A Partnership to Translate an Evidence-based Intervention (Take Heart) for Vulnerable Older Adults With Heart Disease
Primary Purpose
Heart Diseases
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Take Heart
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Diseases focused on measuring self-care, health education, chronic disease, heart diseases, risk factors for heart disease
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
50 years or older
1 or more diagnosed cardiovascular conditions, including:
- Atrial fibrillation
- Angina
- Myocardial infarction
- Congestive heart failure
- Valvular disease (aortic stenosis or mitral regurgitation)
- Peripheral vascular disease
- Pulmonary hypertension
- OR >2 major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD; high cholesterol, high blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, chronic kidney disease-stage 3 or 4)
- Must have access to a mobile or landline telephone
- Must be able to travel to group sessions, with or without transportation assistance
Exclusion Criteria
• Limited fluency in English posing significant barrier to deriving program benefit
Sites / Locations
- University of Michigan, School of Public Health
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Take Heart self-management program
Waitlist control
Arm Description
Group and telephone-based educational program to enhance self-management of heart disease and related risk factors.
Control group participants will be offered the opportunity to participate in Take Heart following the conclusion of their study involvement.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Hospitalizations
This will be measured by asking participants to report the number of nights they have stayed overnight in the hospital during the past year, for something related to their own health. We will ask this at baseline and then at the 12 month mark after the completion of the baseline survey, so that we can compare the year prior to the intervention to the year they completed the intervention. In addition, when possible, we will verify self-reported hospitalizations with Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from our partners at the Detroit Medical Center (DMC). We will only be able to look into the EMRs of those participants that are patients at the DMC. Change will be indicated by difference between count at baseline and count at follow-up.
Emergency Department Visits
This will be measured by asking participants to report the number of times they went to the emergency department for something related to their own health, during the past year. We will ask this at baseline and then at the 12 month mark after the completion of the baseline survey, so that we can compare the year prior to the intervention to the year they completed the intervention. In addition, when possible, we will verify self-reported Emergency Department visits with Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from our partners at the Detroit Medical Center (DMC). We will only be able to look into the EMRs of those participants that are patients at the DMC. Change will be indicated by difference between count at baseline and count at follow-up.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Health-related Quality of Life
Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured with the PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29) profile measure, which assesses depression, anxiety, pain interference, physical function, fatigue, satisfaction with social role participation, and sleep disturbance (4 items each, 5 point Likert scales). Higher values indicate poorer health. One item (11 point scale) measures pain intensity on a scale of 0 -10, 0=no pain, 10=worst pain). The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. https://www.assessmentcenter.net/documents/PROMIS%20Profile%20Scoring%20Manual.pdf This table indicates the mean score in each domain at the 12-month follow up time point for both intervention and control groups, as well as the difference between the means of the two groups at the 12-month time point.
Cardiac Symptom Experience
The cardiac symptom subscale of the Symptom and Health Problem Profile (Janz et al., 1999) asks about the frequency of chest pain/discomfort; shortness of breath; waking up from sleep because of chest pain or pressure; waking up from sleep because of shortness of breath or difficulty breathing; and irregular heartbeat or palpitations (not present, once or twice/week, a few times/week, once/day, several times/day) in the prior 12 months. Symptom frequency (0 to 4) was summed, yielding an overall symptom burden score that ranged from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate worse health. Change is indicated by the difference in mean frequency from baseline to follow-up.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02950818
First Posted
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 29, 2022
Sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), Detroit Medical Center, Detroit Area Agency on Aging
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02950818
Brief Title
A Partnership to Translate an Evidence-based Intervention (Take Heart) for Vulnerable Older Adults With Heart Disease
Official Title
A Partnership to Translate an Evidence-based Intervention for Vulnerable Older Adults With Heart Disease
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 10, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 18, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 18, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), Detroit Medical Center, Detroit Area Agency on Aging
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To evaluate the effectiveness of Take Heart, a behavioral/educational program for adults age 50+ with heart disease, or with at least two risk factors for heart disease, that helps them to better manage their health condition(s). Take Heart is a new version of an evidence-based program that has recently been adapted to be suitable for the needs of adults residing in Detroit.
Detailed Description
In this study, a heart disease self-management program will be tested in a low-income, predominantly African-American community via a partnership with the Detroit Area Agency on Aging (DAAA), the Detroit Medical Center (DMC), and University of Michigan School of Public Health's Center for Managing Chronic Disease (CMCD). The specific aims of the research are to: (1) adapt existing program materials to be appropriate for the new target population, getting feedback from various sources including focus group interviews; (2) conduct a pilot study of the adapted "Take Heart" program; (3) refine the intervention and conduct a randomized trial with 376 participants age 50 years and over, to assess health outcomes; (4) assess the translation and implementation of the intervention in the target setting and identify factors that help and hinder the process; (5) assess cost savings associated with the intervention; and (6) develop guidelines for "scaling up", that is, for replicating the program in other low-income areas through the national network of Area Agencies on Aging.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Diseases
Keywords
self-care, health education, chronic disease, heart diseases, risk factors for heart disease
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
453 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Take Heart self-management program
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group and telephone-based educational program to enhance self-management of heart disease and related risk factors.
Arm Title
Waitlist control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Control group participants will be offered the opportunity to participate in Take Heart following the conclusion of their study involvement.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Take Heart
Intervention Description
Participants receive an evidence-based heart disease self management program consisting of a combination of five two and a half hour group sessions and telephone counseling offered by a trained facilitator employed by the Detroit Area Agency on Aging. The program is designed so that participants select an area to work on (e.g., diet, exercise, medication taking, communication with health care professionals) and receive support, information, and encouragement from group members and program facilitators, to help them reach their goals.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hospitalizations
Description
This will be measured by asking participants to report the number of nights they have stayed overnight in the hospital during the past year, for something related to their own health. We will ask this at baseline and then at the 12 month mark after the completion of the baseline survey, so that we can compare the year prior to the intervention to the year they completed the intervention. In addition, when possible, we will verify self-reported hospitalizations with Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from our partners at the Detroit Medical Center (DMC). We will only be able to look into the EMRs of those participants that are patients at the DMC. Change will be indicated by difference between count at baseline and count at follow-up.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12-month follow up
Title
Emergency Department Visits
Description
This will be measured by asking participants to report the number of times they went to the emergency department for something related to their own health, during the past year. We will ask this at baseline and then at the 12 month mark after the completion of the baseline survey, so that we can compare the year prior to the intervention to the year they completed the intervention. In addition, when possible, we will verify self-reported Emergency Department visits with Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from our partners at the Detroit Medical Center (DMC). We will only be able to look into the EMRs of those participants that are patients at the DMC. Change will be indicated by difference between count at baseline and count at follow-up.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 month follow up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Health-related Quality of Life
Description
Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured with the PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29) profile measure, which assesses depression, anxiety, pain interference, physical function, fatigue, satisfaction with social role participation, and sleep disturbance (4 items each, 5 point Likert scales). Higher values indicate poorer health. One item (11 point scale) measures pain intensity on a scale of 0 -10, 0=no pain, 10=worst pain). The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. https://www.assessmentcenter.net/documents/PROMIS%20Profile%20Scoring%20Manual.pdf This table indicates the mean score in each domain at the 12-month follow up time point for both intervention and control groups, as well as the difference between the means of the two groups at the 12-month time point.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
Title
Cardiac Symptom Experience
Description
The cardiac symptom subscale of the Symptom and Health Problem Profile (Janz et al., 1999) asks about the frequency of chest pain/discomfort; shortness of breath; waking up from sleep because of chest pain or pressure; waking up from sleep because of shortness of breath or difficulty breathing; and irregular heartbeat or palpitations (not present, once or twice/week, a few times/week, once/day, several times/day) in the prior 12 months. Symptom frequency (0 to 4) was summed, yielding an overall symptom burden score that ranged from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate worse health. Change is indicated by the difference in mean frequency from baseline to follow-up.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
50 years or older
1 or more diagnosed cardiovascular conditions, including:
Atrial fibrillation
Angina
Myocardial infarction
Congestive heart failure
Valvular disease (aortic stenosis or mitral regurgitation)
Peripheral vascular disease
Pulmonary hypertension
OR >2 major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD; high cholesterol, high blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, chronic kidney disease-stage 3 or 4)
Must have access to a mobile or landline telephone
Must be able to travel to group sessions, with or without transportation assistance
Exclusion Criteria
• Limited fluency in English posing significant barrier to deriving program benefit
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cathleen M Connell, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Michigan School of Public Health
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Michigan, School of Public Health
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48104
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Data sharing: We will have self-reported data (baseline and 12-month) on health, demographics, and psychosocial functioning from both intervention and control participants. An anonymized dataset will be created, which will be made available to other researchers who have appropriate approvals from all relevant Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) through a secure file transfer protocol (FTP) site, M+Box, whose encryption protocols allow secure uploading of files, with sharing limited to specified users (see: http://www.itcs.umich.edu/storage/box/faq.php#storage). Data dictionaries and data collection forms will also be made available. Researchers using the data will be instructed to delete their copy of the dataset once analyses are complete. An email address to reach University of Michigan investigators will be available for questions about the datasets.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36267321
Citation
Janevic MR, Ramsay JE, Allgood KL, Domazet A, Cardozo S, Connell CM. Heart Disease Self-management for African American Older Adults: Outcomes of an Adapted Evidence-Based Intervention. Innov Aging. 2022 Aug 19;6(7):igac053. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac053. eCollection 2022.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
A Partnership to Translate an Evidence-based Intervention (Take Heart) for Vulnerable Older Adults With Heart Disease
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs