search
Back to results

Neurocryostimulation for Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain

Primary Purpose

Ankle Sprain

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Neurocryostimulation
Ice
Sponsored by
Laval University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Ankle Sprain focused on measuring cryotherapy, physical therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session
  • presence of a lateral hematoma and swelling
  • tenderness at the anterior lateral ligament without or with anterior drawer instability

Exclusion Criteria:

  • present a bony ankle injury (indicated by Ottawa ankle rules)
  • had sustained a similar injury of the same joint within the last 6 months
  • require bed rest, hospitalisation, casting or surgery
  • had a previous fracture of the same ankle
  • signs or symptoms of a previous injury at any of the other joints of the lower limbs or trunk
  • contraindication to cryotherapy including cryoglobulinemia, peripheral vascular disease or Raynaud's syndrome

Sites / Locations

  • Laval UniversityRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Neurocryostimulation

Conventional program with ice

Arm Description

CRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established). The treatment time with the CRYOFOS will take between 1 and 2 minutes, and will be pain-free. Both groups will also receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing.

The control group will receive the same conventional program (as the experimental group) consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. Ice will be applied to the ankle for 15 minutes at the end of each of the 8 sessions.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change from Baseline in lower limb functional level at 6 weeks
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), an auto-administered questionnaire of functional capacity

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change from Baseline in pain level at 6 weeks
Visual analog scale for pain
Change from Baseline in pain level at 1 week
Visual analog scale for pain
Change from Baseline in pain level at 2 weeks
Visual analog scale for pain
Change from Baseline in pain level at 4 weeks
Visual analog scale for pain
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 6 weeks
Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 4 weeks
Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 2 weeks
Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 1 week
Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 6 weeks
Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 1 week
Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 2 weeks
Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 4 weeks
Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion

Full Information

First Posted
October 23, 2016
Last Updated
August 29, 2017
Sponsor
Laval University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02945618
Brief Title
Neurocryostimulation for Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain
Official Title
Neurocryostimulation for the Treatment of Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain : a Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
June 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2017 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2017 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Laval University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this exploratory randomized control trial is to compare, in participants with acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS) , the reduction of symptoms and functional limitations between two groups of subjects who undergo a conventional rehabilitation program with (experimental group) or without CRYOFOS (comparison group). The hypothesis is that CRYOFOS will lead to a faster reduction of symptoms and functional limitations, and a faster return to daily living activities.Thirty-six participants of 18 years of age and older with acute LAS (sustained a LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session) will be recruited and randomly assigned to either a group receiving conventional rehabilitation program with the addition of CRYOFOS (experimental group; n=18), or to a group only receiving the conventional rehabilitation program (comparison group; n=18). This single-blind (evaluator), parallel-group RCT will include five evaluation sessions over 6 weeks (baseline, day 7, week 2, week 4 and week 6) and 8 treatment sessions (1st and 2nd weeks: 3 sessions/week; 3rd and 4th weeks: 1 session/week) during a 4-week period. The primary outcome will be the functional limitations, evaluated using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).
Detailed Description
Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is one of the most common reasons for primary care office and emergency department visits, with an overall incidence of 2.15 per 1,000 person-years in the United States.In its acute phase, LAS is associated with swelling, haematoma and pain over the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments, as well as ligamentous laxity of these ligaments. Interventions following acute LAS are based upon the three stages of biological ligament healing: inflammatory phase, proliferation phase (6 weeks to 3 months after trauma) and remodelling or maturation phase (until 1 year after trauma). The initial treatment during inflammatory phase is directed towards avoiding or diminishing excess swelling and ongoing injury, thus optimizing the healing process. Therefore, RICE (Rest, Ice [cryotherapy], Compression, Elevation) is the treatment of choice for the first 7 to 10 days to reduce pain and swelling. Cryotherapy has been used for a long time in rehabilitation; mainly using ice, cool packs or cold water. Lately, a new device, the CRYOFOS, has been developed to provide more performing ways to use cryotherapy. CRYOFOS uses a fluid (hyperbaric CO²) that is sprayed in the form of dry ice on the body region to be treated. It leads to a so-called thermal shock, which sees the skin temperature cooled from 32 ˚C to 2-4 ˚C in 30 sec.While CRYOFOS seems, theoretically, better than other cooling procedures, its superiority has never been determined following acute injuries such as LAS. Considering the extensive use of cold in the management of acute LAS, it would be even more relevant to examine the impact of cryotherapy on both the reduction of symptoms and the functional limitations of subjects who sustained a LAS. The objective of this exploratory randomized control trial is to compare, in participants with acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS) , the reduction of symptoms and functional limitations between two groups of subjects who undergo a conventional rehabilitation program with (experimental group) or without CRYOFOS (comparison group). The hypothesis is that CRYOFOS will lead to a faster reduction of symptoms and functional limitations, and a faster return to daily living activities.Thirty-six participants of 18 years of age and older with acute LAS (sustained a LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session) will be recruited and randomly assigned to either a group receiving conventional rehabilitation program with the addition of CRYOFOS (experimental group; n=18), or to a group only receiving the conventional rehabilitation program (comparison group; n=18). This single-blind (evaluator), parallel-group RCT will include five evaluation sessions over 6 weeks (baseline, day 7, week 2, week 4 and week 6) and 8 treatment sessions (1st and 2nd weeks: 3 sessions/week; 3rd and 4th weeks: 1 session/week) during a 4-week period. The primary outcome will be the functional limitations, evaluated using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Secondary outcomes will include the level of ankle pain, evaluated using Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NPRS), weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (also called Bent Knee DorsiFlexion test), assessed with the maximal advancement of the tibia over the talus in a weight-bearing position, and joint swelling, using the Figure-of-Eight method. Both groups will receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. However, for the experimental group, CRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established). Descriptive statistics will be used for all outcome measures at each measurement time to summarise results. Baseline demographic data will be compared (independent t-test and Chi-squared tests) to establish the comparability of groups. All data will be tested to check the distributional assumptions for the inferential statistical analyses. An intention-to-treat analysis will be used in which all participants will be analysed in the group to which they were originally assigned. All dropouts and the reason for dropping out of the study will be reported. Any harm or unintended effects during the programs will be recorded. A 2-way ANOVA (2 cryotherapy [CRYOFOS or Ice] x 5 Time [baseline, day 7, week 2, week 4, week 6]) will be used to analyse the effects of CRYOFOS on primary outcome (LEFS) and secondary outcomes (SPSS 22, proc GENLIN [Generalized Estimating Equations for repeated measures]).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ankle Sprain
Keywords
cryotherapy, physical therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Neurocryostimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
CRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established). The treatment time with the CRYOFOS will take between 1 and 2 minutes, and will be pain-free. Both groups will also receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing.
Arm Title
Conventional program with ice
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The control group will receive the same conventional program (as the experimental group) consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. Ice will be applied to the ankle for 15 minutes at the end of each of the 8 sessions.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Neurocryostimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Hyperbaric gazeous cryotherapy, Cryostimulation
Intervention Description
CRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established). The treatment time with the CRYOFOS will take between 1 and 2 minutes, and will be pain-free. Both groups will also receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Ice
Other Intervention Name(s)
Conventional program with ice
Intervention Description
The control group will receive the same conventional program (as the experimental group) consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. Ice will be applied to the ankle for 15 minutes at the end of each of the 8 sessions.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from Baseline in lower limb functional level at 6 weeks
Description
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), an auto-administered questionnaire of functional capacity
Time Frame
Baseline-6 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from Baseline in pain level at 6 weeks
Description
Visual analog scale for pain
Time Frame
Baseline-6 weeks
Title
Change from Baseline in pain level at 1 week
Description
Visual analog scale for pain
Time Frame
Baseline-1 week
Title
Change from Baseline in pain level at 2 weeks
Description
Visual analog scale for pain
Time Frame
Baseline-2 weeks
Title
Change from Baseline in pain level at 4 weeks
Description
Visual analog scale for pain
Time Frame
Baseline-4 weeks
Title
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 6 weeks
Description
Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema
Time Frame
Baseline-6 weeks
Title
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 4 weeks
Description
Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema
Time Frame
Baseline-4 weeks
Title
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 2 weeks
Description
Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema
Time Frame
Baseline-2 weeks
Title
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 1 week
Description
Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema
Time Frame
Baseline-1 week
Title
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 6 weeks
Description
Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion
Time Frame
Baseline-6 weeks
Title
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 1 week
Description
Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion
Time Frame
Baseline-1 week
Title
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 2 weeks
Description
Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion
Time Frame
Baseline-2 weeks
Title
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 4 weeks
Description
Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion
Time Frame
Baseline-4 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session presence of a lateral hematoma and swelling tenderness at the anterior lateral ligament without or with anterior drawer instability Exclusion Criteria: present a bony ankle injury (indicated by Ottawa ankle rules) had sustained a similar injury of the same joint within the last 6 months require bed rest, hospitalisation, casting or surgery had a previous fracture of the same ankle signs or symptoms of a previous injury at any of the other joints of the lower limbs or trunk contraindication to cryotherapy including cryoglobulinemia, peripheral vascular disease or Raynaud's syndrome
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jean-Sebastien Roy, PT, PhD
Phone
1-418-529-9141
Ext
6005
Email
jean-sebastien.roy@rea.ulaval.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean-Sebastien Roy, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Universite Laval
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Laval University
City
Québec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1V 0A6
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean Tittley, MSc cand.
Phone
418 656-5501
Email
jean_tittley@yahoo.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean Tittley, MSc cand.
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean-Sébastien Roy, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luc J Hébert, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33261633
Citation
Tittley J, Hebert LJ, Roy JS. Should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? A randomized clinical trial. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Dec 1;13(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00436-6.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Neurocryostimulation for Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs