search
Back to results

Solo Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Primary Purpose

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Solo surgery
operation with a camera operator in SILC
Sponsored by
Seoul National University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic focused on measuring Single incision, Solo surgery

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patient need laparoscopic cholecystectomy (check the possibility of routine application of Solo-SILC in clinical practice)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mirizzi syndrome
  • unstable vital sign
  • no compliance
  • no consent

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Solo-SILC

    Ca-SILC

    Arm Description

    Solo surgery using a laparoscopic camera holder instead of a camera operator in SILC

    No solo surgery, operation with a camera operator in SILC

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Complication rate in Solo-Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC)
    intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications in Solo-SILC comparing with that in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    complications in both groups
    intraoperative and postoperative complications
    Conversion rate
    intraoperative conversion rate to open or additional port surgery
    Incisional hernia
    Umbilical incisional hernia incidence
    Wound, back, and shoulder pain
    Access the patient's pain using the visual analog scale
    Postoperative adverse symptoms after SILC
    Diet change, post-cholecystectomy diarrhea
    number of participant with abnormal laboratory values
    postoperative laboratory findings on visiting outpatient's clinic
    Operator's workload
    Access a operator's workload just after solo surgery comparing to Ca-SILC group using NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) score

    Full Information

    First Posted
    January 8, 2017
    Last Updated
    April 2, 2019
    Sponsor
    Seoul National University Hospital
    Collaborators
    Chungbuk National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Hospital
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03018964
    Brief Title
    Solo Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Official Title
    A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study for The Safety of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With a Camera Holder Versus With a Camera Operator
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    April 2019
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    March 2020 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    January 2021 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    August 2022 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Seoul National University Hospital
    Collaborators
    Chungbuk National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Hospital

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study is to determine safety of solo surgery in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with a camera holder comparing to a camera operator assisted SILC
    Detailed Description
    This study is a multicenter randomized controlled study. The primary outcome based on non-inferior study design(α=0.05, power (1-β)=0.90); comparing a complications rate between Solo-SILC group and conventional cholecystectomy group (Ca-SILC). Total of 272 patients who were undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disorders will randomly assign to two groups according to a computer-generated table of random numbers Solo-SILC group using a laparoscopic camera holder (n=136) or Ca-SILC group in which a camera operator joins (n=136). . Demographics (i.e., age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, indication for operation, need for conversion to open surgery or additional port will be recorded. Outcome including pain, hernia, complication rates, post-cholecystectomy diarrhea, operator's workload will be investigated

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
    Keywords
    Single incision, Solo surgery

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Participant
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    272 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Solo-SILC
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Solo surgery using a laparoscopic camera holder instead of a camera operator in SILC
    Arm Title
    Ca-SILC
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    No solo surgery, operation with a camera operator in SILC
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Solo surgery
    Intervention Description
    Solo surgery using a camera scope holder in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    operation with a camera operator in SILC
    Intervention Description
    conventional single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a scopist
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Complication rate in Solo-Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC)
    Description
    intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications in Solo-SILC comparing with that in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Time Frame
    average 2 weeks
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    complications in both groups
    Description
    intraoperative and postoperative complications
    Time Frame
    average 2 weeks
    Title
    Conversion rate
    Description
    intraoperative conversion rate to open or additional port surgery
    Time Frame
    intraoperative
    Title
    Incisional hernia
    Description
    Umbilical incisional hernia incidence
    Time Frame
    average 6 months
    Title
    Wound, back, and shoulder pain
    Description
    Access the patient's pain using the visual analog scale
    Time Frame
    postoperative 6 hr, 24 hr, 2 weeks after the operation
    Title
    Postoperative adverse symptoms after SILC
    Description
    Diet change, post-cholecystectomy diarrhea
    Time Frame
    average 2weeks after discharge
    Title
    number of participant with abnormal laboratory values
    Description
    postoperative laboratory findings on visiting outpatient's clinic
    Time Frame
    average 2weeks after discharge
    Title
    Operator's workload
    Description
    Access a operator's workload just after solo surgery comparing to Ca-SILC group using NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) score
    Time Frame
    intraoperative

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: all patient need laparoscopic cholecystectomy (check the possibility of routine application of Solo-SILC in clinical practice) Exclusion Criteria: Mirizzi syndrome unstable vital sign no compliance no consent
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    YoungRok Choi, M.D.
    Phone
    +821093212477
    Email
    choiyoungrok@gmail.com
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Ho-Jeong Jeong, R.N.
    Phone
    +821095267743
    Email
    r1441@snubh.org
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Soyeon Ahn, Ph.D.
    Organizational Affiliation
    Medical Research Collaboration Center Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Undecided
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    9171771
    Citation
    Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997 May;84(5):695. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    20174950
    Citation
    Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1842-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    21367381
    Citation
    Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Paraskeva P, Rivas H, Soper N, Rosemurgy A, Shah S. Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg. 2011 Mar;201(3):369-72; discussion 372-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.012.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    22173546
    Citation
    Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1205-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    22083331
    Citation
    Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, Tacchino R, Onders R, DeNoto G, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Paraskeva P, Shah S. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1296-303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2028-z. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    24368985
    Citation
    Deveci U, Barbaros U, Kapakli MS, Manukyan MN, Simsek S, Kebudi A, Mercan S. The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Dec;85(6):275-82. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.275. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    23990155
    Citation
    Gillen S, Pletzer B, Heiligensetzer A, Wolf P, Kleeff J, Feussner H, Furst A. Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study. Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):164-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3142-x. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    22408354
    Citation
    Sasaki K, Watanabe G, Matsuda M, Hashimoto M. Original single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar 7;18(9):944-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i9.944.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    24282363
    Citation
    Chuang SH, Chen PH, Chang CM, Lin CS. Single-incision vs three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for complicated and uncomplicated acute cholecystitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 21;19(43):7743-50. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7743.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    25336816
    Citation
    Sinha R, Yadav AS. Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional instruments: A continuing study. J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Oct;10(4):175-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.141502.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    20727831
    Citation
    Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH, Dewoolkar AV, Slayton SA. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: technical considerations and strategic modifications. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;6(6):658-64. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    8000648
    Citation
    Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jan;180(1):101-25. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    result

    Learn more about this trial

    Solo Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs