search
Back to results

Comparative Effectiveness of MRgFUS Versus CTgRFA for Osteoid Osteomas

Primary Purpose

Osteoid Osteoma

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MRgFUS
CTgRFA
Sponsored by
Matthew Bucknor
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoid Osteoma

Eligibility Criteria

8 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women ages ≥ 8 years old.
  2. Diagnosis of osteoid osteoma as confirmed when a musculoskeletal radiologist and orthopedic oncologist agree that a patient's imaging and clinical history are most compatible with the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma. A patient referred by a clinician other than orthopedic oncologist will require a clinic visit with an orthopedic oncologist for study inclusion.
  3. Patients must have medically uncontrolled pain from an osteoid osteoma, as defined by pain, which, in the view of the referring orthopedic oncologist significantly interferes with that patient's activities of daily living. Pain may be refractory to management with medications because of inadequate pain control, or because of side effects of the pain medication.
  4. If patients have an additional site of pain, it must be 2 points less severe and distinguishable from the pain at the osteoid osteoma site.
  5. Patients (or guardians/parents) who are able and willing to give consent (or assent where applicable) and able to attend all study visits.
  6. No prior interventional therapy for the osteoid osteoma.
  7. Able to safely undergo MRI exam, tolerate being in an MRI scanner, and receive anesthesia/sedation for the treatment.
  8. Targeted bone/tumor interface is accessible to the ExAblate device and located in a rib, extremity (excluding intra-articular location), pelvis, shoulders (including clavicles), or the sternum.
  9. Targeted lesion must be deeper than 1 cm from the skin.
  10. Targeted lesion must be clearly visible by non-contrast MRI.
  11. Karnofsky Performance Status > 60.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients a) who need surgical stabilization of the affected bone (elevated fracture risk) or b) whose targeted tumor is at an impending fracture site, as determined by the referring orthopedic oncologist.
  2. Targeted tumor in the skull/spine.
  3. Targeted tumor is < 1 cm from a major nerve.
  4. Pregnancy.
  5. Patients with an acute medical condition (e.g. pneumonia, sepsis) that is expected to hinder them from completing this study.
  6. Patients with unstable cardiac status including: patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs, unstable angina pectoris, documented myocardial infarction within six months of protocol entry, congestive heart failure requiring medication (other than diuretic).
  7. Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication)
  8. Patients with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices.
  9. Patients with an active infection or severe hematological, neurological, or other uncontrolled disease.
  10. Severe cerebrovascular disease.
  11. Known intolerance or allergy to medications used for sedation/anesthesia.
  12. Known intolerance or allergy to MR contrast agent (gadolinium chelates).
  13. Patients unable to communicate with the investigator and staff.
  14. Patients with persistent pain undistinguishable from the target lesion.

Sites / Locations

  • Stanford Medical CenterRecruiting
  • UCSF Imaging CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

MRgFUS

CTgRFA

Arm Description

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound ablation

Computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Rate of resolution of pain (worst visual analog scale score over last 24 hours < 2.0)
1 month after treatment, worst VAS score over the last 24 hours will be assessed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Procedure time
On the day of the treatment, the procedure time will be recorded
Patient preference
2 weeks after treatment, patient preference surveys will be assessed
Patient quality of life
1 month after treatment, patient quality of life surveys will be assessed
Medication use
Self reported medication use for 5 days before, five days after, and 1 month after the treatment
Adverse events
All adverse events occurring within the first month will be recorded at 1 month following the procedure
Worst VAS
Worst VAS over the last 24 hours will be assessed for each of the first 5 days following the treatment and then at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months following the treatment

Full Information

First Posted
September 30, 2016
Last Updated
July 13, 2023
Sponsor
Matthew Bucknor
Collaborators
Focused Ultrasound Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02923011
Brief Title
Comparative Effectiveness of MRgFUS Versus CTgRFA for Osteoid Osteomas
Official Title
Phase III Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Guided Focused Ultrasound With Computed Tomography Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Osteoid Osteomas
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 28, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Matthew Bucknor
Collaborators
Focused Ultrasound Foundation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Osteoid osteomas are painful, benign bone tumors that occur most frequently in young males between ages 10 and 20 years. The goal of the proposed study is based on the premise that MRgFUS is noninferior to CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (CTgRFA), in terms of pain reduction following treatment of osteoid osteomas, and offers possible improvements with regards to 1) post-procedural pain, 2) clinical resource utilization, 3) patient experience, and/or 4) adverse events. The data from the current study would provide clinicians important information in deciding between treatment options for ablation of osteoid osteomas.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoid Osteoma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
56 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
MRgFUS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound ablation
Arm Title
CTgRFA
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
MRgFUS
Intervention Description
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound ablation of osteoid osteoma
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
CTgRFA
Intervention Description
Computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of resolution of pain (worst visual analog scale score over last 24 hours < 2.0)
Description
1 month after treatment, worst VAS score over the last 24 hours will be assessed
Time Frame
1 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Procedure time
Description
On the day of the treatment, the procedure time will be recorded
Time Frame
Treatment day
Title
Patient preference
Description
2 weeks after treatment, patient preference surveys will be assessed
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Patient quality of life
Description
1 month after treatment, patient quality of life surveys will be assessed
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Medication use
Description
Self reported medication use for 5 days before, five days after, and 1 month after the treatment
Time Frame
5 days before, five days after, 1 month after
Title
Adverse events
Description
All adverse events occurring within the first month will be recorded at 1 month following the procedure
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Worst VAS
Description
Worst VAS over the last 24 hours will be assessed for each of the first 5 days following the treatment and then at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months following the treatment
Time Frame
First 5 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
8 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Men and women ages ≥ 8 years old. Diagnosis of osteoid osteoma as confirmed when a musculoskeletal radiologist and orthopedic oncologist agree that a patient's imaging and clinical history are most compatible with the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma. A patient referred by a clinician other than orthopedic oncologist will require a clinic visit with an orthopedic oncologist for study inclusion. Patients must have medically uncontrolled pain from an osteoid osteoma, as defined by pain, which, in the view of the referring orthopedic oncologist significantly interferes with that patient's activities of daily living. Pain may be refractory to management with medications because of inadequate pain control, or because of side effects of the pain medication. If patients have an additional site of pain, it must be 2 points less severe and distinguishable from the pain at the osteoid osteoma site. Patients (or guardians/parents) who are able and willing to give consent (or assent where applicable) and able to attend all study visits. No prior interventional therapy for the osteoid osteoma. Able to safely undergo MRI exam, tolerate being in an MRI scanner, and receive anesthesia/sedation for the treatment. Targeted bone/tumor interface is accessible to the ExAblate device and located in a rib, extremity (excluding intra-articular location), pelvis, shoulders (including clavicles), or the sternum. Targeted lesion must be deeper than 1 cm from the skin. Targeted lesion must be clearly visible by non-contrast MRI. Karnofsky Performance Status > 60. Exclusion Criteria: Patients a) who need surgical stabilization of the affected bone (elevated fracture risk) or b) whose targeted tumor is at an impending fracture site, as determined by the referring orthopedic oncologist. Targeted tumor in the skull/spine. Targeted tumor is < 1 cm from a major nerve. Pregnancy. Patients with an acute medical condition (e.g. pneumonia, sepsis) that is expected to hinder them from completing this study. Patients with unstable cardiac status including: patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs, unstable angina pectoris, documented myocardial infarction within six months of protocol entry, congestive heart failure requiring medication (other than diuretic). Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication) Patients with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices. Patients with an active infection or severe hematological, neurological, or other uncontrolled disease. Severe cerebrovascular disease. Known intolerance or allergy to medications used for sedation/anesthesia. Known intolerance or allergy to MR contrast agent (gadolinium chelates). Patients unable to communicate with the investigator and staff. Patients with persistent pain undistinguishable from the target lesion.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Maya Aslam
Email
maya.aslam@ucsf.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthew Bucknor, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Francisco
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Stanford Medical Center
City
Palo Alto
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Krithika Rupnarayan
Email
krupnara@stanford.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pejman Ghanouni, MD, PhD
Facility Name
UCSF Imaging Center
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94107
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maya Aslam
Email
maya.aslam@ucsf.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthew Bucknor, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparative Effectiveness of MRgFUS Versus CTgRFA for Osteoid Osteomas

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs