search
Back to results

Dose Response Study of GSK2330672 for the Treatment of Pruritus in Participants With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary Purpose

Cholestasis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Placebo
GSK2330672
Sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cholestasis focused on measuring linerixibat, PBC, itch, GSK2330672, GLIMMER, primary biliary cholangitis, pruritus

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria

  • Participant must be 18 to 80 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • Participants who have proven PBC, as demonstrated by having at least 2 of the following: History of sustained increased ALP levels >ULN first recognized at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit (Sustained ALP elevations at the time of Screening is not required, recognizing that the ALP may have decreased after institution of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy as described in inclusion number 4). Documented positive anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) titer (>1:40 titer on immunofluorescence or M2 positive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) or PBC-specific antinuclear antibodies (antinuclear dot and/or nuclear rim positive). Liver biopsy (at any time in the past) consistent with PBC.
  • Participants must rate their itch severity as being >=4 on a 0 to 10 point scale for the majority of time (at least half the days, as recalled by the participant) during the 8 weeks prior to the Screening Visit. Periods of low itch or no itch are acceptable as long as the worst daily itch score is >=4 on the majority of days.
  • Participants who are currently taking UDCA should be on stable doses of UDCA for >8 weeks at time of screening. Participants not taking UDCA due to intolerance may be enrolled 8 weeks after their last dose of UDCA. No changes or discontinuation is permitted until completion of the Main Study Period.
  • Male and/or female: Female participants- A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) or a WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance during the treatment period and until at least 4 weeks after the last dose of study treatment.
  • Capable of giving signed informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Screening total bilirubin >2x ULN. Total bilirubin >2x ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin <35 percent (%).
  • Screening ALT or AST >6x ULN.
  • Screening eGFR <45 milliliter (mL)/minute/1.73 square meter (m^2) based on the CKD-EPI.
  • History or presence of hepatic decompensation (e.g., variceal bleeds, encephalopathy or ascites).
  • Presence of actively replicating viral hepatitis due to hepatitis B or C virus (HBV, HCV) infection, and/or confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma or biliary cancer. Other hepatic conditions ( e.g., primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC], alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [NASH] ) are permitted if PBC is the dominant liver injury in the investigator's opinion.
  • Current diarrhea.
  • Current symptomatic cholelithiasis or inflammatory gall bladder disease. Participants with history of cholecystectomy >=3 months before screening may be eligible for enrolment.
  • Any current medical condition (e.g. psychiatric disorder, senility or dementia), which may affect the participant's ability to comply with the protocol specified procedures.
  • Initiation or increase in dose of colchicine, methotrexate, azathioprine, or systemic corticosteroids in the 2 months prior to screening. If a change in dose in any of these medications is anticipated during the course of the study, the participant should be excluded.
  • Initiation or increase in dose of bezafibrate or fenofibrate at any time during the 3 months prior to screening. Participants may join the study on stable doses of these medications, but no change or discontinuation is permitted until completion of the Main Study Period.
  • Initiation or increase in dose of any of the following in the 8 weeks prior to screening: rifampicin, naltrexone, naloxone, nalfurafine, or sertraline. Participants may join the study on stable or decreased doses of these medications, but no change in dose is permitted until completion of the Main Study Period.
  • Bile acid binding resin use: a participant must discontinue use of cholestyramine, colesevelam, colestipol or colestimide prior to the start of the Initial Study Period (no later than Day-2). Note: these drugs may be administered after completion of the Main Study Period, if clinically indicated.
  • Obeticholic acid use: a participant must discontinue use of obeticholic acid at least 8 weeks prior to the start of the Initial Study Period and may not restart until after the end of the study.
  • Administration of any other Inhibitor of the Human Ileal Bile Acid Transporter (IBAT) in the 3 months prior to screening.
  • Current enrolment or participation within the 8 weeks before start of the Initial Study Period, in any other clinical study involving an investigational study treatment.
  • QT interval corrected for heart rate QTc >480 millisecond (msec).
  • History of sensitivity to the study treatment or components thereof or a history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Medical Monitor, contraindicates their participation in the study.
  • History of regular alcohol consumption within 6 months of the study defined as an average weekly intake of >21 units for males or >14 units for females. One unit is equivalent to 8 gram of alcohol: a half-pint (approximately 240 mL) of beer, 1 glass (125 mL) of wine or 1 measure (25 mL) of spirits.

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo

GSK2330672 20 mg once daily

GSK2330672 90 mg once daily

GSK2330672 180 mg once daily

GSK2330672 40 mg twice daily

GSK2330672 90 mg twice daily

Arm Description

Participants will receive matching placebo

Participants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind

Participants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind

Participants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind

Participants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind

Participants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score
Participants were required to score the severity of their itching using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 represents no itching and 10 indicates the worst imaginable itching. The Worst Daily Itch Score is the most severe (highest) NRS recorded on a given day. Mean Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as the average of the worst daily itch scores provided in the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. Baseline is the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the Week 4 (Visit 3 [V3]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was done using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) including treatment group and centered Mean Worst Daily Itch score at Baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Scale
PBC-40 is a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire for use in PBC participants. It consists of 40 questions arranged in 6 domains with 3 to 11 questions in each domain. Each question is scored from 1 (least impact) to 5 (greatest impact). All questions within a domain are summed to obtain individual domain score. Domains were: Symptoms (7 questions) with score range 7-35, Itch (3 questions) with score range 3-15, Fatigue (11 questions) with score range 11-55, Cognitive (6 questions) with score range 6-30, Emotional (3 questions) with score range 3-15, and Social (10 questions) with score range 10-50. Higher scores for individual domains represent a poor quality of life. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3) which is conducted prior to first dosing of randomized medication that evening. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Concentrations, in Participants With High Risk of PBC Progression
Criteria for high risk of PBC progression is defined as serum ALP concentrations more than or equal to (>=)1.67 times upper limit of normal (ULN) range and/or total bilirubin concentrations more than (>)ULN at Day 1. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 (Day 1) or Visit 1 (Screening), excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.
Number of Participants With Serum ALP Concentrations Less Than (<)1.67 Times ULN and Total Bilirubin Concentrations Less Than or Equal to (<=) ULN at Week 16
Number of participants with ALP < 1.67 times ULN and total bilirubin <= ULN at Week 16 is presented. The endpoint was analyzed in Restricted High Risk Population.
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including Treatment group and Baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including Treatment group and Baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group and Baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Total Bilirubin Concentration, Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Albumin Concentration, Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR), Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group and Baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Prothrombin Time, Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group and Baseline.
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) -Main Study Period
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Any untoward event resulting in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persisting disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment is categorized as SAE.
Number of Participants With Non-SAEs and SAEs -Final Study Period
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Any untoward event resulting in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persisting disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment is categorized as SAE.
Number of Participants With Non-SAEs and SAEs - Follow-up Period
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Any untoward event resulting in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persisting disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment is categorized as SAE.
Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of Potential Clinical Importance
Blood samples were collected to measure analyze the following parameters: albumin, calcium, Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from creatinine, glucose, potassium and sodium. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (low, within range [w/in] or no change, or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (for example [e.g.], high to high), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100 percent (%). Only "To Low" and/or "To High" categories with potential clinical importance data have been presented.
Number of Participants With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Importance
Blood samples were collected to analyze the following parameters: hematocrit, hemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils and platelets. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (low, w/in or no change, or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (e.g., high to high), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%. Only "To Low" and/or "To High" categories with potential clinical importance data have been presented.
Number of Participants With Abnormal 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a semi-supine position. 12-lead ECGs were obtained by using an automated ECG machine. Data for abnormal, not clinically significant (NCS) and clinically significant (CS) ECG findings are presented. CS abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP and DBP were measured in the semi-supine position with a completely automated device after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
Pulse rate was measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Assessment
GSRS is a validated scale used to assess gastrointestinal symptoms experienced by participants over the preceding 5 to 7 days. GSRS was measured for all 5 domains: Average Diarrhea Syndrome Score, Average Indigestion Syndrome Score, Average Constipation Syndrome Score, Average Abdominal Pain Syndrome Score, Average Reflux Syndrome Score. All individual domains are scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1(not at all) to 7(extremely). Higher score indicate more severe symptoms. The Average Total GSRS score was mean of these 5 domains and ranges from 1 to 7. Higher score indicates worst possible degree of symptoms. The responses summarized at each visit are those given during the week prior to the visit, with exception of Day 1. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by participant prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Data has been presented for each domain along with the average Total GSRS score.
Number of Participants With Mean Worst Daily Itch Score of <4 at Week 16
Participants were required to score the severity of their itching using a 0-10 NRS where 0 represents no itching and 10 indicates the worst imaginable itching. The Worst Daily Itch Score is the most severe (highest) NRS recorded on a given day. Mean Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as the average of the worst daily itch scores provided in the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. Number of participants with Mean Worst Daily Itch Score of <4 at Week 16 is presented.
Number of Participants With Improvement of >= 30 Percent (%) in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 From Baseline
Participants were required to score the severity of their itching using a 0-10 NRS where 0 represents no itching and 10 indicates the worst imaginable itching. The Worst Daily Itch Score is the most severe (highest) NRS recorded on a given day. Mean Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as the average of the worst daily itch scores provided in the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by the participant prior to randomization. Number of participants with improvement of >= 30% in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 from Baseline is presented.
Number of Participants With Improvement of >=2 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 From Baseline
Participants were required to score the severity of their itching using a 0-10 NRS where 0 represents no itching and 10 indicates the worst imaginable itching. The Worst Daily Itch Score is the most severe (highest) NRS recorded on a given day. Mean Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as the average of the worst daily itch scores provided in the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by the participant prior to randomization. Number of participants with improvement of >=2 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 from Baseline is presented.
Percentage of Responder Days With Worst Daily Itch Score of <4
Percentage of Responder Days with Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as: (number of days response from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 divided by number of days from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 with worst daily itch scores available) times 100. Days for which no worst daily itch score was available did not contribute to either the numerator or the denominator. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group. Percentage of responder days with Worst Daily Itch Score of <4 is presented.
Percentage of Responder Days With Improvement of >= 30% in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 From Baseline
Percentage of Responder Days with Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as: (number of days response from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 divided by number of days from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 with worst daily itch scores available) times 100. Days for which no worst daily itch score was available did not contribute to either the numerator or the denominator. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by the participant prior to randomization. Percentage of responder days with improvement of >= 30% in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 from Baseline is presented..
Percentage of Responder Days With Improvement of >=2 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 From Baseline
Percentage of Responder Days with Worst Daily Itch was calculated as: (number of days response from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 divided by number of days from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 with worst daily itch scores available) times 100. Days for which no worst daily itch score was available did not contribute to either the numerator or the denominator. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by the participant prior to randomization. Percentage of responder days with improvement of >=2 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 from Baseline is presented.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Sleep Score at Week 16
Mean Daily Sleep Score is defined as the average of the daily sleep scores provided in the 7 days prior to the relevant visit. Participants sleep quality was recorded in an electronic diary each morning using a 0-10 NRS in which 0: good sleep to 10:worst possible sleep. Higher score indicates worse possible sleep. Baseline is the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the Week 4 (V3) visit. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Fatigue Score at Week 16
Mean Daily Fatigue Score is defined as the average of the daily fatigue scores provided in the 7 days prior to the relevant visit. Participants fatigue level was recorded in an electronic diary each evening using a 0-10 NRS in which 0: no fatigue to 10:worst possible fatigue. Higher score indicates worse possible fatigue. Baseline is the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the Week 4 (V3) visit. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group and Baseline.
Change From Baseline in the Five-Dimensional (5-D) Itch Scale at Week 16
The 5-D itch scale had been developed as a brief, single page, instrument for the multidimensional quantification of itch that is sensitive to change over time. It has data to support its validity in a population of participants with pruritus and covers five dimensions of itch experienced by participants: duration, degree, direction, disability and distribution. Each domain was scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (Not present/resolved/never) to 5 (unbearable/getting worse/always), higher scores indicates worst itching. The scores of each of five domains were achieved separately and then summed together to obtain a total 5-D score. A total 5-D scores potentially ranged between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus) where higher score indicates worse possible itching. Baseline is assessment performed at Week 4 (V3) which is conducted prior to first dosing of randomized medication that evening. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Total Bile Acid Concentration
Blood samples were collected for evaluating total bile acid concentration as a biomarker of PBC. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum 7-alpha Hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4)
Blood samples were collected for evaluating C4 concentration as a marker of bile acid synthesis. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Plasma Concentration of GSK2330672 After Sparse Sampling
Blood samples were collected for measurement of plasma GSK2330672 concentration.

Full Information

First Posted
November 15, 2016
Last Updated
April 8, 2021
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02966834
Brief Title
Dose Response Study of GSK2330672 for the Treatment of Pruritus in Participants With Primary Biliary Cholangitis
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-dose, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of GSK2330672 Administration for the Treatment of Pruritus in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (GLIMMER: GSK2330672 triaL of IBAT Inhibition With Multidose Measurement for Evaluation of Response)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 11, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 15, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 15, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSK2330672 administration for the treatment of pruritus (itch) in participants with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Participants will receive either placebo or one of the 4 dose regimens of GSK2330672 (20 milligram [mg], 90 mg or 180 mg taken once daily or 90 mg twice daily). Participants on GSK2330672 will also receive placebo tablets to maintain blinding. The study has a prospectively defined adaptive design that will utilize interim data to further inform and potentially optimize the doses under investigation. Hence, additional dose regimen may be added during study. The total duration of a participant in the study will be up to 45 days of screening and 24 weeks of study including follow-up.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cholestasis
Keywords
linerixibat, PBC, itch, GSK2330672, GLIMMER, primary biliary cholangitis, pruritus

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
147 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive matching placebo
Arm Title
GSK2330672 20 mg once daily
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind
Arm Title
GSK2330672 90 mg once daily
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind
Arm Title
GSK2330672 180 mg once daily
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind
Arm Title
GSK2330672 40 mg twice daily
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind
Arm Title
GSK2330672 90 mg twice daily
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
GSK2330672 matching placebo will be supplied as white film-coated tablets.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
GSK2330672
Intervention Description
GSK2330672 will be supplied in 2 dose strengths of 10 mg and 45 mg white film-coated tablets.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score
Description
Participants were required to score the severity of their itching using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 represents no itching and 10 indicates the worst imaginable itching. The Worst Daily Itch Score is the most severe (highest) NRS recorded on a given day. Mean Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as the average of the worst daily itch scores provided in the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. Baseline is the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the Week 4 (Visit 3 [V3]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was done using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) including treatment group and centered Mean Worst Daily Itch score at Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Scale
Description
PBC-40 is a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire for use in PBC participants. It consists of 40 questions arranged in 6 domains with 3 to 11 questions in each domain. Each question is scored from 1 (least impact) to 5 (greatest impact). All questions within a domain are summed to obtain individual domain score. Domains were: Symptoms (7 questions) with score range 7-35, Itch (3 questions) with score range 3-15, Fatigue (11 questions) with score range 11-55, Cognitive (6 questions) with score range 6-30, Emotional (3 questions) with score range 3-15, and Social (10 questions) with score range 10-50. Higher scores for individual domains represent a poor quality of life. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3) which is conducted prior to first dosing of randomized medication that evening. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Concentrations, in Participants With High Risk of PBC Progression
Description
Criteria for high risk of PBC progression is defined as serum ALP concentrations more than or equal to (>=)1.67 times upper limit of normal (ULN) range and/or total bilirubin concentrations more than (>)ULN at Day 1. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 (Day 1) or Visit 1 (Screening), excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With Serum ALP Concentrations Less Than (<)1.67 Times ULN and Total Bilirubin Concentrations Less Than or Equal to (<=) ULN at Week 16
Description
Number of participants with ALP < 1.67 times ULN and total bilirubin <= ULN at Week 16 is presented. The endpoint was analyzed in Restricted High Risk Population.
Time Frame
At Week 16
Title
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Description
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including Treatment group and Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Description
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including Treatment group and Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Description
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group and Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Total Bilirubin Concentration, Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Description
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Albumin Concentration, Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Description
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR), Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Description
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group and Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Prothrombin Time, Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression
Description
Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group and Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) -Main Study Period
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Any untoward event resulting in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persisting disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment is categorized as SAE.
Time Frame
Up to 12 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Non-SAEs and SAEs -Final Study Period
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Any untoward event resulting in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persisting disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment is categorized as SAE.
Time Frame
Up to 4 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Non-SAEs and SAEs - Follow-up Period
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Any untoward event resulting in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persisting disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment is categorized as SAE.
Time Frame
Up to 4 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of Potential Clinical Importance
Description
Blood samples were collected to measure analyze the following parameters: albumin, calcium, Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from creatinine, glucose, potassium and sodium. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (low, within range [w/in] or no change, or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (for example [e.g.], high to high), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100 percent (%). Only "To Low" and/or "To High" categories with potential clinical importance data have been presented.
Time Frame
At Weeks 8, 12, 16 and 20
Title
Number of Participants With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Importance
Description
Blood samples were collected to analyze the following parameters: hematocrit, hemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils and platelets. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (low, w/in or no change, or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (e.g., high to high), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%. Only "To Low" and/or "To High" categories with potential clinical importance data have been presented.
Time Frame
At Weeks 8, 12, 16 and 20
Title
Number of Participants With Abnormal 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
Description
A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a semi-supine position. 12-lead ECGs were obtained by using an automated ECG machine. Data for abnormal, not clinically significant (NCS) and clinically significant (CS) ECG findings are presented. CS abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.
Time Frame
At Weeks 8, 12, 16 and 20
Title
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Description
SBP and DBP were measured in the semi-supine position with a completely automated device after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 20
Title
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
Description
Pulse rate was measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 20
Title
Change From Baseline in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Assessment
Description
GSRS is a validated scale used to assess gastrointestinal symptoms experienced by participants over the preceding 5 to 7 days. GSRS was measured for all 5 domains: Average Diarrhea Syndrome Score, Average Indigestion Syndrome Score, Average Constipation Syndrome Score, Average Abdominal Pain Syndrome Score, Average Reflux Syndrome Score. All individual domains are scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1(not at all) to 7(extremely). Higher score indicate more severe symptoms. The Average Total GSRS score was mean of these 5 domains and ranges from 1 to 7. Higher score indicates worst possible degree of symptoms. The responses summarized at each visit are those given during the week prior to the visit, with exception of Day 1. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by participant prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Data has been presented for each domain along with the average Total GSRS score.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 20
Title
Number of Participants With Mean Worst Daily Itch Score of <4 at Week 16
Description
Participants were required to score the severity of their itching using a 0-10 NRS where 0 represents no itching and 10 indicates the worst imaginable itching. The Worst Daily Itch Score is the most severe (highest) NRS recorded on a given day. Mean Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as the average of the worst daily itch scores provided in the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. Number of participants with Mean Worst Daily Itch Score of <4 at Week 16 is presented.
Time Frame
At Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With Improvement of >= 30 Percent (%) in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 From Baseline
Description
Participants were required to score the severity of their itching using a 0-10 NRS where 0 represents no itching and 10 indicates the worst imaginable itching. The Worst Daily Itch Score is the most severe (highest) NRS recorded on a given day. Mean Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as the average of the worst daily itch scores provided in the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by the participant prior to randomization. Number of participants with improvement of >= 30% in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 from Baseline is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline and At Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With Improvement of >=2 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 From Baseline
Description
Participants were required to score the severity of their itching using a 0-10 NRS where 0 represents no itching and 10 indicates the worst imaginable itching. The Worst Daily Itch Score is the most severe (highest) NRS recorded on a given day. Mean Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as the average of the worst daily itch scores provided in the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by the participant prior to randomization. Number of participants with improvement of >=2 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 from Baseline is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline and At Week 16
Title
Percentage of Responder Days With Worst Daily Itch Score of <4
Description
Percentage of Responder Days with Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as: (number of days response from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 divided by number of days from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 with worst daily itch scores available) times 100. Days for which no worst daily itch score was available did not contribute to either the numerator or the denominator. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group. Percentage of responder days with Worst Daily Itch Score of <4 is presented.
Time Frame
Up to Week 16
Title
Percentage of Responder Days With Improvement of >= 30% in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 From Baseline
Description
Percentage of Responder Days with Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as: (number of days response from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 divided by number of days from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 with worst daily itch scores available) times 100. Days for which no worst daily itch score was available did not contribute to either the numerator or the denominator. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by the participant prior to randomization. Percentage of responder days with improvement of >= 30% in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 from Baseline is presented..
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Percentage of Responder Days With Improvement of >=2 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 From Baseline
Description
Percentage of Responder Days with Worst Daily Itch was calculated as: (number of days response from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 divided by number of days from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 with worst daily itch scores available) times 100. Days for which no worst daily itch score was available did not contribute to either the numerator or the denominator. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by the participant prior to randomization. Percentage of responder days with improvement of >=2 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 from Baseline is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Sleep Score at Week 16
Description
Mean Daily Sleep Score is defined as the average of the daily sleep scores provided in the 7 days prior to the relevant visit. Participants sleep quality was recorded in an electronic diary each morning using a 0-10 NRS in which 0: good sleep to 10:worst possible sleep. Higher score indicates worse possible sleep. Baseline is the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the Week 4 (V3) visit. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Fatigue Score at Week 16
Description
Mean Daily Fatigue Score is defined as the average of the daily fatigue scores provided in the 7 days prior to the relevant visit. Participants fatigue level was recorded in an electronic diary each evening using a 0-10 NRS in which 0: no fatigue to 10:worst possible fatigue. Higher score indicates worse possible fatigue. Baseline is the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the Week 4 (V3) visit. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group and Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in the Five-Dimensional (5-D) Itch Scale at Week 16
Description
The 5-D itch scale had been developed as a brief, single page, instrument for the multidimensional quantification of itch that is sensitive to change over time. It has data to support its validity in a population of participants with pruritus and covers five dimensions of itch experienced by participants: duration, degree, direction, disability and distribution. Each domain was scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (Not present/resolved/never) to 5 (unbearable/getting worse/always), higher scores indicates worst itching. The scores of each of five domains were achieved separately and then summed together to obtain a total 5-D score. A total 5-D scores potentially ranged between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus) where higher score indicates worse possible itching. Baseline is assessment performed at Week 4 (V3) which is conducted prior to first dosing of randomized medication that evening. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Total Bile Acid Concentration
Description
Blood samples were collected for evaluating total bile acid concentration as a biomarker of PBC. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum 7-alpha Hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4)
Description
Blood samples were collected for evaluating C4 concentration as a marker of bile acid synthesis. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and at Week 16
Title
Plasma Concentration of GSK2330672 After Sparse Sampling
Description
Blood samples were collected for measurement of plasma GSK2330672 concentration.
Time Frame
At Week 4 (between 1 and 3 hours post-dose) and At Weeks 8, 12 and 16 (between 1 and 3 hours post-dose, and between 5 and 8 hours post-dose)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria Participant must be 18 to 80 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent. Participants who have proven PBC, as demonstrated by having at least 2 of the following: History of sustained increased ALP levels >ULN first recognized at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit (Sustained ALP elevations at the time of Screening is not required, recognizing that the ALP may have decreased after institution of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy as described in inclusion number 4). Documented positive anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) titer (>1:40 titer on immunofluorescence or M2 positive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) or PBC-specific antinuclear antibodies (antinuclear dot and/or nuclear rim positive). Liver biopsy (at any time in the past) consistent with PBC. Participants must rate their itch severity as being >=4 on a 0 to 10 point scale for the majority of time (at least half the days, as recalled by the participant) during the 8 weeks prior to the Screening Visit. Periods of low itch or no itch are acceptable as long as the worst daily itch score is >=4 on the majority of days. Participants who are currently taking UDCA should be on stable doses of UDCA for >8 weeks at time of screening. Participants not taking UDCA due to intolerance may be enrolled 8 weeks after their last dose of UDCA. No changes or discontinuation is permitted until completion of the Main Study Period. Male and/or female: Female participants- A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) or a WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance during the treatment period and until at least 4 weeks after the last dose of study treatment. Capable of giving signed informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol. Exclusion Criteria Screening total bilirubin >2x ULN. Total bilirubin >2x ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin <35 percent (%). Screening ALT or AST >6x ULN. Screening eGFR <45 milliliter (mL)/minute/1.73 square meter (m^2) based on the CKD-EPI. History or presence of hepatic decompensation (e.g., variceal bleeds, encephalopathy or ascites). Presence of actively replicating viral hepatitis due to hepatitis B or C virus (HBV, HCV) infection, and/or confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma or biliary cancer. Other hepatic conditions ( e.g., primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC], alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [NASH] ) are permitted if PBC is the dominant liver injury in the investigator's opinion. Current diarrhea. Current symptomatic cholelithiasis or inflammatory gall bladder disease. Participants with history of cholecystectomy >=3 months before screening may be eligible for enrolment. Any current medical condition (e.g. psychiatric disorder, senility or dementia), which may affect the participant's ability to comply with the protocol specified procedures. Initiation or increase in dose of colchicine, methotrexate, azathioprine, or systemic corticosteroids in the 2 months prior to screening. If a change in dose in any of these medications is anticipated during the course of the study, the participant should be excluded. Initiation or increase in dose of bezafibrate or fenofibrate at any time during the 3 months prior to screening. Participants may join the study on stable doses of these medications, but no change or discontinuation is permitted until completion of the Main Study Period. Initiation or increase in dose of any of the following in the 8 weeks prior to screening: rifampicin, naltrexone, naloxone, nalfurafine, or sertraline. Participants may join the study on stable or decreased doses of these medications, but no change in dose is permitted until completion of the Main Study Period. Bile acid binding resin use: a participant must discontinue use of cholestyramine, colesevelam, colestipol or colestimide prior to the start of the Initial Study Period (no later than Day-2). Note: these drugs may be administered after completion of the Main Study Period, if clinically indicated. Obeticholic acid use: a participant must discontinue use of obeticholic acid at least 8 weeks prior to the start of the Initial Study Period and may not restart until after the end of the study. Administration of any other Inhibitor of the Human Ileal Bile Acid Transporter (IBAT) in the 3 months prior to screening. Current enrolment or participation within the 8 weeks before start of the Initial Study Period, in any other clinical study involving an investigational study treatment. QT interval corrected for heart rate QTc >480 millisecond (msec). History of sensitivity to the study treatment or components thereof or a history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Medical Monitor, contraindicates their participation in the study. History of regular alcohol consumption within 6 months of the study defined as an average weekly intake of >21 units for males or >14 units for females. One unit is equivalent to 8 gram of alcohol: a half-pint (approximately 240 mL) of beer, 1 glass (125 mL) of wine or 1 measure (25 mL) of spirits.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85054
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Novi
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48377
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Manhasset
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
11030
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Allentown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18104
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75390-8887
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
981104
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Camperdown
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2050
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Herston
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4029
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Prahran
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3181
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nedlands
State/Province
Western Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
6009
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2N 4Z6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6G 2C8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R3E 3P4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 5A5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2C4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Montréal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2X 0A9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Clermont-Ferrand
ZIP/Postal Code
63003
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Grenoble Cedex 9
ZIP/Postal Code
38043
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lille cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Paris cedex 12
ZIP/Postal Code
75571
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pessac cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
33604
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Erlangen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
91054
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Homburg
State/Province
Saarland
ZIP/Postal Code
66421
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bologna
State/Province
Emilia-Romagna
ZIP/Postal Code
40138
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20142
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Monza (MB)
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20900
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Firenze
State/Province
Toscana
ZIP/Postal Code
50134
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Padova
State/Province
Veneto
ZIP/Postal Code
35128
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chiba
ZIP/Postal Code
270-1694
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukui
ZIP/Postal Code
918-8503
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gunma
ZIP/Postal Code
371-8511
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hiroshima
ZIP/Postal Code
730-8619
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
006-8555
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
760-8557
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
252-0375
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nagasaki
ZIP/Postal Code
856-8562
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
545-8586
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
591-8025
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
105-8471
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
173-8606
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
181-8611
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Czestochowa
ZIP/Postal Code
42-217
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-506
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Myslowice
ZIP/Postal Code
41-400
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
00-332
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-349
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08036
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28007
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28034
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41013
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46026
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Basingstoke
ZIP/Postal Code
RG24 9NA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Edgbaston
ZIP/Postal Code
B15 2GW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Glasgow
ZIP/Postal Code
G31 2ER
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Liverpool.
ZIP/Postal Code
L7 8XP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
NW3 2QG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M13 9WU
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Middlesbrough
ZIP/Postal Code
TS4 3BW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Newcastle-upon-Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE1 4LP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nottingham
ZIP/Postal Code
NG7 2UH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Plymouth
ZIP/Postal Code
PL6 8DH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sheffield
ZIP/Postal Code
S5 7AU
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD will be made available within 6 months of publishing the results of the primary endpoints, key secondary endpoints and safety data of the study.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.
IPD Sharing URL
http://clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36343847
Citation
Levy C, Kendrick S, Bowlus CL, Tanaka A, Jones D, Kremer AE, Mayo MJ, Haque N, von Maltzahn R, Allinder M, Swift B, McLaughlin MM, Hirschfield GM; GLIMMER Study Group. GLIMMER: A Randomized Phase 2b Dose-Ranging Trial of Linerixibat in Primary Biliary Cholangitis Patients With Pruritus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jul;21(7):1902-1912.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.10.032. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Dose Response Study of GSK2330672 for the Treatment of Pruritus in Participants With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs