Solo Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Primary Purpose
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Solo surgery
operation with a camera operator in SILC
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic focused on measuring Single incision, Solo surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- all patient need laparoscopic cholecystectomy (check the possibility of routine application of Solo-SILC in clinical practice)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mirizzi syndrome
- unstable vital sign
- no compliance
- no consent
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Solo-SILC
Ca-SILC
Arm Description
Solo surgery using a laparoscopic camera holder instead of a camera operator in SILC
No solo surgery, operation with a camera operator in SILC
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Complication rate in Solo-Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC)
intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications in Solo-SILC comparing with that in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Secondary Outcome Measures
complications in both groups
intraoperative and postoperative complications
Conversion rate
intraoperative conversion rate to open or additional port surgery
Incisional hernia
Umbilical incisional hernia incidence
Wound, back, and shoulder pain
Access the patient's pain using the visual analog scale
Postoperative adverse symptoms after SILC
Diet change, post-cholecystectomy diarrhea
number of participant with abnormal laboratory values
postoperative laboratory findings on visiting outpatient's clinic
Operator's workload
Access a operator's workload just after solo surgery comparing to Ca-SILC group using NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) score
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03018964
First Posted
January 8, 2017
Last Updated
April 2, 2019
Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Collaborators
Chungbuk National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03018964
Brief Title
Solo Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Official Title
A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study for The Safety of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With a Camera Holder Versus With a Camera Operator
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 2020 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
January 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Collaborators
Chungbuk National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Hospital
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine safety of solo surgery in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with a camera holder comparing to a camera operator assisted SILC
Detailed Description
This study is a multicenter randomized controlled study. The primary outcome based on non-inferior study design(α=0.05, power (1-β)=0.90); comparing a complications rate between Solo-SILC group and conventional cholecystectomy group (Ca-SILC).
Total of 272 patients who were undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disorders will randomly assign to two groups according to a computer-generated table of random numbers Solo-SILC group using a laparoscopic camera holder (n=136) or Ca-SILC group in which a camera operator joins (n=136). .
Demographics (i.e., age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, indication for operation, need for conversion to open surgery or additional port will be recorded. Outcome including pain, hernia, complication rates, post-cholecystectomy diarrhea, operator's workload will be investigated
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Keywords
Single incision, Solo surgery
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
272 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Solo-SILC
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Solo surgery using a laparoscopic camera holder instead of a camera operator in SILC
Arm Title
Ca-SILC
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
No solo surgery, operation with a camera operator in SILC
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Solo surgery
Intervention Description
Solo surgery using a camera scope holder in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
operation with a camera operator in SILC
Intervention Description
conventional single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a scopist
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complication rate in Solo-Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC)
Description
intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications in Solo-SILC comparing with that in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Time Frame
average 2 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
complications in both groups
Description
intraoperative and postoperative complications
Time Frame
average 2 weeks
Title
Conversion rate
Description
intraoperative conversion rate to open or additional port surgery
Time Frame
intraoperative
Title
Incisional hernia
Description
Umbilical incisional hernia incidence
Time Frame
average 6 months
Title
Wound, back, and shoulder pain
Description
Access the patient's pain using the visual analog scale
Time Frame
postoperative 6 hr, 24 hr, 2 weeks after the operation
Title
Postoperative adverse symptoms after SILC
Description
Diet change, post-cholecystectomy diarrhea
Time Frame
average 2weeks after discharge
Title
number of participant with abnormal laboratory values
Description
postoperative laboratory findings on visiting outpatient's clinic
Time Frame
average 2weeks after discharge
Title
Operator's workload
Description
Access a operator's workload just after solo surgery comparing to Ca-SILC group using NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) score
Time Frame
intraoperative
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
all patient need laparoscopic cholecystectomy (check the possibility of routine application of Solo-SILC in clinical practice)
Exclusion Criteria:
Mirizzi syndrome
unstable vital sign
no compliance
no consent
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
YoungRok Choi, M.D.
Phone
+821093212477
Email
choiyoungrok@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ho-Jeong Jeong, R.N.
Phone
+821095267743
Email
r1441@snubh.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Soyeon Ahn, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Medical Research Collaboration Center Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
9171771
Citation
Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997 May;84(5):695. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20174950
Citation
Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1842-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21367381
Citation
Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Paraskeva P, Rivas H, Soper N, Rosemurgy A, Shah S. Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg. 2011 Mar;201(3):369-72; discussion 372-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.012.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22173546
Citation
Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1205-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22083331
Citation
Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, Tacchino R, Onders R, DeNoto G, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Paraskeva P, Shah S. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1296-303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2028-z. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24368985
Citation
Deveci U, Barbaros U, Kapakli MS, Manukyan MN, Simsek S, Kebudi A, Mercan S. The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Dec;85(6):275-82. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.275. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23990155
Citation
Gillen S, Pletzer B, Heiligensetzer A, Wolf P, Kleeff J, Feussner H, Furst A. Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study. Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):164-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3142-x. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22408354
Citation
Sasaki K, Watanabe G, Matsuda M, Hashimoto M. Original single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar 7;18(9):944-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i9.944.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24282363
Citation
Chuang SH, Chen PH, Chang CM, Lin CS. Single-incision vs three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for complicated and uncomplicated acute cholecystitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 21;19(43):7743-50. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7743.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25336816
Citation
Sinha R, Yadav AS. Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional instruments: A continuing study. J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Oct;10(4):175-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.141502.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20727831
Citation
Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH, Dewoolkar AV, Slayton SA. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: technical considerations and strategic modifications. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;6(6):658-64. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
8000648
Citation
Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jan;180(1):101-25. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
Solo Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs