search
Back to results

Lithium Versus Quetiapine in Treatment Resistant Depression (LQD)

Primary Purpose

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Quetiapine
Lithium
Sponsored by
King's College London
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant focused on measuring Lithium, Quetiapine, Augmentation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Under the care of a GP and/or adult mental health services
  2. Current episode of depression meeting DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) - single or recurrent episode 3.17-item HAM-D score ≥ 14 - this cut-off reflects a pragmatic minimum severity of depression as also chosen in comparable studies such as STAR*D (Rush et al 2006, Trivedi et al 2006)

4.Any gender and aged 18 years or over 5.Meet criteria for treatment resistant depression (Fekadu et al., 2009a; Cleare et al., 2015): current episode has not responded to at least two antidepressants given for at least 6 weeks at minimum therapeutic dose defined as fluoxetine ≥20mg/day, paroxetine ≥20mg/day, sertraline ≥50mg/day, citalopram ≥20mg/day, escitalopram ≥10mg/day, venlafaxine ≥75mg/day, duloxetine ≥60 mg/day, mirtazapine ≥15mg/day, tricyclic antidepressant ≥125mg/day, and dosage as guided by the national Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines or BNF for any other antidepressant. Please note, relapse whilst on an antidepressant also counts as a failed treatment trial 6.Current antidepressant treatment has remained unchanged and at, or above, a therapeutic dose for ≥6 weeks 7.Provision of written, informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of bipolar disorder (defined as meeting DSM-5 criteria for bipolar 1 or bipolar 2) on the MINI 7.0 (as recommended treatments are different for bipolar depression)
  2. Diagnosis of current psychosis (as recommended treatments are different for current psychosis - antidepressants plus antipsychotics is the first-line treatment recommendation (NiCE, 2009; Cleare et al., 2015)
  3. Adequate use of lithium or quetiapine during the current episode. An adequate dose of lithium is defined as the patient taking lithium for at least 4 weeks at an adequate dose (leading to a documented plasma concentration of >0.4mmol/L) and for quetiapine, prescription in the range of 150-300mg/d for 4 weeks or longer. Or, if the patient has taken an inadequate dose of lithium or quetiapine in the current episode, the patient and clinician are not willing to re-prescribe/take the medication.
  4. Ongoing use of another atypical antipsychotic (discontinuation will be required before study entry i.e. any time prior to randomisation)
  5. Known contraindication to use of either lithium or quetiapine: known hypersensitivity of lithium or quetiapine or any of their excipients; severe renal insufficiency / impairment; untreated hypothyroidism; severe cardiac disease / insufficiency; low sodium levels e.g. dehydrated patients or those on low sodium diets; Addison's disease; Brugada syndrome or family history of Brugada syndrome; the rare hereditary inborn errors of metabolism galactosaemia, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption; concomitant administration of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors; or congenital QT prolongation.
  6. We will not recruit any individual who is currently participating in a clinical trial of an investigational medical product (CTIMP).
  7. Insufficient degree of comprehension or attention to be able to engage in trial procedures.
  8. We will exclude women who are pregnant, actively trying for pregnancy, or currently breastfeeding. This will be based on verbal report of the subject. Otherwise the management will be as appropriate according to standard clinical practice within the context of a pragmatic, open trial, for example adequate contraceptive precautions decided on the clinical judgement of the prescriber.

Sites / Locations

  • Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Lithium

Quetiapine

Arm Description

Lithium will be prescribed to patients in this arm as an augmenter on top of a patient's existing antidepressant treatment.

Quetiapine will be prescribed to patients in this arm as an augmenter on top of a patient's existing antidepressant treatment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Longitudinal depressive symptom severity
QIDS-SR
Difference in time to all-cause treatment discontinuation
The difference in the time at which patients stop taking the medication for any reason between the two treatment arms.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in clinician rated depression severity
MADRS
Response rates
Assessed using the MADRS questionnaire
Remission rates
Assessed using the MADRS questionnaire
Health related quality of life
Assessed using the EuroQol-5D questionnaire
Social functioning
Measured using the WSAS self rated questionnaire
Adherence to treatment
Assessed using the MARS-5 questionnaire
Change in weight in kilograms
Assessed by weighing participants
Change in diastolic blood pressure
Assessed by measuring blood pressure
Change in systolic blood pressure
Assessed by measuring blood pressure
Time to uptake of a new intervention (pharmacological or non-pharmalogical)
Assessed by recording all pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions
Time to initiation of treatment
Assessed using treatment initiation form
CGI Global Improvement
CGI
Side effects
PRISE total score
Serious Adverse Events
Serious adverse events will be monitored and reported throughout the patient's participation in the trial.

Full Information

First Posted
November 17, 2016
Last Updated
March 3, 2021
Sponsor
King's College London
Collaborators
University of Oxford, Newcastle University, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03004521
Brief Title
Lithium Versus Quetiapine in Treatment Resistant Depression
Acronym
LQD
Official Title
A Randomised Pragmatic Trial Comparing the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Lithium and Quetiapine Augmentation in Treatment Resistant Depression
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
November 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 2021 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
King's College London
Collaborators
University of Oxford, Newcastle University, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
LQD is a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of lithium versus quetiapine when used as add-on therapies to antidepressant medication for patients with treatment resistant depression. The Lithium versus Quetiapine in Depression (LQD) study will assess patients over 12 months to establish which (if any) treatment is more likely to improve TRD over a long duration of time. Professor Anthony Cleare is the Chief Investigator and recruitment began in November 2016.
Detailed Description
This 12 month parallel group, multi-centre, patient randomised, pragmatic, open label trial is comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the decision to prescribe lithium versus quetiapine add-on treatment to antidepressant medication. There will be two parallel groups: 1) Quetiapine add-on to existing antidepressant medication; 2) Lithium add-on to existing antidepressant medication. 276 patients will be randomised 1:1 at baseline to the decision to prescribe either lithium or quetiapine, and treatment will then be undertaken by clinicians on a real world basis. All patients, regardless of their treatment status, will be followed up in the trial for one year. This is a superiority design whereby we hypothesise that quetiapine will be superior to lithium in terms of time to treatment discontinuation and average symptom burden (QIDS-SR) over 12 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
Keywords
Lithium, Quetiapine, Augmentation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
276 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lithium
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Lithium will be prescribed to patients in this arm as an augmenter on top of a patient's existing antidepressant treatment.
Arm Title
Quetiapine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Quetiapine will be prescribed to patients in this arm as an augmenter on top of a patient's existing antidepressant treatment.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Quetiapine
Intervention Description
Quetipatine prescribed in addition to the patient's existing antidepressant treatment.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lithium
Intervention Description
Lithium prescribed in addition to the patient's existing antidepressant treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Longitudinal depressive symptom severity
Description
QIDS-SR
Time Frame
52 weeks
Title
Difference in time to all-cause treatment discontinuation
Description
The difference in the time at which patients stop taking the medication for any reason between the two treatment arms.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in clinician rated depression severity
Description
MADRS
Time Frame
From baseline to weeks 8 and 52
Title
Response rates
Description
Assessed using the MADRS questionnaire
Time Frame
8 weeks and 52 weeks
Title
Remission rates
Description
Assessed using the MADRS questionnaire
Time Frame
8 and 52 weeks
Title
Health related quality of life
Description
Assessed using the EuroQol-5D questionnaire
Time Frame
Measured at 8 and 52 weeks
Title
Social functioning
Description
Measured using the WSAS self rated questionnaire
Time Frame
Measured at baseline, 8 and 52 weeks
Title
Adherence to treatment
Description
Assessed using the MARS-5 questionnaire
Time Frame
Measured at weeks 8 and 52
Title
Change in weight in kilograms
Description
Assessed by weighing participants
Time Frame
Measured at 8 and 52 weeks
Title
Change in diastolic blood pressure
Description
Assessed by measuring blood pressure
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 8 and 52 weeks
Title
Change in systolic blood pressure
Description
Assessed by measuring blood pressure
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 8 and 52 weeks
Title
Time to uptake of a new intervention (pharmacological or non-pharmalogical)
Description
Assessed by recording all pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Time to initiation of treatment
Description
Assessed using treatment initiation form
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
CGI Global Improvement
Description
CGI
Time Frame
Measured at 8 and 52 weeks
Title
Side effects
Description
PRISE total score
Time Frame
Measured at 8 and 52 weeks
Title
Serious Adverse Events
Description
Serious adverse events will be monitored and reported throughout the patient's participation in the trial.
Time Frame
52 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change in global severity
Description
Change in CGI severity score
Time Frame
Measured at 8, 26 and 52 weeks
Title
Global efficacy
Description
Change in CGI efficacy score
Time Frame
Measured at 8, 26 and 52 weeks
Title
Side effects
Description
Frequency of individual items on the PRISE
Time Frame
Measured at 8 and 52 weeks
Title
Physical health changes
Description
Not completed for all participants. Will be reported if there is a sufficient number e.g. blood parameters and waist circumference
Time Frame
Measured at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks
Title
Satisfaction with lithium / quetiapine treatment
Description
Measured using TSQM subscales
Time Frame
Measured at 8, 26 and 52 weeks
Title
Change in self-report manic symptoms
Description
Measured using the Altman Mania Self Rating Scale
Time Frame
Measured at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks
Title
Change in anxiety symptoms
Description
GAD-7 score
Time Frame
Measured at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks
Title
Time to prescription
Description
First date participant is given a prescription for the treatment
Time Frame
0-52 weeks
Title
Baseline adherence to antidepressant
Description
MARS-5 score
Time Frame
Measured at baseline
Title
Change in cognition
Description
Total DSCT score
Time Frame
Measured at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks
Title
Adherence of clinicians
Description
Clinician adherence to prescribing and monitoring guidelines
Time Frame
0-52 weeks
Title
Proportion of participants having an adequate treatment trial
Description
Adequate treatment trial as defined in study protocol
Time Frame
0-8 weeks
Title
Number of hospital admissions for depressive episode
Description
Measured using psychiatric history assessment
Time Frame
52 weeks
Title
Change in personality measure
Description
SAPAS
Time Frame
Measured at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks
Title
Social functioning
Description
WSAS
Time Frame
Measured weekly over 12 months
Title
Economic analysis
Description
Costs from the NHS and Personal Social Services perspective and from a societal perspective.
Time Frame
52 weeks
Title
Predictors of treatment response
Description
Measured using the Maudsley Staging Model, HAM-D, MINI 7, IDS-C and SAPAS questionnaires.
Time Frame
52 weeks
Title
Longitudinal depression severity until time to all cause treatment discontinuation
Description
Measured weekly using the QIDS-SR
Time Frame
52 weeks
Title
Collection and analysis of biological samples for genetic, cytokine and cortisol analysis
Description
Blood/hair/saliva samples collected in collaboration with the BRC BioResource
Time Frame
0-52 weeks
Title
Reliability and validity of the Maudsley VAS
Description
Measured using the Maudsley VAS, validated against the QIDS-SR and MADRS
Time Frame
Measured at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks
Title
Discrepancy between the self-rated and clinician-rated version of 16 item IDS
Description
Assessed using QIDS and IDS
Time Frame
Measured at baseline and 8 weeks
Title
Relationship between quetiapine and lithium serum levels, prescribed dose and depressive symptom severity
Description
MADRS
Time Frame
52 weeks
Title
Time to new interventions for depression.
Description
Measured using concomitant medication and concomitant therapy questionnaires
Time Frame
52 weeks
Title
Number of new interventions for depression
Description
Measured using concomitant medication and concomitant therapy questionnaires
Time Frame
52 weeks
Title
Patient rated experience of the True Colours weekly monitoring system
Description
Qualitative Interview in a subset of participants
Time Frame
8 / 26 / 52 weeks
Title
Change in cognitive function
Description
THINC-it composite and individual tests scores in a subset of participants
Time Frame
Baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks
Title
12. Patient views and experiences of lithium and quetiapine
Description
Qualitative interviews in a subset of participants
Time Frame
52 week visit

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Under the care of a GP and/or adult mental health services Current episode of depression meeting DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) - single or recurrent episode 3.17-item HAM-D score ≥ 14 - this cut-off reflects a pragmatic minimum severity of depression as also chosen in comparable studies such as STAR*D (Rush et al 2006, Trivedi et al 2006) 4.Any gender and aged 18 years or over 5.Meet criteria for treatment resistant depression (Fekadu et al., 2009a; Cleare et al., 2015): current episode has not responded to at least two antidepressants given for at least 6 weeks at minimum therapeutic dose defined as fluoxetine ≥20mg/day, paroxetine ≥20mg/day, sertraline ≥50mg/day, citalopram ≥20mg/day, escitalopram ≥10mg/day, venlafaxine ≥75mg/day, duloxetine ≥60 mg/day, mirtazapine ≥15mg/day, tricyclic antidepressant ≥125mg/day, and dosage as guided by the national Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines or BNF for any other antidepressant. Please note, relapse whilst on an antidepressant also counts as a failed treatment trial 6.Current antidepressant treatment has remained unchanged and at, or above, a therapeutic dose for ≥6 weeks 7.Provision of written, informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of bipolar disorder (defined as meeting DSM-5 criteria for bipolar 1 or bipolar 2) on the MINI 7.0 (as recommended treatments are different for bipolar depression) Diagnosis of current psychosis (as recommended treatments are different for current psychosis - antidepressants plus antipsychotics is the first-line treatment recommendation (NiCE, 2009; Cleare et al., 2015) Adequate use of lithium or quetiapine during the current episode. An adequate dose of lithium is defined as the patient taking lithium for at least 4 weeks at an adequate dose (leading to a documented plasma concentration of >0.4mmol/L) and for quetiapine, prescription in the range of 150-300mg/d for 4 weeks or longer. Or, if the patient has taken an inadequate dose of lithium or quetiapine in the current episode, the patient and clinician are not willing to re-prescribe/take the medication. Ongoing use of another atypical antipsychotic (discontinuation will be required before study entry i.e. any time prior to randomisation) Known contraindication to use of either lithium or quetiapine: known hypersensitivity of lithium or quetiapine or any of their excipients; severe renal insufficiency / impairment; untreated hypothyroidism; severe cardiac disease / insufficiency; low sodium levels e.g. dehydrated patients or those on low sodium diets; Addison's disease; Brugada syndrome or family history of Brugada syndrome; the rare hereditary inborn errors of metabolism galactosaemia, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption; concomitant administration of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors; or congenital QT prolongation. We will not recruit any individual who is currently participating in a clinical trial of an investigational medical product (CTIMP). Insufficient degree of comprehension or attention to be able to engage in trial procedures. We will exclude women who are pregnant, actively trying for pregnancy, or currently breastfeeding. This will be based on verbal report of the subject. Otherwise the management will be as appropriate according to standard clinical practice within the context of a pragmatic, open trial, for example adequate contraceptive precautions decided on the clinical judgement of the prescriber.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lindsey Marwood
Email
LQDstudy@kcl.ac.uk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anothony Cleare
Organizational Affiliation
Professor of Psychiatry
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE5 8AF
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Helena Tee
Email
helena.tee@kcl.ac.uk

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The decision to share IPD to other researchers will be made by the CI on a case by case basis.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28651526
Citation
Marwood L, Taylor R, Goldsmith K, Romeo R, Holland R, Pickles A, Hutchinson J, Dietch D, Cipriani A, Nair R, Attenburrow MJ, Young AH, Geddes J, McAllister-Williams RH, Cleare AJ. Study protocol for a randomised pragmatic trial comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of lithium and quetiapine augmentation in treatment resistant depression (the LQD study). BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 26;17(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1393-0.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://www.kcl.ac.uk/research/lqd-study
Description
Study website link

Learn more about this trial

Lithium Versus Quetiapine in Treatment Resistant Depression

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs