search
Back to results

Efficacity and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Cirrhotic Patients Presenting With Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding (EXARHOSE)

Primary Purpose

Upper Digestive Bleeding, Cirrhosis

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tranexamic acid
Placebo
Sponsored by
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Upper Digestive Bleeding focused on measuring Upper digestive bleeding, Haemorrhage, Cirrhosis, Antifibrinolytic, Tranexamic acid, Emergency

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria (modified by amendment1)

  • Age ≥ 18
  • Patient treated by a prehospital physician-staffed SMUR team, a firefighter physician-staffed ambulance (ARBSPP), an hospital EMS or an ICU
  • Acute upper digestive bleeding (< 24h) in the shape of hematemesis, described either by the physician, the patient, a relative or a member of the medical team
  • Known or suspected cirrhosis (based on clinical/biological/radiographic/anamnestic data)
  • Affiliated or recipient of the French social security
  • Written consent (or under emergency procedures)

Exclusion Criteria (modified by amendment1)

  • Known ongoing pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • TA already given (if inter-hospital transfer)
  • Endoscopy already performed for the current haemorrhagic episode
  • Hospitalization for over 24h in an intensive care unit or a routine care unit
  • Exclusive lower digestive bleeding or melena only
  • Patient in cardiac arrest at the arrival of the prehospital medical team, whether recovered or not
  • Patient already randomised once in EXARHOSE study
  • TA Counter-indications

    • creatininemia > 500 μmol/L or documented clearance < 30 mL/min
    • documented ongoing CIVD (prior to UDB)
    • ongoing seizures
    • ongoing arterial or venous thrombosis
    • allergy
  • Known participation of the patient to another therapeutic study
  • Known linguistic inability of the patient to understand the study
  • Patient under known guardianship

Sites / Locations

  • Jean Verdier HospitalRecruiting
  • Henri Mondor HospitalRecruiting
  • Marc Jacquet HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Tranexamic acid

Placebo

Arm Description

At randomisation : loading dose of 1g of intravenous tranexamic acid for 10 min, immediately followed by an intravenous infusion of 3g of TA over 24h

At randomisation : loading dose of 10 mL of intravenous isotonic saline for 10 min, immediately followed by an intravenous infusion of 30 mL of isotonic saline over 24h

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The main outcome is a composite criterion and includes: control on acute bleeding, absence of re-bleeding episodes at day 5 and absence of death at day 5 (modified by amendment 1)
Specifically, the composite criterion is defined by all the following criteria: Immediate control of the hemorrhage after initial patient management using splanchnic vasoconstrictors and/or proton pump inhibitors, potentially including volume expander, transfusion and/or prescription of vasopressor amines : Achievement of the transfusion target (Hb ≥ 7 g/dL) 24 hours after initial patient management and then until day 5 Absence of initiation or increase in vasopressor amines, until day 5 Absence of recourse to the transfusion of 2 or more red cells packs within 24h to maintain the transfusion target (Hb ≥ 7 g/dL) Absence of persistence or evolution towards haemorrhagic shock (systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg and/or mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg and/or heart rate > 100 bpm) Absence of re-bleeding episodes at day 5, assessed by the medical team on the bases of clinical, biological or endoscopic elements Absence of death at day 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Control of the bleeding
At least 1 criterion present : Persistence of the bleeding (regardless of the volume), 2 hours after initiation of medical or endoscopic treatment And/Or blood transfusion needed within 24 hours after treatment initiation (≥ 2 red cells units) And/Or hemorrhagic shock installation (systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg and/or mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg and/or heart rate > 100 bpm)
Re-bleeding episodes
Death
Fluid infusion volume (in mL)
Blood transfusion volume (in mL)
Blood transfusion quantity (number of units)
Nature of blood transfusion: - Red cells units - Platelets units - Fresh frozen plasma - Fibrinogen - Other
TIPS procedure (in Child-Pugh B patients)
Visceral and systemic complications
Complications, defined as: Acute organ failure (using CLIF-C ACLF and CLIF-SOFA scores) Hepatic encephalopathy Hepatic failure Hepatorenal syndrome Renal failure (using grades 2 and 3 of the KDIGO classification) Sepsis Ascites liquid infection
Need for organ substitution - Renal replacement therapy (dialysis) - Liver replacement therapy - Mechanical ventilation
Liver transplantation
Length of stay in ICU (in days)
Duration of hospitalization (in days)
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by the ANSM notice of Exacyl®
Adverse events as assessed by the ANSM notice of Exacyl® are : Allergy Thrombotic events Seizures Acute renal failure (KDIGO grades 2 and 3) Death Or any other adverse event suspected to be treatment-related Adverse effects will be systematically searched for and collected in the electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) during the acute phase (within 5 days after randomization), as assessed by the AP-HP notification form. When present, investigators will have to send a notification to the promoter (by fax). Patients with severe adverse effects (leading to death, life-threatening condition, hospitalization and pursuit of hospitalization, incapacity or handicap, congenital malformation) will be followed until disappearance of these. Every document related to the patient during the protocol should be transmitted to the promoter. Investigators are supposed to answer every inquiry of the promoter.
Delay between the beginning of the haemorrhage and the initiation of the AT treatment

Full Information

First Posted
December 23, 2016
Last Updated
April 10, 2018
Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03023189
Brief Title
Efficacity and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Cirrhotic Patients Presenting With Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Acronym
EXARHOSE
Official Title
Efficacy and Safety of Early Administration of Tranexamic Acid in Cirrhotic Patients Presenting With Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: a Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial (Modified by amendment1)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 3, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Upper digestive bleeding. Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage is a common cause of decompensated cirrhosis and is associated with a high mortality rate among cirrhotic patients. Its leading cause is the rupture of gastro-esophageal varices due to portal hypertension. In cirrhotic patients, the management of acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage is challenging as they often present with coagulation (or haemostasis abnormalities) abnormalities such as hyperfibrinolysis, especially when the cirrhosis is decompensated. Beyond life support measures, therapeutic modalities of upper gastrointestinal bleeding rely on both endoscopic and pharmacological interventions. Tranexamic acid (TA) is an antifibrinolytic that may help control the bleeding in this setting, as it showed an unquestionable benefit in other indications. TA has previously been studied in both upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage from any causes and in liver transplantation of cirrhotic patients. However, there is a lack of data to conclude on its effectiveness (or efficiency) in the early treatment of acute bleeding in cirrhotic patients. Investigators hypothesize that, when given early, TA would be beneficial for cirrhotic patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage , by controlling the haemorrhage, avoiding rebleeding episodes and reducing mortality within 5 days after its administration. Moreover, TA could prevent early cirrhosis complications (such as hepatic encephalopathy, sepsis and ascites liquid infection, hepatorenal syndrome), could reduce indications to transjugular portosystemic shunt (TIPS), shorten the length of stay in intensive care unit and the length of hospitalization, and decrease late relapses and one-year mortality.
Detailed Description
Acute Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (UGIH) is frequent, with an estimated annual incidence of 150/100 000 in France. Its second etiology is the rupture of portal hypertension-related gastro-esophageal varices, accounting for 20 % of the patients and responsible for more than 50 % of the hospitalizations in intensive care unit (ICU) for UGIH. In cirrhotic patients, variceal bleeding is the main cause of UGIH (over 70 %) and death (30 %), which occurs in the most severe patients (Child-Pugh score B or C and/or high MELD score, and high levels of portal hypertension). Acute UGIH is directly responsible for 50 % of the deaths, either because it remains uncontrolled during the acute phase (within 5 days), or because of early relapses (within 6 weeks). Every episode of acute UGIH worsens the middle and long-term vital prognosis: about 60 % of the patients present with UGIH recurrence within one year and the survival rate is only 30 % 3 years after the first episode. Moreover, acute UGIH is a triggering factor for several severe cirrhosis-specific complications (such as hepatic encephalopathy, sepsis and ascites liquid infection, hepatorenal syndrome), which themselves lead to high mortality rates. Despite the improvement of preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, UGIH remains stable in France. The haemostasis of cirrhotic patients is often abnormal at baseline : thrombopenia, decrease of factors II, V, VII, IX, X and XI, decrease of fibrinolytic proteins, increase of factor VIII and spontaneous fibrinolysis. When compensated, the cirrhotic's haemostasis remains globally preserved, due to the balance of pro and anticoagulant alterations. Every cause of cirrhosis decompensation, such as acute PHT-UGIH, can increase hemostatic disorders, leading to hyperfibrinolysis. This could slow down or inhibit the clotting, thus disrupting pharmacological control of acute UGIH. TA could be efficient in acute UGIH of cirrhotic patients. It is a simple antifibrinolytic which showed clinical benefits on haemorrhage and/or mortality in several other indications (surgical, obstetrical and traumatic). It is now widely used according to recommendations. Early administration of TA seems to be beneficial in UGIH haemorrhage. Despite theoretical efficiency, 4 recent Cochrane meta-analysis concluded to the lack of significant data (poor overall trials quality). The benefit of the use of TA in acute UGIH (and acute PHT-UGIH) remains uncertain. At this day, TA has still not been studied in acute UGIH of cirrhotic patients, although it showed benefits on blood transfusion's requirements and on haemorrhagic complications during liver transplantation (for which cirrhosis most frequent cause).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Upper Digestive Bleeding, Cirrhosis
Keywords
Upper digestive bleeding, Haemorrhage, Cirrhosis, Antifibrinolytic, Tranexamic acid, Emergency

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
500 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tranexamic acid
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
At randomisation : loading dose of 1g of intravenous tranexamic acid for 10 min, immediately followed by an intravenous infusion of 3g of TA over 24h
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
At randomisation : loading dose of 10 mL of intravenous isotonic saline for 10 min, immediately followed by an intravenous infusion of 30 mL of isotonic saline over 24h
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tranexamic acid
Intervention Description
At randomisation : loading dose of 1g of intravenous tranexamic acid for 10 min, immediately followed by an intravenous infusion of 3g of TA over 24h. Total dose : 4 g of TA
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
At randomisation : loading dose of 10 mL of intravenous isotonic saline for 10 min, immediately followed by an intravenous infusion of 30 mL of isotonic saline over 24h Total dose : 40 mL of Placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The main outcome is a composite criterion and includes: control on acute bleeding, absence of re-bleeding episodes at day 5 and absence of death at day 5 (modified by amendment 1)
Description
Specifically, the composite criterion is defined by all the following criteria: Immediate control of the hemorrhage after initial patient management using splanchnic vasoconstrictors and/or proton pump inhibitors, potentially including volume expander, transfusion and/or prescription of vasopressor amines : Achievement of the transfusion target (Hb ≥ 7 g/dL) 24 hours after initial patient management and then until day 5 Absence of initiation or increase in vasopressor amines, until day 5 Absence of recourse to the transfusion of 2 or more red cells packs within 24h to maintain the transfusion target (Hb ≥ 7 g/dL) Absence of persistence or evolution towards haemorrhagic shock (systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg and/or mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg and/or heart rate > 100 bpm) Absence of re-bleeding episodes at day 5, assessed by the medical team on the bases of clinical, biological or endoscopic elements Absence of death at day 5
Time Frame
5 days after randomisation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Control of the bleeding
Description
At least 1 criterion present : Persistence of the bleeding (regardless of the volume), 2 hours after initiation of medical or endoscopic treatment And/Or blood transfusion needed within 24 hours after treatment initiation (≥ 2 red cells units) And/Or hemorrhagic shock installation (systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg and/or mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg and/or heart rate > 100 bpm)
Time Frame
Within 5 days after randomisation
Title
Re-bleeding episodes
Time Frame
At day 6, day 28, day 42, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after randomisation
Title
Death
Time Frame
At day 6, day 28, day 42, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after randomisation
Title
Fluid infusion volume (in mL)
Time Frame
At day 6, day 28 and day 42 after randomisation
Title
Blood transfusion volume (in mL)
Time Frame
At day 6, day 28 and day 42 after randomisation
Title
Blood transfusion quantity (number of units)
Time Frame
At day 6, day 28 and day 42 after randomisation
Title
Nature of blood transfusion: - Red cells units - Platelets units - Fresh frozen plasma - Fibrinogen - Other
Time Frame
At day 6, day 28 and day 42, after randomisation
Title
TIPS procedure (in Child-Pugh B patients)
Time Frame
At day 6, day 28, day 42 after randomisation
Title
Visceral and systemic complications
Description
Complications, defined as: Acute organ failure (using CLIF-C ACLF and CLIF-SOFA scores) Hepatic encephalopathy Hepatic failure Hepatorenal syndrome Renal failure (using grades 2 and 3 of the KDIGO classification) Sepsis Ascites liquid infection
Time Frame
At day 6, day 28 and day 42, after randomisation (or until discharge)
Title
Need for organ substitution - Renal replacement therapy (dialysis) - Liver replacement therapy - Mechanical ventilation
Time Frame
At day 6, day 28 and day 42, after randomisation (or until discharge)
Title
Liver transplantation
Time Frame
At day 6, day 28, day 42, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after randomisation
Title
Length of stay in ICU (in days)
Time Frame
At day 6, day 28, day 42, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after randomisation
Title
Duration of hospitalization (in days)
Time Frame
At day 6, day 28, day 42, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after randomisation
Title
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by the ANSM notice of Exacyl®
Description
Adverse events as assessed by the ANSM notice of Exacyl® are : Allergy Thrombotic events Seizures Acute renal failure (KDIGO grades 2 and 3) Death Or any other adverse event suspected to be treatment-related Adverse effects will be systematically searched for and collected in the electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) during the acute phase (within 5 days after randomization), as assessed by the AP-HP notification form. When present, investigators will have to send a notification to the promoter (by fax). Patients with severe adverse effects (leading to death, life-threatening condition, hospitalization and pursuit of hospitalization, incapacity or handicap, congenital malformation) will be followed until disappearance of these. Every document related to the patient during the protocol should be transmitted to the promoter. Investigators are supposed to answer every inquiry of the promoter.
Time Frame
up to 5 days
Title
Delay between the beginning of the haemorrhage and the initiation of the AT treatment
Time Frame
At day 1

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria (modified by amendment1) Age ≥ 18 Patient treated by a prehospital physician-staffed SMUR team, a firefighter physician-staffed ambulance (ARBSPP), an hospital EMS or an ICU Acute upper digestive bleeding (< 24h) in the shape of hematemesis, described either by the physician, the patient, a relative or a member of the medical team Known or suspected cirrhosis (based on clinical/biological/radiographic/anamnestic data) Affiliated or recipient of the French social security Written consent (or under emergency procedures) Exclusion Criteria (modified by amendment1) Known ongoing pregnancy or breastfeeding TA already given (if inter-hospital transfer) Endoscopy already performed for the current haemorrhagic episode Hospitalization for over 24h in an intensive care unit or a routine care unit Exclusive lower digestive bleeding or melena only Patient in cardiac arrest at the arrival of the prehospital medical team, whether recovered or not Patient already randomised once in EXARHOSE study TA Counter-indications creatininemia > 500 μmol/L or documented clearance < 30 mL/min documented ongoing CIVD (prior to UDB) ongoing seizures ongoing arterial or venous thrombosis allergy Known participation of the patient to another therapeutic study Known linguistic inability of the patient to understand the study Patient under known guardianship
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Matthieu HEIDET, MD
Email
matthieu.heidet@aphp.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Roland AMATHIEU, MD
Email
roland.amathieu@aphp.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthieu HEIDET
Organizational Affiliation
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Jean Verdier Hospital
City
Bondy
ZIP/Postal Code
93140
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roland Amathieu, MD
Email
roland.amathieu@aphp.fr
Facility Name
Henri Mondor Hospital
City
Creteil
ZIP/Postal Code
94010
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthieu HEIDET, MD
Email
matthieu.heidet@aphp.fr
Facility Name
Marc Jacquet Hospital
City
Melun
ZIP/Postal Code
77000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Line JACOB, MD
Email
line.jacob@ch-melun.fr

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30099397
Citation
Heidet M, Amathieu R, Audureau E, Augusto O, Nicolazo de Barmon V, Rialland A, Schmitz D, Pierrang F, Marty J, Chollet-Xemard C, Thirion O, Jacob L. Efficacy and tolerance of early administration of tranexamic acid in patients with cirrhosis presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (the EXARHOSE study). BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 10;8(8):e021943. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021943.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30077741
Citation
Heidet M, Mermet E, Vaux J, Jeremie R, Audureau E, Marty J. Simulated EMS response times until patients located in public train stations: A geospatial model to improve on-foot accessibility. Resuscitation. 2018 Oct;131:e3-e5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 2. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Efficacity and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Cirrhotic Patients Presenting With Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs