search
Back to results

Improving Chronic Illness Management With the Apsaalooke Nation: The Baa Nnilah Project

Primary Purpose

Chronic Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
baa nnilah
Sponsored by
Montana State University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Disease

Eligibility Criteria

25 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 25 years
  • AI
  • diagnosed with diabetes
  • hypertension
  • osteoporosis
  • liver disease
  • chronic lung disease (asthma, chronic bronchitis or emphysema)
  • heart disease (coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure)
  • stroke (completed cerebrovascular accident with neurologic handicap and normal mentation)
  • chronic arthritis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • major medical illness that precludes their attendance at 7 meetings
  • <25 years of age

Sites / Locations

  • Messengers for Health

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Intervention arm

Wait-list control arm

Arm Description

There are no devices or drugs used in this trial. The treatment is the same for the intervention arm and the wait-list control arm. The treatment is group trial of 7 meetings designed to improve chronic illness self-management. The name of the treatment is baa nnilah.

There are no devices or drugs used in this trial. The treatment is the same for the intervention arm and the wait-list control arm. The treatment is group trial of 7 meetings designed to improve chronic illness self-management. The name of the treatment is baa nnilah.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

SF-12 - Physical Health
The SF-12 is a set of 12 questions regarding function in physical and mental health domains. We changed question 2 to encapsulate moderate activities more applicable to our study population. Activities deleted were bowling and playing golf and activities added were carrying a small child, walking for exercise, or round dancing/push dancing (Native American traditional dances). Participants responded to questions about their physical and mental health, especially regarding the degree of limitation experienced, using varying response categories (i.e., 3, 5, or 6-point Likert scale, or yes/no format). A Physical Component Summary (PCS) score and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) score were computed and normalized based on an algorithm developed by Farivar, Cunningham, and Hays (2007), which used an oblique factor solution for item weights. PCS and MCS scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning, respectively.
SF-12 - Mental Health
The SF-12 is a set of 12 questions regarding function in physical and mental health domains. We changed question 2 to encapsulate moderate activities more applicable to our study population. Activities deleted were bowling and playing golf and activities added were carrying a small child, walking for exercise, or round dancing/push dancing (Native American traditional dances). Participants responded to questions about their physical and mental health, especially regarding the degree of limitation experienced, using varying response categories (i.e., 3, 5, or 6-point Likert scale, or yes/no format). A Physical Component Summary (PCS) score and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) score were computed and normalized based on an algorithm developed by Farivar, Cunningham, and Hays (2007), which used an oblique factor solution for item weights. PCS and MCS scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning, respectively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Patient Health Questionnaire-9
The PHQ-9 is a widely used instrument to measure symptoms of depression. This set of 9 questions asked participants to respond to statements pertaining to their mental health in the preceding 2 weeks. The score range for the instrument is 0-27, with higher scores correlating with higher levels of symptoms of depression. Additionally, there is 1 question, not scored, rating difficulty of problems.
PROMIS Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 8-item form was used to assess the participant's satisfaction with and ability to participant in social roles and activities, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 8 item form was used to assess the participant's confidence in their ability to manage symptoms of chronic illness and prevent them from interfering from activities of daily living, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
PROMIS Emotional Support
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 8-item form was used to assess the participant's perception of availability of trusted individuals in their life to provide emotional support, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
PROMIS Positive Affect and Well-being
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 8-item form was used to assess the participant's recent sense of well-being and agreement with positive outlook and experience of life, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
PROMIS Physical Function
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 8 item form was used to assess the function of upper/lower extremities, core, and ability to perform activities of daily living, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
PROMIS Self-efficacy for Managing Emotions
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 8 item form was used to assess the participant's current confidence to manage emotional distress and stressful situations core, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
PROMIS Self-efficacy for Managing Social Interactions
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 4 item form was used to assess the participant's current confidence in being able to access support in processing emotions and health problems, and obtain assistance with transportation and problem solving, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
Patient Activation Measure
PAM assesses self-management related health knowledge, skills, and confidence. Developed by Insignia Health as a 22-item measure and shortened to 13 questions, with the short form validated to assess patient knowledge, skill and confidence for self-management of health conditions. We used the 13-item measure. Insignia Health's proprietary survey scoring algorithm produces a PAM Score along an empirical, interval-level scale from 0-100 with higher scores indicating higher patient activation.
Modified Timed Up and Go
The TUG test is physical test that assists in screening and measurement of balance deficits in older adults, which correlates with increased fall risk, and has been validated across populations. In this physical test, participants sit in a chair with feet flat on the ground and back against the chair. A timer is started as they leave the chair, and continues as they pace 3 meters, execute a 180 degree turn and just as they touch the chair again, the timer is stopped. Due to an error in communication between a consultant who assisted with this measure and the research team, the distance that individuals walked during this test was modified from 3 m to 10 m, therefore prior validation data may not apply.
Modified Balance Error Scoring System
The original Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) involved firm and padded surface balance testing in 3 positions, to assess static balance and was validated across study populations. The mBESS only utilizes firm surface data and demonstrated better intertester reliability and validity. During this physical test, a staff member counts how many times participants help themselves to regain balance in 20 seconds. The mBESS involved 3 positions, depicted below. Participants stood with hands on hips and eyes closed, balancing for 20 s in 3 standing positions: a double-leg stance, a single-leg stance, and tandem stance. Test observers counted up to 10 errors per stance, including opening eyes, taking hands off hips, stepping, putting a hand out to a chair or wall, or making other large corrections, which led to a stance score ranging from 0 to 10 with a maximum total of 30. Participants who could not complete a position for balance reasons, were given a score of 10.
6-minute Walk
Serves as a corollary for physical function and cardiovascular performance.Participants walked at a comfortable pace for six minutes and their distance was recorded in feet.

Full Information

First Posted
January 24, 2017
Last Updated
June 7, 2023
Sponsor
Montana State University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), University of Nevada, Las Vegas, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03036189
Brief Title
Improving Chronic Illness Management With the Apsaalooke Nation: The Baa Nnilah Project
Official Title
Improving Chronic Illness Management With the Apsaalooke Nation: The Baa Nnilah Project
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 15, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 29, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 29, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Montana State University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), University of Nevada, Las Vegas, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a group randomized trial of an intervention to improve chronic illness self-management.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
delayed control group design
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
211 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
There are no devices or drugs used in this trial. The treatment is the same for the intervention arm and the wait-list control arm. The treatment is group trial of 7 meetings designed to improve chronic illness self-management. The name of the treatment is baa nnilah.
Arm Title
Wait-list control arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
There are no devices or drugs used in this trial. The treatment is the same for the intervention arm and the wait-list control arm. The treatment is group trial of 7 meetings designed to improve chronic illness self-management. The name of the treatment is baa nnilah.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
baa nnilah
Intervention Description
7 meetings in the community led by a trained community facilitator
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
SF-12 - Physical Health
Description
The SF-12 is a set of 12 questions regarding function in physical and mental health domains. We changed question 2 to encapsulate moderate activities more applicable to our study population. Activities deleted were bowling and playing golf and activities added were carrying a small child, walking for exercise, or round dancing/push dancing (Native American traditional dances). Participants responded to questions about their physical and mental health, especially regarding the degree of limitation experienced, using varying response categories (i.e., 3, 5, or 6-point Likert scale, or yes/no format). A Physical Component Summary (PCS) score and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) score were computed and normalized based on an algorithm developed by Farivar, Cunningham, and Hays (2007), which used an oblique factor solution for item weights. PCS and MCS scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning, respectively.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Title
SF-12 - Mental Health
Description
The SF-12 is a set of 12 questions regarding function in physical and mental health domains. We changed question 2 to encapsulate moderate activities more applicable to our study population. Activities deleted were bowling and playing golf and activities added were carrying a small child, walking for exercise, or round dancing/push dancing (Native American traditional dances). Participants responded to questions about their physical and mental health, especially regarding the degree of limitation experienced, using varying response categories (i.e., 3, 5, or 6-point Likert scale, or yes/no format). A Physical Component Summary (PCS) score and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) score were computed and normalized based on an algorithm developed by Farivar, Cunningham, and Hays (2007), which used an oblique factor solution for item weights. PCS and MCS scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning, respectively.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Description
The PHQ-9 is a widely used instrument to measure symptoms of depression. This set of 9 questions asked participants to respond to statements pertaining to their mental health in the preceding 2 weeks. The score range for the instrument is 0-27, with higher scores correlating with higher levels of symptoms of depression. Additionally, there is 1 question, not scored, rating difficulty of problems.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Title
PROMIS Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities
Description
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 8-item form was used to assess the participant's satisfaction with and ability to participant in social roles and activities, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Title
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms
Description
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 8 item form was used to assess the participant's confidence in their ability to manage symptoms of chronic illness and prevent them from interfering from activities of daily living, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Title
PROMIS Emotional Support
Description
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 8-item form was used to assess the participant's perception of availability of trusted individuals in their life to provide emotional support, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Title
PROMIS Positive Affect and Well-being
Description
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 8-item form was used to assess the participant's recent sense of well-being and agreement with positive outlook and experience of life, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Title
PROMIS Physical Function
Description
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 8 item form was used to assess the function of upper/lower extremities, core, and ability to perform activities of daily living, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Title
PROMIS Self-efficacy for Managing Emotions
Description
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 8 item form was used to assess the participant's current confidence to manage emotional distress and stressful situations core, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Title
PROMIS Self-efficacy for Managing Social Interactions
Description
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure. This 4 item form was used to assess the participant's current confidence in being able to access support in processing emotions and health problems, and obtain assistance with transportation and problem solving, using a 5-point Likert scale. NIH PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Higher scores equal more of the concept being measured.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Title
Patient Activation Measure
Description
PAM assesses self-management related health knowledge, skills, and confidence. Developed by Insignia Health as a 22-item measure and shortened to 13 questions, with the short form validated to assess patient knowledge, skill and confidence for self-management of health conditions. We used the 13-item measure. Insignia Health's proprietary survey scoring algorithm produces a PAM Score along an empirical, interval-level scale from 0-100 with higher scores indicating higher patient activation.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Title
Modified Timed Up and Go
Description
The TUG test is physical test that assists in screening and measurement of balance deficits in older adults, which correlates with increased fall risk, and has been validated across populations. In this physical test, participants sit in a chair with feet flat on the ground and back against the chair. A timer is started as they leave the chair, and continues as they pace 3 meters, execute a 180 degree turn and just as they touch the chair again, the timer is stopped. Due to an error in communication between a consultant who assisted with this measure and the research team, the distance that individuals walked during this test was modified from 3 m to 10 m, therefore prior validation data may not apply.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Title
Modified Balance Error Scoring System
Description
The original Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) involved firm and padded surface balance testing in 3 positions, to assess static balance and was validated across study populations. The mBESS only utilizes firm surface data and demonstrated better intertester reliability and validity. During this physical test, a staff member counts how many times participants help themselves to regain balance in 20 seconds. The mBESS involved 3 positions, depicted below. Participants stood with hands on hips and eyes closed, balancing for 20 s in 3 standing positions: a double-leg stance, a single-leg stance, and tandem stance. Test observers counted up to 10 errors per stance, including opening eyes, taking hands off hips, stepping, putting a hand out to a chair or wall, or making other large corrections, which led to a stance score ranging from 0 to 10 with a maximum total of 30. Participants who could not complete a position for balance reasons, were given a score of 10.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)
Title
6-minute Walk
Description
Serves as a corollary for physical function and cardiovascular performance.Participants walked at a comfortable pace for six minutes and their distance was recorded in feet.
Time Frame
Intervention group: baseline (T1), up to 1 month (T2), up to 8 months (T3), up to 13 months (T4). WLC group pre-baseline (T1), baseline (T2), up to 1 month (T3), up to 9 months (T4), up to 13 months (T5)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
25 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: ≥ 25 years AI diagnosed with diabetes hypertension osteoporosis liver disease chronic lung disease (asthma, chronic bronchitis or emphysema) heart disease (coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure) stroke (completed cerebrovascular accident with neurologic handicap and normal mentation) chronic arthritis Exclusion Criteria: major medical illness that precludes their attendance at 7 meetings <25 years of age
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Suzanne Held, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Montana State University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Messengers for Health
City
Crow Agency
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59022
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17825096
Citation
Farivar SS, Cunningham WE, Hays RD. Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.I. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Sep 7;5:54. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-54.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35724843
Citation
Hallett J, Feng D, McCormick AKHG, Allen S, Inouye J, Schure M, Holder S, Medicine LO, Held S. Improving Chronic Illness Self-Management with the Apsaalooke Nation: The Baa nnilah Project, a cluster randomized trial protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106835. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106835. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34534371
Citation
Allen S, Held S, Milne-Price S, McCormick A, Feng D, Inouye J, Schure M, Castille D, Howe RB, Pitts M, Keene S, Belone L, Wallerstein N. Community sharing: Contextualizing Western research notions of contamination within an Indigenous research paradigm. Am J Community Psychol. 2022 Mar;69(1-2):145-156. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12552. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33180688
Citation
Rink E, Knight K, Ellis C, McCormick A, FireMoon P, Held S, Webber E, Adams A. Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Design, Conduct, and Evaluate Randomized Controlled Trials with American Indian Communities. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Nov 12;17:E143. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200099.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Improving Chronic Illness Management With the Apsaalooke Nation: The Baa Nnilah Project

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs