search
Back to results

A Clinical Comparison of 2 Multifocal Toric XR (Extended Range) Contact Lenses

Primary Purpose

Astigmatism

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
comfilcon A
omafilcon B
Sponsored by
Coopervision, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Astigmatism

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will only be eligible for the study if:

    1. They are aged 40 - 70 years, inclusive.
    2. They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
    3. They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
    4. They have successfully completed the non-dispensing study (C16-597) as the lenses to be worn on this study (C16-599) are predetermined from their participation on study C16-597.
    5. They have a contact lens spherical prescription between +10.00 to -10.00D (Diopters) (inclusive).
    6. They have astigmatism between of -0.75 and -5.75DC (based on the calculated ocular refraction) in each eye.
    7. They have an Add component to their spectacle refraction (between +0.75 and

      +2.50DS).

    8. They can be satisfactorily fitted with the study lenses.
    9. They can attain at least 0.30 logMAR binocular distance high contrast visual acuity with the study lenses within the available power range.
    10. They have successfully worn soft contact lenses in the last two years.
    11. They are willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least five days per week and for at least six hours per day).
    12. They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study.
    13. They own a wearable pair of spectacles.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will not be eligible to take part in the study if:

    1. They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
    2. They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
    3. They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
    4. They have had cataract surgery.
    5. They have had corneal refractive surgery.
    6. They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
    7. They are pregnant or breast-feeding.
    8. They have any clinically meaningful slit lamp findings contraindicating contact lens wear (e.g. ≥ Grade 3 finding of oedema, corneal neovascularisation, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection, blepharitis/meibomian gland dysfunction) on the Efron classification scale or any other ocular abnormality that in the opinion of the investigator would contraindicate contact lens wear.
    9. They have any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis) which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
    10. They have a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
    11. They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.

Sites / Locations

  • Eurolens Research

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

comfilcon A

omafilcon B

Arm Description

Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study. The final optical design of comfilcon A contact lens was optimized to improve the quality and two further studies (CV-18-10 and CV-18-11) were conducted after completion of this study to evaluate the modified optical design.

Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Stability
Investigator's acceptance on overall stability for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses assessed using grading scale 0-4, 0=Totally unstable, can't be worn to provide acceptable vision correction for astigmatism, 4=Excellent orientation and optimum rotational.
Stability
Investigator's acceptance on overall stability for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses assessed using grading scale 0-4, 0=Totally unstable, can't be worn to provide acceptable vision correction for astigmatism, 4=Excellent orientation and optimum rotational.
Overall Toric Lens Fit Acceptance
Overall toric lens fit acceptance is assessed for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum.
Overall Toric Lens Fit Acceptance
Overall toric lens fit acceptance is assessed for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum.
Comfort
Subjective ratings for comfort assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain; 100=cannot be felt ever
Comfort
Subjective ratings for comfort assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain; 100=cannot be felt ever
Overall Satisfaction
Subjective ratings for overall satisfaction for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely dissatisfied, 100=extremely satisfied
Dryness
Subjective ratings for dryness assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry; 100=no dryness experienced at any time
Visual Fluctuation/ Stability
Subjective ratings for visual fluctuation/stability assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=totally unstable/ fluctuation/changing; 100=perfectly stable/not fluctuation/changing
Handling
Subjective ratings for handling difficulty assessed at 2 weeks. Scale 0-100, 0=very difficult, 100=very easy
Quality of Near Vision
Subjective ratings for quality of near vision. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Quality of Intermediate Vision
Subjective ratings for quality of intermediate vision. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Quality of Distance Vision
Subjective ratings for quality of distance vision. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Quality of Vision While Driving During the Day
Subjective rating for quality of vision while driving during the day. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Quality of Vision While Driving During the Night
Subjective ratings for quality of vision while driving at night. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Ghosting at Near
Subjective ratings for ghosting at near assessed at 2 weeks. Scale 0-100, 0=intolerable, 100=not noticeable.
Ghosting at Distance
Subjective ratings for ghosting at distance assessed at 2 weeks. Scale 0-100, 0=intolerable, 100=not noticeable.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
December 27, 2016
Last Updated
May 15, 2020
Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03006458
Brief Title
A Clinical Comparison of 2 Multifocal Toric XR (Extended Range) Contact Lenses
Official Title
A Clinical Comparison of the Comfilcon A (Extended Range) XR Toric Multifocal and Omafilcon B Toric XR Multifocal Contact Lenses
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 6, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 6, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the clinical performance and subjective acceptance of the comfilcon A and the omafilcon B soft contact lenses.
Detailed Description
This will be a randomized, subject-masked, crossover, bilateral study, controlled by cross comparison. Thirty subjects will use each lens type for two weeks in random sequence. Follow-up visits for each lens will be performed after two weeks of wear. Lenses will be worn on a daily wear basis. The final optical design of comfilcon A contact lens was optimized to improve the quality and two further studies (CV-18-10 and CV-18-11) were conducted after completion of this study to evaluate the modified optical design.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Astigmatism

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
24 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
comfilcon A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study. The final optical design of comfilcon A contact lens was optimized to improve the quality and two further studies (CV-18-10 and CV-18-11) were conducted after completion of this study to evaluate the modified optical design.
Arm Title
omafilcon B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
comfilcon A
Intervention Description
toric contact lens
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
omafilcon B
Intervention Description
toric contact lens
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Stability
Description
Investigator's acceptance on overall stability for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses assessed using grading scale 0-4, 0=Totally unstable, can't be worn to provide acceptable vision correction for astigmatism, 4=Excellent orientation and optimum rotational.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Stability
Description
Investigator's acceptance on overall stability for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses assessed using grading scale 0-4, 0=Totally unstable, can't be worn to provide acceptable vision correction for astigmatism, 4=Excellent orientation and optimum rotational.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Overall Toric Lens Fit Acceptance
Description
Overall toric lens fit acceptance is assessed for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Overall Toric Lens Fit Acceptance
Description
Overall toric lens fit acceptance is assessed for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Comfort
Description
Subjective ratings for comfort assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain; 100=cannot be felt ever
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Comfort
Description
Subjective ratings for comfort assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain; 100=cannot be felt ever
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Overall Satisfaction
Description
Subjective ratings for overall satisfaction for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely dissatisfied, 100=extremely satisfied
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Dryness
Description
Subjective ratings for dryness assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry; 100=no dryness experienced at any time
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Visual Fluctuation/ Stability
Description
Subjective ratings for visual fluctuation/stability assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=totally unstable/ fluctuation/changing; 100=perfectly stable/not fluctuation/changing
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Handling
Description
Subjective ratings for handling difficulty assessed at 2 weeks. Scale 0-100, 0=very difficult, 100=very easy
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Quality of Near Vision
Description
Subjective ratings for quality of near vision. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Quality of Intermediate Vision
Description
Subjective ratings for quality of intermediate vision. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Quality of Distance Vision
Description
Subjective ratings for quality of distance vision. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Quality of Vision While Driving During the Day
Description
Subjective rating for quality of vision while driving during the day. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Quality of Vision While Driving During the Night
Description
Subjective ratings for quality of vision while driving at night. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Ghosting at Near
Description
Subjective ratings for ghosting at near assessed at 2 weeks. Scale 0-100, 0=intolerable, 100=not noticeable.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Ghosting at Distance
Description
Subjective ratings for ghosting at distance assessed at 2 weeks. Scale 0-100, 0=intolerable, 100=not noticeable.
Time Frame
2 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects will only be eligible for the study if: They are aged 40 - 70 years, inclusive. They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent. They are willing and able to follow the protocol. They have successfully completed the non-dispensing study (C16-597) as the lenses to be worn on this study (C16-599) are predetermined from their participation on study C16-597. They have a contact lens spherical prescription between +10.00 to -10.00D (Diopters) (inclusive). They have astigmatism between of -0.75 and -5.75DC (based on the calculated ocular refraction) in each eye. They have an Add component to their spectacle refraction (between +0.75 and +2.50DS). They can be satisfactorily fitted with the study lenses. They can attain at least 0.30 logMAR binocular distance high contrast visual acuity with the study lenses within the available power range. They have successfully worn soft contact lenses in the last two years. They are willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least five days per week and for at least six hours per day). They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study. They own a wearable pair of spectacles. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects will not be eligible to take part in the study if: They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment. They have had cataract surgery. They have had corneal refractive surgery. They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus. They are pregnant or breast-feeding. They have any clinically meaningful slit lamp findings contraindicating contact lens wear (e.g. ≥ Grade 3 finding of oedema, corneal neovascularisation, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection, blepharitis/meibomian gland dysfunction) on the Efron classification scale or any other ocular abnormality that in the opinion of the investigator would contraindicate contact lens wear. They have any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis) which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV). They have a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction. They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Eurolens Research
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M13 9PL
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

A Clinical Comparison of 2 Multifocal Toric XR (Extended Range) Contact Lenses

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs