search
Back to results

GeneXpert Performance Evaluation for Linkage to Tuberculosis Care (XPEL-TB)

Primary Purpose

Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Rifampicin Resistant Tuberculosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Uganda
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
GeneXpert I
Process re-design
Performance Feedback
Sponsored by
University of California, San Francisco
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Tuberculosis, Pulmonary focused on measuring tuberculosis, implementation science, point-of-care, diagnostics, GeneXpert, Uganda

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Site-level: Use standard (multi-day) sputum smear microscopy as the primary method of TB diagnosis
  • Site-level: Participate in NTP-sponsored external quality assurance (EQA) for sputum smear microscopy
  • Site-level: Send samples to a district or regional hospital/health center for Xpert testing
  • Patient-level: Initiate evaluation for active TB at a study health center

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Site-level: Do not agree to be randomized to standard-of-care vs. intervention arms
  • Site-level: Perform sputum smear examination on <150 patients per year (based on 2015 data)
  • Site-level: Diagnose <15 smear-positive TB cases per year (based on 2015 data)
  • Patient-level: Have sputum collected for monitoring of response to anti-TB therapy
  • Patient-level: Have sputum collected as part of active, community-based case finding (e.g., contact tracing, community outreach campaign)
  • Patient-level: Referred to a study health center for TB treatment after a diagnosis is established elsewhere
  • Patient-level: Started on TB treatment for extra-pulmonary TB only

Sites / Locations

  • St Francis Njeru Health Center III
  • Busana Health Center III
  • Busesa Health Center IV
  • Buwama Health Center III
  • Iganga TC
  • Bukulula Health Center IV
  • Nazigo Health Center III
  • Kiganda Health Center IV
  • Kira Health Center III
  • Lugasa Health Center III
  • Bishop Asili Health Center
  • Kinoni Health Center III
  • Kityerera Health Center IV
  • Malongo Health Center III
  • Mayuge Health Center III
  • Wabulungu Health Center III
  • Malangala Health Center III
  • Lwampanga Health Center III
  • Namungalwe Health Center III
  • Nankandulo Health Center IV

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Control group

Intervention

Arm Description

Onsite ZN or LED fluorescence microscopy + hub-based GeneXpert testing per existing protocols

Onsite molecular testing for TB with GeneXpert I + process redesign to facilitate same-day TB diagnosis and treatment + performance feedback

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number treated for microbiologically-confirmed TB within two weeks of referral for sputum-based testing
Effectiveness outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number referred for TB testing
Effectiveness outcome.
Number diagnosed with microbiologically-confirmed TB
Effectiveness outcome.
Number suspected/diagnosed with RIF-resistant TB
Effectiveness outcome.
Time to microbiologically-confirmed TB
Effectiveness outcome. Time-to-diagnosis if microbiologically-confirmed TB.
Number treated for TB
Effectiveness outcome.
Number of patients enrolled
Effectiveness outcome.
Number diagnosed and treated for microbiologically-confirmed TB
Effectiveness outcome.
Time-to-treatment of microbiologically-confirmed TB
Effectiveness outcome. Time-to-treatment if microbiologically-confirmed TB and treated.
Number diagnosed AND completing treatment
Effectiveness outcome.
Number who died within 6 months
Effectiveness outcome.

Full Information

First Posted
January 23, 2017
Last Updated
April 18, 2023
Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
Makerere University, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Yale University, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03044158
Brief Title
GeneXpert Performance Evaluation for Linkage to Tuberculosis Care
Acronym
XPEL-TB
Official Title
GeneXpert Performance Evaluation for Linkage to Tuberculosis Care: The XPEL-TB Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 22, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 31, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
Makerere University, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Yale University, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The investigators' overall objective is to assess the effectiveness, implementation and costs of a streamlined TB diagnostic evaluation strategy based around rapid, onsite molecular testing. The intervention strategy was developed based on theory-informed assessment of barriers to TB diagnostic evaluation at community health centers in Uganda and a process of engagement with local stakeholders. It includes: 1) Point-of-care molecular testing using GeneXpert as a replacement for sputum smear microscopy; 2) Re-structuring of clinic-level procedures to facilitate same-day TB diagnosis and treatment; and 3) Quarterly feedback of TB evaluation metrics to health center staff. The investigators' central hypothesis is that the intervention strategy will have high uptake and increase the number of patients diagnosed with and treated for active pulmonary TB. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will conduct a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial at community health centers that provide TB microscopy services in Uganda in partnership with the National TB Program (NTP). The investigators utilize an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design in which, concurrent with the clinical trial, the investigators will conduct nested mixed methods, health economic and modeling studies to assess 1) whether the intervention strategy modifies targeted barriers to TB diagnostic evaluation; 2) fidelity of implementation of the intervention components (i.e, the degree to which intervention components were implemented as intended vs. adapted across sites); and 3) cost-effectiveness and public health impact.
Detailed Description
Aim 1: To compare patient outcomes at health centers randomized to intervention vs. standard-of-care TB diagnostic evaluation strategies. The investigators will randomize 20 community health centers to continue standard TB evaluation (routine microscopy plus referral of patients for Xpert testing per existing processes of care) or to implement the intervention strategy (1. Onsite molecular testing; 2. Re-structuring clinic-level procedures to facilitate same-day TB diagnosis and treatment; and 3. Performance feedback). The investigators will compare reach and effectiveness based on the numbers and proportions of patients (N=5500) who complete TB testing, are found to have TB, and have treatment initiated within one week of specimen provision. Aim 2: To identify processes and contextual factors that influence the effectiveness and fidelity of the intervention TB diagnostic evaluation strategy. The investigators will use quantitative process metrics to assess the adoption and maintenance over time of the core components of the intervention strategy. The investigators will also collect quantitative and qualitative data to describe the fidelity of implementation of each component and faithfulness to the conceptual model. Aim 3: To compare the costs and epidemiological impact of intervention vs. standard-of-care TB diagnostic evaluation strategies. The investigators will model the incremental costs and cost-effectiveness of intervention relative to standard-of-care TB diagnostic evaluation from the health system and patient perspective. The investigators will then construct an epidemic model of the population-level impact of the intervention strategy on TB incidence and mortality.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Rifampicin Resistant Tuberculosis
Keywords
tuberculosis, implementation science, point-of-care, diagnostics, GeneXpert, Uganda

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
10644 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Onsite ZN or LED fluorescence microscopy + hub-based GeneXpert testing per existing protocols
Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Onsite molecular testing for TB with GeneXpert I + process redesign to facilitate same-day TB diagnosis and treatment + performance feedback
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
GeneXpert I
Other Intervention Name(s)
GeneXpert
Intervention Description
Onsite molecular testing with GeneXpert I as a replacement for microscopy
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Process re-design
Intervention Description
Research and Uganda NTLP staff will engage health center staff in a discussion of how to re-organize clinical, laboratory and pharmacy services to enable same-day TB diagnosis and treatment.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Performance Feedback
Intervention Description
Feedback of TB diagnostic evaluation quality indicators to health center staff
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number treated for microbiologically-confirmed TB within two weeks of referral for sputum-based testing
Description
Effectiveness outcome.
Time Frame
Within 2 weeks of initial sputum submission
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number referred for TB testing
Description
Effectiveness outcome.
Time Frame
Within 2 weeks of initial sputum submission
Title
Number diagnosed with microbiologically-confirmed TB
Description
Effectiveness outcome.
Time Frame
Within 2 weeks of initial sputum submission
Title
Number suspected/diagnosed with RIF-resistant TB
Description
Effectiveness outcome.
Time Frame
Within 2 weeks of initial sputum submission
Title
Time to microbiologically-confirmed TB
Description
Effectiveness outcome. Time-to-diagnosis if microbiologically-confirmed TB.
Time Frame
Days from initial sputum submission to being diagnosed, up to 60 days.
Title
Number treated for TB
Description
Effectiveness outcome.
Time Frame
Within 2 weeks of initial sputum submission
Title
Number of patients enrolled
Description
Effectiveness outcome.
Time Frame
Within 2 weeks of initial sputum submission
Title
Number diagnosed and treated for microbiologically-confirmed TB
Description
Effectiveness outcome.
Time Frame
Within 2 weeks of initial sputum submission
Title
Time-to-treatment of microbiologically-confirmed TB
Description
Effectiveness outcome. Time-to-treatment if microbiologically-confirmed TB and treated.
Time Frame
Days from initial health center visit to initiation of treatment if diagnosed, up to 1 year.
Title
Number diagnosed AND completing treatment
Description
Effectiveness outcome.
Time Frame
Days from initial health center visit to treatment outcome, up to 2 years.
Title
Number who died within 6 months
Description
Effectiveness outcome.
Time Frame
Days from initial health center visit to treatment outcome, up to 6 months.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Site-level: Use standard (multi-day) sputum smear microscopy as the primary method of TB diagnosis Site-level: Participate in NTP-sponsored external quality assurance (EQA) for sputum smear microscopy Site-level: Send samples to a district or regional hospital/health center for Xpert testing Patient-level: Initiate evaluation for active TB at a study health center Exclusion Criteria: Site-level: Do not agree to be randomized to standard-of-care vs. intervention arms Site-level: Perform sputum smear examination on <150 patients per year (based on 2015 data) Site-level: Diagnose <15 smear-positive TB cases per year (based on 2015 data) Patient-level: Have sputum collected for monitoring of response to anti-TB therapy Patient-level: Have sputum collected as part of active, community-based case finding (e.g., contact tracing, community outreach campaign) Patient-level: Referred to a study health center for TB treatment after a diagnosis is established elsewhere Patient-level: Started on TB treatment for extra-pulmonary TB only
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Adithya Cattamanchi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Francisco
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
St Francis Njeru Health Center III
City
Buikwe
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Busana Health Center III
City
Busana
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Busesa Health Center IV
City
Busesa
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Buwama Health Center III
City
Buwama
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Iganga TC
City
Iganga
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Bukulula Health Center IV
City
Kalungu
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Nazigo Health Center III
City
Kayunga
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Kiganda Health Center IV
City
Kiganda
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Kira Health Center III
City
Kira
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Lugasa Health Center III
City
Lugala
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Bishop Asili Health Center
City
Luwero
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Kinoni Health Center III
City
Lwengo
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Kityerera Health Center IV
City
Mayuge
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Malongo Health Center III
City
Mayuge
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Mayuge Health Center III
City
Mayuge
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Wabulungu Health Center III
City
Mayuge
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Malangala Health Center III
City
Mityana
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Lwampanga Health Center III
City
Nakasongola
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Namungalwe Health Center III
City
Namungalwe
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Nankandulo Health Center IV
City
Nankandulo
Country
Uganda

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24623906
Citation
MacPherson P, Houben RM, Glynn JR, Corbett EL, Kranzer K. Pre-treatment loss to follow-up in tuberculosis patients in low- and lower-middle-income countries and high-burden countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Feb 1;92(2):126-38. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.124800. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19419537
Citation
Cattamanchi A, Dowdy DW, Davis JL, Worodria W, Yoo S, Joloba M, Matovu J, Hopewell PC, Huang L. Sensitivity of direct versus concentrated sputum smear microscopy in HIV-infected patients suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2009 May 6;9:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-53.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26383102
Citation
Chihota VN, Ginindza S, McCarthy K, Grant AD, Churchyard G, Fielding K. Missed Opportunities for TB Investigation in Primary Care Clinics in South Africa: Experience from the XTEND Trial. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0138149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138149. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21471088
Citation
Davis J, Katamba A, Vasquez J, Crawford E, Sserwanga A, Kakeeto S, Kizito F, Dorsey G, den Boon S, Vittinghoff E, Huang L, Adatu F, Kamya MR, Hopewell PC, Cattamanchi A. Evaluating tuberculosis case detection via real-time monitoring of tuberculosis diagnostic services. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Aug 1;184(3):362-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201012-1984OC. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18647453
Citation
Aspler A, Menzies D, Oxlade O, Banda J, Mwenge L, Godfrey-Faussett P, Ayles H. Cost of tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment from the patient perspective in Lusaka, Zambia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008 Aug;12(8):928-35.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17768515
Citation
Kemp JR, Mann G, Simwaka BN, Salaniponi FM, Squire SB. Can Malawi's poor afford free tuberculosis services? Patient and household costs associated with a tuberculosis diagnosis in Lilongwe. Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Aug;85(8):580-5. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.033167.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18163918
Citation
Simwaka BN, Bello G, Banda H, Chimzizi R, Squire BS, Theobald SJ. The Malawi National Tuberculosis Programme: an equity analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2007 Dec 31;6:24. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-6-24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18647454
Citation
Botha E, den Boon S, Lawrence KA, Reuter H, Verver S, Lombard CJ, Dye C, Enarson DA, Beyers N. From suspect to patient: tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment initiation in health facilities in South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008 Aug;12(8):936-41.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15970047
Citation
Ouyang H, Chepote F, Gilman RH, Moore DA. Failure to complete the TB diagnostic algorithm in urban Peru: a study of contributing factors. Trop Doct. 2005 Apr;35(2):120-1. doi: 10.1258/0049475054037002. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24448973
Citation
Steingart KR, Schiller I, Horne DJ, Pai M, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N. Xpert(R) MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 21;2014(1):CD009593. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21814496
Citation
Dowdy DW, Cattamanchi A, Steingart KR, Pai M. Is scale-up worth it? Challenges in economic analysis of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis. PLoS Med. 2011 Jul;8(7):e1001063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001063. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17159894
Citation
Keeler E, Perkins MD, Small P, Hanson C, Reed S, Cunningham J, Aledort JE, Hillborne L, Rafael ME, Girosi F, Dye C. Reducing the global burden of tuberculosis: the contribution of improved diagnostics. Nature. 2006 Nov 23;444 Suppl 1:49-57. doi: 10.1038/nature05446. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24176144
Citation
Theron G, Zijenah L, Chanda D, Clowes P, Rachow A, Lesosky M, Bara W, Mungofa S, Pai M, Hoelscher M, Dowdy D, Pym A, Mwaba P, Mason P, Peter J, Dheda K; TB-NEAT team. Feasibility, accuracy, and clinical effect of point-of-care Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis in primary-care settings in Africa: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):424-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62073-5. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10474547
Citation
Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18631386
Citation
Godin G, Belanger-Gravel A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: a systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implement Sci. 2008 Jul 16;3:36. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-36.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1501333
Citation
Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1992 Sep 2;268(9):1111-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25609495
Citation
Cattamanchi A, Miller CR, Tapley A, Haguma P, Ochom E, Ackerman S, Davis JL, Katamba A, Handley MA. Health worker perspectives on barriers to delivery of routine tuberculosis diagnostic evaluation services in Uganda: a qualitative study to guide clinic-based interventions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:10. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0668-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22696318
Citation
Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, O'Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11101705
Citation
Grogan S, Conner M, Norman P, Willits D, Porter I. Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services. Qual Health Care. 2000 Dec;9(4):210-5. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.4.210.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21775313
Citation
Nabbuye-Sekandi J, Makumbi FE, Kasangaki A, Kizza IB, Tugumisirize J, Nshimye E, Mbabali S, Peters DH. Patient satisfaction with services in outpatient clinics at Mulago hospital, Uganda. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Oct;23(5):516-23. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr040. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22853820
Citation
Ivers NM, Halperin IJ, Barnsley J, Grimshaw JM, Shah BR, Tu K, Upshur R, Zwarenstein M. Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review. Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:120. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-120.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18697846
Citation
Sismanidis C, Moulton LH, Ayles H, Fielding K, Schaap A, Beyers N, Bond G, Godfrey-Faussett P, Hayes R. Restricted randomization of ZAMSTAR: a 2 x 2 factorial cluster randomized trial. Clin Trials. 2008;5(4):316-27. doi: 10.1177/1740774508094747.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22745362
Citation
Sandelowski M, Leeman J. Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1404-13. doi: 10.1177/1049732312450368. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18288640
Citation
Sandelowski MJ. Justifying qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 2008 Jun;31(3):193-5. doi: 10.1002/nur.20272. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18677415
Citation
Voils CI, Sandelowski M, Barroso J, Hasselblad V. Making Sense of Qualitative and Quantitative Findings in Mixed Research Synthesis Studies. Field methods. 2008;20(1):3-25. doi: 10.1177/1525822X07307463.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25025235
Citation
Salje H, Andrews JR, Deo S, Satyanarayana S, Sun AY, Pai M, Dowdy DW. The importance of implementation strategy in scaling up Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosis of tuberculosis in the Indian health-care system: a transmission model. PLoS Med. 2014 Jul 15;11(7):e1001674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001674. eCollection 2014 Jul.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23262515
Citation
Dowdy DW, Basu S, Andrews JR. Is passive diagnosis enough? The impact of subclinical disease on diagnostic strategies for tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar 1;187(5):543-51. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201207-1217OC. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25186263
Citation
Sun AY, Denkinger CM, Dowdy DW. The impact of novel tests for tuberculosis depends on the diagnostic cascade. Eur Respir J. 2014 Nov;44(5):1366-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00111014. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Chandrasekaran V, Ramachandran R, Cunningham J, Balasubramaniun R, Thomas A, Sudha G, et al. Factors leading to tuberculosis diagnostic drop-out and delayed treatment initiation in Chennai, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005;9:172.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Den Boon S, Semitala F, Cattamanchi A, Walter N, Worodria W, Joloba M, Huang L, Davis JL. Impact of patient drop-out on the effective sensitivity of smear microscopy strategies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181:A2258.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Miller C, Haguma P, Ochom E, Ross J, Davis JL, Cattamanchi A, Katamba A. Costs associated with tuberculosis evaluation in rural Uganda. 43rd Union World Conference on Lung Health; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 2012.
Results Reference
background
Citation
WHO. Global strategy and targets for tuberculosis prevention, care and control after 2015. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2013 EB134/12.
Results Reference
background
Citation
WHO. WHO monitoring of Xpert MTB/RIF roll-out. Available at: http://www.who.int/tb/areas-of-work/laboratory/mtb-rif-rollout/en/ [cited 2015 January 15].
Results Reference
background
Citation
Churchyard GJ, on behalf of the Xtend study team. Xpert MTB/RIF vs microscopy as the first line TB test in South Africa: mortality, yield, initial loss to follow up and proportion treated. The Xtend Study. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; Boston, USA: Available at: http://www.stoptb.org/wg/gli/assets/documents/M6/Churchyard%20-%20XTEND%20study.pdf; 2014.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Cepheid. GeneXpert Omni: The True Point of Care Molecular Diagnostic System: Cepheid Inc; 2015. Available from: http://www.cepheid.com/us/genexpert-omni.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50:179-211.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Green LW, Krueter M. Health Program Planning - An Educational and Ecological Approach. 4th ed. Philadelphia, USA: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Hayes RJ, Moulton LH. Cluster Randomized Trials. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press; 2009.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34936740
Citation
Cattamanchi A, Reza TF, Nalugwa T, Adams K, Nantale M, Oyuku D, Nabwire S, Babirye D, Turyahabwe S, Tucker A, Sohn H, Ferguson O, Thompson R, Shete PB, Handley MA, Ackerman S, Joloba M, Moore DAJ, Davis JL, Dowdy DW, Fielding K, Katamba A. Multicomponent Strategy with Decentralized Molecular Testing for Tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 23;385(26):2441-2450. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2105470.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32316993
Citation
Reza TF, Nalugwa T, Farr K, Nantale M, Oyuku D, Nakaweesa A, Musinguzi J, Vangala M, Shete PB, Tucker A, Ferguson O, Fielding K, Sohn H, Dowdy D, Moore DAJ, Davis JL, Ackerman SL, Handley MA, Katamba A, Cattamanchi A. Study protocol: a cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of onsite GeneXpert testing at community health centers in Uganda (XPEL-TB). Implement Sci. 2020 Apr 21;15(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-00988-y.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

GeneXpert Performance Evaluation for Linkage to Tuberculosis Care

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs