search
Back to results

Carboplatin, Etoposide, and Atezolizumab With or Without Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK4/6 Inhibitor, in Extensive-Stage SCLC

Primary Purpose

Small Cell Lung Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Trilaciclib
Placebo
Carboplatin
Etoposide
Atezolizumab
Sponsored by
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Small Cell Lung Cancer focused on measuring Small Cell Lung Cancer, CDK4/6 Inhibitor, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subjects aged ≥18 years
  • Unequivocally confirmed diagnosis of SCLC by histology or cytology, preferably including the presence of neuroendocrine features by immunohistochemistry
  • Extensive-stage SCLC
  • At least 1 target lesion that is measurable by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
  • Adequate organ function
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 2
  • Predicted life expectancy of ≥3 months
  • Able to understand and sign an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Limited-stage SCLC
  • Prior chemotherapy for limited or extensive-stage SCLC
  • Prior treatment with immunotherapies including but not limited to cluster of differentiation 137 agonists or immune checkpoint blockade therapies (such as anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), anti-programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) therapeutic antibodies).
  • Presence of symptomatic brain metastases requiring immediate treatment with radiation therapy or steroids.
  • Malignancies other than SCLC within 3 years prior to randomization, with the exception of those with negligible risk of metastasis or death treated with expected curative outcome
  • History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug induced pneumonitis, idiopathic pneumonitis, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest CT scan
  • Active, known, suspected autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment in the past 2 years
  • Uncontrolled ischemic heart disease or uncontrolled symptomatic congestive heart failure
  • Known history of stroke or cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to enrollment
  • Serious active infection at the time of enrollment
  • Psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit study compliance
  • Other uncontrolled serious chronic disease or conditions that in the investigator's opinion could affect compliance or follow-up in the protocol
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus, known active hepatitis B, or hepatitis C
  • Radiotherapy to any site or radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Receipt of any investigational medication within 4 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Administration of attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks before enrollment or anticipation that such a live attenuated vaccine will be required during the study
  • Influenza vaccination should be given during influenza season only (approx. Oct to March). Patients must not receive live, attenuated influenza vaccine (eg, FluMist) within 4 weeks prior to enrollment at any time during the study, and at least 5 months after the last dose of atezolizumab.
  • Patients with a condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids ( > 10 mg daily prednisone equivalents) or other immunosuppressive medications (including but not limited to cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, thalidomide, and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents) within 14 days of study drug administration. Inhaled or topical steroids ad adrenal replacement dosed > 10 mg daily prednisone equivalents are permitted in the absence of active autoimmune disease.
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the components of the formulation of etoposide or etoposide phosphate
  • Hypersensitivity to carboplatin or other platinum-containing compounds or to mannitol
  • History of severe allergic, anaphylactic, or other hypersensitivity reactions to chimeric or humanized antibodies or fusion proteins
  • Known hypersensitivity to Chinese hamster ovary cell products or other recombinant human antibodies
  • Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
  • Pregnant or lactating women

Sites / Locations

  • Beverly Hills Cancer Center
  • St. Jude Heritage Healthcare
  • Loma Linda University
  • UCLA Medical Center - Santa Monica Hematology And Oncology
  • Redwood Regional Medical Group (RRMG) - Fountain Grove
  • Singing River Health System
  • Piedmont Cancer Institute
  • Northside Hospital - Georgia Cancer Specialists
  • Joliet Oncology-Hematology Associates
  • Horizon Oncology Center
  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation
  • St. Louis Cancer Care, LLP, North County
  • The Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center - Center for Advanced Med
  • Summit Medical Group, P.A.
  • Northern Westchester Hospital
  • Trinity Health - Trinity CancerCare Center
  • Oklahoma University - Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center
  • Gibbs Cancer Center
  • Valley Cancer Associates
  • Millennium Oncology
  • Virginia Cancer Specialists
  • Blue Ridge Cancer Care
  • Fort Belvoir Community Hospital
  • Complex Oncology Center - Burgas
  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Serdika", Sofia
  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Serdika"
  • East Tallinn Central Hospital Ltd., Clinic of Internal Medicine, Center for Oncology
  • CHU Caen De La Côte De Nacre
  • Centre Oscar Lambret
  • Daugavpils Regional Hospital, Department of Oncology
  • Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, Oncology Clinic
  • Hospital Universitario Son Espases
  • Hospital Teresa Herrera
  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
  • Hospital Clínico
  • H.U. Quirón Dexeus, Hospital Universitario
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona- Servicio de Oncología Médica
  • Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
  • Hospital 12 de Octubre
  • H. Donostia, Hospital Donostia- Servicio de Oncología
  • Hospital Universitario Ntra. Sra. de Valme
  • Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
  • Chernivtsi Regional Clinical Oncology Center
  • Dnipropetrovsk City Multispecialty Clinical Hospital #4
  • Lviv State Regional Treatment and Diagnostics Oncology Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

trilaciclib+etoposide/carboplatin/atezolizumab

placebo+etoposide/carboplatin/atezolizumab

Arm Description

Induction: Patients received trilaciclib 240 mg/m² administered intravenously (IV) once daily prior to E/P/A on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day E/P/A therapy cycle (up to 4 cycles in total). Etoposide 100 mg/m² was administered IV daily on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle using the Calvert formula with a target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) = 5 milligrams per milliliter per minute (mg/mL/min) to calculate the dose. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Maintenance: Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance atezolizumab at a dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator.

Induction: Patients received placebo administered IV once daily prior to E/P/A on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day E/P/A therapy cycle (up to 4 cycles in total). Etoposide 100 mg/m² was administered IV daily on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was be administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle using the Calvert formula with a target AUC = 5 mg/mL/min to calculate the dose. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Maintenance: Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance atezolizumab at a dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Duration of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia in Cycle 1
Duration of severe neutropenia (DSN; days) was defined as the number of days from the date of the first absolute neutrophil count (ANC) value of <0.5 × 10⁹/L observed between start of cycle and end of cycle to the date of the first ANC value ≥0.5 × 10⁹/L that met the following criteria: (1) occurred after the ANC value of <0.5 × 10⁹/L and (2) no other ANC values <0.5 × 10⁹/L occurred between this day and end of cycle. DSN was set to 0 for patients who did not experience severe neutropenia in a cycle, including those that were randomized and not treated. Data from unscheduled visits and the actual assessment date (rather than visit date) were included in the derivation.
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia
The occurrence of severe (Grade 4) neutropenia (SN) was a binary variable. If a patient had at least 1 absolute neutrophil count value <0.5 × 10^9/L during the Induction Period, the patient was assigned as Yes to the occurrence of SN; otherwise, it was No.

Secondary Outcome Measures

All-Cause Dose Reductions
Dose reductions are not permitted for trilaciclib or atezolizumab. Dose reductions for E/P are derived from changes in the protocol-specified dose on the dosing page and correspond to the reductions for toxicity specified in the protocol. No more than 2 dose reductions of E/P in total were allowed for any patient. Simultaneous reduction in the doses of etoposide and carboplatin were counted as 1 dose reduction.
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of RBC Transfusion on/After Week 5 (Proportion of Patients)
For this endpoint, the occurrence during the Induction Period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes, if total number of events ≥1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a patient did not have an event, a value of 0 was assigned to that patient. Each red blood cell transfusion with a unique start date on/after Week 5 on study during the Induction was defined as a separate event.
Occurrence of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Administration (Proportion of Patients)
For this endpoint, the occurrence during the Induction Period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes, if total number of events ≥1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a patient did not have an event, a value of 0 was assigned to that patient. Any G-CSF administration in a cycle during the Induction Period was defined as a separate event. A patient with at least 1 cycle with G-CSF administration during an induction cycle or the Induction Period was considered to have occurrence of G-CSF administration.
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival was calculated as the time (months) from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients who did not die during the study were censored at the date last known to be alive. Patients lacking data beyond the date of randomization had their survival time censored at date of randomization. Overall survival was not censored if a patient received other anti-tumor treatments after the study drugs. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Major Adverse Hematologic Events (MAHE) (Composite Endpoint)
The composite endpoint "major adverse hematologic events" (MAHE) included the following aspects of myelosuppression: All-cause hospitalizations - Each recorded preferred term (PT) with a unique start date was counted as an event. All-cause dose reductions - Dose reductions were permitted for E/P but not for trilaciclib or atezolizumab. No more than 2 dose reductions were allowed. Each dose reduction was counted as a separate event. Febrile neutropenia-Each febrile neutropenia event with a unique start date during the Induction Period was defined as a separate event. Prolonged severe neutropenia (SN)-Each cycle with a severe neutropenia duration greater than 5 days was counted as an event, with the date of the first Grade 4 laboratory value defined as the start date for the time-to-first event analysis. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on/after Week 5-Each RBC transfusion with a unique start date on/after Week 5 on study during the Induction Period was defined as a separate event.
Best Overall Response
For all patients, the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) tumor response data were used to determine each patient's visit response (TPR = time point response). Per RECIST v1.1 for target lesions and assessed by CT/MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD), >=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, Stable Disease, neither sufficient shrinkage or increase to quality for PR or PD. Objective Response Rate (ORR) = CR + PR. The TPR at each visit was determined in 2 ways: (1) derived programmatically at the time of analysis using the information from target lesions, non-target lesions, and new lesions based on data collected through eCRF; and (2) judged by the investigator as collected in the eCRF. Results shown here are from the programmatically derived assessments.
Duration of Objective Response (Complete Response or Partial Response)
Duration of Response (DOR) is the time between first response by RECIST Version 1.1 of CR or PR and the first date that progressive disease is documented by RECIST Version 1.1, or death. Patients who do not experience PD or death will be censored at the last tumor assessment date. Only those patients with confirmed responses will be included in this analysis.
Progression-Free Survival
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time (number of months) from date of randomization until date of documented radiologic disease progression per RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever came first.
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Febrile Neutropenia
The criterion for identifying febrile neutropenia was if the preferred term for an adverse event was "FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA." Any occurrence of a febrile neutropenia event during the induction treatment period is defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of febrile neutropenia events ≥ 1 is observed, No for other scenarios. Each febrile neutropenia event with a unique start date during the induction treatment period was defined as a separate event.
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Grade 3 or 4 Hematologic Laboratory Abnormalities
The occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities was a binary endpoint. If a patient had at least 1 cycle with at least 1 Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities during the Induction Period, the patient was assigned as "Yes" to the occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities; otherwise, it was "No". If a patient did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that patient.
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) Administration
Any ESA administration in a cycle during the Induction Period was defined as a separate event. A patient with at least 1 cycle with ESA administration during an induction cycle or the Induction Period was considered to have occurrence of ESA administration. The criterion to select proper records was as follows: If the chemical subgroup from WHO-DD Version September 2017 (ie TEXT4 for CODE4) takes the value "OTHER ANTIANEMIC PREPARATIONS," the medication was classified as ESAs.
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Platelet Transfusion
Any occurrence of a platelet transfusion during the induction treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of febrile neutropenia events ≥ 1 is observed, No for other scenarios. If the patient did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that patient. Each platelet transfusion event with a unique start date during the induction treatment period was defined as a separate event.
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Infection Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Any occurrence of an infection SAE during the induction treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of febrile neutropenia events ≥ 1 is observed, No for other scenarios. If the patient did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that patient. The criterion for identifying the proper infection SAE records was as follows: if the system organ class (SOC) from Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 20.1 takes value "INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS," and the AE was a serious event.
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Pulmonary Infection Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Any occurrence of a pulmonary SAE during the induction treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of febrile neutropenia events ≥ 1 is observed, No for other scenarios. If the patient did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that patient. Each pulmonary infection SAE with a unique start date during the induction treatment period was defined as separate event. The criterion for identifying the proper pulmonary infection SAE records was as follows: The SOC from MedDRA Version 20.1 took the value "INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS," the adverse event was a serious event, and the PT took values from the following list of PTs under the category of pulmonary infection adverse events: bronchiolitis, bronchitis, infectious pleural effusion, influenza, pneumonia, pneumonia bacterial, respiratory tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection, and viral upper respiratory tract infection.
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of IV Antibiotic Uses
Occurrence of an IV antibiotics administration during the induction treatment period is defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of IV antibiotics administration ≥ 1 is observed, No for other scenarios. Each IV antibiotic with a unique start date during the induction treatment period will be defined as a separate event. The criteria for identifying an IV antibiotic administration event was (1) if the therapeutic subgroup from WHO-DD Version September 2017 (ie, TEXT2 for CODE2) takes the value "ANTIBACTERIALS FOR SYSTEMIC USE," and (2) the route of medication was "intravenous" or the route was "other" with the detailed specification as "IVPB."
Duration of Study Drug Exposure (Induction Period and Maintenance Period)
Induction period duration of exposure (days) = Day 1 of last induction cycle - Cycle 1 Day 1 of induction phase + 21. Maintenance period duration of exposure (days) = Day 1 of the last maintenance cycle -Cycle 1 Day 1 of maintenance phase + 21.
Number of Cycles Completed (Induction Period and Maintenance Period)
Patients were considered to have started a cycle if they have received at least one dose of any study drug (carboplatin, etoposide, atezolizumab or trilaciclib).
Relative Dose Intensity of Trilaciclib/Placebo, Carboplatin, Etoposide, Atezolizumab (Induction Period) and Atezolizumab (Maintenance Period)
Relative dose intensity is defined as 100% times the actual dose intensity divided by the planned dose intensity. The planned dose intensity is defined as the cumulative planned dose through the study divided by (number of cycles * 3 weeks)
Number of Participants With Any Cycle Delays and the Number of Cycles Delayed (Induction Period)
After Cycle 1, patients need to meet pre-specified laboratory parameter criteria before initiating Cycle 2 and each subsequent cycle of chemotherapy. A "Cycle Day Status" page asks if the cycle was delayed. If the start of the current cycle was delayed (the site answers "Yes"), this will be counted as a delay. Cycle delays could occur for management of toxicity (hematologic or non-hematologic) or for administrative/logistic reasons. The reason for each cycle delay was captured in the eCRF if it was related to AEs. Reasons other than AEs were not captured.
Number of Participants With Any Cycle Delays and the Number of Cycles Delayed (Maintenance Period)
After Cycle 1, patients need to meet pre-specified laboratory parameter criteria before initiating Cycle 2 and each subsequent cycle of chemotherapy. A "Cycle Day Status" page asks if the cycle was delayed. If the start of the current cycle was delayed (the site answers "Yes"), this will be counted as a delay. Cycle delays could occur for management of toxicity (hematologic or non-hematologic) or for administrative/logistic reasons. The reason for each cycle delay was captured in the eCRF if it was related to AEs. Reasons other than AEs were not captured.
Number of Participants With Any Missed Doses [for Each Study Drug: Trilaciclib/Placebo, Carboplatin and Etoposide] (Induction Period)
Missed doses are identified on the dosing page of each study drug based on the question "Was the dose given?". The missed dose information will be obtained for each study drug. For a study drug, if the last record of response to question "Was the dose given?" is No, it will not be considered as a missed dose but instead considered to be end of treatment if both criteria below are met: (1) No other study drugs are given on the same day, and (2) No study drugs are given subsequently.
Number of Participants With Any Missed Doses of Atezolizumab (Overall Treatment Period)
Missed doses are identified on the dosing page of each study drug based on the question "Was the dose given?". The missed dose information will be obtained for each study drug. For a study drug, if the last record of response to question "Was the dose given?" is No, it will not be considered as a missed dose but instead considered to be end of treatment if both criteria below are met: (1) No other study drugs are given on the same day, and (2) No study drugs are given subsequently.
Number of Participants With Any Dose Interruptions [for Each Study Drug: Trilaciclib/Placebo, Carboplatin and Etoposide] (Induction Period)
Dose interruptions were defined as interruption of infusion, regardless of whether the study drug was continued after the interruption.
Number of Participants With Any Interrupted Doses of Atezolizumab (Overall Treatment Period)
Dose interruptions were defined as interruption of infusion, regardless of whether the study drug was continued after the interruption.
Number of Participants With Any Dose Reductions of Carboplatin and Etoposide (Induction Period)
No dose reductions were allowed for trilaciclib or atezolizumab during the study.

Full Information

First Posted
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 8, 2022
Sponsor
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.
Collaborators
Roche-Genentech
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03041311
Brief Title
Carboplatin, Etoposide, and Atezolizumab With or Without Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK4/6 Inhibitor, in Extensive-Stage SCLC
Official Title
Phase 2 Study of Carboplatin, Etoposide, and Atezolizumab With or Without Trilaciclib in Patients With Untreated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Primary Analysis and survival follow up completed per protocol. Not stopped due to safety concerns.
Study Start Date
June 29, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 17, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 29, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.
Collaborators
Roche-Genentech

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This was a study to investigate the potential clinical benefit of trilaciclib (G1T28) in preserving the bone marrow and the immune system, and enhancing antitumor efficacy when administered with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab (E/P/A) therapy in first line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC. The study was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled design. Approximately, 100 patients were randomized to trilaciclib + E/P/A or placebo + E/P/A in the study.
Detailed Description
The posted results represent the final results from Study G1T28-05, a Phase 2 study of carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab with or without trilaciclib (G1T28) in patients with untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The final myelopreservation efficacy results are from database lock 1 (data cut-off [DCO] 17 Aug 2018). The final anti-tumor efficacy data (BOR, DOR, PFS) are from a second database lock 2 (DCO 28 June 2019) that occurred to support the trilaciclib New Drug Application (NDA). Final overall survival and safety data are reported from the final study database lock (DCO 11 Dec 2020, last patient last visit date of 29 October 2020). Please note the last patient last visit date description above which is recorded as the study completion date. Following the last patient last visit, the final database lock occurred a few weeks later which accounts for the discrepancy between the study completion date and the reported assessment time frames.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Small Cell Lung Cancer
Keywords
Small Cell Lung Cancer, CDK4/6 Inhibitor, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
107 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
trilaciclib+etoposide/carboplatin/atezolizumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Induction: Patients received trilaciclib 240 mg/m² administered intravenously (IV) once daily prior to E/P/A on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day E/P/A therapy cycle (up to 4 cycles in total). Etoposide 100 mg/m² was administered IV daily on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle using the Calvert formula with a target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) = 5 milligrams per milliliter per minute (mg/mL/min) to calculate the dose. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Maintenance: Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance atezolizumab at a dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator.
Arm Title
placebo+etoposide/carboplatin/atezolizumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Induction: Patients received placebo administered IV once daily prior to E/P/A on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day E/P/A therapy cycle (up to 4 cycles in total). Etoposide 100 mg/m² was administered IV daily on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was be administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle using the Calvert formula with a target AUC = 5 mg/mL/min to calculate the dose. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Maintenance: Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance atezolizumab at a dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Trilaciclib
Other Intervention Name(s)
G1T28
Intervention Description
Trilaciclib IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Carboplatin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Paraplatin
Intervention Description
Carboplatin IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Etoposide
Other Intervention Name(s)
VP-16
Intervention Description
Etoposide IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Atezolizumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Tecentriq
Intervention Description
Atezolizumab IV
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia in Cycle 1
Description
Duration of severe neutropenia (DSN; days) was defined as the number of days from the date of the first absolute neutrophil count (ANC) value of <0.5 × 10⁹/L observed between start of cycle and end of cycle to the date of the first ANC value ≥0.5 × 10⁹/L that met the following criteria: (1) occurred after the ANC value of <0.5 × 10⁹/L and (2) no other ANC values <0.5 × 10⁹/L occurred between this day and end of cycle. DSN was set to 0 for patients who did not experience severe neutropenia in a cycle, including those that were randomized and not treated. Data from unscheduled visits and the actual assessment date (rather than visit date) were included in the derivation.
Time Frame
Evaluated for Cycle 1 of the Induction Period (i.e., from randomization to the end of Cycle 1, each cycle = 21 days).
Title
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia
Description
The occurrence of severe (Grade 4) neutropenia (SN) was a binary variable. If a patient had at least 1 absolute neutrophil count value <0.5 × 10^9/L during the Induction Period, the patient was assigned as Yes to the occurrence of SN; otherwise, it was No.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles up to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
All-Cause Dose Reductions
Description
Dose reductions are not permitted for trilaciclib or atezolizumab. Dose reductions for E/P are derived from changes in the protocol-specified dose on the dosing page and correspond to the reductions for toxicity specified in the protocol. No more than 2 dose reductions of E/P in total were allowed for any patient. Simultaneous reduction in the doses of etoposide and carboplatin were counted as 1 dose reduction.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of RBC Transfusion on/After Week 5 (Proportion of Patients)
Description
For this endpoint, the occurrence during the Induction Period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes, if total number of events ≥1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a patient did not have an event, a value of 0 was assigned to that patient. Each red blood cell transfusion with a unique start date on/after Week 5 on study during the Induction was defined as a separate event.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 374 days.
Title
Occurrence of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Administration (Proportion of Patients)
Description
For this endpoint, the occurrence during the Induction Period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes, if total number of events ≥1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a patient did not have an event, a value of 0 was assigned to that patient. Any G-CSF administration in a cycle during the Induction Period was defined as a separate event. A patient with at least 1 cycle with G-CSF administration during an induction cycle or the Induction Period was considered to have occurrence of G-CSF administration.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
Overall survival was calculated as the time (months) from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients who did not die during the study were censored at the date last known to be alive. Patients lacking data beyond the date of randomization had their survival time censored at date of randomization. Overall survival was not censored if a patient received other anti-tumor treatments after the study drugs. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 38.1 months.
Title
Major Adverse Hematologic Events (MAHE) (Composite Endpoint)
Description
The composite endpoint "major adverse hematologic events" (MAHE) included the following aspects of myelosuppression: All-cause hospitalizations - Each recorded preferred term (PT) with a unique start date was counted as an event. All-cause dose reductions - Dose reductions were permitted for E/P but not for trilaciclib or atezolizumab. No more than 2 dose reductions were allowed. Each dose reduction was counted as a separate event. Febrile neutropenia-Each febrile neutropenia event with a unique start date during the Induction Period was defined as a separate event. Prolonged severe neutropenia (SN)-Each cycle with a severe neutropenia duration greater than 5 days was counted as an event, with the date of the first Grade 4 laboratory value defined as the start date for the time-to-first event analysis. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on/after Week 5-Each RBC transfusion with a unique start date on/after Week 5 on study during the Induction Period was defined as a separate event.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Best Overall Response
Description
For all patients, the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) tumor response data were used to determine each patient's visit response (TPR = time point response). Per RECIST v1.1 for target lesions and assessed by CT/MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD), >=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, Stable Disease, neither sufficient shrinkage or increase to quality for PR or PD. Objective Response Rate (ORR) = CR + PR. The TPR at each visit was determined in 2 ways: (1) derived programmatically at the time of analysis using the information from target lesions, non-target lesions, and new lesions based on data collected through eCRF; and (2) judged by the investigator as collected in the eCRF. Results shown here are from the programmatically derived assessments.
Time Frame
From date of randomization, up to four 21-day cycles of Induction therapy, followed by 21 day cycles of Maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to 724 days.
Title
Duration of Objective Response (Complete Response or Partial Response)
Description
Duration of Response (DOR) is the time between first response by RECIST Version 1.1 of CR or PR and the first date that progressive disease is documented by RECIST Version 1.1, or death. Patients who do not experience PD or death will be censored at the last tumor assessment date. Only those patients with confirmed responses will be included in this analysis.
Time Frame
From date of randomization, up to four 21-day cycles of Induction therapy, followed by 21 day cycles of Maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to 724 days.
Title
Progression-Free Survival
Description
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time (number of months) from date of randomization until date of documented radiologic disease progression per RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever came first.
Time Frame
From date of randomization, up to four 21-day cycles of Induction therapy, followed by 21 day cycles of Maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to 724 days.
Title
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Febrile Neutropenia
Description
The criterion for identifying febrile neutropenia was if the preferred term for an adverse event was "FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA." Any occurrence of a febrile neutropenia event during the induction treatment period is defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of febrile neutropenia events ≥ 1 is observed, No for other scenarios. Each febrile neutropenia event with a unique start date during the induction treatment period was defined as a separate event.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Grade 3 or 4 Hematologic Laboratory Abnormalities
Description
The occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities was a binary endpoint. If a patient had at least 1 cycle with at least 1 Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities during the Induction Period, the patient was assigned as "Yes" to the occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities; otherwise, it was "No". If a patient did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that patient.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) Administration
Description
Any ESA administration in a cycle during the Induction Period was defined as a separate event. A patient with at least 1 cycle with ESA administration during an induction cycle or the Induction Period was considered to have occurrence of ESA administration. The criterion to select proper records was as follows: If the chemical subgroup from WHO-DD Version September 2017 (ie TEXT4 for CODE4) takes the value "OTHER ANTIANEMIC PREPARATIONS," the medication was classified as ESAs.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Platelet Transfusion
Description
Any occurrence of a platelet transfusion during the induction treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of febrile neutropenia events ≥ 1 is observed, No for other scenarios. If the patient did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that patient. Each platelet transfusion event with a unique start date during the induction treatment period was defined as a separate event.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Infection Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
Any occurrence of an infection SAE during the induction treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of febrile neutropenia events ≥ 1 is observed, No for other scenarios. If the patient did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that patient. The criterion for identifying the proper infection SAE records was as follows: if the system organ class (SOC) from Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 20.1 takes value "INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS," and the AE was a serious event.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of Pulmonary Infection Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
Any occurrence of a pulmonary SAE during the induction treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of febrile neutropenia events ≥ 1 is observed, No for other scenarios. If the patient did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that patient. Each pulmonary infection SAE with a unique start date during the induction treatment period was defined as separate event. The criterion for identifying the proper pulmonary infection SAE records was as follows: The SOC from MedDRA Version 20.1 took the value "INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS," the adverse event was a serious event, and the PT took values from the following list of PTs under the category of pulmonary infection adverse events: bronchiolitis, bronchitis, infectious pleural effusion, influenza, pneumonia, pneumonia bacterial, respiratory tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection, and viral upper respiratory tract infection.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of IV Antibiotic Uses
Description
Occurrence of an IV antibiotics administration during the induction treatment period is defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of IV antibiotics administration ≥ 1 is observed, No for other scenarios. Each IV antibiotic with a unique start date during the induction treatment period will be defined as a separate event. The criteria for identifying an IV antibiotic administration event was (1) if the therapeutic subgroup from WHO-DD Version September 2017 (ie, TEXT2 for CODE2) takes the value "ANTIBACTERIALS FOR SYSTEMIC USE," and (2) the route of medication was "intravenous" or the route was "other" with the detailed specification as "IVPB."
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Duration of Study Drug Exposure (Induction Period and Maintenance Period)
Description
Induction period duration of exposure (days) = Day 1 of last induction cycle - Cycle 1 Day 1 of induction phase + 21. Maintenance period duration of exposure (days) = Day 1 of the last maintenance cycle -Cycle 1 Day 1 of maintenance phase + 21.
Time Frame
From date of first dose, up to four 21-day cycles of Induction therapy, followed by 21 day cycles of Maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to 1162 days.
Title
Number of Cycles Completed (Induction Period and Maintenance Period)
Description
Patients were considered to have started a cycle if they have received at least one dose of any study drug (carboplatin, etoposide, atezolizumab or trilaciclib).
Time Frame
From date of first dose, up to four 21-day cycles of Induction therapy, followed by 21 day cycles of Maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to 49 cycles.
Title
Relative Dose Intensity of Trilaciclib/Placebo, Carboplatin, Etoposide, Atezolizumab (Induction Period) and Atezolizumab (Maintenance Period)
Description
Relative dose intensity is defined as 100% times the actual dose intensity divided by the planned dose intensity. The planned dose intensity is defined as the cumulative planned dose through the study divided by (number of cycles * 3 weeks)
Time Frame
From date of first dose, up to four 21-day cycles of Induction therapy, followed by 21 day cycles of Maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to 724 days.
Title
Number of Participants With Any Cycle Delays and the Number of Cycles Delayed (Induction Period)
Description
After Cycle 1, patients need to meet pre-specified laboratory parameter criteria before initiating Cycle 2 and each subsequent cycle of chemotherapy. A "Cycle Day Status" page asks if the cycle was delayed. If the start of the current cycle was delayed (the site answers "Yes"), this will be counted as a delay. Cycle delays could occur for management of toxicity (hematologic or non-hematologic) or for administrative/logistic reasons. The reason for each cycle delay was captured in the eCRF if it was related to AEs. Reasons other than AEs were not captured.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Number of Participants With Any Cycle Delays and the Number of Cycles Delayed (Maintenance Period)
Description
After Cycle 1, patients need to meet pre-specified laboratory parameter criteria before initiating Cycle 2 and each subsequent cycle of chemotherapy. A "Cycle Day Status" page asks if the cycle was delayed. If the start of the current cycle was delayed (the site answers "Yes"), this will be counted as a delay. Cycle delays could occur for management of toxicity (hematologic or non-hematologic) or for administrative/logistic reasons. The reason for each cycle delay was captured in the eCRF if it was related to AEs. Reasons other than AEs were not captured.
Time Frame
Maintenance Period. From date of first maintenance dose, 21 day cycles of Maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to 1160 days.
Title
Number of Participants With Any Missed Doses [for Each Study Drug: Trilaciclib/Placebo, Carboplatin and Etoposide] (Induction Period)
Description
Missed doses are identified on the dosing page of each study drug based on the question "Was the dose given?". The missed dose information will be obtained for each study drug. For a study drug, if the last record of response to question "Was the dose given?" is No, it will not be considered as a missed dose but instead considered to be end of treatment if both criteria below are met: (1) No other study drugs are given on the same day, and (2) No study drugs are given subsequently.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Number of Participants With Any Missed Doses of Atezolizumab (Overall Treatment Period)
Description
Missed doses are identified on the dosing page of each study drug based on the question "Was the dose given?". The missed dose information will be obtained for each study drug. For a study drug, if the last record of response to question "Was the dose given?" is No, it will not be considered as a missed dose but instead considered to be end of treatment if both criteria below are met: (1) No other study drugs are given on the same day, and (2) No study drugs are given subsequently.
Time Frame
From date of first dose, up to four 21-day cycles of Induction therapy, followed by 21 day cycles of Maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to 1162 days.
Title
Number of Participants With Any Dose Interruptions [for Each Study Drug: Trilaciclib/Placebo, Carboplatin and Etoposide] (Induction Period)
Description
Dose interruptions were defined as interruption of infusion, regardless of whether the study drug was continued after the interruption.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.
Title
Number of Participants With Any Interrupted Doses of Atezolizumab (Overall Treatment Period)
Description
Dose interruptions were defined as interruption of infusion, regardless of whether the study drug was continued after the interruption.
Time Frame
From date of first dose, up to four 21-day cycles of Induction therapy, followed by 21 day cycles of Maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to 1162 days.
Title
Number of Participants With Any Dose Reductions of Carboplatin and Etoposide (Induction Period)
Description
No dose reductions were allowed for trilaciclib or atezolizumab during the study.
Time Frame
Induction Period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 409 days.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: Male or female subjects aged ≥18 years Unequivocally confirmed diagnosis of SCLC by histology or cytology, preferably including the presence of neuroendocrine features by immunohistochemistry Extensive-stage SCLC At least 1 target lesion that is measurable by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Adequate organ function Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 2 Predicted life expectancy of ≥3 months Able to understand and sign an informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Limited-stage SCLC Prior chemotherapy for limited or extensive-stage SCLC Prior treatment with immunotherapies including but not limited to cluster of differentiation 137 agonists or immune checkpoint blockade therapies (such as anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), anti-programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) therapeutic antibodies). Presence of symptomatic brain metastases requiring immediate treatment with radiation therapy or steroids. Malignancies other than SCLC within 3 years prior to randomization, with the exception of those with negligible risk of metastasis or death treated with expected curative outcome History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug induced pneumonitis, idiopathic pneumonitis, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest CT scan Active, known, suspected autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment in the past 2 years Uncontrolled ischemic heart disease or uncontrolled symptomatic congestive heart failure Known history of stroke or cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to enrollment Serious active infection at the time of enrollment Psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit study compliance Other uncontrolled serious chronic disease or conditions that in the investigator's opinion could affect compliance or follow-up in the protocol Known human immunodeficiency virus, known active hepatitis B, or hepatitis C Radiotherapy to any site or radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior to enrollment Receipt of any investigational medication within 4 weeks prior to enrollment Administration of attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks before enrollment or anticipation that such a live attenuated vaccine will be required during the study Influenza vaccination should be given during influenza season only (approx. Oct to March). Patients must not receive live, attenuated influenza vaccine (eg, FluMist) within 4 weeks prior to enrollment at any time during the study, and at least 5 months after the last dose of atezolizumab. Patients with a condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids ( > 10 mg daily prednisone equivalents) or other immunosuppressive medications (including but not limited to cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, thalidomide, and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents) within 14 days of study drug administration. Inhaled or topical steroids ad adrenal replacement dosed > 10 mg daily prednisone equivalents are permitted in the absence of active autoimmune disease. Hypersensitivity to any of the components of the formulation of etoposide or etoposide phosphate Hypersensitivity to carboplatin or other platinum-containing compounds or to mannitol History of severe allergic, anaphylactic, or other hypersensitivity reactions to chimeric or humanized antibodies or fusion proteins Known hypersensitivity to Chinese hamster ovary cell products or other recombinant human antibodies Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity Pregnant or lactating women
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Contact
Organizational Affiliation
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Beverly Hills Cancer Center
City
Beverly Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90211
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Jude Heritage Healthcare
City
Fullerton
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92835
Country
United States
Facility Name
Loma Linda University
City
Loma Linda
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92350
Country
United States
Facility Name
UCLA Medical Center - Santa Monica Hematology And Oncology
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Redwood Regional Medical Group (RRMG) - Fountain Grove
City
Santa Rosa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95403
Country
United States
Facility Name
Singing River Health System
City
Whittier
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90603
Country
United States
Facility Name
Piedmont Cancer Institute
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30318
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northside Hospital - Georgia Cancer Specialists
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30341
Country
United States
Facility Name
Joliet Oncology-Hematology Associates
City
Joliet
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60435
Country
United States
Facility Name
Horizon Oncology Center
City
Lafayette
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70121
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Louis Cancer Care, LLP, North County
City
Bridgeton
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63044
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center - Center for Advanced Med
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110-1094
Country
United States
Facility Name
Summit Medical Group, P.A.
City
Morristown
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07962
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northern Westchester Hospital
City
Mount Kisco
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10549
Country
United States
Facility Name
Trinity Health - Trinity CancerCare Center
City
Minot
State/Province
North Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
58701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oklahoma University - Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73117
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gibbs Cancer Center
City
Spartanburg
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29303
Country
United States
Facility Name
Valley Cancer Associates
City
Harlingen
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78550
Country
United States
Facility Name
Millennium Oncology
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77090
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Cancer Specialists
City
Arlington
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22031
Country
United States
Facility Name
Blue Ridge Cancer Care
City
Blacksburg
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24060
Country
United States
Facility Name
Fort Belvoir Community Hospital
City
Fort Belvoir
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22060
Country
United States
Facility Name
Complex Oncology Center - Burgas
City
Burgas
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Serdika", Sofia
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1303
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Serdika"
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1303
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
East Tallinn Central Hospital Ltd., Clinic of Internal Medicine, Center for Oncology
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
11312
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
CHU Caen De La Côte De Nacre
City
Caen
ZIP/Postal Code
14033
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Oscar Lambret
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59020
Country
France
Facility Name
Daugavpils Regional Hospital, Department of Oncology
City
Daugavpils
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-5417
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, Oncology Clinic
City
Riga
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-1002
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Son Espases
City
Palma
State/Province
Islas Baleares
ZIP/Postal Code
07120
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Teresa Herrera
City
A Coruña
State/Province
La Coruña
ZIP/Postal Code
15006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
City
Majadahonda
State/Province
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28222
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Clínico
City
San Carlos
State/Province
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28040
Country
Spain
Facility Name
H.U. Quirón Dexeus, Hospital Universitario
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08028
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona- Servicio de Oncología Médica
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08036
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28034
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital 12 de Octubre
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28041
Country
Spain
Facility Name
H. Donostia, Hospital Donostia- Servicio de Oncología
City
San Sebastián
ZIP/Postal Code
20014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Ntra. Sra. de Valme
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46015
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Chernivtsi Regional Clinical Oncology Center
City
Chernivtsi
ZIP/Postal Code
58013
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Dnipropetrovsk City Multispecialty Clinical Hospital #4
City
Dnipro
ZIP/Postal Code
49102
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Lviv State Regional Treatment and Diagnostics Oncology Center
City
Lviv
ZIP/Postal Code
79031
Country
Ukraine

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33348420
Citation
Daniel D, Kuchava V, Bondarenko I, Ivashchuk O, Reddy S, Jaal J, Kudaba I, Hart L, Matitashvili A, Pritchett Y, Morris SR, Sorrentino JA, Antal JM, Goldschmidt J. Trilaciclib prior to chemotherapy and atezolizumab in patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II trial. Int J Cancer. 2020 Dec 21;148(10):2557-70. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33453. Online ahead of print.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33895103
Citation
Weiss J, Goldschmidt J, Andric Z, Dragnev KH, Gwaltney C, Skaltsa K, Pritchett Y, Antal JM, Morris SR, Daniel D. Effects of Trilaciclib on Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pooled Results from Three Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies. Clin Lung Cancer. 2021 Sep;22(5):449-460. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.03.010. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34873975
Citation
Abraham I, Onyekwere U, Deniz B, Moran D, Chioda M, MacDonald K, Huang H. Trilaciclib and the economic value of multilineage myeloprotection from chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy. J Med Econ. 2021 Nov;24(sup1):71-83. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2014163.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34777341
Citation
Zeng R, Liu F, Fang C, Yang J, Luo L, Yue P, Gao B, Dong Y, Xiang Y. PIV and PILE Score at Baseline Predict Clinical Outcome of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Combined With Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Front Immunol. 2021 Oct 29;12:724443. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.724443. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34408488
Citation
Hussein M, Maglakelidze M, Richards DA, Sabatini M, Gersten TA, Lerro K, Sinielnikov I, Spira A, Pritchett Y, Antal JM, Malik R, Beck JT. Myeloprotective Effects of Trilaciclib Among Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer at Increased Risk of Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression: Pooled Results from Three Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies. Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Aug 9;13:6207-6218. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S313045. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34405547
Citation
Ferrarotto R, Anderson I, Medgyasszay B, Garcia-Campelo MR, Edenfield W, Feinstein TM, Johnson JM, Kalmadi S, Lammers PE, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Pritchett Y, Morris SR, Malik RK, Csoszi T. Trilaciclib prior to chemotherapy reduces the usage of supportive care interventions for chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients with small cell lung cancer: Pooled analysis of three randomized phase 2 trials. Cancer Med. 2021 Sep;10(17):5748-5756. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4089. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Carboplatin, Etoposide, and Atezolizumab With or Without Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK4/6 Inhibitor, in Extensive-Stage SCLC

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs