancy suggested that Vitamin D deficiency may be associated with an increase risk in maternal and neonatal morbidity. For example, vitamin D deficiency has correlated with an array of maternal conditions, including gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, myopathy, vaginal infection, and mental disease. Associated neonatal risks include preterm birth, immunosuppression, infection, low birth weight, hypokalemia, neonatal seizures, asthma, fractures and rickets.
Unfortunately, Vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy is an ongoing epidemic, affecting as many as 82% of pregnant women. While studies on Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy have consistently shown an associated increase in maternal and neonatal serum Vitamin D levels, some studies have also suggested a concurrent decrease in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. For example, Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancies with known deficiency has been shown to decrease the incidence of preeclampsia as much as 32%. Other studies, on the other hand, have suggested no benefit. The inconsistency in findings lie in the fact that these studies were primarily observational in nature and plagued by small sample sizes, recall bias, and inability to adjust for potential confounders. Given this, interpretation regarding clinical significance is limited, preventing providers from making appropriate recommendations to their patients. As such, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has called for high quality studies to address whether the use of Vitamin D supplementation beyond that found in prenatal vitamins is beneficial.
In an effort to elucidate the potential benefit of Vitamin D supplementation in an unscreened population, the investigators propose conducting a randomized control trial in which Vitamin D prophylaxis is provided to a cohort of pregnant women regardless of their Vitamin D status. The aims of the study, therefore, are to:
Specific Aim 1: Determine if Vitamin D prophylaxis in pregnant women decreases the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Specific Aim 2: Compare neonatal outcomes in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis.
Specific Aim 3: Compare placental histology and inflammatory markers in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gestational Hypertension, Toxemia, Superimposed Preeclampsia, Eclampsia, HELLP Syndrome
Keywords
Vitamin D; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
412 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Vitamin D Prophylaxis
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will be provided Vitamin D 3000 IU daily or Vitamin D 4000 IU daily with and without concurrent use of prenatal vitamins, respectively.
Arm Title
No Vitamin D Prophylaxis
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Participants will not receive additional Vitamin D in the pregnancy.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vitamin D3
Other Intervention Name(s)
Vitamin D
Intervention Description
Vitamin D prophylaxis
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Vitamin D prophylaxis in pregnant women and incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Description
Number of participants diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy defined as: elevated blood pressure (systolic/diastolic > 140/90mmHg, 2 determinations, 4 hours apart) more than 20 weeks gestation +/- new onset proteinuria (300mg/24hour; protein/creatinine ratio > 3.0mg/dL; 1+ protein on dipstick) or abnormal labs (thrombocytopenia (platelet < 100,000 microliter), impaired liver function testing (AST/ALT twice higher than normal), renal insufficiency (creatinine >1.1mg/dL or doubling of creatinine in the absence of renal disease)) or pulmonary edema or seizure. The outcome will be dichotomized and coded as present or absent.
Time Frame
1.5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adverse neonatal outcome in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Description
The number of participants with an adverse neonatal outcome will be determined by the presence of any of the following pregnancy characteristics: preterm birth <37 weeks; Apgar score <5 at 1 minute, <7 at 5 minutes; low birth weight <2500g; neonatal intensive care unit admission; fetal distress; respiratory distress syndrome; ventilation; neonatal infection; fracture; and neonatal death. The outcome will be dichotomized and coded as present or absent.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Placental pathology in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Description
The number of participants with abnormal placental evaluation will be based on the presence of any of the following: placental abruption, infarction, hypoxia, decidual vasculopathy, or thrombosis of fetal vessels. The outcome will be dichotomized and coded as present or absent.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Placental TNF-alpha in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Description
Number value of placental TNF-alpha level (ng/mL)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Placental inflammatory marker IL-6 in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Description
Number value of placental IL-6 (ng/mL)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Placental inflammatory marker IFN-gamma in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Description
Number value of IFN-gamma (ng/mL)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Placental inflammatory marker GMSCF-2 in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Description
Number value of GMSCF-2 (ng/mL)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Placental inflammatory marker endometrial growth factor in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Description
Number value of endometrial growth factor (ng/mL)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Maternal Vitamin D level in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Description
Number value of maternal serum levels of 25(OH)D (ng/mL)
Time Frame
1.5 years
Title
Cord blood Vitamin D level in those who received Vitamin D prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive Vitamin D prophylaxis
Description
Number value of cord blood levels of 25(OH)D (ng/mL)
Time Frame
1.5 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years of age and older
With a confirmed intrauterine pregnancy, less than 16 weeks gestation
Carrying a singleton gestation
Exclusion Criteria:
Taking Vitamin D supplementation outside of prenatal vitamins
Has a known disorder that will affect vitamin D levels (i.e, hyperparathyroidism, mal-absorption disorder, history of gastric bypass surgery, immunocompromised state, maternal use of immune-modulators etc.)
Carrying a fetus with known aneuploidy or anomaly
With fetal demise
Women with chronic diuretic or cardiac medication therapy including calcium channel blockers
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Diana J Garretto, MD
Phone
(631) 444-7650
Email
diana.garretto@stonybrookmedicine.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Malini D Persad, MD MPH
Phone
(631) 444-7650
Email
malini.persad@stonybrookmedicine.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Diana J Garretto, MD
Organizational Affiliation
SUNY Stony Brook Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
SUNY Stony Brook Hospital
City
Stony Brook
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11794
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Diana J Garretto, MD
Phone
631-444-7650
Email
diana.garretto@stonybrookmedicine.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Malini D Persad, MD MPH
Phone
(631) 444-7650
Email
malini.persad@stonybrookmedicine.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Diana J Garretto, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Malini D Persad, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Garry, DO
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James G Quirk, MD PhD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21691184
Citation
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 495: Vitamin D: Screening and supplementation during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):197-198. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318227f06b.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17535985
Citation
Bodnar LM, Catov JM, Simhan HN, Holick MF, Powers RW, Roberts JM. Maternal vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of preeclampsia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Sep;92(9):3517-22. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0718. Epub 2007 May 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20863562
Citation
Shin JS, Choi MY, Longtine MS, Nelson DM. Vitamin D effects on pregnancy and the placenta. Placenta. 2010 Dec;31(12):1027-34. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.08.015. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19451820
Citation
Haugen M, Brantsaeter AL, Trogstad L, Alexander J, Roth C, Magnus P, Meltzer HM. Vitamin D supplementation and reduced risk of preeclampsia in nulliparous women. Epidemiology. 2009 Sep;20(5):720-6. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a70f08.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22327734
Citation
Urrutia RP, Thorp JM. Vitamin D in pregnancy: current concepts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;24(2):57-64. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283505ab3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21706518
Citation
Hollis BW, Johnson D, Hulsey TC, Ebeling M, Wagner CL. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: double-blind, randomized clinical trial of safety and effectiveness. J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Oct;26(10):2341-57. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.463. Erratum In: J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Dec; 26(12):3001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21040394
Citation
Shand AW, Nassar N, Von Dadelszen P, Innis SM, Green TJ. Maternal vitamin D status in pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a group at high risk for pre-eclampsia. BJOG. 2010 Dec;117(13):1593-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02742.x. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20640974
Citation
Johnson DD, Wagner CL, Hulsey TC, McNeil RB, Ebeling M, Hollis BW. Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency is common during pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 2011 Jan;28(1):7-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262505. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21631991
Citation
Ringrose JS, PausJenssen AM, Wilson M, Blanco L, Ward H, Wilson TW. Vitamin D and hypertension in pregnancy. Clin Invest Med. 2011 Jun 1;34(3):E147-54. doi: 10.25011/cim.v34i3.15187.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20733087
Citation
Powe CE, Seely EW, Rana S, Bhan I, Ecker J, Karumanchi SA, Thadhani R. First trimester vitamin D, vitamin D binding protein, and subsequent preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2010 Oct;56(4):758-63. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.158238. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15585798
Citation
Specker B. Vitamin D requirements during pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Dec;80(6 Suppl):1740S-7S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/80.6.1740S.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24290528
Citation
Burton GJ, Sebire NJ, Myatt L, Tannetta D, Wang YL, Sadovsky Y, Staff AC, Redman CW. Optimising sample collection for placental research. Placenta. 2014 Jan;35(1):9-22. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Nov 19. Erratum In: Placenta. 2014 Apr;35(4):289.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21482732
Citation
Liu NQ, Kaplan AT, Lagishetty V, Ouyang YB, Ouyang Y, Simmons CF, Equils O, Hewison M. Vitamin D and the regulation of placental inflammation. J Immunol. 2011 May 15;186(10):5968-74. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003332. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23825981
Citation
Androutsopoulos G, Gkogkos P, Decavalas G. Mid-trimester maternal serum HCG and alpha fetal protein levels: clinical significance and prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Spring;11(2):102-6. doi: 10.5812/ijem.5014. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22261570
Citation
Ertl R, Yu CK, Samaha R, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Maternal serum vitamin D at 11-13 weeks in pregnancies delivering small for gestational age neonates. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;31(2):103-8. doi: 10.1159/000333810. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26765344
Citation
De-Regil LM, Palacios C, Lombardo LK, Pena-Rosas JP. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 14;(1):CD008873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008873.pub3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21252966
Citation
Roth DE. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: safety considerations in the design and interpretation of clinical trials. J Perinatol. 2011 Jul;31(7):449-59. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.203. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
A Randomized Control Trial of Vitamin D Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs