search
Back to results

Working Memory Training in Huntington's Disease

Primary Purpose

Huntington's Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cogmed QM
Sponsored by
York University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Huntington's Disease focused on measuring Huntington disease, cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive dysfunction

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Laboratory-confirmed gene expansion of at least 36 CAG repeats
  2. Reported working memory difficulties on the Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cognitive Impairment (PROCOG) questionnaire
  3. Total Functional Capacity (TFC) score of at least 3, taken from the UHDRS
  4. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score of 19 or greater

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of head trauma/neurological event such as stroke
  2. Untreated psychiatric symptoms or substance abuse
  3. Visual or motor symptoms that would impede ability to complete the program and/or neuropsychological testing
  4. Nonfluency in English

Sites / Locations

  • North York General Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Cognitive training

Arm Description

Participants will undergo five weeks of cognitive training using the Cogmed QM program. All patients complete the same intervention.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Adherence to training (defined by completing the intervention within the recommended time frame)
Adherence was defined as completion of at least 80% of the total 25 training sessions within 40 calendar days or less

Secondary Outcome Measures

Digit Span subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scales - third edition
This test is used as a criterion measure (i.e. measure that closely resembles tasks in the Cogmed program). Scores will be reported in raw score units as the total correct responses.
Spatial Span subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scales - third edition
This test is used as a criterion measure (i.e. measure that closely resembles tasks in the Cogmed program). Scores will be reported in raw score units as the total correct responses.
Auditory Working Memory from the Woodcock Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability - third edition
This test is used as a near transfer measure (i.e. test of verbal or visuospatial working memory that include stimuli that are similar to trained tasks). Scores will be reported in raw score units (total correct responses)
Symbol span subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scales - fourth edition, reported in raw score units (total correct responses)
This test is used as a near transfer measure (i.e. test of verbal or visuospatial working memory that include stimuli that are similar to trained tasks). Scores will be reported in raw score units (total correct responses)
Verbal Fluency subtest from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System
This tests is used as a control task (i.e tests that do not directly assess working memory). Score will be reported in raw score units (total words produced)
Symbol Digits Modalities Test (oral administration)
This tests is used as a control task (i.e tests that do not directly assess working memory). Score will be reported in raw score units (total words produced)
Word List Learning from the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test -Revised
This tests is used as a control task (i.e tests that do not directly assess working memory). Score will be reported in raw score units (total words learned)
Trail Making Test - Parts A and B
This tests is used as a control task (i.e tests that do not directly assess working memory). Score will be reported in raw score units (total time in seconds)

Full Information

First Posted
September 30, 2016
Last Updated
October 7, 2016
Sponsor
York University
Collaborators
North York General Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02926820
Brief Title
Working Memory Training in Huntington's Disease
Official Title
Working Memory Training in Individuals With Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Project
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
York University
Collaborators
North York General Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
There is a paucity of investigation into effective interventions to enhance cognitive function and/or mitigate cognitive decline in individuals with Huntington disease (HD). This study targeted working memory (WM), which is the ability to actively hold information in the mind in order to perform complex mental tasks, given reports of WM dysfunction in patients with HD. The investigators examined the feasibility of conducting a 5-week WM training program (Cogmed). Patient adherence and treatment tolerance were assessed. In addition, preliminary evidence for the efficacy of this training program on targeted cognitive abilities was examined. Nine patients with pre-manifest or early stage HD underwent training. Patients were assessed before the intervention and one week after completion.
Detailed Description
Huntington disease (HD) is associated with a variety of cognitive deficits, with prominent difficulties in working memory (WM). WM deficits are notably compromised in early-onset and prodromal HD patients. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a computer-ized WM training program (Cogmed QM), novel to the HD population. Nine patients, aged 26-62, with early stage HD underwent a 25-session (5 days/week for 5 weeks) WM training program (Cogmed QM). Training exercises involved the manipulation and storage of verbal and visuospatial information, with difficulty adapted as a function of individual performance. Neuropsychological testing was conducted before and after training, and performance on criterion WM measures (Digit Span and Spatial Span) and near-transfer WM measures (Symbol Span and Auditory WM) were evaluated. Post-training inter-views about patient experience were thematically analyzed using NVivo software. Seven of nine patients demonstrated adherence to the training and completed all sessions within the recommended timeframe of 5 weeks. All adherent patients reported that they found training helpful (n=7), and almost all felt that their memory improved (n=6). Compared to baseline scores, patients showed significant improvement on the neuropsychological measures of verbal WM, including Digit Span (p = .047) and Auditory WM (p = .041). This pilot study provides support for feasibility of computerized WM training in early-stage patients with HD. Results suggest that HD patients can improve WM with intensive training, though a full-scale intervention project is needed to understand the reliability of changes over time.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Huntington's Disease
Keywords
Huntington disease, cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive dysfunction

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
9 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cognitive training
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will undergo five weeks of cognitive training using the Cogmed QM program. All patients complete the same intervention.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Cogmed QM
Intervention Description
The intervention consisted of 25 Cogmed sessions, typically completed over a five week period (i.e. 5 days per week), with each session lasting between 40-50 minutes per day. The program consists of 12 exercises that target visuo-spatial or verbal working memory. At each training session, participants completed 8 of the 12 exercises (order selected by the user), with 15 trials per exercise. Cogmed QM is an adaptive program, wherein task difficulty is adjusted to performance on each trial. The level of difficulty adjusts continuously and automatically, ensuring that each session provides an engaging, challenging level of WM capacity. Breaks were permitted, and encouraged, at the participants' discretion throughout the session.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adherence to training (defined by completing the intervention within the recommended time frame)
Description
Adherence was defined as completion of at least 80% of the total 25 training sessions within 40 calendar days or less
Time Frame
40 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Digit Span subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scales - third edition
Description
This test is used as a criterion measure (i.e. measure that closely resembles tasks in the Cogmed program). Scores will be reported in raw score units as the total correct responses.
Time Frame
Baseline (time 0) versus Post-intervention test score (up to 45 days post-baseline)
Title
Spatial Span subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scales - third edition
Description
This test is used as a criterion measure (i.e. measure that closely resembles tasks in the Cogmed program). Scores will be reported in raw score units as the total correct responses.
Time Frame
Baseline (time 0) versus Post-intervention test score (up to 45 days post-baseline)
Title
Auditory Working Memory from the Woodcock Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability - third edition
Description
This test is used as a near transfer measure (i.e. test of verbal or visuospatial working memory that include stimuli that are similar to trained tasks). Scores will be reported in raw score units (total correct responses)
Time Frame
Baseline (time 0) versus Post-intervention test score (up to 45 days post-baseline)
Title
Symbol span subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scales - fourth edition, reported in raw score units (total correct responses)
Description
This test is used as a near transfer measure (i.e. test of verbal or visuospatial working memory that include stimuli that are similar to trained tasks). Scores will be reported in raw score units (total correct responses)
Time Frame
Baseline (time 0) versus Post-intervention test score (up to 45 days post-baseline)
Title
Verbal Fluency subtest from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System
Description
This tests is used as a control task (i.e tests that do not directly assess working memory). Score will be reported in raw score units (total words produced)
Time Frame
Baseline (time 0) versus Post-intervention test score (up to 45 days post-baseline)
Title
Symbol Digits Modalities Test (oral administration)
Description
This tests is used as a control task (i.e tests that do not directly assess working memory). Score will be reported in raw score units (total words produced)
Time Frame
Baseline (time 0) versus Post-intervention test score (up to 45 days post-baseline)
Title
Word List Learning from the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test -Revised
Description
This tests is used as a control task (i.e tests that do not directly assess working memory). Score will be reported in raw score units (total words learned)
Time Frame
Baseline (time 0) versus Post-intervention test score (up to 45 days post-baseline)
Title
Trail Making Test - Parts A and B
Description
This tests is used as a control task (i.e tests that do not directly assess working memory). Score will be reported in raw score units (total time in seconds)
Time Frame
Baseline (time 0) versus Post-intervention test score (up to 45 days post-baseline)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Qualitative experiences of training program as reported by the patient
Description
Keywords were used to elicit themes that were indicative of participant attitude and motivation for training
Time Frame
Post-interview follow-up, up to 45 days following baseline visit
Title
Tolerance (ratio of training time to breaks per day)
Description
To assess tolerance, the ratio of active training time to breaks per day was examined (Cogmed guidelines suggest at most a 2:1 ratio of active training time and breaks per sessions).
Time Frame
Per session and through completion of training program, up to 40 days
Title
Cogmed Improvement Index
Description
The Improvement Index represents average improvement over the course of the training. It is calculated automatically by the program by subtracting the Start Index (score on third day of training) from the Max Index (best score throughout training).
Time Frame
Through completion of training program, up to 40 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Laboratory-confirmed gene expansion of at least 36 CAG repeats Reported working memory difficulties on the Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cognitive Impairment (PROCOG) questionnaire Total Functional Capacity (TFC) score of at least 3, taken from the UHDRS Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score of 19 or greater Exclusion Criteria: History of head trauma/neurological event such as stroke Untreated psychiatric symptoms or substance abuse Visual or motor symptoms that would impede ability to complete the program and/or neuropsychological testing Nonfluency in English
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christine Till, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
York University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
North York General Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M2K 1E1
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28453532
Citation
Sadeghi M, Barlow-Krelina E, Gibbons C, Shaikh KT, Fung WLA, Meschino WS, Till C. Feasibility of computerized working memory training in individuals with Huntington disease. PLoS One. 2017 Apr 28;12(4):e0176429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176429. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
derived
Available IPD and Supporting Information:
Available IPD/Information Type
Study Protocol
Available IPD/Information URL
http://www.yorku.ca/ctill
Available IPD/Information Comments
The lead investigator, Dr. Christine Till, can be contacted by email (ctill@yorku.ca) for a copy of the Informed Consent Form or study protocol.

Learn more about this trial

Working Memory Training in Huntington's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs