search
Back to results

Assessment of Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Primary Purpose

Kidney Neoplasms

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
Robot assisted partial nephrectomy
Conventional laparoscopic instruments
Da- Vinci Robot and conventional laparoscopic instruments
Mannitol
Sponsored by
Luzerner Kantonsspital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Kidney Neoplasms focused on measuring renal cell carcinoma, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, nephron sparing surgery, warm ischemia time, renal function loss

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women >18 years
  • Organ-confined renal cancer (tumor stage cT1-cT2), assessed by MRI/CT
  • Patient qualifies for robotic or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Renal masses necessitating radical tumor nephrectomy
  • Patients with single kidney
  • Bilateral kidney cancer when simultaneously operated
  • Previous partial nephrectomy
  • Renal insufficiency: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) stages 4-5

Sites / Locations

  • Klinik für Urologie, Kantonsspital Luzern

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Robot assisted partial nephrectomy

Arm Description

Inclusion criteria fulfilled: Baseline Abdomen CT/MRI Patient Age, Weight, Height, Co-Medication Informed Consent Baseline renal function (eGFR, renal scintigraphy, sCreatinine, creatinine clearance) During hospitalization, one day before laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: eGFR sCreatinine Hemoglobin After surgery: Assessment of eGFR 4 days after operation Hb assessment every 6 H in the first 48 H Assessment of adverse events Histological Results 6, 12, 24 months after intervention: Creatinine Clearance (only performed at 6 months follow-up) Tc-99m MAG3Dynamic Scintigraphy (only performed at 6 months follow-up) eGFR Assessment of adverse events Assessment of possible recurrence Assesment of kidney volume variation

Inclusion criteria fulfilled: Baseline Abdomen CT/MRI Patient Age, Weight, Height, Co-Medication Informed Consent Baseline renal function (eGFR, renal scintigraphy, sCreatinine, creatinine clearance) During hospitalization, one day before robot assisted partial nephrectomy: eGFR sCreatinine Hemoglobin After surgery: Assessment of eGFR 4 days after operation Hb assessment every 6 H in the first 48 H Assessment of adverse events Histological Results 6, 12, 24 months after intervention: Creatinine Clearance (only performed at 6 months follow-up) Tc-99m MAG3Dynamic Scintigraphy (only performed at 6 months follow-up) eGFR Assessment of adverse events Assessment of possible recurrence Assesment of kidney volume variation

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change of Scintigraphic Split Renal Function (%) after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Duration of Operation
Duration of Warm Ischemia
Mass Resection Time
Suturing Time
Amount of Spared Renal Parenchyma
Rate of Recurrence
Positive Surgical Margin Rate

Full Information

First Posted
September 23, 2016
Last Updated
August 31, 2020
Sponsor
Luzerner Kantonsspital
Collaborators
Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02924922
Brief Title
Assessment of Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
Official Title
Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) in Selective Ischemia Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy (LPN) in Total Ischemia: Prospective Randomized Study to Assess Oncological and Functional Outcomes
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 1, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Luzerner Kantonsspital
Collaborators
Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Currently, partial nephrectomy (PN) is considered as the gold standard treatment modality for small renal masses. In this setting, robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic approaches are gaining more consensus every day. However, until now, no superiority of one technique over the other has yet been demonstrated, especially on postoperative function recovery. This study compares oncological and functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus robot assisted partial nephrectomy.
Detailed Description
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 2-3% of all cancers, with the highest incidence in Western countries. Due to increased detection of tumors by ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT), the number of incidentally diagnosed RCCs has increased. These tumors are usually smaller and of lower stage. Currently, partial nephrectomy (PN) is considered as the gold standard treatment modality for small renal masses. In this setting, robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic approaches are gaining more consensus every day. However, until now, no superiority of one technique over the other has yet been demonstrated, especially on postoperative function recovery. This is a single center prospective randomized trial investigating the functional and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robot-assisted) nephron sparing surgery. Patients will be assessed with renal scintigraphy and 24 hours creatinine clearance pre- and postoperatively. Furthermore, duration of the operation, resection and suturing times will be assessed. Renal function recovery is defined as primary endpoint; oncological outcome and positive surgical margin rate are defined as secondary measures. In addition, kidney volume variation will be calculated to describe the amount of healthy tissue preserved in both procedures.The aim of the study is to assess whether robot assisted partial nephrectomy in selective ischemia is superior to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in global ischemia in terms of functional and oncological outcomes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Kidney Neoplasms
Keywords
renal cell carcinoma, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, nephron sparing surgery, warm ischemia time, renal function loss

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
85 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Inclusion criteria fulfilled: Baseline Abdomen CT/MRI Patient Age, Weight, Height, Co-Medication Informed Consent Baseline renal function (eGFR, renal scintigraphy, sCreatinine, creatinine clearance) During hospitalization, one day before laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: eGFR sCreatinine Hemoglobin After surgery: Assessment of eGFR 4 days after operation Hb assessment every 6 H in the first 48 H Assessment of adverse events Histological Results 6, 12, 24 months after intervention: Creatinine Clearance (only performed at 6 months follow-up) Tc-99m MAG3Dynamic Scintigraphy (only performed at 6 months follow-up) eGFR Assessment of adverse events Assessment of possible recurrence Assesment of kidney volume variation
Arm Title
Robot assisted partial nephrectomy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Inclusion criteria fulfilled: Baseline Abdomen CT/MRI Patient Age, Weight, Height, Co-Medication Informed Consent Baseline renal function (eGFR, renal scintigraphy, sCreatinine, creatinine clearance) During hospitalization, one day before robot assisted partial nephrectomy: eGFR sCreatinine Hemoglobin After surgery: Assessment of eGFR 4 days after operation Hb assessment every 6 H in the first 48 H Assessment of adverse events Histological Results 6, 12, 24 months after intervention: Creatinine Clearance (only performed at 6 months follow-up) Tc-99m MAG3Dynamic Scintigraphy (only performed at 6 months follow-up) eGFR Assessment of adverse events Assessment of possible recurrence Assesment of kidney volume variation
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
Other Intervention Name(s)
LPN, Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy
Intervention Description
The renal hilus is identified and both vein and artery are dissected. A laparoscopic ultrasound probe is introduced through a 12 mm port to define the tumor resection margins. A laparoscopic Satinsky clamp is used to induce total kidney ischemia, clamping both vein and artery. Athermal resection of the tumor is performed and titanium clips are used to close interlobar or arcuate arteries encountered during resection. The defect is closed with stitches secured by Hem-o-Lok clips and haemostatic glue. Ischemia is interrupted once renorrhaphy is completed
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Robot assisted partial nephrectomy
Other Intervention Name(s)
RAPN, Da Vinci, Robot assisted minimally invasive surgery
Intervention Description
The renal hilus is carefully dissected, so that the arterial segmental branches are reached. Tumor resection margins are identified through ultrasound. Drop-in bulldog clamps are used to clamp segmental arterial branches and induce selective ischemia. Indocyanine green 0.2-0.3mg/KG is infused intravenously a few seconds after the selective ischemia is induced. The Firefly near infra-red fluorescence system is used to determine the extent of the ischemic area. The ischemic zone can now be tailored to the tumor by adding or removing bulldog clamps according to the vascular anatomical conditions. Athermal resection of the tumor is performed and titanium clips are used to close interlobar or arcuate arteries encountered during resection. The resection defect is closed with stitches secured by Hem-o-Lok clips and haemostatic glue. Selective ischemia will be interrupted once renorrhaphy is completed
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional laparoscopic instruments
Intervention Description
Endoscope, Scissor, Needleholder, Forceps, Suction unit, Ports, Tissel, CO2, Sutures, Needles, Scalpel, Ultrasound-Probe, Monitors
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Da- Vinci Robot and conventional laparoscopic instruments
Intervention Description
Da Vinci Robot, Console, Ports and Instruments; Suction unit, Forceps, Tisseel, Ultrasound Probe, Monitors
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Mannitol
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change of Scintigraphic Split Renal Function (%) after surgery
Time Frame
Scintigraphic split renal function (%) preoperatively and at 6 months follow up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of Operation
Time Frame
During surgery
Title
Duration of Warm Ischemia
Time Frame
During surgery
Title
Mass Resection Time
Time Frame
During surgery
Title
Suturing Time
Time Frame
During surgery
Title
Amount of Spared Renal Parenchyma
Time Frame
During surgery
Title
Rate of Recurrence
Time Frame
6 months - 12 months - 24 months
Title
Positive Surgical Margin Rate
Time Frame
During surgery
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change of Renal Function After Surgery (eGFR)
Time Frame
eGFR assessment preoperatively, first postoperative day and at all follow ups (6, 12, 24 months)
Title
Change of Renal Function After Surgery (sCreatinin)
Time Frame
Serum creatinine preoperatively, first postoperative day and at all follow ups (6, 12, 24 months)
Title
Change of Renal Function After Surgery (24 hour Creatinin Clearance)
Time Frame
24 hour Creatinin Clearance preoperatively and at 6 months follow up
Title
Change of Hemoglobin after Surgery (Hb)
Time Frame
Preoperatively, 6 hours postoperatively, 12 hours postoperatively, 18 hours postoperatively, 24 hours postoperatively, 48 hours postoperatively

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Men and women >18 years Organ-confined renal cancer (tumor stage cT1-cT2), assessed by MRI/CT Patient qualifies for robotic or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Renal masses necessitating radical tumor nephrectomy Patients with single kidney Bilateral kidney cancer when simultaneously operated Previous partial nephrectomy Renal insufficiency: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) stages 4-5
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Agostino Mattei, Ass. Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Luzerner Kantonsspital Luzern, Leiter der Klinik für Urologie
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Klinik für Urologie, Kantonsspital Luzern
City
Luzern
ZIP/Postal Code
6000
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Assessment of Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs