search
Back to results

Intraoperative Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Bupivacaine for Total Hip Replacement Pain Management

Primary Purpose

Pain, Postoperative

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Liposomal Bupivacaine
0.25% Bupivacaine with epinephrine
Saline
Sponsored by
American Hip Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain, Postoperative focused on measuring Exparel, total hip replacement, bupivacaine

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled to undergo primary unilateral total hip replacement
  • Patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis
  • Patients failed to improve with conservative measures
  • Patients willing and able to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision total hip replacement
  • Bilateral total hip replacement
  • Birmingham hip resurfacing
  • Patients with hepatic/kidney disease
  • Patients with a known allergy to bupivacaine or other local anesthetics

Sites / Locations

  • Adventist Hinsdale Hospital
  • American Hip Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Liposomal bupivacaine

Bupivacaine with epinephrine

Arm Description

Periarticular infiltration cocktail of 20cc of liposomal bupivacaine with 20cc of normal saline and 40cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine

Periarticular infiltration cocktail of 60cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Patient Morphine Equivalent Consumption
All opioid doses were administered to the patient at 12-hour intervals post-surgery. Doses were recorded till either of the following criteria was met, the patient was discharged or the 72-hour post-surgery timeframe ended. The doses were then collected and converted to OMEs, in milligrams.
Change in Patient-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Intensity Score
Patient-reported VAS pain intensity score (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain possible) will be collected. Mean VAS scores for the 72-hour period were calculated using the cohort's reported average pain scores at each 12-hour interval.
Time to Ambulation More Than 20 Feet (in Hours)
The length of time (in hours) until the patient first ambulates more than 20 feet from the time of surgery will be recorded.
Length of Stay (LOS, in Days)
Number of Patients That Experienced a Fall

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
November 8, 2016
Last Updated
June 28, 2018
Sponsor
American Hip Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03001453
Brief Title
Intraoperative Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Bupivacaine for Total Hip Replacement Pain Management
Official Title
Post-surgical Pain Care Pathways During Enhanced Recovery Surgery Using Exparel (Bupivacaine Liposome Injectable Suspension) Plus Bupivacaine With Epinephrine Versus Bupivacaine.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
American Hip Institute

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two medications currently injected intra-operatively to help decrease pain after surgery in patients undergoing a primary total hip replacement (THR). The two medications are Exparel® (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) plus bupivacaine with epinephrine versus bupivacaine with epinephrine. This study is looking to see if one medication works better than the other in managing post-operative pain after THR. The study hypothesis is that Exparel® plus bupivacaine with epinephrine will demonstrate better pain management in THR patients post-operatively. Both medications are FDA-approved for post-operative analgesia.
Detailed Description
All surgeries were performed by the same orthopaedic surgeon. Two groups, one receiving Exparel® (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) plus bupivacaine with epinephrine (LB group) and the other receiving bupivacaine with epinephrine (Control group), will be compared using post-operative pain scores, hospital length of stay, time to ambulation, falls, narcotic use, and narcotic-related adverse effects. Aside from hospital length of stay, all outcomes were recorded for up to 72 hours following surgery. An a priori power analysis was performed to calculate the total number of patients that needed to be enrolled to achieve a minimum 90% power, with the threshold of statistical significance set to 0.05. Based on a previous study reporting a mean oral opioid consumption of 57.04mg ± 25.6 at 24 hours post THR, a mean difference of 17.14mg was considered to be clinically significant. Thus, at least 26 patients were necessary in each group for an adequately powered assessment. The diagnosis for osteoarthritis was determined by patient history, physical examination, and imaging findings. Each patient received a thorough explanation of the protocol, and willing patients signed an informed consent form. All patients underwent a personal preoperative education program regarding pre, intra-, and post-procedural information including physical therapy, expectations, discharge goals, home therapy, and pain management. After written consent was collected, the form was sent to the hospital pharmacy for randomization. Envelopes were randomized, sealed, numbered, and given to the pharmacy staff, ultimately dispensing the envelopes to the nurse in the operating room in numerical order. The pharmacy documented the required information, selected medication, and drug accountability forms according to the contents of the envelopes. A nurse delivered study drugs to the operating room in a sealed, non-descriptive envelope. During the standard anterior approach procedure, an anesthesiologist administered fentanyl or hydromorphone as needed for analgesia. The local anesthetics were administered after reduction of the implants. Patients in the LB group received 20cc liposomal bupivacaine, 40cc 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine, and 20cc of normal saline. Each patient in the control group received 60cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine. Using a 20-gauge spinal needle, the local anesthetics were injected using a deep tissue administration technique. Structures innervated by the femoral nerve, superior gluteal nerve, or lateral femoral cutaneous nerve were considered suitable for injection. Throughout administration, frequent aspirations were performed to check for blood and minimize the risk of intravascular injection. The patients, surgical team, and floor staff was blinded to the local anesthetic drugs given. During hospitalization, patients were observed, evaluated and treated according to postoperative protocols. Patients received opioids for pain management as needed, which was routinely documented by hospital staff. Opioids included fentanyl, hydromorphone, oxycodone, codeine, tramadol, morphine, and hydrocodone. All opioid dosages were converted into morphine equivalent dosages for analysis. Each patient began physical therapy within the first 24 hours postoperatively. Patients were discharged when they were able to begin self-care, their pain was controlled utilizing an oral regimen, and they were able to tolerate oral medication intake.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Postoperative
Keywords
Exparel, total hip replacement, bupivacaine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
107 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Liposomal bupivacaine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Periarticular infiltration cocktail of 20cc of liposomal bupivacaine with 20cc of normal saline and 40cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine
Arm Title
Bupivacaine with epinephrine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Periarticular infiltration cocktail of 60cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Liposomal Bupivacaine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Exparel
Intervention Description
266mg liposomal bupivacaine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
0.25% Bupivacaine with epinephrine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Marcaine
Intervention Description
0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Saline
Other Intervention Name(s)
Saline solution
Intervention Description
Normal saline
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient Morphine Equivalent Consumption
Description
All opioid doses were administered to the patient at 12-hour intervals post-surgery. Doses were recorded till either of the following criteria was met, the patient was discharged or the 72-hour post-surgery timeframe ended. The doses were then collected and converted to OMEs, in milligrams.
Time Frame
72 hours postoperation, divided into six 12-hour periods
Title
Change in Patient-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Intensity Score
Description
Patient-reported VAS pain intensity score (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain possible) will be collected. Mean VAS scores for the 72-hour period were calculated using the cohort's reported average pain scores at each 12-hour interval.
Time Frame
72 hours post-operation, divided into six 12-hour periods
Title
Time to Ambulation More Than 20 Feet (in Hours)
Description
The length of time (in hours) until the patient first ambulates more than 20 feet from the time of surgery will be recorded.
Time Frame
from time of surgery until patient first ambulates more than 20 feet or 72 hours post-surgery or patient discharge, whichever comes first
Title
Length of Stay (LOS, in Days)
Time Frame
From time of surgery until patient is discharged, an average of 1.5 days.
Title
Number of Patients That Experienced a Fall
Time Frame
72 hours postoperation

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients scheduled to undergo primary unilateral total hip replacement Patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis Patients failed to improve with conservative measures Patients willing and able to sign informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Revision total hip replacement Bilateral total hip replacement Birmingham hip resurfacing Patients with hepatic/kidney disease Patients with a known allergy to bupivacaine or other local anesthetics
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benjamin G Domb, MD
Organizational Affiliation
American Hip Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Adventist Hinsdale Hospital
City
Hinsdale
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60521
Country
United States
Facility Name
American Hip Institute
City
Westmont
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60559
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29033152
Citation
Perets I, Walsh JP, Mu BH, Yuen LC, Ashberg L, Battaglia MR, Domb BG. Intraoperative Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine Hydrochloride for Pain Management in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):441-446. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Intraoperative Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Bupivacaine for Total Hip Replacement Pain Management

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs