search
Back to results

Giomer vs Glass Ionomer Cement for ART Occlusoproximal Restorations: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Primary Purpose

Dental Caries

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ART with Equia
ART with Giomer Beautifil-Bulk Restorative
Sponsored by
University of Sao Paulo
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Dental Caries focused on measuring Atraumatic Restorative Treatment, glass ionomer cement, primary teeth, dental caries.

Eligibility Criteria

4 Years - 8 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aging between 4 and 8 years
  • Children presenting good health conditions
  • Children whose parents or legal guardians accept and sign the consent form
  • Children with at least one occlusal proximal caries lesion in primary molars
  • only occlusal-proximal surfaces with caries lesions with dentin involvement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe behavioral issues
  • presence of fistula or abscess near the selected tooth
  • presence of pulp exposure in the selected tooth
  • presence of mobility in the selected tooth

Sites / Locations

  • University of Sao Paulo

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

ART with Equia

ART with Giomer Beautifil-Bulk Restorative

Arm Description

Occlusal-proximal restoration in primary molars using Equia (Easy/Quick/Unique/Intelligent/Aesthetic) from GC Corp, encapsulated, pre-dosed and mechanized handling.

Occlusal-proximal restoration in primary molars using Giomer Beautifil-Bulk Restorative (SHOFU Inc)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Longevity of atraumatic restoration using Roeleveld et al. (2006) criteria
The treatments will be classified as successful when they present a clinical satisfactory aspect. Otherwise, "minor failure" will be analyzed. "Minor failures" are those in which there is a defect in the restoration, but it does not interfere in the tooth health.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cost-effiectiveness assessment
The direct cost analysis of the ART performed with the encapsulated GICs will be based on previous publications (Takanashi et al., 2004; Oscarson et al., 2003) adjusted to the Brazilian reality (Floriano et al., 2013). For this, we will consider professional cost and cost of the procedure itself.

Full Information

First Posted
August 30, 2016
Last Updated
March 1, 2021
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02962713
Brief Title
Giomer vs Glass Ionomer Cement for ART Occlusoproximal Restorations: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Official Title
Giomer vs Glass Ionomer Cement for ART Occlusoproximal Restorations: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 6, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 20, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 20, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Although the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) is well settled in the literature regarding occlusal-proximal cavities, the longevity of these restorations is still lower when compared to occlusal ones. This factor is often associated with low mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements (GIC). The objective of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of two different materials: an encapsulated GIC - Equia (GC Corp), compared with Giomer (Beautifill Bulk Restorative - Shofu) used as restoratives materials in occlusal-proximal ART restorations of primary molars. Children aged between 4 and 8 years, will be selected in schools in the city of Cerquilho, São Paulo. All restorations will be held following the precepts of the ART and the manufacturer's instructions. The restorations will be evaluated after 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months according to Roeleveld et al. (2006) criteria. To verify the survival of the restorations will be used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log rank test. To evaluate the association between the clinical variables, Cox regression test will be applied. For the cost analysis will be used analysis of variance. The level of significance for all tests will be considered to 5%.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dental Caries
Keywords
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment, glass ionomer cement, primary teeth, dental caries.

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
182 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
ART with Equia
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Occlusal-proximal restoration in primary molars using Equia (Easy/Quick/Unique/Intelligent/Aesthetic) from GC Corp, encapsulated, pre-dosed and mechanized handling.
Arm Title
ART with Giomer Beautifil-Bulk Restorative
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Occlusal-proximal restoration in primary molars using Giomer Beautifil-Bulk Restorative (SHOFU Inc)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
ART with Equia
Intervention Description
Occlusal-proximal ART restorations in primary molars using Equia (Easy/Quick/Unique/ Intelligent/Aesthetic) will be performed. No local anesthesia will be used. Infected carious tissue will be removed with hand instruments, and the cavities restored with GIC (Glass Ionomer Cement). The cavity will be filled with GIC. After the press-finger technique, the excess of material will be removed and occlusion will be checked.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
ART with Giomer Beautifil-Bulk Restorative
Intervention Description
Occlusal-proximal ART restorations in primary molars using Giomer will be performed. No local anesthesia will be used. Infected carious tissue will be removed with hand instruments, and the cavities restored with Giomer Beautifil-Bulk Restorative and occlusion will be checked.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Longevity of atraumatic restoration using Roeleveld et al. (2006) criteria
Description
The treatments will be classified as successful when they present a clinical satisfactory aspect. Otherwise, "minor failure" will be analyzed. "Minor failures" are those in which there is a defect in the restoration, but it does not interfere in the tooth health.
Time Frame
up to 24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cost-effiectiveness assessment
Description
The direct cost analysis of the ART performed with the encapsulated GICs will be based on previous publications (Takanashi et al., 2004; Oscarson et al., 2003) adjusted to the Brazilian reality (Floriano et al., 2013). For this, we will consider professional cost and cost of the procedure itself.
Time Frame
an average of 24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
4 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
8 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Children aging between 4 and 8 years Children presenting good health conditions Children whose parents or legal guardians accept and sign the consent form Children with at least one occlusal proximal caries lesion in primary molars only occlusal-proximal surfaces with caries lesions with dentin involvement Exclusion Criteria: severe behavioral issues presence of fistula or abscess near the selected tooth presence of pulp exposure in the selected tooth presence of mobility in the selected tooth
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniela P Raggio, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
University of Sao Paulo
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Sao Paulo
City
Sao Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
05508-000
Country
Brazil

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20091655
Citation
Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Appelbe P, Marinho VC, Shi X. Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD007868. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007868.pub2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17243467
Citation
van 't Hof MA, Frencken JE, van Palenstein Helderman WH, Holmgren CJ. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for managing dental caries: a meta-analysis. Int Dent J. 2006 Dec;56(6):345-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2006.tb00339.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9792126
Citation
ten Berge M, Hoogstraten J, Veerkamp JS, Prins PJ. The Dental Subscale of the Children's Fear Survey Schedule: a factor analytic study in The Netherlands. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;26(5):340-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01970.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15119869
Citation
Takanashi Y, Penrod JR, Lund JP, Feine JS. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Mar-Apr;17(2):181-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15986946
Citation
Sunico MC, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Two-year clinical performance of occlusal and cervical giomer restorations. Oper Dent. 2005 May-Jun;30(3):282-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26319990
Citation
Shimazu K, Oguchi R, Takahashi Y, Konishi K, Karibe H. Effects of surface reaction-type pre-reacted glass ionomer on oral biofilm formation of Streptococcus gordonii. Odontology. 2016 Sep;104(3):310-7. doi: 10.1007/s10266-015-0217-2. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17128231
Citation
Sheiham A. Dental caries affects body weight, growth and quality of life in pre-school children. Br Dent J. 2006 Nov 25;201(10):625-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4814259.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26161601
Citation
Sengul F, Gurbuz T. Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Summer;39(4):315-21. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.4.315.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12542428
Citation
Schriks MC, van Amerongen WE. Atraumatic perspectives of ART: psychological and physiological aspects of treatment with and without rotary instruments. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;31(1):15-20. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00021.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25343394
Citation
Santamaria R, Innes N. Trial shows partial caries removal is an effective technique in primary molars. Evid Based Dent. 2014 Sep;15(3):81-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401044.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17140533
Citation
Roeleveld AC, van Amerongen WE, Mandari GJ. Influence of residual caries and cervical gaps on the survival rate of Class II glass ionomer restorations. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006 Jun;7(2):85-91. doi: 10.1007/BF03320820.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23190278
Citation
Raggio DP, Hesse D, Lenzi TL, Guglielmi CA, Braga MM. Is Atraumatic restorative treatment an option for restoring occlusoproximal caries lesions in primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Nov;23(6):435-43. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12013. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8915959
Citation
Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Pilot T, Frencken JE. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year community field trial in Thailand--survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition. J Public Health Dent. 1996;56(3 Spec No):141-5; discussion 161-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1996.tb02424.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12752542
Citation
Oscarson N, Kallestal C, Fjelddahl A, Lindholm L. Cost-effectiveness of different caries preventive measures in a high-risk population of Swedish adolescents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Jun;31(3):169-78. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00033.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16540227
Citation
Ngo HC, Mount G, Mc Intyre J, Tuisuva J, Von Doussa RJ. Chemical exchange between glass-ionomer restorations and residual carious dentine in permanent molars: an in vivo study. J Dent. 2006 Sep;34(8):608-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.12.012. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27417376
Citation
Miki S, Kitagawa H, Kitagawa R, Kiba W, Hayashi M, Imazato S. Antibacterial activity of resin composites containing surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler. Dent Mater. 2016 Sep;32(9):1095-102. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.06.018. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19688227
Citation
Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Jun;14(3):233-40. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0335-8. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26370072
Citation
Abanto J, Paiva SM, Sheiham A, Tsakos G, Mendes FM, Cordeschi T, Vidigal EA, Bonecker M. Changes in preschool children's OHRQoL after treatment of dental caries: responsiveness of the B-ECOHIS. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Jul;26(4):259-65. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12192. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16878198
Citation
Amaral MT, Guedes-Pinto AC, Chevitarese O. Effects of a glass-ionomer cement on the remineralization of occlusal caries--an in situ study. Braz Oral Res. 2006 Apr-Jun;20(2):91-6. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242006000200001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7643329
Citation
Anusavice KJ. Preservative dentistry: the standard of care for the 21st century. J Public Health Dent. 1995 Spring;55(2):67-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1995.tb02334.x. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23053709
Citation
Bonifacio CC, Hesse D, de Oliveira Rocha R, Bonecker M, Raggio DP, van Amerongen WE. Survival rate of approximal-ART restorations using a two-layer technique for glass ionomer insertion. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Sep;17(7):1745-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0859-1. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21274581
Citation
de Amorim RG, Leal SC, Frencken JE. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Apr;16(2):429-41. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0513-3. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Giomer vs Glass Ionomer Cement for ART Occlusoproximal Restorations: a Randomized Clinical Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs