search
Back to results

CV Wizard: Does a Clinical Decision Support Tool Improve CVD Risk Factor Control in Safety Net Clinics? (CV_WIZARD)

Primary Purpose

Heart Attack, Stroke, Cardiovascular Diseases

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CV WIZARD
Sponsored by
Kaiser Permanente
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Heart Attack

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult clinic attendees with high CVD risk, including women and minorities
  • Persons aged 18-21 with high-CVD risk
  • Some subjects with mental health conditions of various types

Exclusion Criteria:

-Children aged younger than 18

Note: The investigators are not enrolling patients for this clinic-randomized study, but rather studying the uptake and impact of a set of EHR-based clinical decision support tools into regular care at the participating clinics. In this clinic-randomized trial, the intervention / randomization are clinic level.

Sites / Locations

  • Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Arm 1: Immediate implementation

Arm 2: Delayed implementation

Arm Description

30 safety net community health centers (CHCs) will be randomized to implement the sophisticated CV Wizard clinical decision support (CDS) system at the start of study year 2. Arm 1 CHCs will receive implementation support that will be pragmatically iterated to address any barriers to adoption / sustained use of the CDS that are identified through study activities. The investigators will apply these learnings to improve adoption rates in Arm 2.

30 safety net community health centers (CHCs) will be randomized to implement the sophisticated CV Wizard clinical decision support (CDS) system 18 months later than Arm 1. The investigators will measure the intervention's impact on CVD risk factor control in CHCs.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Comparison of CVD outcomes for patients in CHCs
Compare patients' CVD outcomes in the 30 Arm 1 vs. 30 Arm 2 CHCs, in months 13-30 (Aim 1); assess whether the revised implementation support materials expedite CDS adoption (Aim 2); and use mixed methods to identify multi-level barriers / facilitators to adoption of the CDS tool (Aim 3).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Reach: Encounters affected
% clinic encounters where CV Wizard suggests running the full risk assessment tool, i.e., identified a target patient.
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - 10 year pooled ASCVD risk score
(i) ASCVD risk score (American College of Cardiology-ACC/ American Heart Association - AHA) 10-year pooled ASCVD risk score, 40-75 year olds
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - Framingham 30-year CVD risk score
(i) Framingham 30-year CVD risk score, 20-39 year olds.
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - last BP ≤140/90
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: last BP ≤140/90
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - last A1c≤8
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: last A1c≤8
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - last LDL<100
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: last LDL<100
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - appropriate aspirin use
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: appropriate aspirin use
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - not current smoker
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: not current smoker
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - last BMI ≤25
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: last BMI≤25
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - appropriate cardioprotective medications
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: appropriate cardioprotective prescriptions (e.g., statins).
Adoption: CDS uptake
% of encounters where care team member opts to run the CV Wizard risk assessment.
Implementation: User perceptions
Perceived ease of use, usefulness, acceptability of CV Wizard; intent to use it.
Maintenance over time
All measures over 2.5 years of follow-up, Arm 1; 1.5 years, Arm 2.

Full Information

First Posted
December 14, 2016
Last Updated
May 25, 2022
Sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
Collaborators
OCHIN, Inc., HealthPartners Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03001713
Brief Title
CV Wizard: Does a Clinical Decision Support Tool Improve CVD Risk Factor Control in Safety Net Clinics?
Acronym
CV_WIZARD
Official Title
CV Wizard: Does a Prioritized, Point-of-Care Clinical Decision Support Tool Improve Guideline-Based CVD Risk Factor Control in Safety Net Clinics?
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
February 22, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
Collaborators
OCHIN, Inc., HealthPartners Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This project aims to reduce disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor control and in rates of heart attacks and strokes among the low-income, racially / ethnically diverse Americans who receive primary care at safety net community health centers (CHCs). To achieve this important objective, the investigators will adapt a successful clinical decision support (CDS) system currently used in CVD care at several large, integrated health care systems, to meet the patient needs and workflow processes of 60 CHCs. The investigators will determine if use of this CDS improves CVD care, reduces disparities in CVD care and outcomes, and increases patient engagement in CVD treatment choices, in CHCs. Results of this randomized trial will help accelerate the translation of major investments in health informatics systems into substantial clinical benefits for large numbers of high-risk, low-income patients. Results will also provide a template for CVD care improvement that can be spread to other CHCs and extended to other clinical conditions.
Detailed Description
The investigators seek to learn whether clinical decision support (CDS) systems from well-resourced care settings are effective in safety net community health centers (CHCs), and how to enhance such cross-setting implementation. Thus, the investigators propose a clinic-randomized, pragmatic trial of the uptake and impact of the 'CV Wizard' CDS tool in 60 CHCs that share a linked electronic health record. CV Wizard summarizes each patient's reversible CVD risks, generates prioritized, guideline-based care recommendations based on those risks, and shows these in a 'provider view' and a 'patient view,' enabling patient engagement. Use rates and satisfaction with this CDS were high in the large healthcare delivery system where it was developed and tested. The investigators will: study its impact in the CHC setting, assess uptake of the CDS system, assess strategies for integrating it into CHC workflows, and its impact on patients' CVD risk and risk factor management. The investigators hypothesize that this cutting-edge CDS will improve rates of guideline-based CVD preventive care in CHC patients, who experience disparities in CVD risk factors, care and outcomes. The 60 study clinics will be members of OCHIN, Inc., a non-profit health center-controlled network and national leader in health information technology for CHCs. OCHIN's leadership enthusiastically supports the proposed work and will help ensure that recruitment goals are met. The investigators will partner with stakeholders / medical leadership from OCHIN's member clinics at every step, via existing structures. This study addresses gaps in guideline-based CVD care in high-risk populations, using targeted, multi-level strategies; considers setting-specific needs; tests how CDS affects guideline implementation in community clinics; and uses technology to support patient engagement. Results will yield knowledge about providing CHCs with cutting-edge CDS, and associated impacts on CVD disparities. The innovative study is the second trial to implement CDS tools from private care settings in CHCs, and the first to do so with complex CDS tools that address a range of CVD risk management guidelines, make prioritized care recommendations, and facilitate point-of-care patient engagement. Results could lead to substantial improvements in CVD prevention, care, and outcomes in CHCs nationwide. Our overarching aims are to: Aim 1. Conduct a clinic-randomized trial of the impact of an evidence-based point-of-care CDS system on (i) overall CVD risk scores, and (ii) control of individual CVD risks (blood pressure; HbA1c, lipid levels; aspirin use; smoking; body mass index), among high CVD risk CHC adult patients. H1: High CVD risk patients in Arm 1 CHCs will have significantly lower overall CVD risk scores over a 12-month post-index visit period, compared to those in Arm 2 CHCs. H2: High CVD risk patients in Arm 1 CHCs who have poor control of specific CVD risk factors at an index visit will have significantly better control of those factors over a 12 month post-index visit period, compared to those in Arm 2 CHCs. H3: Disparities in specific CVD risk factor control between CHC patients' versus national CVD risk factor control rates will be significantly reduced by 18 months post-implementation in each Arm (secondary analysis). Aim 2. Develop and hone need-based implementation support protocols to help Arm 1 CHCs implement the CV Wizard CDS system into their standard workflows; assess whether use of the protocols developed for Arm 1 CHCs accelerates implementation and adoption of the CDS system in the Arm 2 CHCs. H4: CDS uptake into CHC workflows will be significantly faster in Arm 2 CHCs than in Arm 1 CHCs. Aim 3. Conduct a mixed methods process evaluation, guided by the Technology Acceptance Model, to identify and address patient, provider, and delivery system barriers to uptake / impact of this CDS in CHCs.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Attack, Stroke, Cardiovascular Diseases

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm 1: Immediate implementation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
30 safety net community health centers (CHCs) will be randomized to implement the sophisticated CV Wizard clinical decision support (CDS) system at the start of study year 2. Arm 1 CHCs will receive implementation support that will be pragmatically iterated to address any barriers to adoption / sustained use of the CDS that are identified through study activities. The investigators will apply these learnings to improve adoption rates in Arm 2.
Arm Title
Arm 2: Delayed implementation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
30 safety net community health centers (CHCs) will be randomized to implement the sophisticated CV Wizard clinical decision support (CDS) system 18 months later than Arm 1. The investigators will measure the intervention's impact on CVD risk factor control in CHCs.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
CV WIZARD
Intervention Description
This project will determine whether a sophisticated CDS system will be effective in CHCs. The innovative, point-of-care, web-based CDS system we will test ("CV Wizard") generates a guideline-based prioritized summary of each patient's major CVD risk factors, then presents patient and provider 'views' of this summary, with individualized care recommendations.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of CVD outcomes for patients in CHCs
Description
Compare patients' CVD outcomes in the 30 Arm 1 vs. 30 Arm 2 CHCs, in months 13-30 (Aim 1); assess whether the revised implementation support materials expedite CDS adoption (Aim 2); and use mixed methods to identify multi-level barriers / facilitators to adoption of the CDS tool (Aim 3).
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Reach: Encounters affected
Description
% clinic encounters where CV Wizard suggests running the full risk assessment tool, i.e., identified a target patient.
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
Title
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - 10 year pooled ASCVD risk score
Description
(i) ASCVD risk score (American College of Cardiology-ACC/ American Heart Association - AHA) 10-year pooled ASCVD risk score, 40-75 year olds
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
Title
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - Framingham 30-year CVD risk score
Description
(i) Framingham 30-year CVD risk score, 20-39 year olds.
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
Title
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - last BP ≤140/90
Description
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: last BP ≤140/90
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
Title
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - last A1c≤8
Description
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: last A1c≤8
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
Title
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - last LDL<100
Description
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: last LDL<100
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
Title
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - appropriate aspirin use
Description
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: appropriate aspirin use
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
Title
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - not current smoker
Description
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: not current smoker
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - last BMI ≤25
Description
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: last BMI≤25
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
Title
Effectiveness (impact): Patient outcomes - appropriate cardioprotective medications
Description
(ii) Control of individual CVD risk factors: appropriate cardioprotective prescriptions (e.g., statins).
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
Title
Adoption: CDS uptake
Description
% of encounters where care team member opts to run the CV Wizard risk assessment.
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
Title
Implementation: User perceptions
Description
Perceived ease of use, usefulness, acceptability of CV Wizard; intent to use it.
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
Title
Maintenance over time
Description
All measures over 2.5 years of follow-up, Arm 1; 1.5 years, Arm 2.
Time Frame
Up to 36 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult clinic attendees with high CVD risk, including women and minorities Persons aged 18-21 with high-CVD risk Some subjects with mental health conditions of various types Exclusion Criteria: -Children aged younger than 18 Note: The investigators are not enrolling patients for this clinic-randomized study, but rather studying the uptake and impact of a set of EHR-based clinical decision support tools into regular care at the participating clinics. In this clinic-randomized trial, the intervention / randomization are clinic level.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rachel Gold, PhD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Kaiser Permanente
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97227
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35119463
Citation
Gold R, Larson AE, Sperl-Hillen JM, Boston D, Sheppler CR, Heintzman J, McMullen C, Middendorf M, Appana D, Thirumalai V, Romer A, Bava J, Davis JV, Yosuf N, Hauschildt J, Scott K, Moore S, O'Connor PJ. Effect of Clinical Decision Support at Community Health Centers on the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146519. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46519.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

CV Wizard: Does a Clinical Decision Support Tool Improve CVD Risk Factor Control in Safety Net Clinics?

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs