The Missing Link- Development and Feasibility Evaluation of Person-centred Transitions From the Stroke Unit to the Home (Missing Link)
Primary Purpose
Stroke
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Co-designed person-centred care transitions
Current care transitions
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional health services research trial for Stroke focused on measuring stroke, rehabilitation, interdisciplinary health team, patient-centered care, care transition
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
- patients who have had a first time or recurrent stroke, and who will be discharged home from the participating stroke units and referred to a rehabilitation team in primary healthcare for continued rehabilitation in the home.
Exclusion criteria:
- unable to give informed consent, due to e.g., severe aphasia or dementia.
Sites / Locations
- Karolinska University Hospital
- Danderyd hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Co-designed person-centred care transitions
Current care transitions
Arm Description
Co-designed person-centred care transitions from stroke unit to rehabilitation in the home
Current care transitions from the stroke unit to rehabilitation in the home
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Care Transition Measure
Questionnaire that assesses perceived quality in care transitions. The total score (0-100) reflects the overall perceived quality of the care transition, with lower scores indicating a poor quality care transition, and higher scores indicating a higher quality care transition.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Health Literacy Questionnaire
Questionnaire that assesses health literacy. The Health Literacy Questionnaire contains 44 items, which are divided into nine areas of health literacy. The first five scales are scored on a 4-point Likert scale (ranging from strongly disagree to disagree, agree, and strongly agree), building part I. The other four scales, representing part II, are scored on a 5-point Likert scale where respondents are asked to rate the level of difficulty in undertaking a task (ranging from cannot do, always difficult, usually difficult, sometime difficult, usually easy, and always easy). Higher scores indicate better health literacy.
Stroke Impact Scale, perceived recovery (patient)
Perceived recovery after stroke is rated on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (no recovery) to 100 (full recovery).
The Medication Adherence Report Scale (patient)
Questionnaire that consists of 5 items that assesses medication adherence. Participants are asked to rate the frequency with which they engaged in each of the adherence-related behaviours on a five-point scale, where 5 = never, 4 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 2 = often and 1 = always. Scores for each item were summed to give a total score, with higher scores indicating higher levels of reported adherence.
General Self-Efficacy Scale (patient)
Questionnaire that assesses the strength of an individual's belief in his/her own ability to respond to novel or difficult situations and to deal with any associated obstacles or setbacks. The scale consists of 10 items rated on a four-point Likert scale ("not at all true" to "exactly true") where higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
Caregiver Burden Scale (significant other)
Questionnaire that consists of 22 items for different types of subjective caregiver burden, covering areas of the caregiver's health, feelings of psychological well-being, relations, social network, physical workload, and environmental aspects. The items are scored on a scale from 1 to 4 and the higher the score the greater the burden.
EuroQol-5D Visual Analogue Scale (significant other)
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20-centimeter vertical visual analog scale with end-points ranging from 0 to 100. The single global question in the EQ VAS asks the individual to label his/her health as "the worst health you can imagine" (0) to "the best health you can imagine"
Life Satisfaction Checklist, item 1 (significant other)
Questionnaire that assesses life satisfaction with one global item "Life as a whole". Answering alternatives range from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied) where higher scores indicate a higher satisfaction.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02925871
First Posted
April 8, 2016
Last Updated
March 4, 2023
Sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
Collaborators
Kamprad Family Foundation, Forte
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02925871
Brief Title
The Missing Link- Development and Feasibility Evaluation of Person-centred Transitions From the Stroke Unit to the Home
Acronym
Missing Link
Official Title
The Missing Link- Development and Feasibility Evaluation of Person-centred Transitions From the Stroke Unit to the Home - a Co-design Project
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 7, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 7, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
Collaborators
Kamprad Family Foundation, Forte
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim is to design, implement and evaluate new person-centred transitions between stroke units and the home. The development of person-centred transition will be performed together by people with stroke, significant others, stroke unit staff and interdisciplinary teams.
Phase 1, a prospective observational study of current transitions from stroke units to rehabilitation in the home without coordination. The aim is to identify factors that are facilitators or barriers to transitions, patient and caregiver outcomes, use of health care during the first year after stroke. In phase 2, a co-design process of new person-centred transitions will be carried out by people with stroke, significant others, stroke unit staff and interdisciplinary home rehabilitation teams. In phase 3 new person-centred transitions will be implemented and evaluated in a feasibility study.
Detailed Description
A phased approach, as recommended for development and evaluation of complex interventions, will be used. In phase 1 the current transitions from stroke units to the home environment will be explored and facilitators / barriers to coordinated person-centred safe transitions will be identified. Knowledge generated in phase 1 will inform phase 2; a co-design process of new coordinated person-centred car transitions conducted by people with stroke, significant others and staff from stroke units and interdisciplinary home rehabilitation teams together. Knowledge from phase 1 and phase 2 will inform phase 3; implementation and feasibility evaluation of the new care transitions.
Phase 1 Aims: Explore current state of care transitions combined with rehabilitation in the home, identify facilitators and barriers to person-centred transitions, current patient and caregiver outcome, satisfaction, and resource use of health services during the first year after stroke.
Design: prospective longitudinal observational study.
Participants: people with mild/moderate stroke, referred from stroke units to home rehabilitation and their significant others will be asked to participate before discharge from the stroke unit.
Data collection: Baseline data on medical and socio-demographic aspects and functioning will be collected from the medical records. Data on satisfaction with the transition process will be collected after discharge from the stroke unit. At 3, and 12 months people with stroke will be assessed regarding disability, perceived impact of stroke, participation in social activities, health related quality of life, perceived needs of health services and satisfaction with services received using reliable validated measures and structured interviews. Data on caregiver burden, life satisfaction and informal care will be collected from significant others. Data on use of health care will be obtained from the register at Region Stockholm.
Analyses: Statistical analyses to identify factors at baseline associated with satisfactory transitions, and associations between perceived quality of transitions and patient and significant other outcomes at 3 and 12 months.
Participants: staff of stroke units and interdisciplinary home rehabilitation teams.
Data collection: Focus group interviews with staff of stroke units on experiences of identifying candidates for home rehabilitation, the planning and decisions; and with the interdisciplinary teams on experiences of preparation for rehabilitation in the home and establishing new contacts with people referred for home rehabilitation.
Analyses: Grounded theory.
Participants: Strategic samples of people with stroke based on satisfaction with transition and their significant others.
Data collection: Semistructured individual interviews on the experiences of the transition from the stroke unit to the home and the initiation of the home rehabilitation.
Analyses: Grounded theory.
Phase 2 Aims: Develop new person-centred coordinated transitions. Design: Workshops with all stakeholders using a collaborative design process which include reflection, analysis, and description of the problem, visualization to get a common picture, modelling and/or prototyping.
Participants: People with stroke, significant others, staff from stroke units and interdisciplinary home rehabilitation teams in a series of five workshops.
Data collection: field-notes, diaries and documentation of the design process.
Phase 3 Aims: Implement and evaluate the new person-centred transitions between stroke units and the home in a feasibility study regarding satisfaction with the transitions, patient and caregiver outcomes and use of health care during the first year after stroke and explore experiences of the new transitions from all stakeholders involved.
a) Design: cluster non-randomized controlled feasibility study. Participants: people with mild/moderate stroke, referred from stroke units to home rehabilitation and their significant others will be asked to participate before discharge from the stroke unit. The intervention will be implemented at a geriatric stroke unit and an acute stroke unit at Danderyd Hospital and two corresponding home rehabilitatin teams in Stockholm, Sweden. The controls will be recruited from an acute stroke unit at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. In total, 50 persons will be consecutively included, 25 from the intervention site and 25 from the control site. In addition, staff of the participating stroke units and interdisciplinary teams will be recruited.
Data collection: Data on feasibility, operationalised as fidelity and acceptability, of the intervention will be collected by participant observations, interviews, and data from the healthcare record. Data on likely effectiveness will be collected using questionnaires and registry data:
Sociodemographic and disease-related data will be collected from hospital records and cognitive function, depression, and fatigue in structured interviews. One week after discharge data will be collected on the primary outcome satisfaction with the transition process, and the secondary outcomes patient health literacy, medication adherence, fatigue, depresion symptoms. At 3 months, data will be collected on health literacy, medication adherence, fatigue, depresion symptoms, self-efficacy, perceived stroke recovery, activities of daily living, and satisfaction with care. All data will be collected using validated questionnaires.
Semi-structured interviews will be held with a purposive sampling of about 10 patients, and about 10 healthcare professionals. For people with stroke, the interviews will be conducted one-week after discharge. For professionals, the interviews will be conducted 1 to 3 months after start of intervention.
a) Analyses: Patients in the intervention group will be compared to control group using intention-to-treat analysis.
b) Analyses: Qualitative content analysis
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
stroke, rehabilitation, interdisciplinary health team, patient-centered care, care transition
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
49 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Co-designed person-centred care transitions
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Co-designed person-centred care transitions from stroke unit to rehabilitation in the home
Arm Title
Current care transitions
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Current care transitions from the stroke unit to rehabilitation in the home
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Co-designed person-centred care transitions
Intervention Description
The intervention consists of several elements that aim to meet patients', significant others', and professionals' needs for shared understanding, patient preparedness for homecoming, and coordination.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Current care transitions
Intervention Description
Control group participants will receive current care transitions, initiated by an electronic referral from hospital healthcare professionals to the receiving neurorehabilitation team
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Care Transition Measure
Description
Questionnaire that assesses perceived quality in care transitions. The total score (0-100) reflects the overall perceived quality of the care transition, with lower scores indicating a poor quality care transition, and higher scores indicating a higher quality care transition.
Time Frame
1 week after discharge from hospital stroke unit
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Health Literacy Questionnaire
Description
Questionnaire that assesses health literacy. The Health Literacy Questionnaire contains 44 items, which are divided into nine areas of health literacy. The first five scales are scored on a 4-point Likert scale (ranging from strongly disagree to disagree, agree, and strongly agree), building part I. The other four scales, representing part II, are scored on a 5-point Likert scale where respondents are asked to rate the level of difficulty in undertaking a task (ranging from cannot do, always difficult, usually difficult, sometime difficult, usually easy, and always easy). Higher scores indicate better health literacy.
Time Frame
1 week and 3 months after inclusion
Title
Stroke Impact Scale, perceived recovery (patient)
Description
Perceived recovery after stroke is rated on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (no recovery) to 100 (full recovery).
Time Frame
1 week and 3 months after inclusion
Title
The Medication Adherence Report Scale (patient)
Description
Questionnaire that consists of 5 items that assesses medication adherence. Participants are asked to rate the frequency with which they engaged in each of the adherence-related behaviours on a five-point scale, where 5 = never, 4 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 2 = often and 1 = always. Scores for each item were summed to give a total score, with higher scores indicating higher levels of reported adherence.
Time Frame
1 week and 3 months after inclusion
Title
General Self-Efficacy Scale (patient)
Description
Questionnaire that assesses the strength of an individual's belief in his/her own ability to respond to novel or difficult situations and to deal with any associated obstacles or setbacks. The scale consists of 10 items rated on a four-point Likert scale ("not at all true" to "exactly true") where higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
Time Frame
3 months after inclusion
Title
Caregiver Burden Scale (significant other)
Description
Questionnaire that consists of 22 items for different types of subjective caregiver burden, covering areas of the caregiver's health, feelings of psychological well-being, relations, social network, physical workload, and environmental aspects. The items are scored on a scale from 1 to 4 and the higher the score the greater the burden.
Time Frame
3 months after inclusion
Title
EuroQol-5D Visual Analogue Scale (significant other)
Description
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20-centimeter vertical visual analog scale with end-points ranging from 0 to 100. The single global question in the EQ VAS asks the individual to label his/her health as "the worst health you can imagine" (0) to "the best health you can imagine"
Time Frame
3 months after inclusion
Title
Life Satisfaction Checklist, item 1 (significant other)
Description
Questionnaire that assesses life satisfaction with one global item "Life as a whole". Answering alternatives range from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied) where higher scores indicate a higher satisfaction.
Time Frame
3 months after inclusion
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Fatigue visual analogue scale (patient)
Description
A visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 100 (extreme fatigue)
Time Frame
1 week and 3 months after inclusion
Title
Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (patient)
Description
Questionnaire with to items that inquire about the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia over the past two weeks. Score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 6 (nearly every day) where higher scores indicate higher frequency of depressed mood
Time Frame
1 week and 3 months after inclusion
Title
Barthel Index (patient)
Description
Questionnaire that includes 10 personal care and mobility activities, each scoring 0, 5 or 10 points resulting in a total score of 0 to 100, where a higher score reflects a greater degree of independence.
Time Frame
1 week and 3 months after inclusion
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
patients who have had a first time or recurrent stroke, and who will be discharged home from the participating stroke units and referred to a rehabilitation team in primary healthcare for continued rehabilitation in the home.
Exclusion criteria:
unable to give informed consent, due to e.g., severe aphasia or dementia.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Charlotte Ytterberg, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Karolinska University Hospital
City
Huddinge
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Danderyd hospital
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
18288
Country
Sweden
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The investigators would be happy to share the data but there are some limitations due to the Swedish legislation that may hamper the possibilities to share the data
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35505404
Citation
Lindblom S, Tistad M, Flink M, Laska AC, von Koch L, Ytterberg C. Referral-based transition to subsequent rehabilitation at home after stroke: one-year outcomes and use of healthcare services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 3;22(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08000-7.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34949604
Citation
Flink M, Lindblom S, Tistad M, Laska AC, Bertilsson BC, Warlinge C, Hasselstrom J, Elf M, von Koch L, Ytterberg C. Person-centred care transitions for people with stroke: study protocol for a feasibility evaluation of codesigned care transition support. BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 23;11(12):e047329. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047329.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
The Missing Link- Development and Feasibility Evaluation of Person-centred Transitions From the Stroke Unit to the Home
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs