EUS - Guided Choledocho-duodenostomy Versus ERCP With Covered Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Strictures (DRAMBO)
Primary Purpose
Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
EUS-guided choledocho-duodenostomy
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with covered metallic stent
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Malignant Biliary Obstruction focused on measuring Malignant biliary obstruction, EUS - guided choledocho-duodenostomy, ERCP with covered metallic stents
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years old with informed consent
- Histologically (preferred) or radiologically confirmed distal malignant bile duct tumors
- Inoperability by staging, comorbidities or patient wishes
- Distal tumors 2cm away from the portal hilum
- Bilirubin > 50umol/L at diagnosis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Multiple hepatic metastases with significant blockage of one or more liver segments (if no segment blockage, metastasis is not an exclusion criteria)
- Presence of main portal vein thrombosis
- Prior SEMS placement
- Intraductal papillary mucinous carcinomas
- Prior Billroth II or roux-en Y reconstruction
- History of bleeding disorder or use of anticoagulation
- Child's B/C cirrhosis
- Pregnancy
- Performance status ECOG ≥3 (confined to bed / chair > 50% waking hours)
- Presence of other malignancy
- Life expectancy < 3months
Sites / Locations
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
- The University of Leuven
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Aarhus University Hospital
- Tokyo Medical University Hospital
- Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
ECDS
ERCP with CSEMS
Arm Description
EUS-guided choledocho-duodenostomy
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with covered metallic stent
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
stent patency rate
Stent dysfunction is defined as radiology or endoscopy confirmed stent obstruction.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Technical success
Technical success is defined as the ability to access and drain the CBD by placement of a stent.
Clinical success
Clinical success is defined as >30% drop in bilirubin levels
Adverse events
Adverse events related to the endoscopic procedures would be graded according to the lexicon of endoscopic adverse events
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03000855
First Posted
December 20, 2016
Last Updated
August 30, 2023
Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Collaborators
Tokyo Medical University, Kinki University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03000855
Brief Title
EUS - Guided Choledocho-duodenostomy Versus ERCP With Covered Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Strictures
Acronym
DRAMBO
Official Title
EUS - Guided Choledocho-duodenostomy Versus ERCP With Covered Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Strictures. A Multi-centred Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Collaborators
Tokyo Medical University, Kinki University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
EUS - guided choledocho-duodenostomy (ECDS) is an established option for bile duct drainage in unresectable malignant distal CBD strictures when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails. However, how primary ECDS compares with ERCP with covered self-expanding metallic stents (CSEMS) in unresectable malignant distal CBD strictures is uncertain.
The aim of the current study is to compare primary ECDS versus ERCP with CSEMS in unresectable malignant distal CBD strictures. We hypothesis that ECDS is associated with a higher 1-year stent patency rate.
Detailed Description
Malignant biliary obstruction is a common sequela of pancreatic cancers or distal bile duct cancers, and its development can hinder the use of chemotherapy, decrease patient quality of life and decrease survival. Malignant biliary obstruction is traditionally palliated with ERCP with metallic stent insertion. However, these stents are prone to obstruction due to tumour ingrowth. In addition, ERCP may not always be possible due to tumour obstruction and percutaneous biliary drainage may be required.
Recently, ECDS has been described as an alternative to percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with failed ERCP. The procedure is also associated with potential advantages as compared to conventional ERCP. In particular, the risk of tumour ingrowth into the stent placed after ECDS is low and stent patency rates may be better than ERCP. Thus, the aim of the current study is to compare primary ECDS versus ERCP with CSEMS in unresectable malignant distal CBD strictures.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Keywords
Malignant biliary obstruction, EUS - guided choledocho-duodenostomy, ERCP with covered metallic stents
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
77 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
ECDS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
EUS-guided choledocho-duodenostomy
Arm Title
ERCP with CSEMS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with covered metallic stent
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
EUS-guided choledocho-duodenostomy
Intervention Description
The CBD would be identified by a linear echoendoscope and a suitable puncture site in the bulb of the duodenum would be located. The common bile duct would be punctured with a 19-gauge needle and the position would be confirmed by aspiration of bile and contrast injection. A 0.025" or 0.035" guide wire would be passed through the needle in to the CBD. A fully covered metal stent would then be inserted after track dilation.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with covered metallic stent
Intervention Description
After cannulation of the CBD, a cholangiography would be performed to assess the diameter of the CBD, the length and position of the biliary stricture. The endoscopist would decide on the appropriate size of SEMS to be placed. The stents should be visible from the duodenal lumen after deployment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
stent patency rate
Description
Stent dysfunction is defined as radiology or endoscopy confirmed stent obstruction.
Time Frame
1-year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Technical success
Description
Technical success is defined as the ability to access and drain the CBD by placement of a stent.
Time Frame
1year
Title
Clinical success
Description
Clinical success is defined as >30% drop in bilirubin levels
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Adverse events
Description
Adverse events related to the endoscopic procedures would be graded according to the lexicon of endoscopic adverse events
Time Frame
30 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥ 18 years old with informed consent
Histologically (preferred) or radiologically confirmed distal malignant bile duct tumors
Inoperability by staging, comorbidities or patient wishes
Distal tumors 2cm away from the portal hilum
Bilirubin > 50umol/L at diagnosis
Exclusion Criteria:
Multiple hepatic metastases with significant blockage of one or more liver segments (if no segment blockage, metastasis is not an exclusion criteria)
Presence of main portal vein thrombosis
Prior SEMS placement
Intraductal papillary mucinous carcinomas
Prior Billroth II or roux-en Y reconstruction
History of bleeding disorder or use of anticoagulation
Child's B/C cirrhosis
Pregnancy
Performance status ECOG ≥3 (confined to bed / chair > 50% waking hours)
Presence of other malignancy
Life expectancy < 3months
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anthony Teoh, FRCSEd(Gen
Organizational Affiliation
anthoyteoh@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
City
Sydney
Country
Australia
Facility Name
The University of Leuven
City
Leuven
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Chinese University of Hong Kong
City
Hong Kong
State/Province
Hong Kong
Country
China
Facility Name
Aarhus University Hospital
City
Aarhus
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Tokyo Medical University Hospital
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine
City
Wakayama
Country
Japan
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
EUS - Guided Choledocho-duodenostomy Versus ERCP With Covered Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Strictures
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs