search
Back to results

Using Step Count to Enhance Daily Physical Activity in Pulmonary Hypertension (STEPinPH)

Primary Purpose

Hypertension, Pulmonary

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Actigraph GT9X Link device
Sponsored by
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hypertension, Pulmonary focused on measuring Physical activity, Steps count

Eligibility Criteria

19 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to give informed consent
  • Nice Classification Groups 1 and 4 Pulmonary Hypertension (pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension)
  • WHO functional class I-IV
  • Stable on current medication for 8/52 for group 1 (feedback and goal-setting group) and group 2 (control group)
  • For group 3 (newly diagnosed patients), treatment-naïve patients undergoing investigation who are likely to start therapy (based on clinical judgment of the clinician)
  • Patients with handheld devices (such as smartphones or tablets) which can run the Study Admin Mobile application.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy: we will screen for this on the basis of the history from the patient, and if she is not sure if she might be pregnant, a pregnancy test will be offered
  • Malignant arrhythmias
  • Syncope within the last 6 months
  • Skeletal or muscle abnormalities prohibiting walking

Sites / Locations

  • Hammersmith Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

feedback and goal-setting group

Control group

newly diagnosed patients

Arm Description

At the baseline, patients will fill a questionnaire about their quality of life (SF36), will perform a 6'walk test (6MWT), will undertake a blood sample (BNP). In the run-in period (1 week) patients will wear an Actigraph GT9X Link device which only displays the time and the battery level; all activity data will be recorded. Then participants will wear an Actigraph GT9X Link device which shows real time data about the number of steps and will upload their data via the Study Admin Mobile application for smartphones/tablets. Patients will be asked to aim for an average specified number of steps/day week by week and will receive a weekly report with results from the previous week and targets to achieve. After 8 weeks, patients will attend visit 2 (6MWT, SF36 and BNP assessment) and will carry on wearing the activated device for 8 weeks receiving weekly feedbacks and targets. After 8 weeks patients will attend visit 3 (6MWD, SF36 and BNP will be assessed) which is the end of the study.

At the baseline, patients will fill a questionnaire about their quality of life (SF36), will perform a 6'WT and will undertake a blood sample (BNP). After a run-in period (1 week) with an Actigraph GT9X Link device disabled from showing the number of steps, patients will wear an Actigraph GT9X Link device which still only displays time and battery level and will upload data via the Study Admin Mobile application for smartphones/tablets without receiving any feedback. After 8 weeks, patients will be assessed (SF36, 6'WT, BNP) and will start to wear a new device enabled to display the daily step count. Patients will be asked to aim for an average specified number of steps/day, receiving a weekly summary of the previous week with targets to achieve week by week. After 8 weeks, patients will be assessed (6'WT, SF36, BNP) and will carry on wearing the device and receiving feedbacks and targets for a further 8 week period, after that patients will be finally assessed (SF36, 6'WT, BNP)

In the week leading up to their inpatient admission for diagnostic investigations, patients who are treatment-naïve will be given the Actigraph GT9X Link device which will only display the time and the charge level of the battery. Patients will be asked, as well, to fill a questionnaire about their quality of life, to perform a 6MWT and a blood sample (BNP). As soon as patients start the drug therapy, patients will wear a second Actigraph GT9X Link device still disabled from showing real time data about the number of daily steps. Participants will not receive any feedback during the whole period and will be asked, as well, to upload the data collected through the remote mobile system. At their first clinical assessment (after about 4 or 5 weeks), 6'WT, BNP and questionnaire about quality of life will be reassessed. If patients are not being started on drug therapy then they will be withdrawn from the study

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in daily physical activity
The principal objective is to demonstrate a difference in the intensity of daily physical activity, measured in activity counts per minute, from the basal period to the last week of the 8-week training programme compared with control

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in 6MWT
Evaluation of the difference in the 6MWT from the basal period to the end of the 8-week training programme compared with control
Change in BNP
Evaluation of the difference in BNP values from the basal period to the end of the 8-week training programme compared with control
Change in Quality of life
Evaluation of the difference in quality of life (assessed by SF36 questionnaire) from the basal period to the end of the 8-week training programme compared with control
Long-term effects of training protocol
Evaluate if the eventual benefit gained after the 8 week training period (measured in activity counts per minute) is maintained, reduced or increased for a further 8 week period (group1+ group 2).
Comparison between training protocol and initiation of PH treatment in terms of increased physical activity
Comparing the efficacy of our training protocol to the effects of the initiation of the PH drug treatment in newly diagnosed patients, in terms of increased physical activity assessed in terms of activity counts.

Full Information

First Posted
September 9, 2016
Last Updated
October 13, 2023
Sponsor
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03043976
Brief Title
Using Step Count to Enhance Daily Physical Activity in Pulmonary Hypertension
Acronym
STEPinPH
Official Title
Using Step Count to Enhance Daily Physical Activity in Pulmonary Hypertension
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Study terminated early due to ligistic reasons with study staff
Study Start Date
October 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will collect information about physical activity in patients affected by pulmonary hypertension, through a specific device that can be worn on the wrist, and which measures daily step count. The purpose of the study is to demonstrate whether providing patients with their daily step count can increase their levels of daily activity if they have some basic targets to achieve. Investigators also wish to compare the effects of this approach in increasing daily physical activity, with the benefit gained when a drug therapy for pulmonary hypertension is initiated, in patients that have just been diagnosed.
Detailed Description
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a rare and progressive disorder and shortness of breath and fatigue, especially during exercise, are very common symptoms, resulting in a reduced capacity to perform daily activities and in an impaired quality of life. Furthermore, reduced exercise capacity in PH is associated with depression and anxiety disorders. Recent literature reveals a strong association of sedentary time with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, so that the development of therapeutic strategies to avoid this event is pivotal in the management of PH, in addition to the beneficial results of modern medical treatment. Recently the role of exercise and rehabilitation in different respiratory and cardiac conditions has been evaluated in the literature, overtaking the concerns raised in the past that exercise could worsen the condition and thus the progression of these kind of diseases, but just a few studies have been done in patients affected by PH. International guidelines on pulmonary hypertension recommend avoiding strenuous exercise that leads to distressing symptoms, while encourage low level graded aerobic exercise, such as walking, as tolerated. Nonetheless, little is still known about the effects of lifestyle changes, such as the amount of physical activity that patients can or should practice. Pedometers have been used to enhance the daily physical activity and to improve, when assessed, some prognosis related outcomes, both in healthy subjects and those affected by different pathological conditions, in particular cardiac and respiratory diseases. However, a training model based on step count targets has never been evaluated in PH, to our knowledge. Step counting devices have recently experienced a surge in popularity as a tool for motivating and monitoring physical activity in the general population, especially combined with applications for smartphones, that provide feedback, such as an overview of the data recorded. Thus, it seems reasonable to explore the opportunity to develop a step count based training model to enhance daily exercise in PH patients, through these non-invasive, patient friendly and relatively inexpensive devices.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hypertension, Pulmonary
Keywords
Physical activity, Steps count

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Partial crossover. A group of 10 underwent the intervention, a group of 10 was observed for 8 weeks without receiveng any feedback, then underwent the intervention. The main outcome was evaluated as the difference between the end of intervention and baseline (paired data). We did not recuit any patient in arm 3.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
feedback and goal-setting group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
At the baseline, patients will fill a questionnaire about their quality of life (SF36), will perform a 6'walk test (6MWT), will undertake a blood sample (BNP). In the run-in period (1 week) patients will wear an Actigraph GT9X Link device which only displays the time and the battery level; all activity data will be recorded. Then participants will wear an Actigraph GT9X Link device which shows real time data about the number of steps and will upload their data via the Study Admin Mobile application for smartphones/tablets. Patients will be asked to aim for an average specified number of steps/day week by week and will receive a weekly report with results from the previous week and targets to achieve. After 8 weeks, patients will attend visit 2 (6MWT, SF36 and BNP assessment) and will carry on wearing the activated device for 8 weeks receiving weekly feedbacks and targets. After 8 weeks patients will attend visit 3 (6MWD, SF36 and BNP will be assessed) which is the end of the study.
Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
At the baseline, patients will fill a questionnaire about their quality of life (SF36), will perform a 6'WT and will undertake a blood sample (BNP). After a run-in period (1 week) with an Actigraph GT9X Link device disabled from showing the number of steps, patients will wear an Actigraph GT9X Link device which still only displays time and battery level and will upload data via the Study Admin Mobile application for smartphones/tablets without receiving any feedback. After 8 weeks, patients will be assessed (SF36, 6'WT, BNP) and will start to wear a new device enabled to display the daily step count. Patients will be asked to aim for an average specified number of steps/day, receiving a weekly summary of the previous week with targets to achieve week by week. After 8 weeks, patients will be assessed (6'WT, SF36, BNP) and will carry on wearing the device and receiving feedbacks and targets for a further 8 week period, after that patients will be finally assessed (SF36, 6'WT, BNP)
Arm Title
newly diagnosed patients
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
In the week leading up to their inpatient admission for diagnostic investigations, patients who are treatment-naïve will be given the Actigraph GT9X Link device which will only display the time and the charge level of the battery. Patients will be asked, as well, to fill a questionnaire about their quality of life, to perform a 6MWT and a blood sample (BNP). As soon as patients start the drug therapy, patients will wear a second Actigraph GT9X Link device still disabled from showing real time data about the number of daily steps. Participants will not receive any feedback during the whole period and will be asked, as well, to upload the data collected through the remote mobile system. At their first clinical assessment (after about 4 or 5 weeks), 6'WT, BNP and questionnaire about quality of life will be reassessed. If patients are not being started on drug therapy then they will be withdrawn from the study
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Actigraph GT9X Link device
Intervention Description
Assessment of the level of physical activity of PH patients using the Actigraph GT9X Link device that includes a triaxial accelerometer and can be enabled to show on its display the number of steps taken for the day, so that it can also be used by the patients as a common pedometer. Evaluation of the effects of an 8 week step count-based light touch training programme to see if activity can be increased
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in daily physical activity
Description
The principal objective is to demonstrate a difference in the intensity of daily physical activity, measured in activity counts per minute, from the basal period to the last week of the 8-week training programme compared with control
Time Frame
From baseline to 16 - 25 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in 6MWT
Description
Evaluation of the difference in the 6MWT from the basal period to the end of the 8-week training programme compared with control
Time Frame
From baseline to 16 - 25 weeks
Title
Change in BNP
Description
Evaluation of the difference in BNP values from the basal period to the end of the 8-week training programme compared with control
Time Frame
From baseline to 16 - 25 weeks
Title
Change in Quality of life
Description
Evaluation of the difference in quality of life (assessed by SF36 questionnaire) from the basal period to the end of the 8-week training programme compared with control
Time Frame
From baseline to 16 - 25 weeks
Title
Long-term effects of training protocol
Description
Evaluate if the eventual benefit gained after the 8 week training period (measured in activity counts per minute) is maintained, reduced or increased for a further 8 week period (group1+ group 2).
Time Frame
End of the 8 week period
Title
Comparison between training protocol and initiation of PH treatment in terms of increased physical activity
Description
Comparing the efficacy of our training protocol to the effects of the initiation of the PH drug treatment in newly diagnosed patients, in terms of increased physical activity assessed in terms of activity counts.
Time Frame
5-6 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Able to give informed consent Nice Classification Groups 1 and 4 Pulmonary Hypertension (pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension) WHO functional class I-IV Stable on current medication for 8/52 for group 1 (feedback and goal-setting group) and group 2 (control group) For group 3 (newly diagnosed patients), treatment-naïve patients undergoing investigation who are likely to start therapy (based on clinical judgment of the clinician) Patients with handheld devices (such as smartphones or tablets) which can run the Study Admin Mobile application. Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy: we will screen for this on the basis of the history from the patient, and if she is not sure if she might be pregnant, a pregnancy test will be offered Malignant arrhythmias Syncope within the last 6 months Skeletal or muscle abnormalities prohibiting walking
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luke SGE Howard
Organizational Affiliation
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hammersmith Hospital
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
W12 0HS
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22323570
Citation
Grunig E, Lichtblau M, Ehlken N, Ghofrani HA, Reichenberger F, Staehler G, Halank M, Fischer C, Seyfarth HJ, Klose H, Meyer A, Sorichter S, Wilkens H, Rosenkranz S, Opitz C, Leuchte H, Karger G, Speich R, Nagel C. Safety and efficacy of exercise training in various forms of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2012 Jul;40(1):84-92. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00123711. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22110770
Citation
Mainguy V, Provencher S, Maltais F, Malenfant S, Saey D. Assessment of daily life physical activities in pulmonary arterial hypertension. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027993. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19720810
Citation
de Man FS, Handoko ML, Groepenhoff H, van 't Hul AJ, Abbink J, Koppers RJ, Grotjohan HP, Twisk JW, Bogaard HJ, Boonstra A, Postmus PE, Westerhof N, van der Laarse WJ, Vonk-Noordegraaf A. Effects of exercise training in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2009 Sep;34(3):669-75. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00027909.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25261324
Citation
Mendoza L, Horta P, Espinoza J, Aguilera M, Balmaceda N, Castro A, Ruiz M, Diaz O, Hopkinson NS. Pedometers to enhance physical activity in COPD: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J. 2015 Feb;45(2):347-54. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00084514. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19332472
Citation
McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, Barst RJ, Farber HW, Lindner JR, Mathier MA, McGoon MD, Park MH, Rosenson RS, Rubin LJ, Tapson VF, Varga J, Harrington RA, Anderson JL, Bates ER, Bridges CR, Eisenberg MJ, Ferrari VA, Grines CL, Hlatky MA, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Lichtenberg RC, Lindner JR, Moliterno DJ, Mukherjee D, Pohost GM, Rosenson RS, Schofield RS, Shubrooks SJ, Stein JH, Tracy CM, Weitz HH, Wesley DJ; ACCF/AHA. ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association: developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, Inc., and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. Circulation. 2009 Apr 28;119(16):2250-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192230. Epub 2009 Mar 30. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2009 Jul 14;120(2):e13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16982941
Citation
Mereles D, Ehlken N, Kreuscher S, Ghofrani S, Hoeper MM, Halank M, Meyer FJ, Karger G, Buss J, Juenger J, Holzapfel N, Opitz C, Winkler J, Herth FF, Wilkens H, Katus HA, Olschewski H, Grunig E. Exercise and respiratory training improve exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with severe chronic pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2006 Oct 3;114(14):1482-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618397. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22576635
Citation
Pugh ME, Buchowski MS, Robbins IM, Newman JH, Hemnes AR. Physical activity limitation as measured by accelerometry in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 2012 Dec;142(6):1391-1398. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0150.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19713419
Citation
Galie N, Hoeper MM, Humbert M, Torbicki A, Vachiery JL, Barbera JA, Beghetti M, Corris P, Gaine S, Gibbs JS, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jondeau G, Klepetko W, Opitz C, Peacock A, Rubin L, Zellweger M, Simonneau G; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), endorsed by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J. 2009 Oct;30(20):2493-537. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp297. Epub 2009 Aug 27. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2011 Apr;32(8):926.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23234873
Citation
Ulrich S, Fischler M, Speich R, Bloch KE. Wrist actigraphy predicts outcome in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Respiration. 2013;86(1):45-51. doi: 10.1159/000342351. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Using Step Count to Enhance Daily Physical Activity in Pulmonary Hypertension

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs