search
Back to results

A Study of Durvalumab in Combination With R-CHOP or Lenalidomide Plus R-CHOP in Previously Untreated High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Primary Purpose

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Durvalumab
Rituximab
Doxorubicin
Vincristine
Cyclophosphamide
Prednisone
Lenalidomide
Sponsored by
Celgene
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse focused on measuring Lymphoma, Diffuse-large B-Cell Lymphoma, Durvalumab, Anti-PD-L1 Antibody, MEDI4736, Immune Checkpoint, Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone/Prednisolone, Lenalidomide

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. CD20+Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
  2. Ann Arbor stage 3 or 4 or stage 2 with bulky disease
  3. High or high-intermediate disease risk.
  4. No prior anti-lymphoma treatment.
  5. Subject is willing and able to undergo biopsy.
  6. Investigator considers R-CHOP immunochemotherapy appropriate.
  7. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.
  8. Adequate hematology laboratory results (absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 * 10^9/L, platelet count ≥ 75 * 10^9/L, hemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dL).
  9. Adequate biochemistry laboratory results (aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT) ≤ 3.0 * upper limit of normal; bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL; creatinine clearance of ≥ 40 mL/min).
  10. Bi-dimensionally measurable disease (> 2.0 cm).
  11. Subject is using effective contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of lymphoma other than Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
  2. Composite lymphoma or transformed lymphoma.
  3. Primary or secondary Central Nervous System involvement by lymphoma.
  4. Seropositive or active viral infection with hepatitis B virus, human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis C virus.
  5. History of other malignancies, unless disease-free for ≥ 5 years.
  6. Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%.
  7. Peripheral neuropathy ≥ Grade 2.
  8. Prior use of lenalidomide, or monoclonal antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1, or PD-L1.
  9. High risk of developing thromboembolic events, who are unwilling to take venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.
  10. Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders within the past 3 years.
  11. Current or prior use of immunosuppressive medication within 28 days before start of treatment.

Sites / Locations

  • Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Parkview Research Center
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
  • Mid Ohio Oncology Hematology Inc
  • Swedish Cancer Institute
  • Innsbruck Medical University Department of Internal Medicine
  • Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg
  • Local Institution - 101
  • Medical University of Vienna Internalmedicine 1, Hematology
  • Hanusch Krankenhaus
  • Aarhus Sygehus
  • Rigshospitalet, Kobenhavns Universitet - Centre for Clinical Intervention Research - The Copenhagen
  • Odense Universitetshospital
  • (North Estonia Medical Centre) - Onkoloogia-ja Hematoloogiakliinik
  • Tartu University Hospital
  • University Hospital Birmingham
  • Royal Marsden Hospital
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust- Churchill Hospital-Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

DUR + R-CHOP

DUR + R2-CHOP

Arm Description

On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received durvalumab 1125 mg intravenously (IV) followed by R-CHOP (IV rituximab 375 mg/m^2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m^2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m^2 (maximum dose of 2.0 mg total), and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m^2); Participants also were administered daily oral or IV prednisone/prednisolone 100 mg from Day 1 to 5. Induction treatment continued for a total of 6-8 cycles. Participants who achieve a complete response or partial response continue with consolidation therapy treatment consisting of durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg by IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle for up to a total of 12 months.

Participants start the study on durvalumab in combination with R-CHOP (as described in Arm DUR + R-CHOP). Based on their DLBCL Cell-of-Origin subtype (test typically done between cycles 1 and 2), participants with ABC subtype continue the study taking durvalumab in combination with R2-CHOP. On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received durvalumab 1125 mg intravenously (IV) followed by R-CHOP. Participants were also administered daily oral or IV prednisone/prednisolone 100 mg from Day 1 to 5. In addition, a daily oral lenalidomide 15 mg was administered from Day 1 to 14 of each 21-day cycle. Induction treatment continued for a total of 6-8 cycles. Participants who achieve a complete response or partial response continue with consolidation therapy treatment consisting of durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg by IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle for up to a total of 12 months. Enrollment into Arm B was discontinued.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR) at the End of Induction Therapy
The primary efficacy analysis evaluated the complete response rate (CRR) at the end of the induction therapy in the efficacy evaluable population in a comparative manner against historical control. The response to treatment was assessed according to the 2014 International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (Cheson, 2014). CR was defined as a complete metabolic response and radiographic evidence showing target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in longest diameter, no new lesions, regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of splenomegaly, and absence of bone marrow involvement. Clopper-Pearson two-sided 95% confidence interval is reported. Null hypothesis for the primary endpoint was rejected if the lower limit of the confidence interval for the complete response rate at the completion of the induction therapy in the efficacy evaluable population is above 55%.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Who Responded During Induction and Continued Into Consolidation Therapy (Database Cutoff Date: 02-Aug-2018)
The percentage of participants who achieved a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) at the end of Induction and continued into consolidation period in the efficacy evaluable population in a comparative manner against historical control. The response to treatment was assessed according to the 2014 International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (Cheson, 2014). CR was defined in outcome #1. PR was defined as a partial metabolic response and radiographic evidence showing ≥ 50% decrease in sum of perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites, no new lesions, spleen must have regressed > 50% in length beyond normal, and residual bone marrow involvement improved from baseline. Clopper-Pearson two-sided 95% confidence interval is reported. Null hypothesis was rejected if the lower limit of the confidence interval for the rate of subjects who continue consolidation therapy out of all subjects.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) CD8 T-Cell Density
Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Total Percentage
Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Percentage of Tumor Cells
Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for the Interferon Gamma Score (IFNG-Score) From Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)-Sequencing Data
Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.
Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during a study. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that: • Results in death; • Is life-threatening; • Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization; • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; • Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03): - Grade 1 = Mild (no limitation in activity or intervention); - Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention required); - Grade 3 = Severe (marked limitation in activity; medical intervention required, hospitalization possible); - Grade 4 = Life-threatening; - Grade 5 = Death. Relation to IP is determined by the investigator.

Full Information

First Posted
December 22, 2016
Last Updated
April 24, 2023
Sponsor
Celgene
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03003520
Brief Title
A Study of Durvalumab in Combination With R-CHOP or Lenalidomide Plus R-CHOP in Previously Untreated High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Official Title
A Phase 2, Open-label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Activity of Durvalumab in Combination With Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone (R-CHOP) or With Lenalidomide Plus R-CHOP (R2-CHOP) in Subjects With Previously Untreated, High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 28, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 24, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 24, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Celgene

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This Phase 2, two-arm, open-label study is designed to evaluate the safety, clinical activity, and predictive biomarkers of durvalumab in combination with R-CHOP or R2-CHOP, followed by durvalumab consolidation therapy in previously untreated subjects with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Induction treatment with R-CHOP (± lenalidomide) will last for a total of up to 6 to 8 treatment cycles (21 day cycles), and the total time on study treatment, including durvalumab consolidation, will last up to 12 months. On 05-Sep-2017, the US FDA has issued a Partial Clinical Hold on this study resulting in the discontinuation of enrollment into Arm B (Durvalumab + Lenalidomide + R-CHOP). After the US FDA Partial Clinical Hold, new eligible participants have been enrolled in Arm A (Durvalumab + R-CHOP).
Detailed Description
This research study is conducted in participants with previously untreated, high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients with high-risk DLBCL typically have insufficient therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, the addition of novel agents to the currently used induction therapy (R-CHOP) is a rational approach to improve therapeutic outcomes in this disease setting. Based on pre-clinical and clinical observations, it is hypothesized that durvalumab will have activity in DLBCL because the PD 1/PD L1 pathway is involved in the pathophysiology of DLBCL. In particular, the addition of durvalumab may augment the anti-tumor activity of R-CHOP against high-risk DLBCL sub-types. The safety of durvalumab has already been explored. However, as there is limited clinical experience with durvalumab in DLBCL, the study is divided into two stages: A Safety Run-in Stage to evaluate the safety of the treatment combinations until at least 10 subjects are included in each of the two treatment arms An Expansion Stage to analyze the clinical activity of the treatment combinations Results posted following Primary Outcome Completion date are based on a database cut-off of August 2, 2018.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
Keywords
Lymphoma, Diffuse-large B-Cell Lymphoma, Durvalumab, Anti-PD-L1 Antibody, MEDI4736, Immune Checkpoint, Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone/Prednisolone, Lenalidomide

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
46 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
DUR + R-CHOP
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received durvalumab 1125 mg intravenously (IV) followed by R-CHOP (IV rituximab 375 mg/m^2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m^2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m^2 (maximum dose of 2.0 mg total), and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m^2); Participants also were administered daily oral or IV prednisone/prednisolone 100 mg from Day 1 to 5. Induction treatment continued for a total of 6-8 cycles. Participants who achieve a complete response or partial response continue with consolidation therapy treatment consisting of durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg by IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle for up to a total of 12 months.
Arm Title
DUR + R2-CHOP
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants start the study on durvalumab in combination with R-CHOP (as described in Arm DUR + R-CHOP). Based on their DLBCL Cell-of-Origin subtype (test typically done between cycles 1 and 2), participants with ABC subtype continue the study taking durvalumab in combination with R2-CHOP. On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received durvalumab 1125 mg intravenously (IV) followed by R-CHOP. Participants were also administered daily oral or IV prednisone/prednisolone 100 mg from Day 1 to 5. In addition, a daily oral lenalidomide 15 mg was administered from Day 1 to 14 of each 21-day cycle. Induction treatment continued for a total of 6-8 cycles. Participants who achieve a complete response or partial response continue with consolidation therapy treatment consisting of durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg by IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle for up to a total of 12 months. Enrollment into Arm B was discontinued.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Durvalumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
MEDI4736, IMFINZI™, DUR
Intervention Description
Durvalumab was supplied in single use vials as a liquid solution containing 500 mg (nominal) of durvalumab at a concentration of 50 mg/mL to be infused by intravenous (IV) injection. Day 1 of each treatment cycle (Induction Period and Consolidation Period) started with the administration of IV durvalumab followed by a 2-hour observation period post infusion.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rituximab
Other Intervention Name(s)
RITUXAN®
Intervention Description
Subsequent to durvalumab infusion, rituximab was administered by IV. Rituximab administration could be split over 2 consecutive days according to local clinical practice. Rapid infusion of rituximab was not allowed in this clinical study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Doxorubicin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Adriamycin
Intervention Description
A component of the CHOP therapy administered by IV. CHOP therapy was administered following rituximab.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vincristine
Other Intervention Name(s)
leurocristine, Oncovin
Intervention Description
A component of the CHOP therapy administered by IV. CHOP therapy was administered following rituximab.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cyclophosphamide
Other Intervention Name(s)
cytophosphane, Cytoxan
Intervention Description
A component of the CHOP therapy administered by IV. CHOP therapy was administered following rituximab.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Prednisone
Other Intervention Name(s)
corticosteroid, prednisolone
Intervention Description
Prednisone was administered as an IV infusion or by mouth (PO) on Day 1, followed by PO administration on Days 2-5 of each cycle. Prednisone could be given prior to other drugs of the CHOP therapy. It was administered after lenalidomide dosing in the R2-CHOP treatment arm.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lenalidomide
Other Intervention Name(s)
Revlimid®
Intervention Description
Lenalidomide was administered orally in capsule form on Days 1-14 of the DUR+R2-CHOP treatment arm only.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR) at the End of Induction Therapy
Description
The primary efficacy analysis evaluated the complete response rate (CRR) at the end of the induction therapy in the efficacy evaluable population in a comparative manner against historical control. The response to treatment was assessed according to the 2014 International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (Cheson, 2014). CR was defined as a complete metabolic response and radiographic evidence showing target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in longest diameter, no new lesions, regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of splenomegaly, and absence of bone marrow involvement. Clopper-Pearson two-sided 95% confidence interval is reported. Null hypothesis for the primary endpoint was rejected if the lower limit of the confidence interval for the complete response rate at the completion of the induction therapy in the efficacy evaluable population is above 55%.
Time Frame
From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Responded During Induction and Continued Into Consolidation Therapy (Database Cutoff Date: 02-Aug-2018)
Description
The percentage of participants who achieved a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) at the end of Induction and continued into consolidation period in the efficacy evaluable population in a comparative manner against historical control. The response to treatment was assessed according to the 2014 International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (Cheson, 2014). CR was defined in outcome #1. PR was defined as a partial metabolic response and radiographic evidence showing ≥ 50% decrease in sum of perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites, no new lesions, spleen must have regressed > 50% in length beyond normal, and residual bone marrow involvement improved from baseline. Clopper-Pearson two-sided 95% confidence interval is reported. Null hypothesis was rejected if the lower limit of the confidence interval for the rate of subjects who continue consolidation therapy out of all subjects.
Time Frame
From first dose of study drug to completion of at least one cycle in the Consolidation Period (Day 1 up to Week 52)
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) CD8 T-Cell Density
Description
Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.
Time Frame
Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Total Percentage
Description
Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.
Time Frame
Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Percentage of Tumor Cells
Description
Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.
Time Frame
Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for the Interferon Gamma Score (IFNG-Score) From Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)-Sequencing Data
Description
Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.
Time Frame
Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).
Title
Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Description
An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during a study. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that: • Results in death; • Is life-threatening; • Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization; • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; • Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03): - Grade 1 = Mild (no limitation in activity or intervention); - Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention required); - Grade 3 = Severe (marked limitation in activity; medical intervention required, hospitalization possible); - Grade 4 = Life-threatening; - Grade 5 = Death. Relation to IP is determined by the investigator.
Time Frame
From the date of the first dose of study drug to within 90 days after the last dose of durvalumab or 28 days after the last dose of any investigational product (IP) whichever is greater. (Up to approximately 72 weeks)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: CD20+Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Ann Arbor stage 3 or 4 or stage 2 with bulky disease High or high-intermediate disease risk. No prior anti-lymphoma treatment. Subject is willing and able to undergo biopsy. Investigator considers R-CHOP immunochemotherapy appropriate. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. Adequate hematology laboratory results (absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 * 10^9/L, platelet count ≥ 75 * 10^9/L, hemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dL). Adequate biochemistry laboratory results (aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT) ≤ 3.0 * upper limit of normal; bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL; creatinine clearance of ≥ 40 mL/min). Bi-dimensionally measurable disease (> 2.0 cm). Subject is using effective contraception. Exclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of lymphoma other than Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Composite lymphoma or transformed lymphoma. Primary or secondary Central Nervous System involvement by lymphoma. Seropositive or active viral infection with hepatitis B virus, human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis C virus. History of other malignancies, unless disease-free for ≥ 5 years. Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%. Peripheral neuropathy ≥ Grade 2. Prior use of lenalidomide, or monoclonal antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1, or PD-L1. High risk of developing thromboembolic events, who are unwilling to take venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders within the past 3 years. Current or prior use of immunosuppressive medication within 28 days before start of treatment.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Organizational Affiliation
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center
City
Gilbert
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85234
Country
United States
Facility Name
Parkview Research Center
City
Fort Wayne
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46845
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14263
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Rochester Medical Center
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mid Ohio Oncology Hematology Inc
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43219
Country
United States
Facility Name
Swedish Cancer Institute
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Innsbruck Medical University Department of Internal Medicine
City
Innsbruck
ZIP/Postal Code
6020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg
City
Salzburg
ZIP/Postal Code
5020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Local Institution - 101
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
1190
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Medical University of Vienna Internalmedicine 1, Hematology
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
1190
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Hanusch Krankenhaus
City
Wien
ZIP/Postal Code
1140
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Aarhus Sygehus
City
Arhus C
ZIP/Postal Code
DK-8000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Rigshospitalet, Kobenhavns Universitet - Centre for Clinical Intervention Research - The Copenhagen
City
Copenhagen
ZIP/Postal Code
2100
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Odense Universitetshospital
City
Odense C
ZIP/Postal Code
DK5000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
(North Estonia Medical Centre) - Onkoloogia-ja Hematoloogiakliinik
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
13419
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
Tartu University Hospital
City
Tartu
ZIP/Postal Code
51014
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
University Hospital Birmingham
City
Birmingham
ZIP/Postal Code
B15 2TH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Royal Marsden Hospital
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SW3 6JJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust- Churchill Hospital-Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine
City
Oxford
ZIP/Postal Code
0X3 7LE
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
https://www.bms.com/researchers-and-partners/clinical-trials-and-research.html
Description
BMS Clinical Trial Information
URL
https://www.bmsstudyconnect.com/s/US/English/USenHome
Description
BMS Clinical Trial Patient Recruiting

Learn more about this trial

A Study of Durvalumab in Combination With R-CHOP or Lenalidomide Plus R-CHOP in Previously Untreated High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs