search
Back to results

Restoring Emotion Regulation Networks in Depression Vulnerability

Primary Purpose

Major Depression

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Attentional Bias Modification
Sham Comparator
Sponsored by
University of Oslo
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Major Depression

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Currently no-depressed subjects with a history of major depression.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or past neurological illness, bipolar disorder, psychosis or drug addiction.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Oslo, Department of Psychology

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Attentional Bias Modification

Sham comparator

Arm Description

ABM dot-probe task with image stimuli (faces) of three valences: positive (happy), neutral, or negative (angry and fearful). In the ABM condition, probes were located behind positive stimuli in 87 % of the trials (valid trials), as opposed to 13% with probes located behind the more negative stimuli (invalid trials). Consequently, participants should implicitly learn to deploy their attention toward positive stimuli, and in this way develop a more positive AB when completing the task.

Sham condition without modification of attentional bias. These trials are identical in structure to the ABM trials with the exception that target probes replaced negative and positive images with equal frequency.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

BOLD response in prefrontal cortical regions
Stronger fMRI BOLD response in prefrontal cortical regions in ABMT compared to neutral AMB placebo condition.

Secondary Outcome Measures

BOLD response within the amygdala
Lower ABM fMRI BOLD response within the amygdala in ABMT compared to neutral ABM placebo condition.
DTI
Increased neural integrity as measured by fractional anisotropy values in the uncinate fasciculi (UF) in the active AMBT compared to neutral ABM placebo condition.
RSFC
Increased integrity within the attentional networks at rest as measured by independent component analysis (ICA) in ABMT compared to neutral ABM training.
5-HTTLPR + A>G polymorphic variation divided by the triallelic functional "high expressive" versus "low expressive" genotype will moderate the impact from ABMT as measured by whole brain BOLD responses.
The low expressive variant will be associated with more frontal BOLD activation and lower amygdala activation after ABMT
BDNF
Brain Derived Neurotropic Factor (BDNF) val66met polymorphic variation linked to Brain Derived Neurotropic Factor (BDNF) variation will differentiate between ABMT and neutral AMB placebo as measured by fMRI whole brain BOLD responses.
Serotonergic cumulative genetic score and fMRI
A serotonergic cumulative Genetic score, including (5-HHTLPR, HTR1A 8rs6295) and HTR 2A (rs 6311) polymorphisms will moderate the effects of ABM on fMRI BOLD signal compared to a neutral placebo condition.
Serotonergic cumulative genetic score and morphompetry
A serotonergic cumulative Genetic score, including (5-HHTLPR, HTR1A 8rs6295) and HTR 2A (rs 6311) polymorphisms will moderate the effects of ABM on structural MRI as measured by total grey matter volume compared to a neutral placebo condition.
Serotonergic cumulative genetic score and fMRI and DTI
A serotonergic cumulative Genetic score, including (5-HHTLPR, HTR1A 8rs6295) and HTR 2A (rs 6311) polymorphisms will moderate the effects of ABM on DTI MRI as measured by fractional anisotropy compared to a neutral placebo condition.

Full Information

First Posted
July 8, 2016
Last Updated
April 25, 2019
Sponsor
University of Oslo
Collaborators
Oslo University Hospital, University of Oxford
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02931487
Brief Title
Restoring Emotion Regulation Networks in Depression Vulnerability
Official Title
Restoring Emotion Regulation Networks in Depression Vulnerability: An Experimental Study Applying an Attention Bias Modification Procedure
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Oslo
Collaborators
Oslo University Hospital, University of Oxford

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Selective biases in attention can be modified by a simple computerized technique: The Attention Bias Modification Task (ABM) pioneered by MacLeod et al. Cognitive biases may be one reason depression recurs, and altering these biases should reduce risk of recurrence. Recently, evidence has supported this hypothesis . The mechanisms by which ABM works are not well understood. More research is needed to explore how altering an implicit attentional bias can lead to changes in subjective mood. One possible explanation is that positive attentional biases are an important component of explicit methods of emotion regulation. The ability to effectively regulate one's emotions is a fundamental component of mental health and this ability is impaired in depression. It has also been shown that recovered depressed people spontaneously show a more dysfunctional pattern of emotion regulation as compared to never depressed controls. Supporting this, growing evidence implicates dysregulation of a medial/orbitofrontal circuit in mood disorders. This circuit includes the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, the ventral striatum, the ventral pallidum and medial thalamus. Components of this circuit are reciprocally connected with the amygdala, which is implicated in emotional processing in the healthy brain and dysregulated in depression. Negative emotion processing biases depend on both enhanced "bottom-up" responses to emotionally salient stimuli and reduces "top-down" cognitive control mechanisms, required to suppress responses to emotionally salient but task irrelevant information. Cognitive reappraisal and distancing are common strategies to down- or upregulate emotional responses. Reappraisal is an emotion regulation strategy that involves reinterpretation and changing the way one thinks about an event or stimulus with the goal of changing its affective impact. Distancing is a type of reappraisal that involves creating mental space between oneself and the emotional event in order to see things from a different, less self-focused perspective. It has been shown that distancing is a strategy that people can improve at over time compared to reinterpretation. The neural systems which support the explicit regulation of emotion have previously been characterized and include both lateral- and prefrontal cortex. This frontal activity is predicted to downregulate limbic circuitry involving the amygdala during passive viewing of emotional salient stimuli.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Major Depression

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
134 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Attentional Bias Modification
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
ABM dot-probe task with image stimuli (faces) of three valences: positive (happy), neutral, or negative (angry and fearful). In the ABM condition, probes were located behind positive stimuli in 87 % of the trials (valid trials), as opposed to 13% with probes located behind the more negative stimuli (invalid trials). Consequently, participants should implicitly learn to deploy their attention toward positive stimuli, and in this way develop a more positive AB when completing the task.
Arm Title
Sham comparator
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham condition without modification of attentional bias. These trials are identical in structure to the ABM trials with the exception that target probes replaced negative and positive images with equal frequency.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Attentional Bias Modification
Intervention Description
Computerized
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Sham Comparator
Intervention Description
Computerized
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
BOLD response in prefrontal cortical regions
Description
Stronger fMRI BOLD response in prefrontal cortical regions in ABMT compared to neutral AMB placebo condition.
Time Frame
Two weeks after after ABM-training
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
BOLD response within the amygdala
Description
Lower ABM fMRI BOLD response within the amygdala in ABMT compared to neutral ABM placebo condition.
Time Frame
Two weeks after ABM-training
Title
DTI
Description
Increased neural integrity as measured by fractional anisotropy values in the uncinate fasciculi (UF) in the active AMBT compared to neutral ABM placebo condition.
Time Frame
Two weeks after ABM-training
Title
RSFC
Description
Increased integrity within the attentional networks at rest as measured by independent component analysis (ICA) in ABMT compared to neutral ABM training.
Time Frame
Two weeks after ABM-training
Title
5-HTTLPR + A>G polymorphic variation divided by the triallelic functional "high expressive" versus "low expressive" genotype will moderate the impact from ABMT as measured by whole brain BOLD responses.
Description
The low expressive variant will be associated with more frontal BOLD activation and lower amygdala activation after ABMT
Time Frame
Two weeks after ABM-training
Title
BDNF
Description
Brain Derived Neurotropic Factor (BDNF) val66met polymorphic variation linked to Brain Derived Neurotropic Factor (BDNF) variation will differentiate between ABMT and neutral AMB placebo as measured by fMRI whole brain BOLD responses.
Time Frame
Two week after ABM-training
Title
Serotonergic cumulative genetic score and fMRI
Description
A serotonergic cumulative Genetic score, including (5-HHTLPR, HTR1A 8rs6295) and HTR 2A (rs 6311) polymorphisms will moderate the effects of ABM on fMRI BOLD signal compared to a neutral placebo condition.
Time Frame
Two weeks after ABM-training
Title
Serotonergic cumulative genetic score and morphompetry
Description
A serotonergic cumulative Genetic score, including (5-HHTLPR, HTR1A 8rs6295) and HTR 2A (rs 6311) polymorphisms will moderate the effects of ABM on structural MRI as measured by total grey matter volume compared to a neutral placebo condition.
Time Frame
Two weeks after ABM-training
Title
Serotonergic cumulative genetic score and fMRI and DTI
Description
A serotonergic cumulative Genetic score, including (5-HHTLPR, HTR1A 8rs6295) and HTR 2A (rs 6311) polymorphisms will moderate the effects of ABM on DTI MRI as measured by fractional anisotropy compared to a neutral placebo condition.
Time Frame
Two weeks after ABM-training

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Currently no-depressed subjects with a history of major depression. Exclusion Criteria: Current or past neurological illness, bipolar disorder, psychosis or drug addiction.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nils I Landrø, phd
Organizational Affiliation
University of Oslo
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Oslo, Department of Psychology
City
Oslo
ZIP/Postal Code
0317
Country
Norway

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31397551
Citation
Hilland E, Landro NI ;, Harmer CJ, Browning M, Maglanoc LA, Jonassen R. Attentional bias modification is associated with fMRI response toward negative stimuli in individuals with residual depression: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2020 Jan 1;45(1):23-33. doi: 10.1503/jpn.180118.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30622463
Citation
Hilland E, Landro NI, Harmer CJ, Maglanoc LA, Jonassen R. Within-Network Connectivity in the Salience Network After Attention Bias Modification Training in Residual Depression: Report From a Preregistered Clinical Trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Dec 21;12:508. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00508. eCollection 2018.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Restoring Emotion Regulation Networks in Depression Vulnerability

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs