search
Back to results

Multinational Clinical Study Comparing Isatuximab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone to Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients (ICARIA-MM)

Primary Purpose

Plasma Cell Myeloma

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Isatuximab
Pomalidomide
Dexamethasone
Sponsored by
Sanofi
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Plasma Cell Myeloma focused on measuring Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria :

  • Age superior or equal to 18 years or country's legal age of majority if the legal age was superior to 18 years old.
  • Participants had a documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma with evidence of measurable disease i.e. serum M protein superior or equal to 0.5 grams per decilitre (g/dL) measured using serum protein immunoelectrophoresis and or urine M protein superior or equal to 200 mg per 24 hours measured using urine protein immunoelectrophoresis.
  • Participants had received at least 2 prior lines of anti-myeloma therapy, which must include at least 2 consecutive cycles of lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib) given alone or in combination.
  • Participants had failed treatment with lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib, or ixazomib) alone or in combination (Intolerant, progression within 6 months after reaching Partial Response or better).
  • Participants had progressed on or within 60 days after end of previous therapy before to study entry, i.e., refractory to the last line of treatment.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Primary refractory multiple myeloma defined as participants who had never achieved at least a minimal response (MR) with any treatment during the disease course.
  • Free Light Chain measurable disease only.
  • Prior therapy with pomalidomide.
  • Any anti-myeloma drug treatment within 14 days before randomization, including dexamethasone.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status superior to 2.
  • Platelets inferior to 75 000 cells per microliter (mcL) if inferior to 50% of bone marrow (BM) nucleated cells are plasma cells, and inferior to 30 000 cells per mcL if superior or equal to 50% of BM nucleated cells are plasma cells. Platelet transfusion was not allowed within three days before the screening visit.
  • Absolute neutrophil count inferior to 1000 per mcL (1 x 10^9/L).
  • Creatinine clearance inferior to 30 mL per minute (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] Formula).
  • Total bilirubin superior to 2 x ULN (Upper Limit of Normal).
  • Corrected serum calcium superior to 14 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (superior to 3.5 millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) superior to 3 x ULN.
  • Hypersensitivity to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) (thalidomide or lenalidomide) defined as any hypersensitivity reaction leading to stop IMiDs within the 2 first cycles or toxicity, which does meet intolerance definition.
  • Hypersensitivity to dexamethasone, sucrose histidine (as base and hydrochloride salt), and polysorbate 80 or any of the components of study therapy that are not amenable to premedication with steroids, or H2 blockers that would prohibit further treatment with these agents.
  • Significant cardiac dysfunction; myocardial infarction within 12 months; unstable, poorly controlled angina pectoris.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman or female who intends to become pregnant during the participation in the study.
  • Male participants who disagreed to practice true abstinence or disagreed to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and at least 3 or 5 months following study treatment discontinuation, even if he had undergone a successful vasectomy.
  • All participants who disagreed to refrain from donating blood while on study treatment and for 4 weeks after discontinuation from this study treatment.

The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Sites / Locations

  • Investigational Site Number :8400002
  • Investigational Site Number :8400006
  • Investigational Site Number :0360004
  • Investigational Site Number :0360001
  • Investigational Site Number :0360005
  • Investigational Site Number :0360002
  • Investigational Site Number :0360006
  • Investigational Site Number :0560003
  • Investigational Site Number :0560002
  • Investigational Site Number :0560004
  • Investigational Site Number :0560001
  • Investigational Site Number :1240001
  • Investigational Site Number :1240004
  • Investigational Site Number :1240005
  • Investigational Site Number :2030005
  • Investigational Site Number :2030004
  • Investigational Site Number :2030001
  • Investigational Site Number :2030002
  • Investigational Site Number :2030003
  • Investigational Site Number :2080002
  • Investigational Site Number :2500021
  • Investigational Site Number :2500008
  • Investigational Site Number :2500009
  • Investigational Site Number :2500017
  • Investigational Site Number :2500013
  • Investigational Site Number :2500003
  • Investigational Site Number :2500023
  • Investigational Site Number :2500019
  • Investigational Site Number :2500002
  • Investigational Site Number :2500015
  • Investigational Site Number :2500016
  • Investigational Site Number :2500005
  • Investigational Site Number :2500004
  • Investigational Site Number :2500007
  • Investigational Site Number :2500025
  • Investigational Site Number :2500014
  • Investigational Site Number :2500001
  • Investigational Site Number :2500012
  • Investigational Site Number :2500018
  • Investigational Site Number :2760001
  • Investigational Site Number :3000002
  • Investigational Site Number :3000005
  • Investigational Site Number :3000001
  • Investigational Site Number :3000004
  • Investigational Site Number :3000003
  • Investigational Site Number :3480001
  • Investigational Site Number :3480003
  • Investigational Site Number :3480002
  • Investigational Site Number :3800001
  • Investigational Site Number :3800010
  • Investigational Site Number :3800009
  • Investigational Site Number :3800008
  • Investigational Site Number :3800007
  • Investigational Site Number :3800002
  • Investigational Site Number :3800006
  • Investigational Site Number :3800004
  • Investigational Site Number :3800003
  • Investigational Site Number :3920001
  • Investigational Site Number :3920005
  • Investigational Site Number :3920004
  • Investigational Site Number :3920006
  • Investigational Site Number :3920008
  • Investigational Site Number :3920003
  • Investigational Site Number :3920007
  • Investigational Site Number :3920002
  • Investigational Site Number :4100007
  • Investigational Site Number :4100001
  • Investigational Site Number :4100002
  • Investigational Site Number :4100006
  • Investigational Site Number :4100005
  • Investigational Site Number :5540001
  • Investigational Site Number :5540004
  • Investigational Site Number :5540003
  • Investigational Site Number :5540002
  • Investigational Site Number :5780001
  • Investigational Site Number :6160003
  • Investigational Site Number :6160005
  • Investigational Site Number :6160001
  • Investigational Site Number :6160002
  • Investigational Site Number :6200004
  • Investigational Site Number :6200002
  • Investigational Site Number :6200001
  • Investigational Site Number :6430004
  • Investigational Site Number :6430001
  • Investigational Site Number :6430002
  • Investigational Site Number :7030001
  • Investigational Site Number :7240005
  • Investigational Site Number :7240001
  • Investigational Site Number :7240006
  • Investigational Site Number :7240002
  • Investigational Site Number :7240003
  • Investigational Site Number :7240004
  • Investigational Site Number :7520004
  • Investigational Site Number :7520005
  • Investigational Site Number :1580004
  • Investigational Site Number :1580002
  • Investigational Site Number :1580001
  • Investigational Site Number :1580003
  • Investigational Site Number :7920001
  • Investigational Site Number :7920002
  • Investigational Site Number :7920005
  • Investigational Site Number :7920006
  • Investigational Site Number :7920003
  • Investigational Site Number :7920004
  • Investigational Site Number :7920008
  • Investigational Site Number :7920010
  • Investigational Site Number :7920009
  • Investigational Site Number :7920007
  • Investigational Site Number :8260002
  • Investigational Site Number :8260003
  • Investigational Site Number :8260001

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Pd (pomalidomide + dexamethasone)

IPd (isatuximab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone)

Arm Description

Participants received pomalidomide 4 milligrams (mg) Per os (PO) on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle plus dexamethasone 40 mg (participants greater than or equal to (>=) 75 years of age received 20 mg dexamethasone) PO on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or participant's wish to discontinue study treatment, or any other reason, whichever comes first (maximum exposure: 241.6 weeks).

Participants received isatuximab 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 at Cycle 1, and then on Days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles plus pomalidomide 4 mg PO on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle and dexamethasone 40 mg (participants >= 75 years of age received 20 mg dexamethasone), PO or IV on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or participant's wish to discontinue study treatment, or any other reason, whichever comes first (maximum exposure: 245.6 weeks).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS:time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) determined by Independent Response Committee (IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. If progression or death was not observed, participant was censored at date of last progression-free tumor assessment prior to study cut-off date. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. PD as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria was defined as increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be >=0.5gram(g)/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1g/dL if lowest M component was >=5g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s),>=50% increase from nadir in sum of the products of the maximal perpendicular diameters of measured lesions (SPD) of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 centimeter in short axis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Disease Response as Per Independent Response Committee (IRC)
ORR (IMWG criteria): percentage of participants with stringent complete response(sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed by IRC. sCR:negative immunofixation on serum and urine,disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates plus normal free light chain(FLC)ratio(0.26-1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy.CR:negative immunofixation on serum and urine,disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates.VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation, not on electrophoresis/,>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h/,>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h,if present at baseline,>=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response Committee
BOR:best sequential response from start of treatment until disease progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment/data cut-off, whichever comes first. Ordering of evaluations from best to worse was: sCR,CR,VGPR,PR, minimal response (MR), stable disease (SD), PD, and not evaluable.CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. sCR:CR as defined previously plus normal FLC ratio (0.26 to 1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation,>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h,>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h. MR:>=25% but <=49% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%. SD: Not meeting criteria for CR,VGPR,PR,MR/PD.
Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better as Per Independent Response Committee
VGPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a VGPR or better as BOR. VGPR was defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 h or >=90% decrease in the sum of maximal perpendicular diameter compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit as Per Independent Response Committee
CBR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a MR or better as BOR. MR was defined as >= 25% but <= 49% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%, which still exceed 200 mg/24h; if present at baseline, >=50% reduction in size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first.
Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date participant was known to be alive or at the cut-off date, whichever comes first. This pre-specified final analysis was performed when the 220 OS events were met.
Time to Progression (TTP) as Per Independent Response Committee
TTP was defined as time from randomization to the date of first documentation of PD, as determined by the IRC. As per IMWG criteria, PD was defined for participants with increase of >= 25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be >= 0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1 g/dL if the lowest M component was >=5 g/dL; urine M-component (the absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 centimeter in short axis.
Progression Free Survival in High Risk Cytogenetic Population
PFS in high risk cytogenetic population was defined as PFS in subgroup of participants carrying high risk cytogenetic changes including del(17p), translocation (t)(4;14) or translocation t(14;16) assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD (determined by IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. PD defined as per IMWG criteria as: increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1 g/dL if lowest M component was >=5 g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of previous lesion >1 centimeter (cm) in short axis.
Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Independent Response Committee
DOR:time from date of first IRC determined response(PR or better) to date of first IRC-PD or death, whichever occurred first.DOR was determined only for participants who had achieved a response of PR or better based on disease assessment by IRC.If progression or death was not observed,participant was censored at date of participants last progression-free tumor assessment prior to initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment(if any)and study cut-off date. PD(IMWG criteria):increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1g/dL if lowest M component was >=5g/dL;urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200mg/24 hour),appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion,or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 cm in short axis. PR:>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h.
Time to First Response (TT1R) as Per Independent Response Committee
TT1R was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first IRC determined response (PR or better) that is subsequently confirmed. PR was defined as >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required.
Time to Best Response (TTBR) as Per Independent Response Committee
TTBR was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first occurrence of IRC determined BOR (PR or better) that was subsequently confirmed. PR was defined as >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first.
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
MRD was assessed by next-generation sequencing in bone marrow samples from participants who achieved CR, to determine the depth of response at the molecular level. IMWG criteria for CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. MRD was classified as positive or negative at the minimum sensitivity of 1 in 10^5 nucleated cells. MRD negativity was defined as the absence of the dominant clonotype sequence(s) identified in the bone marrow aspirate collected at screening. MRD positivity was defined as the presence of the dominant clonotype sequence(s) identified in the bone marrow aspirate collected at screening.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened (according to the Investigator opinion), or became serious during the treatment period (time from the first dose of study treatments up to 30 days after last dose of study treatments). An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI)
CEOI was defined as the plasma concentration at end of infusion.
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Concentration at the End of Infusion (CEOI)
Accumulation Ratio was defined as the ratio of CEOI of Cycle 2 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 1, where CEOI was the plasma concentration at the end of infusion.
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at 1 Hour After End of Infusion (CEOI+1 Hour)
CEOI+1 hour was defined as the plasma concentration of isatuximab at 1 hour after end of infusion.
PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at Ctrough
Trough Concentration (Ctrough) is the concentration prior to study drug administration.
PK Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Trough Concentration (Ctrough)
Accumulation Ratio was defined as the ratio of Ctrough of Cycle 2 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 4 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 8, where Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
ADA were categorized as: pre-existing, treatment induced and treatment boosted response. Pre-existing ADA was defined as ADA that were present in samples drawn during the pretreatment period (i.e., before the first isatuximab administration). Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without preexisting ADA, including participants without pretreatment samples. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADA that increased at least 2 titer steps between pre-treatment and post-treatment.
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score
EORTC-Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. EORTC QLQ-C30 included GHS/ QOL, functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and 6 single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Most questions from QLQ-C30 were a 4-point scale (1/Not at All to 4/Very Much), except Items 29-30, which comprise GHS scale and were a 7-point scale (1/Very Poor to 7/Excellent). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best quality of life for participant.
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain Score
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Disease symptoms domain is one of the four domain scores. Disease symptoms domain score used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0 -100 scale, where higher scores = more symptoms and lower health-related quality of life (HRQL) and lower score = less symptoms and more HRQL
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain Score
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Side effects of treatment domain is one of the four domain scores. Side effects of treatment domain score used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale, where higher scores = more side effects and lower HRQL and lower scores = less side effects and better HRQL.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index Value
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status that provides a general assessment of health and wellbeing. The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has a 5-level response: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Response options are measured with a 5-point Likert scale (for the 5L version). The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state and lower score indicate worse health state.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.

Full Information

First Posted
December 4, 2016
Last Updated
July 31, 2023
Sponsor
Sanofi
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02990338
Brief Title
Multinational Clinical Study Comparing Isatuximab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone to Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients
Acronym
ICARIA-MM
Official Title
A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Comparing Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Combination With Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
December 22, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 22, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 27, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sanofi

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Primary Objective: To demonstrate the benefit of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in the prolongation of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as compared to pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in participants with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the Overall Response Rate (ORR) as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria in each arm. To compare the Overall Survival (OS) between the two arms. To evaluate the Time To Progression (TTP) in each arm. To evaluate the PFS in high risk cytogenetic population in each arm. To evaluate the Duration of Response (DOR) in each arm. To evaluate the safety in both treatment arms. To determine the Pharmacokinetic profile of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide. To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab. To assess disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life (HRQL), disease and treatment-related symptoms, health state utility, and health status.
Detailed Description
The duration of the study for the participants included a period for screening of up to 21 days (or up to 28 days for women who can become pregnant). Participants continued study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable adverse reaction, participants' wish or other reason of discontinuation. During follow-up, participants who discontinued the study treatment due to progression of the disease were followed every 3 months (12 weeks) for survival (or until cut-off date), and participants who discontinued the study treatment prior to documentation of disease progression were followed-up every 4 weeks until disease progression, and then every 3 months (12 weeks) for survival (or until cut-off date).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Plasma Cell Myeloma
Keywords
Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
307 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Pd (pomalidomide + dexamethasone)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received pomalidomide 4 milligrams (mg) Per os (PO) on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle plus dexamethasone 40 mg (participants greater than or equal to (>=) 75 years of age received 20 mg dexamethasone) PO on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or participant's wish to discontinue study treatment, or any other reason, whichever comes first (maximum exposure: 241.6 weeks).
Arm Title
IPd (isatuximab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received isatuximab 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 at Cycle 1, and then on Days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles plus pomalidomide 4 mg PO on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle and dexamethasone 40 mg (participants >= 75 years of age received 20 mg dexamethasone), PO or IV on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or participant's wish to discontinue study treatment, or any other reason, whichever comes first (maximum exposure: 245.6 weeks).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Isatuximab
Other Intervention Name(s)
SAR650984, Sarclisa
Intervention Description
Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pomalidomide
Other Intervention Name(s)
POMALYST IMNOVID
Intervention Description
Pharmaceutical form: capsule Route of administration: oral
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dexamethasone
Intervention Description
Pharmaceutical form: tablets or solution for infusion Route of administration: oral or intravenous
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Description
PFS:time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) determined by Independent Response Committee (IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. If progression or death was not observed, participant was censored at date of last progression-free tumor assessment prior to study cut-off date. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. PD as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria was defined as increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be >=0.5gram(g)/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1g/dL if lowest M component was >=5g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s),>=50% increase from nadir in sum of the products of the maximal perpendicular diameters of measured lesions (SPD) of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 centimeter in short axis.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: 76.7 weeks)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Disease Response as Per Independent Response Committee (IRC)
Description
ORR (IMWG criteria): percentage of participants with stringent complete response(sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed by IRC. sCR:negative immunofixation on serum and urine,disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates plus normal free light chain(FLC)ratio(0.26-1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy.CR:negative immunofixation on serum and urine,disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates.VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation, not on electrophoresis/,>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h/,>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h,if present at baseline,>=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response Committee
Description
BOR:best sequential response from start of treatment until disease progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment/data cut-off, whichever comes first. Ordering of evaluations from best to worse was: sCR,CR,VGPR,PR, minimal response (MR), stable disease (SD), PD, and not evaluable.CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. sCR:CR as defined previously plus normal FLC ratio (0.26 to 1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation,>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h,>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h. MR:>=25% but <=49% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%. SD: Not meeting criteria for CR,VGPR,PR,MR/PD.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better as Per Independent Response Committee
Description
VGPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a VGPR or better as BOR. VGPR was defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 h or >=90% decrease in the sum of maximal perpendicular diameter compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Title
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit as Per Independent Response Committee
Description
CBR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a MR or better as BOR. MR was defined as >= 25% but <= 49% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%, which still exceed 200 mg/24h; if present at baseline, >=50% reduction in size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Title
Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis
Description
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date participant was known to be alive or at the cut-off date, whichever comes first. This pre-specified final analysis was performed when the 220 OS events were met.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to date of death from any cause or data cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration 245.6 weeks)
Title
Time to Progression (TTP) as Per Independent Response Committee
Description
TTP was defined as time from randomization to the date of first documentation of PD, as determined by the IRC. As per IMWG criteria, PD was defined for participants with increase of >= 25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be >= 0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1 g/dL if the lowest M component was >=5 g/dL; urine M-component (the absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 centimeter in short axis.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Title
Progression Free Survival in High Risk Cytogenetic Population
Description
PFS in high risk cytogenetic population was defined as PFS in subgroup of participants carrying high risk cytogenetic changes including del(17p), translocation (t)(4;14) or translocation t(14;16) assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD (determined by IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. PD defined as per IMWG criteria as: increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1 g/dL if lowest M component was >=5 g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of previous lesion >1 centimeter (cm) in short axis.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Title
Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Independent Response Committee
Description
DOR:time from date of first IRC determined response(PR or better) to date of first IRC-PD or death, whichever occurred first.DOR was determined only for participants who had achieved a response of PR or better based on disease assessment by IRC.If progression or death was not observed,participant was censored at date of participants last progression-free tumor assessment prior to initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment(if any)and study cut-off date. PD(IMWG criteria):increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1g/dL if lowest M component was >=5g/dL;urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200mg/24 hour),appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion,or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 cm in short axis. PR:>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h.
Time Frame
From the date of the first IRC determined response to the date of first IRC progression or death, whichever occurred first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Title
Time to First Response (TT1R) as Per Independent Response Committee
Description
TT1R was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first IRC determined response (PR or better) that is subsequently confirmed. PR was defined as >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first IRC determined response, or death or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Title
Time to Best Response (TTBR) as Per Independent Response Committee
Description
TTBR was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first occurrence of IRC determined BOR (PR or better) that was subsequently confirmed. PR was defined as >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to date of first occurrence of IRC determined best overall response or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Title
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
Description
MRD was assessed by next-generation sequencing in bone marrow samples from participants who achieved CR, to determine the depth of response at the molecular level. IMWG criteria for CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. MRD was classified as positive or negative at the minimum sensitivity of 1 in 10^5 nucleated cells. MRD negativity was defined as the absence of the dominant clonotype sequence(s) identified in the bone marrow aspirate collected at screening. MRD positivity was defined as the presence of the dominant clonotype sequence(s) identified in the bone marrow aspirate collected at screening.
Time Frame
Up to 76.7 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened (according to the Investigator opinion), or became serious during the treatment period (time from the first dose of study treatments up to 30 days after last dose of study treatments). An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event.
Time Frame
From randomization up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum duration up to 241.6 weeks for Pd arm and 245.6 weeks for IPd arm)
Title
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI)
Description
CEOI was defined as the plasma concentration at end of infusion.
Time Frame
End of infusion on Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 and Cycle1 Day 15; Cycle 2 Day 1; and Cycle 4 Day 1
Title
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Concentration at the End of Infusion (CEOI)
Description
Accumulation Ratio was defined as the ratio of CEOI of Cycle 2 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 1, where CEOI was the plasma concentration at the end of infusion.
Time Frame
End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 4 Day 1
Title
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at 1 Hour After End of Infusion (CEOI+1 Hour)
Description
CEOI+1 hour was defined as the plasma concentration of isatuximab at 1 hour after end of infusion.
Time Frame
Cycle 1:1 hour after End of Infusion on Day 1; Cycle 4:1 hour after End of Infusion on Day 1
Title
PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at Ctrough
Description
Trough Concentration (Ctrough) is the concentration prior to study drug administration.
Time Frame
Pre-infusion on C1D1, C1D8, C1D15, C1D22, C2D1, C2D15, C3D1, C3D15, C4D1, C4D15, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1; End of treatment (EOT [30 days after last drug administration])
Title
PK Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Trough Concentration (Ctrough)
Description
Accumulation Ratio was defined as the ratio of Ctrough of Cycle 2 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 4 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 8, where Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.
Time Frame
Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 4 Day 1
Title
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
Description
ADA were categorized as: pre-existing, treatment induced and treatment boosted response. Pre-existing ADA was defined as ADA that were present in samples drawn during the pretreatment period (i.e., before the first isatuximab administration). Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without preexisting ADA, including participants without pretreatment samples. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADA that increased at least 2 titer steps between pre-treatment and post-treatment.
Time Frame
From randomization up to 60 days after last dose of study drug (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score
Description
EORTC-Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. EORTC QLQ-C30 included GHS/ QOL, functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and 6 single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Most questions from QLQ-C30 were a 4-point scale (1/Not at All to 4/Very Much), except Items 29-30, which comprise GHS scale and were a 7-point scale (1/Very Poor to 7/Excellent). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best quality of life for participant.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Title
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain Score
Description
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Disease symptoms domain is one of the four domain scores. Disease symptoms domain score used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0 -100 scale, where higher scores = more symptoms and lower health-related quality of life (HRQL) and lower score = less symptoms and more HRQL
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Title
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain Score
Description
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Side effects of treatment domain is one of the four domain scores. Side effects of treatment domain score used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale, where higher scores = more side effects and lower HRQL and lower scores = less side effects and better HRQL.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Title
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index Value
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status that provides a general assessment of health and wellbeing. The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has a 5-level response: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Response options are measured with a 5-point Likert scale (for the 5L version). The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state and lower score indicate worse health state.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Title
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)
Description
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria : Age superior or equal to 18 years or country's legal age of majority if the legal age was superior to 18 years old. Participants had a documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma with evidence of measurable disease i.e. serum M protein superior or equal to 0.5 grams per decilitre (g/dL) measured using serum protein immunoelectrophoresis and or urine M protein superior or equal to 200 mg per 24 hours measured using urine protein immunoelectrophoresis. Participants had received at least 2 prior lines of anti-myeloma therapy, which must include at least 2 consecutive cycles of lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib) given alone or in combination. Participants had failed treatment with lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib, or ixazomib) alone or in combination (Intolerant, progression within 6 months after reaching Partial Response or better). Participants had progressed on or within 60 days after end of previous therapy before to study entry, i.e., refractory to the last line of treatment. Exclusion criteria: Primary refractory multiple myeloma defined as participants who had never achieved at least a minimal response (MR) with any treatment during the disease course. Free Light Chain measurable disease only. Prior therapy with pomalidomide. Any anti-myeloma drug treatment within 14 days before randomization, including dexamethasone. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status superior to 2. Platelets inferior to 75 000 cells per microliter (mcL) if inferior to 50% of bone marrow (BM) nucleated cells are plasma cells, and inferior to 30 000 cells per mcL if superior or equal to 50% of BM nucleated cells are plasma cells. Platelet transfusion was not allowed within three days before the screening visit. Absolute neutrophil count inferior to 1000 per mcL (1*10^9/L). Creatinine clearance inferior to 30 mL per minute (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] Formula). Total bilirubin superior to 2*ULN (Upper Limit of Normal). Corrected serum calcium superior to 14 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (superior to 3.5 millimoles per liter (mmol/L). Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) superior to 3*ULN. Hypersensitivity to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) (thalidomide or lenalidomide) defined as any hypersensitivity reaction leading to stop IMiDs within the 2 first cycles or toxicity, which does meet intolerance definition. Hypersensitivity to dexamethasone, sucrose histidine (as base and hydrochloride salt), and polysorbate 80 or any of the components of study therapy that are not amenable to premedication with steroids, or H2 blockers that would prohibit further treatment with these agents. Significant cardiac dysfunction; myocardial infarction within 12 months; unstable, poorly controlled angina pectoris. Pregnant or breastfeeding woman or female who intends to become pregnant during the participation in the study. Male participants who disagreed to practice true abstinence or disagreed to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and at least 3 or 5 months following study treatment discontinuation, even if he had undergone a successful vasectomy. All participants who disagreed to refrain from donating blood while on study treatment and for 4 weeks after discontinuation from this study treatment. The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Sciences & Operations
Organizational Affiliation
Sanofi
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :8400002
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33324
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :8400006
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :0360004
City
St Leonards
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2065
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :0360001
City
Waratah
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2298
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :0360005
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :0360002
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3004
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :0360006
City
Richmond
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3121
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :0560003
City
Antwerpen
ZIP/Postal Code
2060
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :0560002
City
Brussel
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :0560004
City
Gent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :0560001
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :1240001
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H1T 2M4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :1240004
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H4A 3J1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :1240005
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1H 5N4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2030005
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
62500
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2030004
City
Hradec Kralove
ZIP/Postal Code
50005
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2030001
City
Olomouc
ZIP/Postal Code
77900
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2030002
City
Ostrava - Poruba
ZIP/Postal Code
70852
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2030003
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
12808
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2080002
City
Ã…lborg
ZIP/Postal Code
9100
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500021
City
Bayonne
ZIP/Postal Code
64100
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500008
City
Caen
ZIP/Postal Code
14033
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500009
City
Dijon
ZIP/Postal Code
21000
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500017
City
Grenoble
ZIP/Postal Code
38043
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500013
City
La Roche Sur Yon
ZIP/Postal Code
85925
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500003
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500023
City
Limoges
ZIP/Postal Code
87042
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500019
City
Montpellier Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
34295
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500002
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
44093
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500015
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75005
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500016
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75743
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500005
City
Pessac
ZIP/Postal Code
33600
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500004
City
Pierre Benite
ZIP/Postal Code
69495
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500007
City
POITIERS Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
86021
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500025
City
Reims
ZIP/Postal Code
51092
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500014
City
Rennes
ZIP/Postal Code
35033
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500001
City
TOULOUSE Cedex 9
ZIP/Postal Code
31059
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500012
City
Tours
ZIP/Postal Code
37044
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2500018
City
Vandoeuvre-les-nancy
ZIP/Postal Code
54511
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :2760001
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04103
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3000002
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
106 76
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3000005
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
11527
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3000001
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
11528
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3000004
City
Patra
ZIP/Postal Code
26504
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3000003
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
57010
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3480001
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1083
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3480003
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1097
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3480002
City
Debrecen
ZIP/Postal Code
4032
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3800001
City
Bologna
ZIP/Postal Code
40138
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3800010
City
Catania
ZIP/Postal Code
95123
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3800009
City
Firenze
ZIP/Postal Code
50134
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3800008
City
Genova
ZIP/Postal Code
16132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3800007
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3800002
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3800006
City
Padova
ZIP/Postal Code
35128
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3800004
City
Terni
ZIP/Postal Code
05100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3800003
City
Torino
ZIP/Postal Code
10126
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3920001
City
Nagoya-shi
State/Province
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
467-8602
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3920005
City
Shibukawa-shi
State/Province
Gunma
ZIP/Postal Code
377-0280
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3920004
City
Sapporo-shi
State/Province
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
060-8543
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3920006
City
Kyoto-shi
State/Province
Kyoto
ZIP/Postal Code
603-8151
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3920008
City
Suwa-shi
State/Province
Nagano
ZIP/Postal Code
392-8510
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3920003
City
Okayama-shi
State/Province
Okayama
ZIP/Postal Code
701-1192
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3920007
City
Sunto-gun
State/Province
Shizuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
411-8777
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :3920002
City
Shibuya-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
150-8935
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :4100007
City
Hwasun-gun
State/Province
Jeollanam-do
ZIP/Postal Code
58128
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :4100001
City
Seoul
State/Province
Seoul-teukbyeolsi
ZIP/Postal Code
03080
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :4100002
City
Seoul
State/Province
Seoul-teukbyeolsi
ZIP/Postal Code
06351
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :4100006
City
Incheon
ZIP/Postal Code
21565
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :4100005
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
06591
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :5540001
City
Takapuna
State/Province
Auckland
ZIP/Postal Code
1309
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :5540004
City
Dunedin
State/Province
Otago
ZIP/Postal Code
9016
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :5540003
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Waikato
ZIP/Postal Code
3204
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :5540002
City
Auckland
ZIP/Postal Code
2025
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :5780001
City
Oslo
ZIP/Postal Code
0450
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :6160003
City
Lublin
State/Province
Lubuskie
ZIP/Postal Code
20-081
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :6160005
City
Krakow
State/Province
Malopolskie
ZIP/Postal Code
31-501
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :6160001
City
Warszawa
State/Province
Mazowieckie
ZIP/Postal Code
02-776
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :6160002
City
Chorzow
State/Province
Slaskie
ZIP/Postal Code
41-500
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :6200004
City
Coimbra
ZIP/Postal Code
3000-075
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :6200002
City
Lisboa
ZIP/Postal Code
1070
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :6200001
City
Porto
ZIP/Postal Code
4200
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :6430004
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125167
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :6430001
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125284
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :6430002
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
129301
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7030001
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
83310
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7240005
City
Santiago de Compostela
State/Province
A Coruña [La Coruña]
ZIP/Postal Code
15706
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7240001
City
Barcelona
State/Province
Barcelona [Barcelona]
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7240006
City
Santander
State/Province
Cantabria
ZIP/Postal Code
39008
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7240002
City
Pamplona
State/Province
Navarra
ZIP/Postal Code
31008
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7240003
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7240004
City
Salamanca
ZIP/Postal Code
37007
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7520004
City
Luleå
ZIP/Postal Code
97180
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7520005
City
Uddevalla
ZIP/Postal Code
451 80
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :1580004
City
Kaohsiung
ZIP/Postal Code
833
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :1580002
City
Taichung
ZIP/Postal Code
40447
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :1580001
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
100
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :1580003
City
Taoyuan
ZIP/Postal Code
333
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7920001
City
Ankara
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7920002
City
Antalya
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7920005
City
Istanbul
ZIP/Postal Code
34010
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7920006
City
Istanbul
ZIP/Postal Code
34381
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7920003
City
Istanbul
ZIP/Postal Code
34390
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7920004
City
Istanbul
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7920008
City
Izmir
ZIP/Postal Code
35040
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7920010
City
Izmir
ZIP/Postal Code
35340
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7920009
City
Kayseri
ZIP/Postal Code
38039
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :7920007
City
Kocaeli
ZIP/Postal Code
41400
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :8260002
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
EC1A 7BE
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :8260003
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE1 9RT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number :8260001
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
WC1E6AG
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31735560
Citation
Attal M, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV, San-Miguel J, Beksac M, Spicka I, Leleu X, Schjesvold F, Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Huang JS, Minarik J, Cavo M, Prince HM, Mace S, Corzo KP, Campana F, Le-Guennec S, Dubin F, Anderson KC; ICARIA-MM study group. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019 Dec 7;394(10214):2096-2107. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32556-5. Epub 2019 Nov 14. Erratum In: Lancet. 2019 Dec 7;394(10214):2072.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35151415
Citation
Richardson PG, Perrot A, San-Miguel J, Beksac M, Spicka I, Leleu X, Schjesvold F, Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Huang JS, Minarik J, Cavo M, Prince HM, Malinge L, Dubin F, van de Velde H, Anderson KC. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): follow-up analysis of a randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Mar;23(3):416-427. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00019-5. Epub 2022 Feb 10. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):e161. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Sep;23(9):e404.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35641409
Citation
Sunami K, Ikeda T, Huang SY, Wang MC, Koh Y, Min CK, Yeh SP, Matsumoto M, Uchiyama M, Iyama S, Shimazaki C, Lee JH, Kim K, Kaneko H, Kim JS, Lin TL, Campana F, Tada K, Iida S, Suzuki K; ICARIA-MM study group. Isatuximab-Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone in East Asian Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: ICARIA-MM Subgroup Analysis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Aug;22(8):e751-e761. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34800109
Citation
Wilmoth J, Colson K, Dubin F, Kellam C. Isatuximab: Nursing Considerations for Use in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Dec 1;25(6):706-712. doi: 10.1188/21.CJON.706-712.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33839618
Citation
Bringhen S, Pour L, Vorobyev V, Vural F, Warzocha K, Benboubker L, Koh Y, Maisnar V, Karlin L, Pavic M, Campana F, Le Guennec S, Menas F, van de Velde H, Richardson PG. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma according to prior lines of treatment and refractory status: ICARIA-MM subgroup analysis. Leuk Res. 2021 May;104:106576. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106576. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32586908
Citation
Schjesvold FH, Richardson PG, Facon T, Alegre A, Spencer A, Jurczyszyn A, Sunami K, Frenzel L, Min CK, Guillonneau S, Lin PL, Le-Guennec S, Campana F, van de Velde H, Bensfia S, Bringhen S. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: ICARIA-MM subgroup analysis. Haematologica. 2021 Apr 1;106(4):1182-1187. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.253450. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Multinational Clinical Study Comparing Isatuximab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone to Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs