search
Back to results

Minimal Invasive Breast Cancer Excision Using the Breast Lesion Excision System Under Ultrasound Guidance (BLES)

Primary Purpose

Breastcancer

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
BLES system and conventional lumpectomy
Sponsored by
Radboud University Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Breastcancer focused on measuring Minimal invasive, Biopsy

Eligibility Criteria

19 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • 19 years or older
  • US visible breast cancer with maximum diameter of 15 mm on US
  • Histologically proven invasive breast cancer
  • Willing and able to undergo preoperative breast MRI
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor US visibility of the breast cancer
  • Breast cancer closer than 6 mm to the dermis, nipple or pectoral muscle.
  • Contra-indications to breast MRI or intravenous contrast administration
  • Contra-indications for the use of diathermia
  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Patients with breast implants
  • Patients with implanted electronics
  • Pregnancy
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Sites / Locations

  • Radboudumc
  • Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Patients

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Frequency of successful complete tumor excision by the BLES system.
Successful is defined as 'having tumor free margins, and no residual (in situ) cancer in the surgical specimen'.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Quality of the margin evaluation of the biopsy specimen and the eventual surgical specimen.
In biopsy specimen in which the margin is not completely tumor free, but the Dutch criterion for successful surgery is met (no more than focal (4 mm) margin involvement), we will specifically analyse the residual tumor burden in the surgical excision.
Assess in retrospect whether we can predict successful tumor extraction based upon other factors than tumor size alone.
Parameters categorized in: Patient related variables obtained from a questionnaire Lesion related variables Imaging features Surgical features Histopathological and molecular features from the core biopsy

Full Information

First Posted
November 23, 2016
Last Updated
May 27, 2020
Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Collaborators
Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Dutch Cancer Society
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02975128
Brief Title
Minimal Invasive Breast Cancer Excision Using the Breast Lesion Excision System Under Ultrasound Guidance
Acronym
BLES
Official Title
Minimal Invasive Breast Cancer Excision Using the Breast Lesion Excision System Under Ultrasound Guidance
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Needle production stopped
Study Start Date
February 19, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 31, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 31, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Collaborators
Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Dutch Cancer Society

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will assess whether it is feasible to remove small breast cancers completely using the Breast Lesion Excision System under Ultrasound guidance.
Detailed Description
Rationale: In the Netherlands, ≥7000 women are operated for small breast cancers yearly. In this study, we will evaluate under which conditions it is possible to excise small breast cancers using the Breast Lesion Excision System (BLES) under ultrasound (US) guidance. When successful, this will allow ambulatory treatment of women with small breast cancers, improving the cosmetic outcome and quality of life. Objective: Our study aim is to assess whether it is feasible to remove small breast cancers completely using the BLES system under US guidance. Study design: This is a multi-centre, translational clinical phase II study in 125 women with cancers ≤1.5 cm based upon US measurements, and without mammographic evidence of more extensive disease (e.g. microcalcifications). Study population: Women with cancers ≤1.5 cm based upon US measurements, if there is no mammographic evidence of more extensive disease (e.g. microcalcifications or extensive architectural distortion), and the tumor lies ≥6 mm away from the dermis, nipple or pectoral muscle, are eligible for this study. Intervention: In 125 women with cancers ≤1.5 cm based upon US measurements, and without mammographic evidence of more extensive disease (e.g. microcalcifications), we will conduct additional preoperative breast MRI to ascertain lesion size, after informed consent has been obtained. If the lesion is confirmed ≤1.5 cm on MRI and lying ≥6 mm away from the dermis, nipple and pectoral muscle, the patient is eligible. Moreover, patients will be asked to fill out the questionnaire, detailing their risk profile and comorbidity index. Under general anaesthesia for the normal surgical procedure, the tumor is first removed using the BLES system under US guidance, through a small skin incision (<1 cm). Next, the normal surgical procedure is performed, excising the BLES excision cavity and a ≥ 1cm margin of surrounding tissue, also guided by the US appearance after the BLES procedure. Margin assessment will be performed separately for the BLES excision and the surgical specimen of the surrounding tissue. Main study parameters/endpoints: Main endpoint of the study is the frequency of successful complete tumor excision by the BLES system, where successful is defined as 'having tumor free margins, and no residual (in situ) cancer in the surgical specimen'. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Our approach allows to test the feasibility of this highly innovating approach to remove breast cancer, with minimal negative effects or possible complications. While there is no direct benefit nor detrimental effect from this study to the patients participating, the study has large implications for many women, as breast cancer remains the most common cancer in women, and due to screening, most cancers are small. Further reduction of the impact of local treatment is still desired as the psychosocial and somatic effects of breast deformation can be substantial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breastcancer
Keywords
Minimal invasive, Biopsy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
22 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Patients
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
BLES system and conventional lumpectomy
Intervention Description
Each patient undergoes the same procedure. Under general anaesthesia for the normal surgical procedure, the tumor is first removed using the BLES system under US guidance. Next, the normal surgical procedure is performed, excising the BLES excision cavity and a ≥ 1cm margin of surrounding tissue, also guided by the US appearance after the BLES procedure.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Frequency of successful complete tumor excision by the BLES system.
Description
Successful is defined as 'having tumor free margins, and no residual (in situ) cancer in the surgical specimen'.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of two months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality of the margin evaluation of the biopsy specimen and the eventual surgical specimen.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of two months
Title
In biopsy specimen in which the margin is not completely tumor free, but the Dutch criterion for successful surgery is met (no more than focal (4 mm) margin involvement), we will specifically analyse the residual tumor burden in the surgical excision.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of two months
Title
Assess in retrospect whether we can predict successful tumor extraction based upon other factors than tumor size alone.
Description
Parameters categorized in: Patient related variables obtained from a questionnaire Lesion related variables Imaging features Surgical features Histopathological and molecular features from the core biopsy
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Female 19 years or older US visible breast cancer with maximum diameter of 15 mm on US Histologically proven invasive breast cancer Willing and able to undergo preoperative breast MRI Able to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Poor US visibility of the breast cancer Breast cancer closer than 6 mm to the dermis, nipple or pectoral muscle. Contra-indications to breast MRI or intravenous contrast administration Contra-indications for the use of diathermia Unable to provide informed consent Patients with breast implants Patients with implanted electronics Pregnancy Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ritse Mann, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Radboud University Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Radboudumc
City
Nijmegen
State/Province
Gelderland
ZIP/Postal Code
6500 HB
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital
City
Nijmegen
State/Province
Gelderland
ZIP/Postal Code
6532 SZ
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21240608
Citation
Allen SD, Nerurkar A, Della Rovere GU. The breast lesion excision system (BLES): a novel technique in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of small indeterminate breast lesions? Eur Radiol. 2011 May;21(5):919-24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-2000-7. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16874817
Citation
Sie A, Bryan DC, Gaines V, Killebrew LK, Kim CH, Morrison CC, Poller WR, Romilly AP, Schilling K, Sung JH. Multicenter evaluation of the breast lesion excision system, a percutaneous, vacuum-assisted, intact-specimen breast biopsy device. Cancer. 2006 Sep 1;107(5):945-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22090.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24102869
Citation
Medjhoul A, Canale S, Mathieu MC, Uzan C, Garbay JR, Dromain C, Balleyguier C. Breast lesion excision sample (BLES biopsy) combining stereotactic biopsy and radiofrequency: is it a safe and accurate procedure in case of BIRADS 4 and 5 breast lesions? Breast J. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):590-4. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12184. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24742589
Citation
Allen SD, Osin P, Nerurkar A. The radiological excision of high risk and malignant lesions using the INTACT breast lesion excision system. A case series with an imaging follow up of at least 5 years. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;40(7):824-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Minimal Invasive Breast Cancer Excision Using the Breast Lesion Excision System Under Ultrasound Guidance

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs