search
Back to results

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Eziclen®/Izinova® Versus Klean-prep® on Bowel Cleansing in Adolescents Undergoing Colonoscopy (EASYKID)

Primary Purpose

Digestive System Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Eziclen®/Izinova®
Klean-Prep®
Sponsored by
Ipsen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Digestive System Disease focused on measuring Bowel preparation

Eligibility Criteria

12 Years - 17 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of signed informed consent form to participate in the study obtained from the adolescent's parent(s)/ legal representative and a signed assent form from the adolescent according to local law
  • Male or female subjects between 12 to 17 years of age (inclusive)
  • Body weight more than 40 kg
  • Female of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test
  • If female, and of child-bearing potential, subject must use an acceptable form of birth control (hormonal birth control, intrauterine device (IUD), double-barrier method, or depot contraceptive)
  • Routinely accepted indication for undergoing colonoscopy, including but not limited to polyposis coli diagnosis or surveillance, gastrointestinal bleeding, unexplained diarrhoea or constipation, surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease or confirmation of mucosal healing, abdominal pain, abnormal endosonography or manometry, anaemia of unknown aetiology, cancer surveillance
  • In the investigator's judgment, the parent(s)/legal representative are/is mentally competent to provide informed consent for the subject to participate in the study
  • In the investigator's judgement, subject is able and willing to follow study procedures including drug administration and response to questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject with known or suspected ileus, gastrointestinal obstruction, gastric retention (gastroparesis), rectal impaction, toxic colitis, severe ulcerative colitis or toxic megacolon, advanced carcinoma, swallowing disorders
  • Subject with known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) in moderate to severe active phase defined by Paediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) >30 or Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis Index (PUCAI) >34
  • Subject with bowel perforation or increased risk of bowel perforation, including connective tissue disorders or recent bowel surgery
  • Subject with previous significant gastrointestinal surgery (e.g. colostomy, colectomy, gastric bypass, stomach stapling)
  • Subject with uncontrolled pre-existing electrolyte abnormalities, or with electrolyte abnormalities based on Visit 1 laboratory results such as hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperphosphatemia, hypokalaemia, hypocalcaemia, uncorrected dehydration, or secondary to the use of medications such as diuretics or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors judged clinically significant by the investigator
  • Subject with a prior history or current condition of severe renal (estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m^2 as calculated by using the Schwartz bedside equation* [Schwartz et al, 2009]**), liver (ascites, Child-Pugh C), cardiac insufficiency (including congestive heart failure all grades) or hyperuricemia

    *The estimated GFR will be calculated in patients with elevated creatinine at baseline

    **Schwartz GJ and Work DF. Measurement and Estimation of GFR in Children and Adolescents. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 4: 1832-1843

  • Female subject who is pregnant or lactating
  • Subject who has participated in another investigational drug treatment within the last 90 days before the first study visit
  • Subject with phenylketonuria
  • Subject with history of asthma or hypersensitivity to any ingredient of either drug product
  • Subject for whom intake of substances likely to affect gastrointestinal motility or urinary flow rate is required
  • Subject with requirement to take any other oral medication within 3 hours of starting the bowel preparation, as this may impact medication absorption
  • Subject with tendency for nausea and/or vomiting
  • Subject with impaired consciousness that predisposes them to pulmonary aspiration or who have known swallowing disorders
  • Subject with history of major medical/psychiatric conditions that, in the judgment of the investigator, would compromise safety in the study
  • Subject with mental or psychiatric condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude
  • Subject with a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, might increase the risk to the subject or decrease the chance of obtaining satisfactory data needed to achieve the objectives of the study
  • Subject who has previous enrolment in this study or concomitant enrolment in other clinical studies

Sites / Locations

  • Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady
  • Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice v Praze
  • Université de Picardie Jules Verne
  • Hôpital Femme Mère-Enfant
  • Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades
  • Uniklinikum Essen
  • Evang Krankenhaus Hamm
  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin
  • Klinikum Ulm
  • HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal
  • ORN Santobono-Pausilipon Padiglione Santobono
  • Ospedale "Spirito Santo" U.D.C.
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Andrea
  • AMC Emma kinderziekenhuis
  • Maasstad ziekenhuis
  • Copernicus Podmiot Leczniczy Sp. z.o.o
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 6 Śląskiego
  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Dziecięcy w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytecki Dziecięcy Szpital Kliniczny im. L. Zamenhofa w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Dziecięcy w Lublinie
  • Instytut "Pomnik - Centrum Zdrowia Dziecka"
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 1 we Wrocławiu
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 1
  • Instytut Centrum Zdrowia Matki Polki

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Eziclen®/Izinova®

Klean-Prep®

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Subjects With Successful Overall Colon Preparation, Assessed With the Cleansing Score (4-point Scale)
Blinded overall assessment of preparation efficacy (Cleansing Score) was determined by the colonoscopist upon completion of the examination, based on a 4-point scale as follows: 4 (Excellent) = No more than small bits of adherent faeces/fluid 3 (Good) = Small amounts of faeces or fluid not interfering with examination 2 (Fair) = Enough faeces or fluid to prevent a completely reliable examination 1 (Poor) = Large amounts of faecal residue, additional cleansing required. Only perfect preparations graded as excellent (4) or good (3), which allowed full, reliable examination of the mucosa were considered as successful. The adjusted percentage of subjects with a successful preparation was determined using a logistic regression model, including treatment and country as covariates.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean Colon Cleansing Score (4-point Scale)
The Cleansing Score was determined by the blinded colonoscopist, based on a 4-point scale as follows: 4 (Excellent) = No more than small bits of adherent faeces/fluid 3 (Good) = Small amounts of faeces or fluid not interfering with examination 2 (Fair) = Enough faeces or fluid to prevent a completely reliable examination 1 (Poor) = Large amounts of faecal residue, additional cleansing required. The adjusted mean score was estimated using a 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), including treatment and country as covariates.
Mean Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) Global Score and BBPS Scores by Colon Segment
The BBPS score for each colon segment (left, transverse, right) was determined by the blinded colonoscopist as follows: 0 = Unprepared colon segment with mucosa not seen due to solid stool that cannot be cleared 1 = Portion of mucosa of the segment seen, but other areas of the colon segment not well seen due to staining, residual stool and/or opaque liquid 2 = Minor amount of residual staining, small fragments of stool and/or opaque liquid, but mucosa of segment seen well 3 = Entire mucosa of segment seen well with no residual staining, small fragments of stool and/or opaque liquid. Each segment score ranged from 0-3. Global score was sum of the 3 segment scores and ranged from 0-9 (worst to best). Successful colon cleansing was defined as a global BBPS score ≥6. The adjusted mean score was estimated using a 2-way ANOVA, including treatment and country as covariates.
Percentage of Subjects With Need for Rescue Treatment
The percentage of subjects who needed rescue treatment (saline enema) prior to colonoscopy because of inadequate preparation intake was assessed.
Percentage of Subjects With Need for Nasogastric Tube To Complete Preparation
The percentage of subjects who needed placement of a nasogastric tube to achieve administration of the complete preparation was assessed.
Percentage of Subjects With Colonoscopy Procedure Documented as Completed
The percentage of subjects with a complete colonoscopy, defined as a procedure that reached the caecum, was assessed.
Median Time to Caecal Intubation
The time to caecal intubation was defined as the time from colonoscope introduction to caecal intubation, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. In the event the procedure did not reach the caecum, the subject was censored at time of withdrawal of colonoscope.
Mean Duration of Examination
The duration of examination for colonoscopy (in minutes) was measured by the difference between the time of caecum intubation and the time of withdrawal of the colonoscope. The adjusted mean duration of examination was estimated using a 2-way ANOVA, including treatment and country as covariates. Subjects for whom the caecum was not reached were excluded from the analysis.
Mean Score for Overall Treatment Acceptability, Assessed Using Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire
The Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire was completed by the caregiver or subject after the subject ended the intake of preparation. Subject acceptability was rated as follows: 1 = Very badly accepted/unacceptable 2 = Badly but accepted 3 = Neither good nor bad 4 = Well accepted 5 = Very well accepted. Overall acceptability score is the average of scores from the 2 doses ranging from 1 - 5 (worst to best). The adjusted mean score was estimated using a 2-way ANOVA, including treatment and country as covariates.
Mean Overall Treatment Compliance
Treatment compliance according the instructions of use provided in the prescription was assessed as the percentage of volume of fluid taken relative to the planned volume of fluid to be taken (measured by the caregiver and reported in the treatment questionnaire of subject's leaflet during treatment administration). Overall treatment compliance was derived from the total volumes of fluid (i.e. preparation + hydration for Eziclen®/Izinova® and preparation only for Klean-Prep®) and was assessed for dose 1, dose 2 and globally (accounting for both doses). The adjusted mean overall treatment compliance (%) was estimated using a 2-way ANOVA, including treatment and country as covariates.
Mean Subject Tolerability Total Score, Assessed Using a Symptom Scale
Tolerability was assessed using a Symptom Scale after each dose of treatment for stomach cramping, stomach bloating and nausea on a paediatric 5-point scale as follows: 1 = No symptom 2 = Mild 3 = Bothersome 4 = Distressing 5 = Severely distressing symptoms. The total tolerability score is the sum of the scores for the 3 symptoms ranging from 3 to 15 (best to worst). Mean total tolerability scores after dose 1 and dose 2 are presented.

Full Information

First Posted
December 30, 2016
Last Updated
March 1, 2021
Sponsor
Ipsen
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03008460
Brief Title
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Eziclen®/Izinova® Versus Klean-prep® on Bowel Cleansing in Adolescents Undergoing Colonoscopy
Acronym
EASYKID
Official Title
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Bowel Cleansing Preparation (Eziclen/Izinova®) in Paediatric Subjects Undergoing Colonoscopy: a Phase III, Multicentre, Randomised, Comparative Study Versus Klean-Prep® (PEG-Electrolytes), Administered on the Day Before Colonoscopy, Investigator-blinded, Non-inferiority in Adolescents of 12 to 17 Years of Age (Inclusive) >40 kg
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 15, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 24, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 29, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ipsen

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the protocol is to demonstrate that Eziclen®/Izinova®, an osmotic sulphate-based laxative preparation given on the day before colonoscopy has non-inferior efficacy to Klean-Prep® (polyethylene glycol (PEG)-electrolytes) on colon cleansing in adolescents aged 12 to 17 years (inclusive) with a body weight >40 kg, scheduled to undergo a colonoscopy for a routinely accepted diagnostic indication.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Digestive System Disease
Keywords
Bowel preparation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
250 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Eziclen®/Izinova®
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Klean-Prep®
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Eziclen®/Izinova®
Other Intervention Name(s)
Suprep®
Intervention Description
Oral solution taken the evening before the colonoscopy
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Klean-Prep®
Intervention Description
Oral solution taken the evening before the colonoscopy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Subjects With Successful Overall Colon Preparation, Assessed With the Cleansing Score (4-point Scale)
Description
Blinded overall assessment of preparation efficacy (Cleansing Score) was determined by the colonoscopist upon completion of the examination, based on a 4-point scale as follows: 4 (Excellent) = No more than small bits of adherent faeces/fluid 3 (Good) = Small amounts of faeces or fluid not interfering with examination 2 (Fair) = Enough faeces or fluid to prevent a completely reliable examination 1 (Poor) = Large amounts of faecal residue, additional cleansing required. Only perfect preparations graded as excellent (4) or good (3), which allowed full, reliable examination of the mucosa were considered as successful. The adjusted percentage of subjects with a successful preparation was determined using a logistic regression model, including treatment and country as covariates.
Time Frame
At Day 2 (colonoscopy visit)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Colon Cleansing Score (4-point Scale)
Description
The Cleansing Score was determined by the blinded colonoscopist, based on a 4-point scale as follows: 4 (Excellent) = No more than small bits of adherent faeces/fluid 3 (Good) = Small amounts of faeces or fluid not interfering with examination 2 (Fair) = Enough faeces or fluid to prevent a completely reliable examination 1 (Poor) = Large amounts of faecal residue, additional cleansing required. The adjusted mean score was estimated using a 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), including treatment and country as covariates.
Time Frame
At Day 2 (colonoscopy visit)
Title
Mean Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) Global Score and BBPS Scores by Colon Segment
Description
The BBPS score for each colon segment (left, transverse, right) was determined by the blinded colonoscopist as follows: 0 = Unprepared colon segment with mucosa not seen due to solid stool that cannot be cleared 1 = Portion of mucosa of the segment seen, but other areas of the colon segment not well seen due to staining, residual stool and/or opaque liquid 2 = Minor amount of residual staining, small fragments of stool and/or opaque liquid, but mucosa of segment seen well 3 = Entire mucosa of segment seen well with no residual staining, small fragments of stool and/or opaque liquid. Each segment score ranged from 0-3. Global score was sum of the 3 segment scores and ranged from 0-9 (worst to best). Successful colon cleansing was defined as a global BBPS score ≥6. The adjusted mean score was estimated using a 2-way ANOVA, including treatment and country as covariates.
Time Frame
At Day 2 (colonoscopy visit)
Title
Percentage of Subjects With Need for Rescue Treatment
Description
The percentage of subjects who needed rescue treatment (saline enema) prior to colonoscopy because of inadequate preparation intake was assessed.
Time Frame
At Day 2 (colonoscopy visit, before colonoscopy)
Title
Percentage of Subjects With Need for Nasogastric Tube To Complete Preparation
Description
The percentage of subjects who needed placement of a nasogastric tube to achieve administration of the complete preparation was assessed.
Time Frame
At Day 1 (treatment visit)
Title
Percentage of Subjects With Colonoscopy Procedure Documented as Completed
Description
The percentage of subjects with a complete colonoscopy, defined as a procedure that reached the caecum, was assessed.
Time Frame
At Day 2 (colonoscopy visit)
Title
Median Time to Caecal Intubation
Description
The time to caecal intubation was defined as the time from colonoscope introduction to caecal intubation, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. In the event the procedure did not reach the caecum, the subject was censored at time of withdrawal of colonoscope.
Time Frame
From colonoscope introduction to caecal intubation, assessed on Day 2 (colonoscopy visit)
Title
Mean Duration of Examination
Description
The duration of examination for colonoscopy (in minutes) was measured by the difference between the time of caecum intubation and the time of withdrawal of the colonoscope. The adjusted mean duration of examination was estimated using a 2-way ANOVA, including treatment and country as covariates. Subjects for whom the caecum was not reached were excluded from the analysis.
Time Frame
From caecum intubation to withdrawal of the colonoscope, assessed on Day 2 (colonoscopy visit)
Title
Mean Score for Overall Treatment Acceptability, Assessed Using Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire
Description
The Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire was completed by the caregiver or subject after the subject ended the intake of preparation. Subject acceptability was rated as follows: 1 = Very badly accepted/unacceptable 2 = Badly but accepted 3 = Neither good nor bad 4 = Well accepted 5 = Very well accepted. Overall acceptability score is the average of scores from the 2 doses ranging from 1 - 5 (worst to best). The adjusted mean score was estimated using a 2-way ANOVA, including treatment and country as covariates.
Time Frame
At Day 1 (treatment visit)
Title
Mean Overall Treatment Compliance
Description
Treatment compliance according the instructions of use provided in the prescription was assessed as the percentage of volume of fluid taken relative to the planned volume of fluid to be taken (measured by the caregiver and reported in the treatment questionnaire of subject's leaflet during treatment administration). Overall treatment compliance was derived from the total volumes of fluid (i.e. preparation + hydration for Eziclen®/Izinova® and preparation only for Klean-Prep®) and was assessed for dose 1, dose 2 and globally (accounting for both doses). The adjusted mean overall treatment compliance (%) was estimated using a 2-way ANOVA, including treatment and country as covariates.
Time Frame
At Day 1 (treatment visit)
Title
Mean Subject Tolerability Total Score, Assessed Using a Symptom Scale
Description
Tolerability was assessed using a Symptom Scale after each dose of treatment for stomach cramping, stomach bloating and nausea on a paediatric 5-point scale as follows: 1 = No symptom 2 = Mild 3 = Bothersome 4 = Distressing 5 = Severely distressing symptoms. The total tolerability score is the sum of the scores for the 3 symptoms ranging from 3 to 15 (best to worst). Mean total tolerability scores after dose 1 and dose 2 are presented.
Time Frame
At Day 1 (treatment visit)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Median Time to Clear Effluent
Description
The time to clear effluent, as reported by the subject, was defined as the time between first intake of prescription and first clear watery stool, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. In the event of no clear watery stools, subjects with colonoscopy were censored at the time of colonoscope introduction, and subjects without colonoscopy were censored at time of start of treatment + 12 hours. Although time to clear effluent was pre-specified as a secondary endpoint in the study protocol, in a change to the planned analysis, it was subsequently analysed and reported as an 'other' efficacy endpoint.
Time Frame
From first intake of prescription to first clear watery stool, assessed on Day 1 (treatment visit) and Day 2 (colonoscopy visit)
Title
Mean Time Between Last Intake of Fluids and Start of Colonoscopy Procedure
Description
The time between the end of treatment administration (on Day 1) and the start of colonoscopy (on Day 2) was determined. The adjusted mean time between the last intake of fluids and the start of colonoscopy procedure was estimated using a 2-way ANOVA, including treatment and country as covariates.
Time Frame
From end of treatment administration to start of colonoscopy, assessed on Day 1 (treatment visit) and Day 2 (colonoscopy visit)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Provision of signed informed consent form to participate in the study obtained from the adolescent's parent(s)/ legal representative and a signed assent form from the adolescent according to local law Male or female subjects between 12 to 17 years of age (inclusive) Body weight more than 40 kg Female of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test If female, and of child-bearing potential, subject must use an acceptable form of birth control (hormonal birth control, intrauterine device (IUD), double-barrier method, or depot contraceptive) Routinely accepted indication for undergoing colonoscopy, including but not limited to polyposis coli diagnosis or surveillance, gastrointestinal bleeding, unexplained diarrhoea or constipation, surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease or confirmation of mucosal healing, abdominal pain, abnormal endosonography or manometry, anaemia of unknown aetiology, cancer surveillance In the investigator's judgment, the parent(s)/legal representative are/is mentally competent to provide informed consent for the subject to participate in the study In the investigator's judgement, subject is able and willing to follow study procedures including drug administration and response to questionnaires Exclusion Criteria: Subject with known or suspected ileus, gastrointestinal obstruction, gastric retention (gastroparesis), rectal impaction, toxic colitis, severe ulcerative colitis or toxic megacolon, advanced carcinoma, swallowing disorders Subject with known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) in moderate to severe active phase defined by Paediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) >30 or Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis Index (PUCAI) >34 Subject with bowel perforation or increased risk of bowel perforation, including connective tissue disorders or recent bowel surgery Subject with previous significant gastrointestinal surgery (e.g. colostomy, colectomy, gastric bypass, stomach stapling) Subject with uncontrolled pre-existing electrolyte abnormalities, or with electrolyte abnormalities based on Visit 1 laboratory results such as hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperphosphatemia, hypokalaemia, hypocalcaemia, uncorrected dehydration, or secondary to the use of medications such as diuretics or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors judged clinically significant by the investigator Subject with a prior history or current condition of severe renal (estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m^2 as calculated by using the Schwartz bedside equation* [Schwartz et al, 2009]**), liver (ascites, Child-Pugh C), cardiac insufficiency (including congestive heart failure all grades) or hyperuricemia *The estimated GFR will be calculated in patients with elevated creatinine at baseline **Schwartz GJ and Work DF. Measurement and Estimation of GFR in Children and Adolescents. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 4: 1832-1843 Female subject who is pregnant or lactating Subject who has participated in another investigational drug treatment within the last 90 days before the first study visit Subject with phenylketonuria Subject with history of asthma or hypersensitivity to any ingredient of either drug product Subject for whom intake of substances likely to affect gastrointestinal motility or urinary flow rate is required Subject with requirement to take any other oral medication within 3 hours of starting the bowel preparation, as this may impact medication absorption Subject with tendency for nausea and/or vomiting Subject with impaired consciousness that predisposes them to pulmonary aspiration or who have known swallowing disorders Subject with history of major medical/psychiatric conditions that, in the judgment of the investigator, would compromise safety in the study Subject with mental or psychiatric condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude Subject with a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, might increase the risk to the subject or decrease the chance of obtaining satisfactory data needed to achieve the objectives of the study Subject who has previous enrolment in this study or concomitant enrolment in other clinical studies
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ipsen Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Ipsen Consumer Healthcare
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady
City
Praha
ZIP/Postal Code
100 34
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice v Praze
City
Praha
ZIP/Postal Code
128 08
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Université de Picardie Jules Verne
City
Amiens
ZIP/Postal Code
80054
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Femme Mère-Enfant
City
Bron
ZIP/Postal Code
69677
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75015
Country
France
Facility Name
Uniklinikum Essen
City
Essen
ZIP/Postal Code
45147
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Evang Krankenhaus Hamm
City
Hamm
ZIP/Postal Code
59063
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04103
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum Ulm
City
Ulm
ZIP/Postal Code
89075
Country
Germany
Facility Name
HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal
City
Wuppertal
ZIP/Postal Code
42283
Country
Germany
Facility Name
ORN Santobono-Pausilipon Padiglione Santobono
City
Napoli
ZIP/Postal Code
680 122
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale "Spirito Santo" U.D.C.
City
Pescara
ZIP/Postal Code
65125
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Andrea
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00189
Country
Italy
Facility Name
AMC Emma kinderziekenhuis
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1105 AZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Maasstad ziekenhuis
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3079 DZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Copernicus Podmiot Leczniczy Sp. z.o.o
City
Gdańsk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-803
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 6 Śląskiego
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-752
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Uniwersytecki Szpital Dziecięcy w Krakowie
City
Kraków
ZIP/Postal Code
30-663
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Uniwersytecki Dziecięcy Szpital Kliniczny im. L. Zamenhofa w Białymstoku
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-093
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Uniwersytecki Szpital Dziecięcy w Lublinie
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-093
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Instytut "Pomnik - Centrum Zdrowia Dziecka"
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
04-730
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 1 we Wrocławiu
City
Wrocław
ZIP/Postal Code
50-369
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 1
City
Zabrze
ZIP/Postal Code
41-800
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Instytut Centrum Zdrowia Matki Polki
City
Łódź
ZIP/Postal Code
93-338
Country
Poland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Eziclen®/Izinova® Versus Klean-prep® on Bowel Cleansing in Adolescents Undergoing Colonoscopy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs