Drug-eluting Balloon vs. Conventional Balloon in the Treatment of (re)Stenosis (Dialysis Fistulae) (DRECOREST2)
Primary Purpose
Vascular Access Complication, Restenosis, Vascular Graft, Dialysis Related Complications
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Conventional angioplasty
Angioplasty with drug-eluting balloon
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Vascular Access Complication focused on measuring drug-eluting balloon,, target lesion revascularization (TLR), restenosis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Any dialysis access w/ native vessels warranting intervention
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous PTA with drug-eluting balloon, thrombolysis, coagulopathy
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Drug-eluting balloon
Conventional angioplasty
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
TLR
Target lesion revascularization, ie. re-intervention to the same lesion
Occlusion of access
Any loss of dialysis access due to thrombosis
Secondary Outcome Measures
Primary assisted patency
Patency after endovascular reintervention due to restenosis or thrombosis
Death
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03036241
First Posted
January 19, 2017
Last Updated
June 22, 2017
Sponsor
Helsinki University Central Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03036241
Brief Title
Drug-eluting Balloon vs. Conventional Balloon in the Treatment of (re)Stenosis (Dialysis Fistulae)
Acronym
DRECOREST2
Official Title
Drug-eluting Balloon vs. Conventional Balloon in the Treatment of (re)Stenosis - a Randomized Prospective Study (Dialysis Fistulae)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 23, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Helsinki University Central Hospital
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of drug-eluting balloons is effective in the treatment of (re)stenosis in dialysis fistulae.
Detailed Description
Drug-eluting devices have proved beneficial in the treatment of stenosis in native coronary and lower limb arteries. Stenosis and restenosis is a known problem in dialysis fistulae and drug-eluting devices might be beneficial in this field as well.
In the procedure a conventional balloon is passed through the stenosis which is then dilated. After this patients are randomized before a second dilatation with either a conventional balloon or a drug-coated balloon.
The stenosis is evaluated preoperatively and followed up by means of ultrasound by a vascular technician. Follow-up will end at 12 months.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Vascular Access Complication, Restenosis, Vascular Graft, Dialysis Related Complications
Keywords
drug-eluting balloon,, target lesion revascularization (TLR), restenosis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
39 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Drug-eluting balloon
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Conventional angioplasty
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional angioplasty
Other Intervention Name(s)
PTA
Intervention Description
Angioplasty with conventional balloon
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Angioplasty with drug-eluting balloon
Other Intervention Name(s)
DEB
Intervention Description
Angioplasty with drug-eluting balloon
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
TLR
Description
Target lesion revascularization, ie. re-intervention to the same lesion
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Occlusion of access
Description
Any loss of dialysis access due to thrombosis
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Primary assisted patency
Description
Patency after endovascular reintervention due to restenosis or thrombosis
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Death
Time Frame
12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Any dialysis access w/ native vessels warranting intervention
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous PTA with drug-eluting balloon, thrombolysis, coagulopathy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maarit Venermo, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
Helsinki University Hospital, dept of vascular surgery
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30182815
Citation
Bjorkman P, Weselius EM, Kokkonen T, Rauta V, Alback A, Venermo M. Drug-Coated Versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty In Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Randomized, Controlled Study With 1-Year Follow-Up (The Drecorest Ii-Study). Scand J Surg. 2019 Mar;108(1):61-66. doi: 10.1177/1457496918798206. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Drug-eluting Balloon vs. Conventional Balloon in the Treatment of (re)Stenosis (Dialysis Fistulae)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs