search
Back to results

Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose vs Iron Sucrose for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)

Primary Purpose

Iron Deficiency Anaemia, Iron Deficiency Anemia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose
Iron sucrose
Sponsored by
Pharmacosmos A/S
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Iron Deficiency Anaemia focused on measuring Iron Deficiency Anaemia, Iron Deficiency Anemia, IDA, Intravenous iron replacement therapy, Iron isomaltoside, Ferric derisomaltose, Monofer, Monoferric, Monover, Monofar, Monoferro

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria includes:

  1. Men or women ≥ 18 years
  2. Subjects having IDA caused by different etiologies
  3. Subjects with intolerance to oral iron therapy or a need for rapid repletion of iron stores:
  4. Haemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 11 g/dL
  5. Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) < 20 %
  6. S-ferritin < 100 ng/mL
  7. Willingness to participate and signing the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria includes :

  1. Anemia predominantly caused by factors other than IDA
  2. Hemochromatosis or other iron storage disorders
  3. Previous serious hypersensitivity reactions to any IV iron compound
  4. Erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) treatment
  5. Prior to screening or during the trial period; has or will be treated with a red blood cell transfusion, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy
  6. Will require a surgical procedure that necessitated general anesthesia prior to screening or during the trial period
  7. Alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase > 3 times upper limit of normal
  8. Required dialysis for treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD)
  9. Alcohol or drug abuse within the past 6 months
  10. Pregnant or nursing women

Sites / Locations

  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
  • Pharmacosmos Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose

Iron sucrose

Arm Description

Administered IV

Administered IV

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) From Baseline to Week 8
Efficacy Evaluate the effect on the hemoglobin (Hb) level following treatment with iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose vs iron sucrose in subjects with iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) . Response was defined as change from baseline in hemoglobin (Hb) to week 8, i.e. ability to increase Hb in subjects with IDA, when oral iron preparations were ineffective or could not be used or in whom the screening Hb measurement in Investigators' opinion were sufficiently low to require rapid repletion of iron stores.
Incidence of Protocol-defined Serious or Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions
Safety For this endpoint, the number of participants with serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions were evaluated. The hypersensitivity reactions that were included in the analysis were those that started on or after the first dose of randomised treatment (i.e. treatment emergent). The terms used to define hypersensitivity were those specified by the Standardised MedDRA Queries (SMQ) for hypersensitivity, plus four additional terms: loss of consciousness, seizure, syncope, unresponsiveness. The potential hypersensitivity AEs were adjudicated in a blinded fashion by an independent Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Committee (CEAC). Results show only those participants that had adjudicated and confirmed serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Composite Cardiovascular Adverse Events (AEs)
Safety Results show the composite cardiovascular adverse events (AEs), that started on or after the first dose of randomised treatment (i.e. treatment emergent) up to week 8. The reported potential cardiovascular AEs were adjudicated in a blinded fashion by an independent Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Committee (CEAC). The potential cardiovascular AEs included the following: Death due to any cause Non-fatal myocardial infarction Non-fatal stroke Unstable angina requiring hospitalisation Congestive heart failure requiring hospitalisation or medical intervention Arrhythmias Hypertension Hypotension Results show only those participants that had adjudicated and confirmed treatment-emergent composite cardiovascular AEs.
Time to First Composite Cardiovascular Safety AE
Safety Time to first composite cardiovascular AE was defined as the actual time in days from first dose of treatment until the date of the composite cardiovascular AE. For subjects not reporting a composite cardiovascular AE, the time was censored at the date of the last attended visit. Only the adjudicated and confirmed composite cardiovascular safety AEs, as judged by the CEAC, were considered for this endpoint. Time to first composite cardiovascular AE was defined as the actual time in days from first dose of treatment until the date of the composite cardiovascular AE. For subjects not reporting a composite cardiovascular AE, the time was censored at the date of the last attended visit.
S-phosphate <2 mg/dL at Any Time From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Safety Results show the number of subjects who had s-phosphate <2 mg/dL at any time from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, or 8.
Hb Concentration Increase of ≥2 g/dL From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Efficacy Results show responders to the treatment. A subject was considered a Hb responder to a certain week if an increase in Hb of at least 2 g/dL from baseline to the week in question was observed (week 1, 2, 4, and 8).
Time to Change in Hb Concentration ≥2 g/dL
Efficacy Time to change in Hb concentration ≥2 g/dL. Subjects who achieved Hb concentration increase of ≥2 g/dL (from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, or 8). For responders, time to Hb response was defined as the scheduled time from baseline until the visit where the first Hb response was measured.
Hb Concentration of >12 g/dL at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8
Efficacy Hb concentration of >12 g/dL at any time from week 1 to week 8. Results show the number of participants who achieved Hb concentration of >12 g/dL at any time from week 1 to week 8.
Hb Concentration Increase of ≥2 g/dL at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8
Efficacy Results show the number of participants who achieved Hb concentration increase of ≥2 g/dL at any time from week 1 to week 8.
S-Ferritin Concentration of ≥100 ng/mL and Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) of 20-50% at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8
Efficacy Proportion of subjects reaching the composite endpoint of s-ferritin concentration ≥100 ng/mL and TSAT of 20-50% at any time from week 1 to 8.
Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline to Week 1, 2, and 4
Efficacy Change in Hb concentration from baseline to week 1, 2, and 4.
Change in S-ferritin Concentration From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Efficacy Change in s-ferritin concentration from baseline to weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8.
Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Efficacy Changes in transferrin saturation (TSAT) from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, and 8. TSAT is the value of serum iron divided by the total iron-binding capacity and the unit is %, which referrers to % of iron-binding sites of transferrin being occupied by iron.
Change in Concentrations of Serum Iron (S-iron) From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Efficacy Changes in the concentrations of serum iron (s-iron) from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, and 8.
Change in Fatigue Symptoms From Baseline to Week 1, 2, and 8
Efficacy Change in fatigue symptoms from baseline to week 1, 2, and 8 was measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale consisted of 13 items ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), except items #7 and #8 which are reversed scored. The total score range is 0-52. A score of less than 30 indicated severe fatigue, and the higher the score, the better outcome/quality of life (QoL). If more than 50% of the items for a subject at a given visit were missing, the total score was not calculated. Total score was calculated as shown below: Total score= Sum of individual scores x 13 / Number of items answered
Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Cost of Public Transport/Taxi And Parking
Pharmacoeconomics The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics. The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups. The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group).
Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Return Journey by Car
Pharmacoeconomics The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics. The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups. The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group).
Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Time Spent on Visit/Helping on Visit
Pharmacoeconomics The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics. The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups. The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group).
Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Participants/Others Who Took Time Off Work to Attend Visits
Pharmacoeconomics The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics. The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups. The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group).
Health Care Resource Use Questionnaire
Pharmacoeconomics Resources used by the health care staff (per administration), measured by the health care resource use questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed the time used by the health care staff during administration of the investigational product and the administration time (including the observational time). The health care participants included in the evaluation were: investigator, pharmacist, physician, study coordinator, study nurse. The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups. The frequency of drug administration between the treatment groups is different (i.e. up to a factor 5 more frequent in the iron sucrose treatment group).

Full Information

First Posted
September 27, 2016
Last Updated
September 15, 2020
Sponsor
Pharmacosmos A/S
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02940886
Brief Title
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose vs Iron Sucrose for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)
Official Title
A Phase III, Randomised, Open-label, Comparative Safety and Efficacy Trial of Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose (Monofer®/Monoferric®) and Iron Sucrose in Subjects With Iron Deficiency Anemia (FERWON-IDA)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 8, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 28, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 28, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pharmacosmos A/S

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Evaluate safety and efficacy of iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose (Monofer®/Monoferric®) compared with iron sucrose (Venofer®), in subjects diagnosed with IDA.
Detailed Description
IDA is highly prevalent condition in subjects with cancer and gastrointestinal diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases, menstruating or pregnant women, and subjects who have undergone bariatric procedure or surgery. IDA can have a substantial medical and quality of life (QoL) burden. Treatment of subjects diagnosed with IDA includes controlling the bleeding and replenishing lost iron. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose compared with iron sucrose in subjects diagnosed with IDA. In a subfraction of 35 subjects treated with iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose, ECG and iron will be frequently measured. The study subjects received either a single intravenous (IV) dose of iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose (1000 mg at baseline) or iron sucrose (200 mg IV injections at baseline and repeated according to standard practice or physician choice up to a maximum of five times within the first two weeks starting at baseline; a cumulative dose of 1000 mg was recommended). The study subjects were monitored for up to 8 weeks from baseline.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Iron Deficiency Anaemia, Iron Deficiency Anemia
Keywords
Iron Deficiency Anaemia, Iron Deficiency Anemia, IDA, Intravenous iron replacement therapy, Iron isomaltoside, Ferric derisomaltose, Monofer, Monoferric, Monover, Monofar, Monoferro

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1512 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Administered IV
Arm Title
Iron sucrose
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Administered IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose
Other Intervention Name(s)
Monofer®, Monoferric®, Monover®, Monofar®, Monoferro®
Intervention Description
Iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose (Monofer®/Monoferric®; 100 mg/mL) was the test product in this trial. The dose of iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose for the individual subject was set to 1000 mg. The dose was diluted in 100 mL 0.9 % sodium chloride (100 mL bags) and administered as a single IV infusion over approximately 20 minutes.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Iron sucrose
Other Intervention Name(s)
Venofer®
Intervention Description
Iron sucrose (Venofer®; 20 mg elemental iron/mL) was the comparator in this trial. Iron sucrose was administered as 200 mg undiluted IV injections over approximately 2-5 minutes and repeated according to standard practice or physician choice up to a maximum of five times within the first two weeks starting at baseline. A cumulative dose of 1000 mg was recommended.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) From Baseline to Week 8
Description
Efficacy Evaluate the effect on the hemoglobin (Hb) level following treatment with iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose vs iron sucrose in subjects with iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) . Response was defined as change from baseline in hemoglobin (Hb) to week 8, i.e. ability to increase Hb in subjects with IDA, when oral iron preparations were ineffective or could not be used or in whom the screening Hb measurement in Investigators' opinion were sufficiently low to require rapid repletion of iron stores.
Time Frame
Baseline to week 8
Title
Incidence of Protocol-defined Serious or Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions
Description
Safety For this endpoint, the number of participants with serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions were evaluated. The hypersensitivity reactions that were included in the analysis were those that started on or after the first dose of randomised treatment (i.e. treatment emergent). The terms used to define hypersensitivity were those specified by the Standardised MedDRA Queries (SMQ) for hypersensitivity, plus four additional terms: loss of consciousness, seizure, syncope, unresponsiveness. The potential hypersensitivity AEs were adjudicated in a blinded fashion by an independent Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Committee (CEAC). Results show only those participants that had adjudicated and confirmed serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions.
Time Frame
Baseline to week 8
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite Cardiovascular Adverse Events (AEs)
Description
Safety Results show the composite cardiovascular adverse events (AEs), that started on or after the first dose of randomised treatment (i.e. treatment emergent) up to week 8. The reported potential cardiovascular AEs were adjudicated in a blinded fashion by an independent Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Committee (CEAC). The potential cardiovascular AEs included the following: Death due to any cause Non-fatal myocardial infarction Non-fatal stroke Unstable angina requiring hospitalisation Congestive heart failure requiring hospitalisation or medical intervention Arrhythmias Hypertension Hypotension Results show only those participants that had adjudicated and confirmed treatment-emergent composite cardiovascular AEs.
Time Frame
Baseline, week 1, 2, and 8
Title
Time to First Composite Cardiovascular Safety AE
Description
Safety Time to first composite cardiovascular AE was defined as the actual time in days from first dose of treatment until the date of the composite cardiovascular AE. For subjects not reporting a composite cardiovascular AE, the time was censored at the date of the last attended visit. Only the adjudicated and confirmed composite cardiovascular safety AEs, as judged by the CEAC, were considered for this endpoint. Time to first composite cardiovascular AE was defined as the actual time in days from first dose of treatment until the date of the composite cardiovascular AE. For subjects not reporting a composite cardiovascular AE, the time was censored at the date of the last attended visit.
Time Frame
Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Title
S-phosphate <2 mg/dL at Any Time From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Description
Safety Results show the number of subjects who had s-phosphate <2 mg/dL at any time from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, or 8.
Time Frame
Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Title
Hb Concentration Increase of ≥2 g/dL From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Description
Efficacy Results show responders to the treatment. A subject was considered a Hb responder to a certain week if an increase in Hb of at least 2 g/dL from baseline to the week in question was observed (week 1, 2, 4, and 8).
Time Frame
Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Title
Time to Change in Hb Concentration ≥2 g/dL
Description
Efficacy Time to change in Hb concentration ≥2 g/dL. Subjects who achieved Hb concentration increase of ≥2 g/dL (from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, or 8). For responders, time to Hb response was defined as the scheduled time from baseline until the visit where the first Hb response was measured.
Time Frame
Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Title
Hb Concentration of >12 g/dL at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8
Description
Efficacy Hb concentration of >12 g/dL at any time from week 1 to week 8. Results show the number of participants who achieved Hb concentration of >12 g/dL at any time from week 1 to week 8.
Time Frame
Week 1 to week 8
Title
Hb Concentration Increase of ≥2 g/dL at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8
Description
Efficacy Results show the number of participants who achieved Hb concentration increase of ≥2 g/dL at any time from week 1 to week 8.
Time Frame
Week 1 to week 8
Title
S-Ferritin Concentration of ≥100 ng/mL and Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) of 20-50% at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8
Description
Efficacy Proportion of subjects reaching the composite endpoint of s-ferritin concentration ≥100 ng/mL and TSAT of 20-50% at any time from week 1 to 8.
Time Frame
Week 1 to week 8
Title
Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline to Week 1, 2, and 4
Description
Efficacy Change in Hb concentration from baseline to week 1, 2, and 4.
Time Frame
Baseline, week 1, 2, and 4
Title
Change in S-ferritin Concentration From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Description
Efficacy Change in s-ferritin concentration from baseline to weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8.
Time Frame
Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Title
Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Description
Efficacy Changes in transferrin saturation (TSAT) from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, and 8. TSAT is the value of serum iron divided by the total iron-binding capacity and the unit is %, which referrers to % of iron-binding sites of transferrin being occupied by iron.
Time Frame
Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Title
Change in Concentrations of Serum Iron (S-iron) From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Description
Efficacy Changes in the concentrations of serum iron (s-iron) from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, and 8.
Time Frame
Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8
Title
Change in Fatigue Symptoms From Baseline to Week 1, 2, and 8
Description
Efficacy Change in fatigue symptoms from baseline to week 1, 2, and 8 was measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale consisted of 13 items ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), except items #7 and #8 which are reversed scored. The total score range is 0-52. A score of less than 30 indicated severe fatigue, and the higher the score, the better outcome/quality of life (QoL). If more than 50% of the items for a subject at a given visit were missing, the total score was not calculated. Total score was calculated as shown below: Total score= Sum of individual scores x 13 / Number of items answered
Time Frame
Baseline, week 1, 2, and 8
Title
Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Cost of Public Transport/Taxi And Parking
Description
Pharmacoeconomics The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics. The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups. The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group).
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Return Journey by Car
Description
Pharmacoeconomics The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics. The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups. The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group).
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Time Spent on Visit/Helping on Visit
Description
Pharmacoeconomics The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics. The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups. The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group).
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Participants/Others Who Took Time Off Work to Attend Visits
Description
Pharmacoeconomics The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics. The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups. The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group).
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Health Care Resource Use Questionnaire
Description
Pharmacoeconomics Resources used by the health care staff (per administration), measured by the health care resource use questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed the time used by the health care staff during administration of the investigational product and the administration time (including the observational time). The health care participants included in the evaluation were: investigator, pharmacist, physician, study coordinator, study nurse. The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups. The frequency of drug administration between the treatment groups is different (i.e. up to a factor 5 more frequent in the iron sucrose treatment group).
Time Frame
Baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria includes: Men or women ≥ 18 years Subjects having IDA caused by different etiologies Subjects with intolerance to oral iron therapy or a need for rapid repletion of iron stores: Haemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 11 g/dL Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) < 20 % S-ferritin < 100 ng/mL Willingness to participate and signing the informed consent form Exclusion Criteria includes : Anemia predominantly caused by factors other than IDA Hemochromatosis or other iron storage disorders Previous serious hypersensitivity reactions to any IV iron compound Erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) treatment Prior to screening or during the trial period; has or will be treated with a red blood cell transfusion, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy Will require a surgical procedure that necessitated general anesthesia prior to screening or during the trial period Alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase > 3 times upper limit of normal Required dialysis for treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) Alcohol or drug abuse within the past 6 months Pregnant or nursing women
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pharmacosmos A/S Clinical and Non-clinical Research
Organizational Affiliation
Pharmacosmos A/S
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Dothan
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Guntersville
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35976
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85018
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Foothill Ranch
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92610
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
City
La Mesa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91942
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
City
La Mesa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91942
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
National City
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91950
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
City
Northridge
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91324
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
City
Northridge
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91324
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Oceanside
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92056
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Quartz Hill
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93536
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Rialto
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92377
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Riverside
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92501
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92117
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
San Marcos
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92078
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Whittier
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90603
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Plainville
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06062
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Aventura
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33180
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Boynton Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33426
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
City
Doral
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33166
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
City
Doral
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33166
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Doral
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33172
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33308
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33012
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33015
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Hollywood
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33024
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Kissimmee
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34741
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Lake City
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32024
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Lake Worth
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33461
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Lake Worth
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33467
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
City
Miami Lakes
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33014
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
City
Miami Lakes
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33014
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Miami Lakes
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33014
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33015
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33126
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33130
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33135
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33144
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33144
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33147
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33155
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33165
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33173
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33174
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33185
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
City
Naples
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
City
Naples
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Palmetto Bay
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33157
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33324
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33409
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Champaign
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61820
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Joliet
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60435
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Palos Heights
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60463
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Terre Haute
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47802
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67214
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Owensboro
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
42303
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70809
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Marrero
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70072
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Metairie
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70006
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70125
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Bethesda
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Hagerstown
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21740
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Towson
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Fall River
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02720
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Grand Rapids
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49525
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Saginaw
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48604
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Troy
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48085
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Florissant
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63031
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68134
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Neptune
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07753
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Plainsboro
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08536
Country
United States
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 1
City
East Setauket
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11733
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site 2
City
East Setauket
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11733
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Wilmington
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Wilmington
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28403
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Beavercreek
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45431
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Canton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44718
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Centerville
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45459
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45206
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Norman
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73069
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
74136
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Jenkintown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19046
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Myrtle Beach
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29572
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Chattanooga
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Franklin
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37067
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37923
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Baytown
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77521
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Beaumont
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77702
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Corsicana
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
DeSoto
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77079
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77099
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
McAllen
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78503
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78217
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Ogden
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Chesapeake
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23320
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pharmacosmos Investigational Site
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98405
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31243803
Citation
Auerbach M, Henry D, Derman RJ, Achebe MM, Thomsen LL, Glaspy J. A prospective, multi-center, randomized comparison of iron isomaltoside 1000 versus iron sucrose in patients with iron deficiency anemia; the FERWON-IDA trial. Am J Hematol. 2019 Sep;94(9):1007-1014. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25564. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
Results Reference
result
Citation
Auerbach M and Lykke LL. A single infusion of iron isomaltoside 1000 allows a more rapid hemoglobin increment than multiple doses of iron sucrose with a similar safety profile in patients with iron deficiency anemia. Blood 2018 132:2334; doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-110199
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-110199
Description
Efficacy and safety of a single infusion of iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose versus multiple doses of iron sucrose

Learn more about this trial

Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose vs Iron Sucrose for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs