search
Back to results

Magnetic Correction of Eye Lid Paralysis

Primary Purpose

Blepharoptosis, Lagophthalmos, Facial Paralysis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Magnetic lid system
Sponsored by
Kevin Houston
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Blepharoptosis

Eligibility Criteria

5 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of an eyelid movement disorder for at least one eye, moderate cognitive function or better defined as greater than or equal to 18 out of 30 on a pre-screening of the Mini-Mental State Exam, age 5 or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of an eyelid movement disorder or presence of a corneal ulcer. Those with a corneal ulcer are at risk for permanent loss of vision and should be managed with proven methods. Age less than 5, Severe Cognitive impairment defined as Mini-mental score <18, behaviors consistent with delirium (combinations of disorientation, hallucinations, delusions, and incoherent speech), or lethargy. These individuals must be excluded since participation requires competent self-care, reliable responses and cooperation during fitting of the devices.

Sites / Locations

  • Ophthalmology of Clinical Research Office, Mass Eye and Ear

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Magnetic lid system

Arm Description

All participants will trial a commercially available device and an experimental magnetic device.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Rating Scale of Skin Integrity
Ratings at the beginning and end of treatment will be analyzed by calculating the mean and standard deviation of the skin erythema rating across all available time points. The outcome measure is the FDA scale, Assessing the Irritation and Sensitization Potential of Transdermal and Topical Delivery Systems for ANDAs Guidance for Industry. Range is 0 to 7 with higher numbers being worse skin erythema.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Count of Participants With Adverse Corneal Events Based on National Eye Institute Rating Scale
Using the National Eye Institute Rating Scale (0 to 3 points with higher being more staining), cases where staining increased more than 2 points or if there was any ulceration, an adverse event was tabulated and summed for each participant over 1 up to 32 weeks of use, depending on how long the participant was followed.
Change in Visual Acuity
Visual acuity at 20ft before treatment and after 1 week or more. Difference between weekly acuity measures to baseline was calculated and averaged for each subject, and then a group mean and standard deviation calculated.

Full Information

First Posted
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 26, 2020
Sponsor
Kevin Houston
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02988856
Brief Title
Magnetic Correction of Eye Lid Paralysis
Official Title
Non-surgical Correction of Eye Lid Paralysis With External Magnet Systems
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 1, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 14, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 14, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Kevin Houston

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Objective 1: Determine the safety and feasibility of externally mounted magnets for extended management of chronic eyelid movement disorders by measuring visual acuity and corneal and skin integrity and comfort over 8 weeks of wear. Objective 2: Collect preliminary data on the relative efficacy of external magnetic devices by comparing them to externally mounted lid weights and ptosis crutches using rating scales and video analysis of blink biomechanics.
Detailed Description
Two major types of eye lid movement disorders include lagophthalmos (incomplete closure of the eyelids) and blepharoptosis (incomplete opening of the eyelids). Both of these conditions occur because of a disruption in the normal agonist-antagonist neuro-muscular complex balance. Generally paralysis of the eyelid or facial muscles is responsible for the abnormality (the eyelids can close but not open, or open but not close). An external device, if able to generate an appropriately balanced force, could restore eyelid movement by performing the paralyzed function; for example, a ptotic (droopy) eyelid could be opened, and the functioning eyelid closure muscle could overcome the device's force. In prior work the investigators established proof-of-concept data demonstrating safety and efficacy for temporary management of ptosis up to 2 hour per day for 2 weeks. Preliminary data suggest similar safety for lagophthalmos. This study will expand on this preliminary work to examine longer wear times, home use, and feasibility for a wider range of eye lid disorders.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Blepharoptosis, Lagophthalmos, Facial Paralysis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
11 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Magnetic lid system
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All participants will trial a commercially available device and an experimental magnetic device.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Magnetic lid system
Other Intervention Name(s)
Magnetic Levator and Magnetic Orbicularis
Intervention Description
Small externally mounted magnetic lid arrays are attached to the eye lid (s). Glasses with a second magnet system may be combined with the arrays depending on the lid condition. The device intends to facilitate eye opening and closing.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rating Scale of Skin Integrity
Description
Ratings at the beginning and end of treatment will be analyzed by calculating the mean and standard deviation of the skin erythema rating across all available time points. The outcome measure is the FDA scale, Assessing the Irritation and Sensitization Potential of Transdermal and Topical Delivery Systems for ANDAs Guidance for Industry. Range is 0 to 7 with higher numbers being worse skin erythema.
Time Frame
Baseline and up to 32 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Count of Participants With Adverse Corneal Events Based on National Eye Institute Rating Scale
Description
Using the National Eye Institute Rating Scale (0 to 3 points with higher being more staining), cases where staining increased more than 2 points or if there was any ulceration, an adverse event was tabulated and summed for each participant over 1 up to 32 weeks of use, depending on how long the participant was followed.
Time Frame
Baseline and up to 32 weeks
Title
Change in Visual Acuity
Description
Visual acuity at 20ft before treatment and after 1 week or more. Difference between weekly acuity measures to baseline was calculated and averaged for each subject, and then a group mean and standard deviation calculated.
Time Frame
Baseline and up to 32 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
5 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Presence of an eyelid movement disorder for at least one eye, moderate cognitive function or better defined as greater than or equal to 18 out of 30 on a pre-screening of the Mini-Mental State Exam, age 5 or older. Exclusion Criteria: Absence of an eyelid movement disorder or presence of a corneal ulcer. Those with a corneal ulcer are at risk for permanent loss of vision and should be managed with proven methods. Age less than 5, Severe Cognitive impairment defined as Mini-mental score <18, behaviors consistent with delirium (combinations of disorientation, hallucinations, delusions, and incoherent speech), or lethargy. These individuals must be excluded since participation requires competent self-care, reliable responses and cooperation during fitting of the devices.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kevin E Houston, OD
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusetts Eye and Ear
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ophthalmology of Clinical Research Office, Mass Eye and Ear
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
021141
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
Citation
Singh NK, Paschalis EI, Tomasi M, Rizzo JF, Houston KE. The boston blink-netic project: preliminary outpatient feasibility results (abstract). Optom Vis Sci 2016;93: E-abstract 16118.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Magnetic Correction of Eye Lid Paralysis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs