search
Back to results

Physiotherapy After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery

Primary Purpose

Cervical Disc Disease, Radiculopathy, Cervical

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Prescribed Physical Activity
Exercises with Internet support
Sponsored by
Linkoeping University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cervical Disc Disease focused on measuring Spine, Disc, Neck pain, Rehabilitation, Exercise Therapy, Internet

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria for each surgical department:

• Record data in Swespine

Inclusion criteria for surgery:

  • Cervical disc disease, confirmed by MRI data compatible with clinical findings (neurological examination performed by neck surgeon i.e. neurosurgeon/orthopaedic surgeon) that show nerve root compression in the cervical spine.
  • Radiculopathy with pain in one or both arms, with or without sensory and/or motor deficit
  • At least 3 months of persistent arm pain

Inclusion criteria for the study:

  • ACDF due to cervical disc disease (disc herniation with or without osteophytes, or stenosis caused by osteophytes) in one or two segmental levels
  • Aged 18-75 years
  • Residual disability (approximately) 3 months after surgery (at the re-visit to the surgeon/ physiotherapist at the neurosurgery/ neuroorthopedic clinic) in terms of the Neck Disability Index (NDI ≥30%).
  • Access to a computer/tablet/smartphone and the Internet
  • Motivated to exercise

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria:

  • Myelopathy
  • Previous fracture or dislocation of the cervical spine
  • Malignancy or benign spinal tumour (e.g. neuromas)
  • Spinal infection, ongoing post-operative infection, or previous spondylodiscitis
  • Previous cervical spine surgery
  • Factors that are contraindicated for study participation or which hinder treatment or follow-up because of systemic disease, physical or mental illness, injury, inconvenience, or postoperative complications.
  • Known alcohol/drug abuse
  • Lack of ability to write/comprehend/or express oneself in the Swedish language

Sites / Locations

  • Anneli PeolssonRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Prescribed Physical Activity

Exercises with Internet support

Arm Description

General physical exercises combined with 3 visits at a physiotherapy clinic (plus an additional first visit), exercises mainly performed outside the health care system during 12 weeks.

Neck-specific exercises with Internet support combined with 3 visits at a physiotherapy clinic (plus an additional first visit), exercises mainly performed outside the health care system during 12 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Self-reported neck-specific function

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain intensities of the neck, arm, and head, measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-100 mm).
Pain intensity VAS
Pain intensities for the neck and arm will be assessed and registered using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 scale in accordance with the Swespine registry
Pain intensity NRS
Distribution of pain by a Pain Drawing assessed with images
painful areas are shaded on a human body image
Use of pain medications
Use of pain medications
Modified Odom
global outcomes of the intervention
Dizziness/balance by the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI)
Self-reported dizziness
Headache questions by VAS and the Headache Handicap Inventory (HIT-6)
Impact of headache
Disaster thoughts measured by the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS).
Disaster thoughts
Confidence in ability measured by the Self-Efficacy Scale (SES).
Confidence in ability
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS).
Estimation of neck-specific function related to participants' chosen activities (daily function, work, spare time
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ).
Operating fear
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD).
Self-reported anxiety and depression
Health related quality of life measured by the EuroQuol five dimensions (EQ-5D)
Health related quality of life
Work Ability Index (WAI), short form
Self-rated work ability
Requirements - effort support in the workplace: Effort Reward Imbalance (ERI)
effort and support in the workplace
Ergonomics questions and how work is perceived
Work ergonomics
Sickness presence measured by the Stanford preseenteism scale
Sickness presence at work
Swedish Standard Classification of Occupations (SSY) code
Classification of Occupations
Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) questionnaire
Patient Enablement
Satisfaction with symptoms measured by the Cherkin symptom satisfaction scale
Satisfaction with symptoms
Level of physical activity score, a combination of 2 questions (everyday physical activity and exercise/sport/open-air activity) to a combined 4-point score
Physical activity
Health-care consumption, number of visits
Health-care consumption
Consumption of analgesic drugs prescribed through the drug registry
Consumption of analgesic drugs
Frequency of pain
Frequency of pain
Sick-leave registration, number of days and episodes
Sick-leave registration
Neck movement measured using the cervical range of motion device (CROM) in degrees
Active range of motion
Endurance in the dorsal and ventral neck muscles, measured in seconds
Neck muscle endurance
Sensorimotor control of ventral neck muscles, in the supine position, with stabilizer (mm HG)
Sensorimotor control
Neurology, clinical judgement yes/no
Neurology, such as reflexes, sensibility, muscle weakness and neural tension test. The results of the neurological examination gives an overall clinical judgement if segmental neurological findings is present and which cervical segmental level/ - is involved,
Hand strength measured with a hand dynamometer (Jamar)
Hand strength
Standing on one leg with eyes closed (Solec test)
Static balance
Conventional radiography, with side views taken during neutral positioning and dynamic flexion/extension
Examination of implants, the degree of mobility of operated segments, subsidence and fusion
Register data for care use. To measure/monitor care use
Care use
MRI may be measured in a sub-group
Neck muscle structure and maybe function
Ultrasound registrations may be measured in a sub-group, deformation and deformation rate
Neck muscle function
Global rating of change scale
Overall change because of the treatment

Full Information

First Posted
January 18, 2017
Last Updated
April 5, 2022
Sponsor
Linkoeping University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03036007
Brief Title
Physiotherapy After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery
Official Title
Physiotherapy After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery for Cervical Disc Disease. A Prospective Randomised Study to Compare Internet-based Neck-specific Exercise With Prescribed Physical Activity
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 22, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Linkoeping University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Background: Patients suffering residual disability after anterior decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery for cervical disc disease may be prescribed physical activity (PPA) or neck-specific exercises (NSE). Currently, we lack data for the success of either approach. There is also a knowledge-gap concerning the use of internet-based care for chronic neck pain, inclusive of cervical disc disease. The scarcity of these data, and the high proportion of patients with various degrees of incapacity following ACDF, warrants increased efforts to investigate and improve cost-effective rehabilitation. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of a structured, internet-based NSE program, versus PPA following ACDF surgery. Methods: This is a prospective, randomised, experimental, longitudinal multicentre study, that includes 140 patients with residual disability (≥30% on the Neck Disability Index; NDI) following ACDF for radiculopathy due to cervical disc disease. Patient recruitment occurs following attendance at routine clinical appointments, scheduled for 3-months post-surgery. Patients are then randomised to one of two groups (70 patients/group), scheduled for a 3-month treatment of either internet-based NSE or PPA. Questionnaires on background data, pain and discomfort, physical and mental capacity, satisfaction with care, and health and workplace factors are completed, with physical measurements of neck-related function performed by independent test leaders blinded to randomisation. Measurements are performed at inclusion, after the 3-month treatments (end of treatment), and at a 2-year follow-up. Radiography will be completed at the 2-year follow-up. Preoperative data will be collected from the Swedish Spine Registry (Swespine). Data on healthcare consumption, drug use, and sick leave will be requested from the relevant national registers.
Detailed Description
The purpose of the study is to investigate whether internet-based, structured NSE, differs from PPA after surgery for cervical disc disease, in relation to function, pain, work capacity, health-related quality of life, satisfaction with care, and cost effectiveness. The hypothesis is that internet-based NSE will be superior in terms of outcome measures to PPA. This assumption, based on an earlier study of patients with chronic WAD, remains untested for individuals with residual disability following ACDF. The project is expected to lead to improved care, well-being, and patient satisfaction, and, as a result, a reduced societal burden. Design This is a prospective, randomised, experimental longitudinal multicentre study, with a two-year follow-up. Questionnaires are distributed and physical measurements taken at baseline, at the end of treatment (3 months after enrolment), and after 2 years. Preoperative data is collected from Swespine. Patients are recruited from the surgical unit following regular follow-up visits to the physiotherapist/surgeon at approximately 3 months postoperatively. Should the study criteria be met, and after the receipt of written and oral informed consent, the patient completes a questionnaire and undergoes physical measurements of neck-related function. The patient is then randomised (computerised block randomisation list compiled by statisticians) to one of two groups for 3 months of treatment with a) internet-based NSE with 3 visits to the physiotherapist or b) PPA with 3 visits to the physiotherapist. In addition, and prior to treatment, patients in both groups are examined by a physiotherapist, in accordance with Swedish law. The test leader is a physiotherapist at the surgical unit who is not involved in study treatment and is blinded to the randomisation groups. Qualified clinicians will perform X-rays and (potentially) ultrasound registration. Following randomization the results will be put into an opaque envelope that contains the name of the patient and their randomisation group, which is sent to the physiotherapy outpatient care clinic. Questionnaires and tests of physical neck-related function are conducted at baseline (before randomisation), after 3 months (when the treatment ends), and after 2 years. Participant physiotherapists will be provided oral, written, and practical training, and are able to consult project managers at any time. Exercise diaries and the number of care contacts will be recorded for both groups. Study criteria Inclusion criteria for each surgical department: • Record data in Swespine Inclusion criteria for surgery: Cervical disc disease, confirmed by MRI data compatible with clinical findings (neurological examination performed by neck surgeon i.e. neurosurgeon/orthopaedic surgeon) that show nerve root compression in the cervical spine. Radiculopathy with pain in one or both arms, with or without sensory and/or motor deficit At least 3 months of persistent arm pain Inclusion criteria for the study: ACDF due to cervical disc disease (disc herniation with or without osteophytes, or stenosis caused by osteophytes) in one or two segmental levels Age 18-75 years Residual disability (approximately) 3 months after surgery (at the re-visit to the surgeon/ physiotherapist at the neurosurgery/ neuroorthopedic clinic) in terms of the Neck Disability Index (NDI ≥30%). Access to a computer/tablet/smartphone and the Internet Motivated to exercise Exclusion criteria: Myelopathy Previous fracture or dislocation of the cervical spine Malignancy or benign spinal tumour (e.g. neuromas) Spinal infection, ongoing post-operative infection, or previous spondylodiscitis Previous cervical spine surgery Factors that are contraindicated for study participation or which hinder treatment or follow-up because of systemic disease, physical or mental illness, injury, inconvenience, or postoperative complications. Known alcohol/drug abuse Lack of ability to write/comprehend/or express oneself in the Swedish language Intervention Internet-based neck-specific exercise (NSE) Participants will be provided with an explanation and justification for their exercise. Training includes exercises to activate the deep neck muscles (initially daily), continuing with endurance training of the neck and shoulder muscles (3 times/week). Exercise will be tailored to the individual's physical condition, and then scaled up progressively in terms of severity and dose. Participants will undertake three visits to the physiotherapist, where the exercises will be introduced and repeated, in order to establish and control patient comprehension. The exercise is completed with the help of internet support outside of the healthcare system, which can be accessed anywhere, but most probably at home. Photos and videos of the exercises, information, and answers to frequently asked questions are available on the internet-support platform. Patients can contact a physiotherapist by e-mail if necessary. Three visits to the physiotherapist are provided in addition to a mandatory first visit (for new clinical investigations as required by Swedish law). At the end of the treatment period, the patients are encouraged to continue practicing the exercises on their own. Prescribed physical activity (PPA) The training consists of general, physical, land-based activity (3 times/week). The aim is to find a physical activity outside of the care unit that suits the individual, based on their specific needs and problems. The goal is that the individual should increase their overall level of physical activity, and that that activity is performed as part of a self-care/wellness routine. This may involve activities that can be performed at home, such as walking according to a set schedule, home exercises given by a physiotherapist (not neck-specific training), and aerobic classes etc. To increase compliance, a simple motivational interview is performed before the PPA schedule is provided, which can occur during the same session or at a separate visit, should the physiotherapist and patient prefer. Patients are advised to contact the physiotherapist should their prescribed activity fail to work so that another activity can be identified. Three visits to the physiotherapist are provided in addition to a mandatory first visit (for new clinical investigations as required by Swedish law), with the patient encouraged to continue practicing on their own at the end of the treatment period. Sample size calculation and statistics Seventy participants per group (i.e. a total of 140 patients) are required. Sample size calculations (conducted by statisticians) are based on the primary outcome measure of Neck Disability Index (NDI). In order to detect a clinically relevant improvement of 10 NDI points, 70 participants per group are needed (assuming 80% power, and a level of significance of 5%). This calculation is based on group differences recorded in previous studies. These include a study in which individuals with chronic whiplash-associated injuries were offered training, as well as a study investigating the benefits of surgery over and above physical therapy for cervical disc disease. As we lack any studies on rehabilitation for patients with disability after ACDF, this calculation remains hypothetical and our sample size may need to be adjusted after the first 30 people (15/group) have completed the 3-month follow-up. This number can also be adjusted in the event of participants dropping-out, such that at least 70 individuals per group complete the intervention. Data will be analysed using an intention-to-treat approach. Alternative analyses (sub-group analyses) will be carried out where the degree of implementation of treatment (compliance) is taken into account, as well as sex, dizziness, headaches, neurological findings, and the number of segmental levels operated on. Analyses will be performed using parametric or non-parametric statistics, depending on the type of data, in consultation with statisticians as appropriate. Ultrasound registrations, electromyography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and kinesthesia may be done on a sub-group of participants to investigate neck muscle structure and function. Interviews may be done on a sub-group of individuals regarding their function, experiences and opinions. Ethical considerations This study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Linköping Ref: 2016 / 283-31. The scientists are independent with no commercial ties. Patients are recruited after providing informed consent. Patient data are presented at the group level such that no connection to any individual can be made. All data are anonymised when reported, and subject to the Official Secrets Health Acts. The test leaders are independent and blinded for randomisation. Exercises, both general and neck-specific, have been used extensively in clinical practice and we anticipate no harm from their implementation other than a risk of muscle soreness. Any important harms or unintended effects in each group will be collected by the test leaders. All questionnaires and test materials are encoded by the research group, with code lists stored in locked, fireproof file cabinets, housed at the university in a room with controlled (card-based) access. Only individuals in receipt of a unique website address posted by the researchers can access the program; patients can neither communicate with each other nor with caregivers via the program.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cervical Disc Disease, Radiculopathy, Cervical
Keywords
Spine, Disc, Neck pain, Rehabilitation, Exercise Therapy, Internet

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
140 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Prescribed Physical Activity
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
General physical exercises combined with 3 visits at a physiotherapy clinic (plus an additional first visit), exercises mainly performed outside the health care system during 12 weeks.
Arm Title
Exercises with Internet support
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Neck-specific exercises with Internet support combined with 3 visits at a physiotherapy clinic (plus an additional first visit), exercises mainly performed outside the health care system during 12 weeks.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Prescribed Physical Activity
Intervention Description
General physical activity prescribed by a physiotherapist
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Exercises with Internet support
Intervention Description
Neck-specific exercise with Internet support
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Description
Self-reported neck-specific function
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up. Preoperative data from the Swespine register
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain intensities of the neck, arm, and head, measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-100 mm).
Description
Pain intensity VAS
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up. Pre-operative data from the Swespine register
Title
Pain intensities for the neck and arm will be assessed and registered using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 scale in accordance with the Swespine registry
Description
Pain intensity NRS
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Distribution of pain by a Pain Drawing assessed with images
Description
painful areas are shaded on a human body image
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Use of pain medications
Description
Use of pain medications
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Modified Odom
Description
global outcomes of the intervention
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Dizziness/balance by the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI)
Description
Self-reported dizziness
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Headache questions by VAS and the Headache Handicap Inventory (HIT-6)
Description
Impact of headache
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Disaster thoughts measured by the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS).
Description
Disaster thoughts
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Confidence in ability measured by the Self-Efficacy Scale (SES).
Description
Confidence in ability
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS).
Description
Estimation of neck-specific function related to participants' chosen activities (daily function, work, spare time
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ).
Description
Operating fear
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD).
Description
Self-reported anxiety and depression
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Health related quality of life measured by the EuroQuol five dimensions (EQ-5D)
Description
Health related quality of life
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Work Ability Index (WAI), short form
Description
Self-rated work ability
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Requirements - effort support in the workplace: Effort Reward Imbalance (ERI)
Description
effort and support in the workplace
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Ergonomics questions and how work is perceived
Description
Work ergonomics
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Sickness presence measured by the Stanford preseenteism scale
Description
Sickness presence at work
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Swedish Standard Classification of Occupations (SSY) code
Description
Classification of Occupations
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) questionnaire
Description
Patient Enablement
Time Frame
Follow-up at 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Satisfaction with symptoms measured by the Cherkin symptom satisfaction scale
Description
Satisfaction with symptoms
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Level of physical activity score, a combination of 2 questions (everyday physical activity and exercise/sport/open-air activity) to a combined 4-point score
Description
Physical activity
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Health-care consumption, number of visits
Description
Health-care consumption
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Consumption of analgesic drugs prescribed through the drug registry
Description
Consumption of analgesic drugs
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Frequency of pain
Description
Frequency of pain
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Sick-leave registration, number of days and episodes
Description
Sick-leave registration
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Neck movement measured using the cervical range of motion device (CROM) in degrees
Description
Active range of motion
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Endurance in the dorsal and ventral neck muscles, measured in seconds
Description
Neck muscle endurance
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Sensorimotor control of ventral neck muscles, in the supine position, with stabilizer (mm HG)
Description
Sensorimotor control
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Neurology, clinical judgement yes/no
Description
Neurology, such as reflexes, sensibility, muscle weakness and neural tension test. The results of the neurological examination gives an overall clinical judgement if segmental neurological findings is present and which cervical segmental level/ - is involved,
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Hand strength measured with a hand dynamometer (Jamar)
Description
Hand strength
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Standing on one leg with eyes closed (Solec test)
Description
Static balance
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
Conventional radiography, with side views taken during neutral positioning and dynamic flexion/extension
Description
Examination of implants, the degree of mobility of operated segments, subsidence and fusion
Time Frame
Occurs routinely in the clinic for visits 3 months after surgery. Additional X-rays will be taken at the 2-year follow up to
Title
Register data for care use. To measure/monitor care use
Description
Care use
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 24 months follow-up
Title
MRI may be measured in a sub-group
Description
Neck muscle structure and maybe function
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months follow-up
Title
Ultrasound registrations may be measured in a sub-group, deformation and deformation rate
Description
Neck muscle function
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months follow-up
Title
Global rating of change scale
Description
Overall change because of the treatment
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 and 24 months follow-ups, measured at follow-ups
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Background data such as age and gender
Description
Background data such as age, gender, living circumstances and earlier care
Time Frame
Baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Inclusion criteria for each surgical department: • Record data in Swespine Inclusion criteria for surgery: Cervical disc disease, confirmed by MRI data compatible with clinical findings (neurological examination performed by neck surgeon i.e. neurosurgeon/orthopaedic surgeon) that show nerve root compression in the cervical spine. Radiculopathy with pain in one or both arms, with or without sensory and/or motor deficit At least 3 months of persistent arm pain Inclusion criteria for the study: ACDF due to cervical disc disease (disc herniation with or without osteophytes, or stenosis caused by osteophytes) in one or two segmental levels Aged 18-75 years Residual disability (approximately) 3 months after surgery (at the re-visit to the surgeon/ physiotherapist at the neurosurgery/ neuroorthopedic clinic) in terms of the Neck Disability Index (NDI ≥30%). Access to a computer/tablet/smartphone and the Internet Motivated to exercise Exclusion Criteria: Exclusion criteria: Myelopathy Previous fracture or dislocation of the cervical spine Malignancy or benign spinal tumour (e.g. neuromas) Spinal infection, ongoing post-operative infection, or previous spondylodiscitis Previous cervical spine surgery Factors that are contraindicated for study participation or which hinder treatment or follow-up because of systemic disease, physical or mental illness, injury, inconvenience, or postoperative complications. Known alcohol/drug abuse Lack of ability to write/comprehend/or express oneself in the Swedish language
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anneli Peolsson, Professor
Phone
+46-13284601
Email
Anneli.Peolsson@liu.se
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Håkan Löfgren, PhD, MD
Phone
+46-102410000
Email
Hakan.Lofgren@rjl.se
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anneli Peolsson, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Dep. Medical and Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Anneli Peolsson
City
Linköping
State/Province
Östergötland
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-58183
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anneli Peolsson, Assoc. Prof.
Phone
+46-101031798
Email
Anneli.Peolsson@liu.se
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gunnel Peterson, MSc
Phone
+46-722100901
Email
Gunnel.Peterson@liu.se
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anneli Peolsson, Assoc.Prof.
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gunnel Peterson, MSc

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30782952
Citation
Peolsson A, Peterson G, Hermansen A, Ludvigsson ML, Dedering A, Lofgren H. Physiotherapy after anterior cervical spine surgery for cervical disc disease: study protocol of a prospective randomised study to compare internet-based neck-specific exercise with prescribed physical activity. BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e027387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027387.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Physiotherapy After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs